Putin: BRICS contributes 40 per cent to global economy
He highlighted the rising prominence of BRICS nations, noting their contribution has doubled from 20 per cent at the turn of the century to nearly 40 per cent of global economic output today.
Putin underscored Russia's commitment to a new development model--one rooted in fairness, openness, and national interests. Recalling the 2024 BRICS summit in Kazan, he said 35 countries expressed the need for a global framework aligned with today's multipolar reality.
He noted that trade among participating nations has already surpassed USD 1 trillion, with joint projects gaining momentum in sectors like AI, nuclear energy, aviation, and IT, as reported by TV BRICS.
"Russia invites its partners to contribute to the formation of a new global growth model, to jointly ensure the prosperity of our countries and the stable development of the whole world for many, many years to come," Putin stated.
South African Deputy President Paul Mashatile called multipolarity a defining theme in global affairs. Hailing Russia as a key partner in BRICS and G20, he stressed the growing strategic importance of Africa in population and industrial potential. "Africa is looking for partnerships based on equality, equal access to capital markets, knowledge and technology," he said.
Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang reaffirmed China's dedication to open cooperation with developing economies, stating, "The civilisations of the world must develop through mutual enrichment, based on equality, dialogue, and respect for diversity."
Bahrain's National Security Advisor, Nasser bin Hamad Al Khalifa, lauded Russia's economic vision, particularly in energy and industry, and reiterated Bahrain's intent to deepen economic ties with Moscow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times of Oman
2 days ago
- Times of Oman
"India has significant role to play this time": BRICS chairman hails PM Modi's initiatives
New Delhi: Harvansh Chawla, Chairman of the BRICS Chamber of Commerce and Industry, highlighted India's importance in the BRICS grouping, stating, "due to the aura and initiatives of our Prime Minister Narendra Modi, India has a significant role to play in BRICS this time." Prime Minister Narendra Modi will visit Brazil from July 5 to 8 to participate in the 17th BRICS Summit, which will be held in Rio de Janeiro from July 6 to 7. Speaking to ANI, he said, "Due to the aura and initiatives of our PM, India has a significant role to play in BRICS this time." Chawla emphasised that India will be the host country of the BRICS summit in 2026 and will chair the grouping for the following year. He said, "India is going to be the host country of the BRICS summit in 2026, and India will be the Chairman of BRICS for the next one year." Chawla noted that India's chairmanship comes at a crucial time, given its neutral stand and substantive role in global trade. He added, "Keeping in mind the neutral stand and the substantive role that India has in trade today, we are there as the Chairman of BRICS at the right time, in the right atmosphere of the trade world as of now." Highlighting the significance of the summit, he noted that, "this is going to be one of the most historic summits of BRICS so far, and not only because PM Modi is going to be there. But keeping in mind the tariff war that the United States has started all over the world, this summit becomes very significant as far as BRICS countries are concerned." "So whatever the summit outcome will be, it will be very historic and very significant this time," he added. PM Modi will embark on a five-nation visit from July 2, during which he will attend the BRICS Summit in Brazil and hold meetings with leaders of Ghana, Trinidad and Tobago, Argentina and Namibia to strengthen bilateral ties.
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
How conflicts reshape air travel
By Anupreeta Das When Israel launched surprise missile attacks on Iran, prompting retaliatory strikes, Gulf countries closed their skies, forcing more than two dozen of the world's major airlines to divert or cancel flights. When India and Pakistan engaged in a brief but intense conflict in May, Pakistan and India each banned the use of their skies by the other's airlines. After Russia began its war on Ukraine in 2022 and closed its airspace to Western airlines, many American and European airlines were forced to redraw flight paths — a disruption that remains today. In recent years, airlines worldwide have increasingly had to deal with geopolitics, as extended wars and sudden conflicts require them to abruptly remap major routes and recalculate profitability. The risk was clear in 2014, when a Malaysia Airlines jet was shot down over a part of Ukraine controlled by pro-Russia separatists, killing all 298 people on board. In December, dozens died when an Azerbaijan Airlines plane crashed while over Russian airspace, likely after being hit by its air defence systems. More than 4.5 per cent of the world's land mass is affected by conflict, a rise of 65 per cent since 2021, according to a report last year by Verisk Maplecroft, a risk consultancy. Conflict is among the biggest causes of disruption for the civil aviation sector, which operates more than 100,000 commercial flights carrying 10 million people a day. Airlines must already balance passenger demand, weather, fuel costs, government regulations, and pilot and crew schedules for each flight. The recent exchange of attacks between Iran and Israel was particularly disruptive for global carriers because Middle Eastern cities are often pit stops between Asian and European destinations. Qatar Airways was forced to divert more than 90 flights after Iran's strike on an American military base in Qatar last Monday, disrupting travel for more than 20,000 passengers. Despite the ceasefire between Iran and Israel, airlines are prepared for the possibility that attacks might resume. Many have suspended routes through the Middle East. Since 2022, many airlines have had to reroute flights to avoid Russia, the world's biggest country by area, with an airspace crucial to long-distance flights connecting Europe and North America to large parts of Asia. An extra hour of flying the kind of large plane used on long, international routes can add about $10,000 in costs, mainly in fuel, labour and maintenance expenses, said Andreas Schäfer, a professor at the UCL Energy Institute at University College London. In a competitive market with limited demand, that can quickly bring an airline 'very close to the limits of profitability,' he said. Some carriers added stops to previously nonstop flights or abandoned newly unprofitable routes. Others flew with fewer passengers or less cargo because demand had fallen or the airlines couldn't justify the expense of flying the longer distances with a full load. In extreme cases, business models had to be redrawn. Finnair, which is based in Finland, a neighbour to Russia, had spent decades making itself a hub for flights between Europe and Asia. That strategy unravelled after the war began. Its flights to Asia are now as much as 40 per cent longer than before, severely hindering Finnair's ability to compete with Chinese airlines, which remain free to use Russian airspace. A direct flight from Helsinki to Shanghai, for example, is now just under nine hours on China's Juneyao Airlines, but takes more than 12 hours on Finnair. As a result, Finnair has had to focus on flights elsewhere. Unable to fly over Russia, American carriers suffered too. A popular nonstop route between New Delhi and Newark on United Airlines that flew over Russia took as little as 13 hours; since the war of Ukraine, US airlines have been flying via Europe, which has added an hour or two.
Observer
4 days ago
- Observer
The connection: Supply chains and geopolitics
Over the decades, the supply chains have become a highly integrated web of interconnections driven by globalization. However, the global supply chain landscape is experiencing constant reorientation and stress in recent years due to the increasing strain of disruptions. The key events that have impacted the supply chain from all fronts are the Covid-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war, the Israel-Palestine war, China-US Trade War 1, and Trade War 2, which was initiated by sweeping tariffs introduced by the trump administration in his current second term. Now, the US bombing of three of Iran's nuclear facilities, and the retaliatory response of Iran bombing the US air base in Doha, Qatar, has put the entire Middle East and the world in a state of heightened uncertainty and could trigger a significant disruption of supply chains and a probable spike in oil prices. Energy analysts fear a specter of panic buying in the international energy market if the situation escalates further. To get a perspective, the Strait of Hormuz is the world's most strategic and critical chokepoint, a narrow stretch of water with Iran to the north and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Oman to the south linking the Persian Gulf to the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is a vital vein for the passage of Oil and gas shipments. The Strait of Hormuz is critical as 20% of the world's oil and a third of liquefied petroleum Gas (LNG) pass through this narrow strait. The Strait handles 20.3 million barrels of oil daily, making it crucial for global trade and supply. The Middle East region is experiencing protracted uncertainty that could affect the global energy markets. The recent US attack on key Iranian enrichment facilities to destroy Iran's nuclear ambitions could affect the movement of ships in this region. The Strait of Hormuz is also a primary export route of Qatari LNG, with a fifth of the global LNG supply passing through this strait last year. This handout natural-colour image acquired with MODIS on NASA's Terra satellite taken on February 5, 2025 shows the Gulf of Oman and the Strait of Hormuz. — AFP If Iran stops the movement of ships through this Strait, it would be economic suicide for the world. While they have not done it, they are taking actions to interfere with energy shipments by jamming the GPS signals of tankers in this region. According to maritime intelligence reports, 23% of the region's vessels, approximately 1600 ships, have experienced signal jamming. Many shipping giants have temporarily issued standby instructions to their vessels or rerouted them in anticipation and fear of further geopolitical escalations. The closure or any restrictions to this trade route will have far-reaching implications for the world. It could also strain diplomatic relationships, increase energy prices, sharply raise inflationary pressures, and cause shipment delays. Over the years, the US has been worried about the vulnerability of the Strait of Hormuz and has gradually reduced its dependency on Middle East oil. It has grown to become one of the world's largest oil-producing nations. Now, the US imports only 10-11% of its oil requirement from Iraq and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East. However, 84% of Hormuz's shipped oil goes to Asia. The strait is 21 miles wide at its narrowest point, with shipping lanes only 2 miles across. A blockade could halt 20% of global oil instantly. Businesses exploring diversifying logistic pathways face significant operational, economic, and geopolitical hurdles. The Strait of Hormuz remains irreplaceable for bulk shipments; it is, in fact, the most viable option for global trade shipments. Given the geopolitical escalations, trade wars, regional instability, and unpredictability of political decisions, the Strait of Hormuz is more than a strategic trade gateway; it has become a geopolitical weapon, magnifying its significance for sustainable international trade and global supply chains.
