Qatar: Medication home delivery service sees increase in usage
In 2024, Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC) and the Primary Health Care Corporation (PHCC) home delivery services dispatched nearly 60,000 items.
The home delivery service, operated by Qatar Post in partnership with HMC and PHCC, delivers medications, medical reports, medical consumables, and dietary products.
According to reported data, HMC's medication home delivery service dispatched 56,436 items in 2024, while PHCC delivered 2,223 items over seven months in the same year.
Launched in April 2020 as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the service continued due to positive feedback from patients. A fee of QR30 is charged for the service.
A study published in October 2024 in BMJ Medical Journal highlighted the satisfaction and preferences of patients who used the new home delivery services offered by PHCC's health centres during the pandemic.
The study involved 604 adults who used the medication delivery services. Participants were asked to rate their satisfaction with 11 service aspects on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 meant 'highly dissatisfied' and 5 meant 'highly satisfied.' The scores were aggregated and adjusted to a maximum of 100 for clarity.
Results showed that 45.5% of participants were very satisfied with the service quality. Additionally, 58.9% would recommend the service to others, though only 30.9% considered the delivery cost to be reasonable. Satisfaction levels varied, with Qatari nationals reporting an average satisfaction score of 89%, compared to 79.5% for expatriates.
To access the HMC medication home delivery service, patients should call 16000 between 8am and 2pm daily, from Sunday to Thursday.
To access the PHCC medication home delivery service, patients can call the designated number for their health centre or 16000 for more information. They can also contact their health centre via WhatsApp, with the number available on the PHCC website.
Items will be delivered within two days of the request.
Patients must present a valid health card, a payment card for medications/items and delivery fees, and be aware of their house and street address. This service is available across the country to all patients.
© Dar Al Sharq Press, Printing and Distribution. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Filipino Times
17 hours ago
- Filipino Times
Filipino nurse receives gift from UAE President for service during COVID-19
A Filipino nurse in the UAE has received a special token of gratitude from none other than UAE President His Highness Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, in recognition of his selfless service as a frontline healthcare worker during the COVID-19 pandemic. In a TikTok video posted by @ Tito Michael shared his surprise and gratitude upon receiving a gold coin and a letter of appreciation—an initiative from the UAE leadership to honor the bravery and dedication of medical frontline workers. He shared that the letter, which accompanied the coin, expressed the President's appreciation to those who played a vital role in the country's pandemic response. 'It says here, 'To all of our frontline heroes, it is a great privilege to extend my sincere and heartfelt thanks to you for the vital role that you played in response to the COVID-19 pandemic,'' he read in the video. Tito Michael recalled how he served as a team leader in the ICU of his facility, stepping up during a time when critical care nurses were urgently needed. He said he had no idea how he managed to survive the ordeal, describing it as one of the most difficult periods in his nursing career. 'There were so many adjustments, and every shift was full of uncertainty,' he continued. 'Every single day, every single shift, lagi kaming nawawalan ng pasyente, and it was completely devastating.' He also opened up about the anxiety he felt each time he went to work, and how prayer became a source of strength amid the daily emotional toll. 'Grabe na lang talaga yung pag-pray ko every time ako papasok sa trabaho kasi hindi ko alam kung ano yung i-e-expect ko,' he added. Despite the hardship, Michael said the experience taught him a valuable lesson—that believing in oneself is essential, especially during a crisis. He noted that while support from family and friends is important, personal resolve is what ultimately sees someone through. As of writing, the video garnered 350K views and 11.5K reactions, earning praises both from Filipinos and Emiratis. 'Emirati here — You're not just frontliners, you're apart of us too. You have no idea how much we respect and appreciate you. I hope you know we have so much love towards all of you nurses. You were and still are our heroes,' a TikTok user commented.
Gulf Today
3 days ago
- Gulf Today
Vaccine panel is turning misinformation into policy
Lisa Jarvis, Tribune news Service Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy's dismantling of Americans' trust in — and ultimately, access to — vaccines isn't happening with one sweeping policy that grabs the public's attention. It's unfolding quickly and quietly, in bland conference rooms where hand-picked appointees make decisions that will have far-reaching consequences for our health. Inside one of those nondescript rooms last week, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), an independent panel that makes vaccine recommendations to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, offered a glimpse of what's to come. The group, few of whom have any expertise in vaccines, infectious diseases or epidemiology, at times cast aside evidence-based science and sowed doubt in some of our most valuable public health tools. This panel of seven replaced the 17 ACIP members Kennedy fired last month in order to stack the committee with members who share his anti-vaccine agenda. Their lack of expertise and, for some, even basic knowledge of epidemiology, were evident throughout the two-day meeting. Some were unfamiliar with the Vaccines for Children Program, which provides free shots to those eligible. (The program has provided some 71.5 billion doses to kids since 1994.) At least one member appeared to struggle to understand the distinction between a vaccine's efficacy and its effectiveness. It's a wonky, but important distinction referring to how well a vaccine works in a trial versus the real world. Some seemed not to take seriously the risk that infections like RSV and the flu can pose to even healthy children. One member suggested that the 250 children who died from the flu last season — a recent high — was a 'modest' number. But this group isn't just unqualified — it's dangerous. Its decisions directly influence insurance coverage and access to vaccines, affecting health outcomes for all Americans. The stakes are particularly high when it comes to protecting children against preventable diseases. Yet the tone of the panel's first formal meeting suggested many members are more intent on sowing doubt about routine immunisations. Even worse, their actions could impede access to these important medicines. 'That whole meeting was a travesty,' says Fiona Havers, a physician and epidemiologist. After the ACIP firings, Havers resigned from the CDC, where she was considered one of its leading experts on vaccine policy. Kennedy's oft-repeated claim is that the COVID-19 response caused vaccine hesitancy in the US and that his drastic changes at the CDC are a necessary step in rebuilding the public's trust. Martin Kulldorff, a former Harvard epidemiologist and chair of the panel, echoed that sentiment during the meeting's opening, emphasizing the importance of 'rebuilding trust in sound science,' and again at the end, when he commended participants for discussing vaccines in an 'unbiased, open and transparent way.' It's a convenient — and inaccurate — framing. It elides the role Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again movement played in spreading vaccine misinformation during the pandemic. It provides cover for their 'just asking questions' approach to evaluating vaccine policy. The problem, of course, is when people given the CDC's imprimatur are asking questions that are purposely crafted to sow doubt. That became clear from the outset when Kuldorff announced that the committee would evaluate the cumulative effects of the childhood vaccine schedule, as well as any immunizations that had not been considered in the last seven years, including the hepatitis B shot given to newborns. The implication is that the CDC has been ignoring some unknown dangers of shots that have been safely used for years. Kuldorff, who was fired from Harvard, was a vocal critic of COVID vaccine mandates during the pandemic and refused the shot. 'The claims that were framed as efforts to increase vaccine confidence actually do the opposite — they undermine vaccine confidence,' says Sean O'Leary, the American Academy of Pediatrics' liaison to ACIP. He called the meeting 'a really long couple of days for science.' A discussion of flu vaccines was a disturbing preview of what 'rebuilding trust' might look like under Kennedy's CDC — and how that mantra could be used to disrupt access to vaccines. After a thankfully routine vote to recommend that Americans get their fall flu shots, the panel stated that those vaccines should not contain thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative that decades ago came under scrutiny for a now-disproven link to autism. It was a disturbing development that upended the panel's normally measured process for evaluating vaccines. The discussion was added to ACIP's agenda at the last minute, but more alarming was that thimerosal was being discussed at all. The preservative's safety has been thoroughly studied, but was removed from all childhood vaccines in 2001 to try to address parents' hesitancy. Today, it is used sparingly— the single-dose flu vaccines that the majority of Americans receive don't contain it, but it's still used as a preservative in multi-dose vials, which just 4-5% of patients in the US receive. Most troubling was that the 'evidence' against thimerosal was presented by Lyn Redwood, a nurse and former head of the Children's Health Defense, the anti-vaccine group founded by Kennedy. She used her time to make a series of false claims about the preservative's risks. Her original presentation cited a fake study on the risks of thimerosal — a reference removed after the media raised concerns. Pediatrician Cody Meissner, one of two rational members, questioned the purpose of her presentation and its contents. (Meissner was often the lone voice of reason and expertise on the panel during the two-day meeting.) Ultimately, when it came time to vote on recommending the preservative be removed from flu shots, Meissner was also the only member to vote against it. The vote has real consequences. It means some Americans will lose out on their shots. The vaccine is more commonly used outside the U.S., and there's concern about how ACIP's decisions could ripple into global health. And vaccine hesitancy experts worry that re-litigating a settled topic could undermine broader confidence in immunisations. And perhaps most alarming is the precedent set by the committee bypassing the CDC's normal review process to push through what seemed like a preordained decision. Typically, a CDC working group comprised of internal staff and subject matter experts would spend months developing recommendations that are presented to ACIP in a public forum. They would examine hard data on a vaccine within the broader context of its real-world use, considering, for example, the magnitude of the public health problem it addresses, challenges to implementing a rollout, and its impact on health equity, Havers explains. Before considering removing a shot like the thimerosal-containing flu vaccine, the working group would first study the public health consequences of the decision. 'None of that happened, which is why this was a complete farce,' Havers says. That's the antithesis of transparency. And it's a sign for what we can expect from this group. After watching the panel railroad a vote on settled science, it's fair to worry about their future plans. The next effort to 'rebuild trust' could have far-reaching health consequences — and, without a doubt, will cost lives.
Gulf Today
29-06-2025
- Gulf Today
CDC says COVID vaccine protects pregnant women
Michael Hiltzik, Tribune News Service Here's how one of the well-laid plans of Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. went blooey. Earlier this month, Kennedy dismantled the all-important Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and remade it into the spearhead for his anti-vaccination campaigns. The rejiggered committee met for the first time Wednesday. Unfortunately for Kennedy's goals, the very first presentation it heard from CDC scientists involved the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine, particularly for pregnant women, infants and children. CDC studies found "no increased risk" that the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines caused adverse effects during pregnancy, Sarah Meyer, director of the CDC's Immunization Safety Office, said at the meeting, citing data from 28 analyses of 68,000 pregnant women. The data showed no increases in miscarriages, stillbirths, preterm births, major birth defects, neonatal ICU admissions, infant deaths, abnormal uterine bleeding or other pregnancy-related conditions. In fact, the CDC found that "maternal vaccination is the best proection against COVID-19 for pregnant women and infants less than six months of age," CDC immunologist Adam MacNeil told the panel. The COVID vaccines aren't approved for infants younger than six months, so maternal immunization is their only protection. That's important because Kennedy, on May 17, removed the vaccines from the recommended list for pregnant women and children. "It's common sense and it's good science" to remove the recommendation, Kennedy said in a 58-second video posted on X. "We're now one step closer to realising President Trump's promise to make America healthy again," Kennedy crowed, flanked by Marty Makary, the newly appointed commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, and Jay Bhattacharya, the newly appointed director of the National Institutes of Health. Neither body plays a role in issuing vaccine recommendations for the government. That's the job of the CDC, which has been operating without a director, and which didn't have a representative on the video. Pediatric and obstetric organisations decried the decision, which ran counter to the findings of extensive research. "Clear benefits of maternal immunisation versus COVID in terms of dramatic reductions in maternal mortality and protecting the newborn infant ... has been detailed in the biomedical literature," vaccinologist Peter Hotez told me by email. I asked Kennedy through his agency's public information team for comment on the CDC presentation, but received no reply. On June 9, Kennedy fired all 17 members of ACIP of the immunization advisory committee and replaced them with eight handpicked members, a cadre that includes "antivaxxers, the antivax-adjacent, and the unqualified," as veteran pseudoscience debunker David Gorski noted. The COVID vaccines have been a leading target of anti-vaccine activists, including Kennedy, since they were introduced in 2021. They've been blamed for a host of purported health harms, most of which have been found by researchers to be largely imaginary. The anti-vaccine camp maintains that the vaccines weren't adequately studied before rolling them out to the general public and haven't been sufficiently monitored for adverse effects since then. The CDC officials' presentation debunked almost all these claims. Indeed, Meyer said, the COVID-19 vaccines have been subjected to "the most extensive safety monitoring programe in US history." The CDC has investigated more than 65 possible adverse effects of the vaccine, Meyer said, including heart attacks, meningitis, spontaneous abortion, seizures and hospitalisation. Other than pain at the injection site, fainting and other transitory conditions common to most vaccines, it has found evidence for one condition — myocarditis, a heart inflammation seen especially in men aged 12 to 29. That appears to be a short-term condition, with 83% of patients recovering within 90 days of onset, and more than 90% fully recovered within a year. No deaths or heart transplants are known to have occurred, the CDC data show. No confirmed cases were seen in children younger than 5. The myocarditis rate among vaccine recipients aged between 6 months and 64 years appeared to spike in 2020-22, when it seemed to be related to the original vaccine and the original booster. After the booster was reformulated, the rate among those aged 12 to 39 fell to about one case per million doses in 2024-25 — half the rate found in the general population. Despite the relative rarity of myocarditis, the condition has underpinned a campaign by anti-vaccine activists to take the vaccines off the market. Among them is Joseph Ladapo, the Florida surgeon general, who in 2022 advised males aged 18-39 not to get the COVID vaccine. His advisory earned him a crisp upbraiding from the then-heads of the FDA and CDC, who informed him by letter that "the known and potential benefits of these vaccines clearly outweigh their known and potential risks.... Not only is there no evidence of increased risk of death following mRNA vaccines, but available data have shown quite the opposite: that being up to date on vaccinations saves lives compared to individuals who did not get vaccinated."
