‘Fantastic Four' actor Julian McMahon passes away at 56 after cancer battle
McMahon's wife, Kelly McMahon, announced the passing of her husband in a statement to Deadline. "With an open heart, I wish to share with the world that my beloved husband, Julian McMahon, died peacefully this week after a valiant effort to overcome cancer. Julian loved life. He loved his family. He loved his friends. He loved his work, and he loved his fans. His deepest wish was to bring joy into as many lives as possible.
We ask for support during this time to allow our family to grieve in privacy. And we wish for all of those to whom Julian brought joy, to continue to find joy in life. We are grateful for the memories,' Kelly McMahon said.
McMahon was an Australian-born actor. His father, Billy McMahon, served as Prime Minister of Australia from 1971 to 1972. Starting his career as a model, McMahon transitioned to acting with a lead role on the short-lived 1989 Australian daytime soap The Power, the Passion.
He made his feature acting debut as a lead opposite Elliott Gould in the 1992 Australian-American movie Wet and Wild Summer!. McMahon then moved to Hollywood and began his American career in the same way he had his Australian one -- with a role on a daytime soap.
After a stint on NBC's Another World in 1993, McMahon transitioned to primetime as a series regular on the network's crime drama Profiler for its four-season run. The actor then went on to join the WB's popular supernatural drama Charmed for a three-season stint starring as the demonic Cole Turner.
McMahon's career took a huge leap when Marvel recruited him for the role of Dr Doom in the 2000s Fantastic Four franchise. He played the role of the iconic villain of Marvel in 'Fantastic Four' (2005) and its sequel Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer (2007).
McMahon's film credits also include Premonition, RED, Paranoia, You're Not You, Swinging Safari, and most recently, The Surfer with Nicolas Cage. It premiered in the Midnight Screenings section at the 2024 Cannes Film Festival. McMahon's final role was on Netflix's murder mystery series The Residence. The actor played the role of the Australian Prime Minister in the series.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
‘Shogun' star Cosmo Jarvis replaced by Logan Marshall-Green in Christopher Nolan's ‘The Odyssey'
Cosmo Jarvis, best known for his recent role in FX's 'Shogun' and war drama 'Warfare', will no longer be joining the ensemble cast of Christopher Nolan's much-anticipated epic 'The Odyssey'. The actor was initially attached to the Universal Pictures production but has exited due to scheduling conflicts, according to industry sources. Jarvis is now preparing to lead the biopic 'Young Stalin', in which he will portray the early life of the infamous Soviet leader. With filming underway on multiple fronts, his commitment to that project reportedly clashed with the shooting schedule for 'The Odyssey', forcing him to step down from Nolan's ambitious adaptation. Jarvis' role in 'The Odyssey'—details of which remain closely guarded—has since been filled by Logan Marshall-Green, known for his work in 'Prometheus' and 'The Defeated'. The recasting was first reported by Deadline. 'The Odyssey', currently filming in locations including Morocco, Italy, Ireland, and Scotland, is based on Homer's ancient Greek epic poem. The film will be released in IMAX on July 17, 2026, and stars Matt Damon as Odysseus, King of Ithaca, who must navigate a treacherous return journey home following the Trojan War. Along his perilous voyage, Odysseus encounters mythical beings such as Polyphemus the Cyclops, the Sirens, the nymph Calypso, and the witch goddess Circe. Back in Ithaca, his wife Penelope cleverly fends off persistent suitors by unravelling a tapestry each night, clinging to the hope of her husband's return. His memory is kept alive by his son Telemachus, played by Tom Holland. The film boasts a star-studded cast including Zendaya, Charlize Theron, Robert Pattinson, and Anne Hathaway, with Greek gods such as Athena, Poseidon, and Zeus also set to appear in the narrative.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
BLACKPINK Drops 'Jump' MV Teaser After DEADLINE Tour Kickoff; BLINKs Hail It ‘Song Of The Year'
BLACKPINK dropped the teaser of new track Jump during their DEADLINE tour in Goyang. Fans called it 'song of the year' ahead of its July 11 release. BLACKPINK kicked off their highly anticipated 2025 world tour, DEADLINE, on July 5 at the Goyang Stadium in Korea, and the opening night was nothing short of electrifying. The biggest surprise of the night came when the iconic K-pop girl group unveiled the teaser for their upcoming music video Jump, sending BLINKs into a frenzy. Titled Ready To Jump, the teaser was released live during the concert and confirmed that the song will drop on July 11 at 1 p.m. KST. ROSÉ, LISA, JENNIE and JISOO lit up the stage with back-to-back performances of some of BLACKPINK's most loved hits including 'Lovesick Girls," 'Pink Venom" and 'How You Like That." These songs were performed live for the first time in over a year, following the conclusion of their Born Pink world tour in 2023. The group took a hiatus afterward to focus on their solo careers before reuniting in February this year. Each member also got a solo segment during the show. JISOO performed songs from her EP Amortage, while LISA, JENNIE and ROSÉ brought their solo albums Alter Ego, Ruby and rosie to life on stage. However, it was the debut of their unreleased track Jump that truly stole the spotlight. The girls performed the song not once but twice during the concert, thrilling fans who had long awaited new music from the group. Jump marks BLACKPINK's first group song since the release of The Girls in 2023 and their 2022 album Born Pink, which topped the Billboard 200. With rumors swirling about more music on the way, BLINKs have high hopes for a massive comeback. Fan reactions online have been euphoric. One BLINK declared Jump the 'SONG OF THE YEAR," while another wrote, 'THIS GONNA BE BIG BIG BIG!" Comments like 'THE LEGEND IS BACKKK" and 'THE GIRLS COMING!" flooded social media, showing the group's global fandom is as strong as ever. The DEADLINE tour will next head to Los Angeles, Chicago, Toronto, New York, Paris, Milan, Barcelona, London, Kaohsiung, Bangkok, Jakarta, Bulacan, Singapore, Tokyo and wrap up in Hong Kong in January 2026. First Published:
New Indian Express
6 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Iron Man to Thunderbolts*: How Marvel went from genius to 'generic' and how they can fix it
In the chaos of superhero cinema, where mediocrity wears a fluttery cape and calls itself entertainment, Marvel proclaimed its latest release, Thunderbolts*, was a game changer. But you know the Hindi saying: andhe mein kana raja; in the land of the blind, the one-eyed is king. That's what I felt watching it. This latest Marvel offering feels less a crown jewel and more a child's scribble of it. Marketed as the 'new Avengers', Thunderbolts* is the cinematic equivalent of a reheated pizza: familiar, slightly stale, and missing that original zing. But hey, even cold pizza tastes good when you're hungry. Are you hungry, though? What I liked best about the film was its first line: 'There is something wrong with me. An emptiness.' Cue the world's slowest clap. Is this honest self-assessment from Marvel, a writer's cocky sneak-in, or simply a Freudian slip for a franchise haemorrhaging creativity while swimming in cash like Scrooge McDuck in DuckTales? Marvel ruled the zeitgeist in the 2010s. But come the 2020s, and they're just a notch better than the fare DC turned out in the 2010s. Sure, Thunderbolts* isn't the worst offender in the superhero genre, but let us also not pretend it is Iron Man reborn. Ah, Iron Man. Remember 2008? When Tony Stark crash-landed into our hearts with his outrageous ego, AI tools before AI was cool, and a geopolitical conscience? That film wasn't just explosions and snark; it pointed a finger at American hubris, wrapped in a full metal jacket (pun intended). Fast-forward to Thunderbolts*, where the stakes are… uh… something something world-ending macguffin? Yawn!!! The magic of early Marvel was its microscopic focus: Tony saving himself, Cap punching Nazis (and nationalism), and Civil War turning heroes into squabbling siblings over a Sokovia-sized guilt trip. Those films had texture; they were political thrillers with a coating of spandex. But post-Endgame, most Marvel's scripts seem penned by aliens who've only heard of Earth via garbled intergalactic podcasts. Eternals? A snooze-fest of celestial taxidermy. Multiverse of Madness? More like Multiverse of Meh-ness. And Quantumania? Let's just say it made the quantum realm feel as exciting as a spreadsheet. These films float in a narrative tesseract, untethered from reality, emotions, or basic logic. Remember when Marvel villains had motives deeper than 'muahaha, destruction'? Thunderbolts* tries. It really really does. There's a Tulsi Gabbard-esque politician, and a half-baked metaphor about talking to evil to quell it and a desperate attempt to reheat the old trope of washed-out, has-been, or could-have-been superheroes redeeming themselves. Yet, somehow the results don't match the desperation, and we get a film that's all sizzle, no steak; a fireworks display where the fireworks are CGI and the fuse is a damp matchstick. Writing action movies is tough. I know, cause I've failed a few times. You've got to have six or seven set action pieces. They take up 30 to 40 per cent of your time. So, in a 100-minute feature, you're left with just an hour to tell your actual story and even parts of that are build-ups to the action. To somehow make the audience feel for a protagonist in such a short time, that's a tough ask. Yet, to use all the 100 minutes for nothing but build-up, action, and slapstick gags like Deadpool & Wolverine ( read my previous rant here ) make it seem less a movie, more TikTok montage (shoutout to the fugly dog, though; true MVP). And Thor: Love and Thunder? It turned Marvel's god into a punchline with repeated gags, inconsistent tone and forced humour. So, what's the issue? All these films made money, didn't they? Yeah! But so did Pablo Escobar and Adolf Hitler. Do we sing paeans for them? In cinema, when you prioritise spectacle over soul, when a green screen outshines your hero's journey, sorry, but you've lost the plot. Now, here's the thing. It's fun to simply critique, but can I offer Marvel any solutions? As a screenwriter and film geek, I think I can. In 2008, Marvel was the scrappy underdog, not the behemoth ordering audiences to 'assemble' like a corporate retreat. Iron Man wasn't just a film; it was a dare. A dare to care about a narcissistic weapons dealer with a heart condition. The genius? It didn't ask us to love Tony Stark; it asked us to root for his redemption. His villain wasn't some alien warlord; it was his own weapons, his greed, his America. The film's climax wasn't a city-levelling laser fight (okay, fine, there was a big fight and a few buildings were indeed damaged), but Tony Stark admitting, 'I am Iron Man,' mind-blown because it was a confession that felt like a middle finger to secret identities and a handshake with accountability. Compare that to Thunderbolts*, where the team's 'redemption' arc is about as deep as a puddle after a drizzle. These characters aren't flawed: they're conveniently damaged. Their backstories are tossed out like food packets in a refugee camp: here's a tragic childhood, there's a dead sidekick. Oops, did we forget to make you care? And let's not forget Captain America, the boy scout. His first film's heart didn't come from a super-soldier serum; it came from a scrawny kid who kept getting punched but stood up anyway. The First Avenger was a love letter to integrity in the face of fascism; a theme that has aged finer than the best wine. But Thunderbolts*? Its political commentary is about as sharp as a spoon. That Tulsi Gabbard knockoff and congressional hearing? Seems as forced as the back stories. So, what's the fix? First of all, give writers time to write. Make 20 films a year, fine. But give writers the time to dig into the want versus the need, the internal conflicts, the personal rebellions, the hubris! The idea is to shape the soul so the outside VFX acts like a nice little jacket. And remember to go micro, not macro. Iron Man worked because Tony's biggest enemy was his own ego. He wasn't trying to save the world, he was just trying to save himself. Civil War ripped the Avengers apart over ideology, not aliens. Even Infinity War made us care about a purple guy with a gardening fetish. Thunderbolts*? The catastrophe is smaller, yes, a city-ending event that could gobble the world. And yes, it does give intimacy an intimate shot! Yet, it just doesn't come together. And the golden rule? Inside out. Start with a character's heart, then build the explosions around it. Iron Man did this. So did Black Panther. Even Guardians of the Galaxy – a film about a talking raccoon – made us cry over a tree saying, 'I am Groot.' But Thunderbolts*? It's outside in. Its action set-pieces seem to have come first; the rest of the story feels like it was reverse-engineered to get there. The result? A film that feels like a trailer for itself – all highlight reel, little soul. Marvel, darling, we're rooting for you. Truly. But recycling the same 'save the universe' schtick is like serving ketchup as soup. Just make movies because you love to make them, not because you feel beholden to shareholders. Stop chasing the spectre of Endgame. Stop trying to be the 'new Avengers.' Just be the old Marvel; the one that took risks, loved its characters, and remembered that even superheroes need to breathe. Yeah, that's it. Be the old Marvel and you'll find your new Avengers.
