logo
US Education in the Trump 2.0: A timeline of what changed in just 6 months

US Education in the Trump 2.0: A timeline of what changed in just 6 months

Time of Indiaa day ago
Timeline of US education-related actions during Donald Trump's second presidency (January 2025 – July 15, 2025)
The second presidency of Donald Trump, inaugurated on January 20, 2025, has brought significant changes to the United States' federal education policy landscape. Over the first six months of the administration, sweeping reforms were undertaken that affected the US Department of Education (USED), civil rights enforcement, university funding, Title IX and Title VI interpretations, and DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) initiatives across K–12 and higher education.
Through executive orders, administrative actions, and Department-led initiatives, the Trump administration pursued a course of decentralisation, framing the movement as returning educational control to states and local communities. The restructuring included staff reductions, program eliminations, funding freezes, and legal battles surrounding enforcement of federal civil rights laws.
January 2025: Executive orders and reorientation of USED priorities
January 20, 2025:
Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term as President of the United States.
January 20–23:
President Trump signed multiple executive orders aimed at dismantling DEI efforts across federal agencies. Most notably, Executive Order 14151 repealed Executive Order 11246, a landmark policy that had established affirmative action programmes requiring federal contractors to promote workforce diversity. This repeal effectively ended federal affirmative action requirements and led to the closure of DEI offices within government departments, marking a significant shift away from institutional efforts to address systemic inequities.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
An engineer reveals: One simple trick to get internet without a subscription
Techno Mag
Learn More
Undo
Additional executive orders signed on January 20 included:

Executive Order on Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Governmen
t: This defined sex as male and female based on biological classification at birth, rescinding prior Title IX protections for gender identity and sexual orientation.

Executive Order on Expanding School Choice:
Promoted public fund usage for private education, reducing federal involvement in K–12 education.

Executive Order on Ending Radical Indoctrination in K–12 Schooling:
Reinstated the 1776 Commission to promote "patriotic education" and prohibited funding for schools promoting gender or equity ideologies.
January 29, 2025:
Executive Order 14190, titled
'Ending Radical Indoctrination in K–12 Schooling'
, was signed. The order categorised the teaching of gender ideology and critical race theory as subversive acts, calling for investigations and the possibility of criminal penalties against educators facilitating social transitions for transgender students.
January 31, 2025:
USED issued a "Dear Colleague" letter signalling the return to the 2020 Title IX rules from Trump's first term. The rules narrowed the definition of sexual harassment, reinstated live hearings, and limited institutional liability. Legal challenges from education advocacy organisations followed.
February 2025: DEI-related investigations and legal actions
February 2, 2025:
USED placed approximately 100 employees on administrative leave, primarily not related to DEI, as part of enforcement under Executive Order 14151.
February 3, 2025:
USED opened Title VI investigations into five universities—Columbia, Northwestern, Portland State, UC Berkeley, and the University of Minnesota—over allegations of antisemitic harassment linked to campus protests. Investigations followed Trump's Executive Order on Additional Measures to Combat Anti-Semitism.
February 5, 2025:
The
'Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports'
executive order was signed.
It directed USED to enforce Title IX such that transgender women would be barred from participating in women's sports. The NCAA responded by restricting eligibility in line with the order. The University of Pennsylvania subsequently lost $175 million in federal funding due to its past compliance with more inclusive NCAA policies.
February 10, 2025:
USED terminated $336 million in Regional Educational Laboratory grants and $33 million in Equity Assistance Centre funding.
The cancellations cited DEI and critical race theory content as misaligned with federal goals. Eight states filed suit, alleging violations of the Administrative Procedure Act.
February 13, 2025:
Linda McMahon was confirmed as Secretary of Education by the Senate (52–48 vote), with her agenda aligned toward dismantling the Department of Education.
February 14, 2025:
USED's Office for Civil Rights issued a "Dear Colleague" letter interpreting the
Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard
Supreme Court decision as invalidating all DEI programmes.
The letter gave institutions 14 days to comply or face funding loss. Legal action followed, and a federal judge in New Hampshire granted a preliminary injunction against enforcement.
March 2025: Layoffs, legal resistance, and executive restructuring orders
March 1, 2025:
An FAQ was issued by USED OCR clarifying the February letter's provisions. Despite adjustments, a Maryland federal court issued a nationwide injunction blocking the executive order's implementation.
March 3, 2025:
Secretary McMahon publicly outlined the "final mission" of USED as the decentralisation of federal education control and dismantling of the Department.
March 11, 2025:
USED announced a workforce reduction of approximately 2,000 employees—nearly half its staff. Layoffs impacted civil rights, special education, student aid, and research functions. An additional 600 employees resigned voluntarily.
The Institute of Education Sciences (IES) was nearly dismantled, with $900 million in research grants cancelled. USED's civil rights office saw over 40% staffing cuts.
March 14, 2025:
The Senate passed H.R. 1968, a Continuing Resolution funding key education programmes like Title I and IDEA through 30 September 2025. On the same day, USED launched Title VI investigations into 45 universities over race-exclusive DEI activities.
March 19, 2025:
The administration cut $175 million in funding to the University of Pennsylvania, citing Title IX violations.
March 20, 2025:
President Trump signed an executive order titled
'Improving Education Outcomes by Empowering Parents, States, and Communities'
, instructing Secretary McMahon to facilitate the closure of USED and reassign responsibilities to Treasury, HHS, DOJ, and others.
March 24, 2025:
Over 20 state attorneys general filed a lawsuit to block USED layoffs.
A federal judge issued an injunction temporarily pausing further terminations and restructuring.
March 31, 2025:
The administration issued detailed oversight demands to Harvard, including audits and DEI policy reviews. Harvard President Alan Garber rejected these as unconstitutional.
April 2025: Escalation of funding cuts and DEI restrictions
April 3–11, 2025:
The Trump administration expanded its demands on Harvard University.
It requested a four-year audit covering academic governance, hiring practices, and curriculum oversight. In response, President Alan Garber reaffirmed resistance on April 14, citing constitutional protections. Litigation from faculty associations followed.
April 14, 2025:
The administration froze over $2.2 billion in federal grants and $60 million in contracts to Harvard, citing concerns over DEI and antisemitism.
Similar funding holds were placed on Columbia University (approx. $400 million), Cornell University (over $1 billion), and Northwestern University (approx. $790 million).
April 23, 2025:
President Trump signed a new executive order targeting DEI in higher education. The order required institutions to disclose all foreign financial ties, decertified DEI programmes for accreditation purposes, and revoked Obama- and Biden-era equity-based discipline guidance for K–12 schools.
The new policy mandated behaviour-based discipline approaches and prohibited what it described as race-conscious disciplinary policies.
May 2025: Institutional scrutiny and proposed agency transfers
May 12, 2025:
A task force including USED, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the General Services Administration (GSA) revoked an additional $450 million in federal grants to Harvard. The justification cited continuing violations of Title VI and DEI enforcement failures.
May 22, 2025:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a notice of intent to revoke Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Programme (SEVP) certification, threatening its international student enrolment. A federal judge swiftly granted an injunction, blocking the move.
Late May 2025:
USED and HHS opened a civil rights investigation into the Harvard Law Review following an alleged Title VI violation related to article submission practices.
The investigation cited discriminatory procedures and editorial decision-making linked to DEI frameworks.
May 2025 (ongoing)
The Trump administration began discussing the structural reassignment of USED responsibilities. Proposals included moving:
• Student loans to the Department of the Treasury or the Small Business Administration (SBA),
• Special education oversight to HHS,
• Civil rights enforcement to the Department of Justice (DOJ).
No formal transfers were completed by July 15, 2025, as such actions require congressional authorisation. The resulting uncertainty affected planning for institutions and borrowers.
June–July 2025: Court rulings and further dismantling efforts
June 6, 2025:
Federal Judge Myong Joun upheld a March injunction that blocked further USED layoffs and agency restructuring. The ruling reaffirmed that layoffs and transfers without congressional oversight exceeded executive authority.
July 14, 2025:
The US Supreme Court, through its shadow docket, lifted the injunction, enabling the Department to terminate approximately 1,400 employees. The affected roles were largely within civil rights enforcement, special education, and federal research divisions. The Court's order allowed the Trump administration to proceed with dismantling USED functions, despite objections from legal and civil rights groups.
Ongoing legal challenges and court rulings (January–July 2025)
Multiple legal actions have been filed against the Trump administration's education policies, leading to several notable court decisions:
• Boston Federal Court (March 2025):
A lawsuit by 20 state attorneys general challenged the legality of USED staff terminations. A judge ordered staff reinstatement, but the administration reportedly delayed full compliance.
• Maryland Federal Court (March 2025):
A nationwide injunction was issued blocking major provisions of the anti-DEI executive orders, temporarily safeguarding grant eligibility.
• New Hampshire Federal Court (March 2025):
A judge blocked the enforcement of the February 14 'Dear Colleague' letter, ruling that it infringed upon free speech protections.
• New York Federal Court (February 2025):
The American Association of University Professors and the American Federation of Teachers filed a case over Columbia's funding cuts, alleging unconstitutional restrictions on institutional autonomy and academic speech.
These legal developments have resulted in temporary relief for some institutions, though broader challenges remain pending in federal courts.
July 15, 2025: Current status
As of July 15, 2025, the US Department of Education remains operational, though significantly weakened. While full congressional dissolution of USED has not occurred, its functions have been curtailed through staffing reductions, executive orders, and agency restructuring.
Core federal education programmes such as Pell Grants, Title I, and IDEA remain active. However, questions persist regarding their future oversight and delivery mechanisms. Universities, particularly Ivy League institutions, continue to face funding freezes and investigations related to DEI and antisemitism compliance.
Summary of actions and institutional impacts
Area
Action
Immediate Effects
DOE workforce
~50% staff cut; legal injunctions; Supreme Court approval in July
Disruptions in civil rights enforcement, research, student loans, and data collection
Student loans/grants
Mandates to transfer to Treasury/SBA; frozen university funds
Borrower uncertainty; disruptions to aid and research funding
Higher education
$2.2B+ in grants frozen; DOJ/HHS investigations; accreditation scrutiny over DEI
Legal battles; oversight compliance measures
K–12 schools
Executive orders on CRT, gender ideology, and discipline
Removal of protections for transgender students; increased litigation
Federal roles
Proposals to transfer to HHS, DOJ, Treasury, Labour
Coordination and implementation issues
Legal and political context
Despite multiple lawsuits and preliminary injunctions, the administration has proceeded with its education reform agenda.
The Supreme Court's intervention to lift an injunction on USED layoffs marked a key turning point, raising concerns about separation of powers. While Congress holds the authority to dissolve federal agencies, no legislative action to abolish USED has occurred as of mid-July.
The Trump administration has framed its education strategy as an effort to return control to states, eliminate bureaucratic inefficiencies, and protect what it describes as American values. The coming months are expected to include continued legal battles, potential legislative standoffs, and policy shifts as USED's functions are reassessed.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
here
.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We have another deal coming up 'maybe' with India, says Trump
We have another deal coming up 'maybe' with India, says Trump

Time of India

timea minute ago

  • Time of India

We have another deal coming up 'maybe' with India, says Trump

US President Donald Trump speaks during a meeting with Bahrain's Crown Prince Salman bin Hamad Al Khalifa in the Oval Office of the White House, Wednesday, July 16, 2025, in Washington. Donald Trump suggests a potential trade agreement with India. This statement occurred during a meeting with Bahrain's Crown Prince and Prime Minister at the White House. Trump mentioned the possibility of another deal with India. Discussions are underway, signaling a positive outlook for economic cooperation. This development could strengthen ties between the two nations. Further details are awaited. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India deal may mirror US-Indonesia template: Trump Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Concerns over 'lopsided' trade framework Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump on Wednesday hinted at the announcement of a possible trade agreement with India, saying 'maybe' another deal was on the made the remarks during a bilateral meeting with the Crown Prince and Prime Minister of Bahrain at the White House."We have another deal coming up maybe with India," Trump was quoted as statement comes even as a fifth round of talks between Indian and US trade officials is underway in Washington, with the two sides working toward a proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA).Earlier this week, Trump had indicated that the India pact may follow the contours of the recently finalised trade agreement with Indonesia. Under that deal, the Southeast Asian country will offer complete market access to US goods, while its own exports will face a 19% duty in the addition, Indonesia has committed to purchasing USD 15 billion in US energy, USD 4.5 billion in American agricultural products, and 50 Boeing to reporters, Trump added, 'India is basically working along that same line. We are going to have access into India. You have to understand, we had no access to any of these countries. Our people couldn't go in, and now we are getting access because of what we are doing with the tariffs…'The US has been pressing India to reduce duties on a range of products, including dairy, automobiles (especially electric vehicles), wines, apples, and genetically modified crops. In return, India is seeking duty relief on key export items like textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, chemicals, and experts have warned that any agreement modelled too closely on the Indonesia deal could harm India's domestic sectors. The Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) raised concerns over the lack of reciprocity in the proposed terms.'A bad deal, especially one that removes India's tariffs without reciprocal benefits, could be worse than no deal at all,' said GTRI founder Ajay Srivastava. He added that India must 'negotiate transparently, guard against one-sided outcomes, and not succumb to pressure for quick, symbolic agreements that compromise long-term economic interests.'India has so far resisted giving tariff concessions in sensitive sectors such as dairy, which it has never opened to any FTA partner. It is also pushing the US to remove or reduce the additional 26% tariffs it has imposed, along with duties on steel (50%) and autos (25%). Washington, in turn, has postponed the imposition of new tariffs on India until August two nations are targeting an interim agreement in the coming months, with the aim to finalise the first tranche of the BTA by September– trade between the two countries has remained robust, with India's merchandise exports to the US rising 21.78% to USD 17.25 billion in April-May this fiscal, while imports increased by 25.8% to USD 8.87 billion.

Mideast crisis: 'We bombed the hell out of Iran,' says Donald Trump; 'they wanna negotiate badly'
Mideast crisis: 'We bombed the hell out of Iran,' says Donald Trump; 'they wanna negotiate badly'

Time of India

time15 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Mideast crisis: 'We bombed the hell out of Iran,' says Donald Trump; 'they wanna negotiate badly'

US President on Wednesday said that Iran wanted to "negotiate badly" recounting how the States "bombed the hell" of the middle eastern nations during its war with Israel. "They wanna negotiate badly. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now We're in no rush. They should have made a deal, and then we bombed the HELL out of their various places," he said. Last month, Trump had announced a 'complete and total' ceasefire between Iran and Israel, claiming both sides had agreed to end the 12-day conflict. This came after the US sided with Israel and threatened Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei's life and hold on power. Following this, Iran's top Shiite cleric Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi issued a fatwa against Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. The decree labeled them 'mohareb', enemies of God, for threatening Iran's leadership and Islamic unity. Under Iranian law, mohareb can face severe punishments, including execution or banishment.

At least 15 injured in Russian attack targeting energy infrastructure in Ukraine
At least 15 injured in Russian attack targeting energy infrastructure in Ukraine

New Indian Express

time25 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

At least 15 injured in Russian attack targeting energy infrastructure in Ukraine

KYIV: Russia pounded four Ukrainian cities overnight into Wednesday, injuring at least 15 people in an attack that mostly targeted energy infrastructure, officials said. The latest bombardment in Russia's escalating aerial campaign against civilian areas came ahead of a Sept. 2 deadline set by U.S. President Donald Trump for the Kremlin to reach a peace deal in the three-year war, under the threat of possible severe Washington sanctions if it doesn't. No date has yet been publicly set for a possible third round of direct peace talks between delegations from Russia and Ukraine. Two previous rounds delivered no progress apart from prisoner swaps. Russia launched 400 Shahed and decoy drones, as well as one ballistic missile, during the night, the Ukrainian air force said. The strikes targeted northeastern Kharkiv, which is Ukraine's second-largest city, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's hometown of Kryvyi Rih in central Ukraine, Vinnytsia in the west and Odesa in the south. 'Russia does not change its strategy,' Zelenskyy said. 'To effectively counter this terror, we need a systemic strengthening of defense: more air defense, more interceptors, and more resolve so that Russia feels our response.' Trump on Monday pledged to deliver more weapons to Ukraine, including vital Patriot air defense systems, and threatened to slap additional sanctions on Russia. It was Trump's toughest stance toward Russian President Vladimir Putin since he returned to the White House nearly six months ago. But some U.S. lawmakers and European government officials expressed misgivings that the 50-day deadline handed Putin the opportunity to capture more Ukrainian territory before any settlement to end the fighting.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store