Planning to dredge the Burrard Inlet to maximize oil shipments is underway
An ocean pollution researcher and at least one First Nation are raising concerns about the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority's (VFPA) plan to dredge the Burrard Inlet.
Dredging is when the bed of a body of water is dug out to make way for ships or for construction or cleaning purposes.
Ocean researcher Juan José Alava told CBC's On The Coast that periodic dredging is common for navigation maintenance in the Inlet. However, he says he was surprised to hear that the port is planning to dredge for the purpose of maximizing oil tanker capacity.
The VFPA plan is to maximize oil shipments from the port. Currently, Aframax tankers, a specific size of oil tanker, with a deadweight ranging from 80,000 to 120,000 metric tonnes, can carry loads up to 80 per cent, with the goal of increasing capacity to 100 per cent. However, doing so carries the risk of hitting the sea bottom.
According to Alava, another risk is environmental harm.
LISTEN | Burrard Inlet could be dredged to maximize oil shipments:
Alava is the principal investigator for the Ocean Pollution Research Unit at the University of British Columbia, and says that this development is deeply concerning because of the potential effect on water quality, aquatic life, and First Nations culture in the area that is dependent on the Inlet and the Second Narrows channel.
"At what environmental cost, for a single tanker, do you want to dredge the Burrard Inlet? What about the First Nation communities that are living there?"
He says that as a scientist who studies marine toxicology, the risk of dredging to increase oil tanker capacity can have a drastic impact on the environment if there is an oil spill, citing lessons learned from the Exxon Valdez southern Alaska spill 36 years ago.
Alava says that you can still find oil remnants in B.C. from that spill today, so environmental impact assessments and Indigenous consultation are necessary.
Tsleil-Waututh Nation's Chief, Jen Thomas, said in a written statement on May 8, that no formal engagement has happened about dredging the Burrard Inlet that runs past the nation.
Thomas says that the nation firmly opposed the Trans Mountain Expansion Project, adding that the Government of Canada built it despite the nation's informed decision not to consent to the project.
"Tsleil-Waututh has a sacred, legal obligation to protect, defend and steward our Inlet. We hold inherent and Constitutionally-protected Indigenous title and rights to this area."
Under UNDRIP, the B.C. government has a duty to obtain free, prior and informed consent from First Nations when pursuing projects in their territories.
Thomas says that the nation will have more to say about the matter once it reviews the proposal and says that it looks forward to meeting with agencies in the future about any projects that may affect Tsleil-Waututh Nation rights and title.
Despite concerns from environmentalists and First Nations, B.C. Energy and Climate Solutions Minister Adrian Dix is supportive of the project, pending it meeting environmental assessment and consultation requirements with First Nations.
In a report from the Canadian Press released on May 11, Dix says that the province spoke with the Tsleil-Waututh Nation before expressing views about the project to the federal government.
The plan, floated by Prime Minister Mark Carney in early May, comes at a time when Canada is looking to diversify energy exports away from the United States.
Dix stressed that the dredging would be a federal project, not provincial and that the project "would allow for less traffic at the port and better utilization" because ships could fully load.
The dredging project's preliminary stages of environmental assessment and First Nation consultation began on May 20.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
18 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Protests continue over the construction of ‘Alligator Alcatraz' in the Everglades
Hundreds of people gathered in the heart of the Everglades on Saturday—signs raised and chants echoing—to protest 'Alligator Alcatraz,' a migrant detention center being built on a former airstrip in Big Cypress National Preserve. Demonstrators lined both sides of the narrow two-way road leading to the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport, a remote landing strip just north of Tamiami Trail. The site, located in Miami-Dade County, is where Attorney General James Uthmeier and Governor Ron DeSantis have expedited construction of the controversial facility. According to officials, supply trucks have been arriving daily to have the center operational by next week. Read more: Meet the folks who live near 'Alligator Alcatraz' and call the Everglades home Dozens of trucks carrying supplies could be seen going in and out of the facility on Saturday as protesters waved their signs towards them. Signs included 'Protect the sacred' and 'Everglades Only,' while others called the construction of the detention center 'Crimes against humanity.' Described by authorities as 'temporary,' the 1,000-bed facility will primarily consist of large tents and trailers, designed to detain undocumented immigrants apprehended in Florida and beyond. Read more: 'Alligator Alcatraz': What you need to know about the Everglades detention camp Since the announcement, the project has faced sharp criticism from Indigenous leaders, environmental groups and members of the South Florida community. They argue that the detention center will damage critical wetlands, disrupt wildlife habitats, and undermine decades of restoration work. At the forefront of Saturday's demonstration was Betty Osceola, a Miccosukee tribe member and activist, who was raised in Big Cypress. Osceola told reporters that she is alarmed at the speed of construction on the detention center, especially when many people still recovering from past hurricanes haven't received comparable support or resources. She was troubled by the sheer amount of resources being funneled into the project and voiced concern about its environmental impact, warning that it could pave the way for permanent development on the land. Read more: Environmental groups file lawsuit over 'Alligator Alcatraz' in Florida Everglades On Friday, two environmental organizations—Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity—filed a lawsuit against federal, state, and county officials, alleging that construction began without proper environmental review or public input, in violation of required procedures.
Newsweek
20 hours ago
- Newsweek
Man Born on Army Base to US Soldier Deported to Jamaica
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Jermaine Thomas, who was born in 1986 on a U.S. Army base in Germany to a father who had become a naturalized U.S. citizen, was deported to Jamaica last month, according to The Austin Chronicle. Newsweek has reached out to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), and several immigration legal experts for comment via email on Saturday. Why It Matters Thomas' deportation comes amid an immigration crackdown by the Trump administration. President Donald Trump has pledged to launch the largest mass deportation operation in U.S. history, with people residing in the country illegally as well as immigrants with valid documentation, including green cards and visas, having been detained, and many deported. The Trump administration has deported multiple individuals to countries where they did not hold citizenship, despite family ties in those nations. Ending automatic birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment has been a focus for the Trump administration. The president signed an executive order restricting birthright citizenship, but the policy was initially blocked by a nationwide injunction. On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal judges cannot issue national injunctions, clearing the way for some states to move forward with measures limiting birthright citizenship. The ruling did not address the legality of the executive order itself. What To Know Thomas' citizenship status has been in question for decades, with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) having issued a "Notice to Appear and Additional Charges of Inadmissibility/Deportability" in 2013, according to court documents reviewed by Newsweek. He was born to an active-duty member of the U.S. Army stationed on a U.S. base in Frankfurt, Germany, in 1986. Court documents from 2015 state that "Thomas's father first entered the United States in September 1977, enlisted in the United States Army in 1979, and became a United States citizen in May 1984." Thomas' mother, who was married to his father at the time of birth, was a citizen of Kenya. Margaret Stock, a lawyer who specializes in immigration and military law, told Newsweek in a phone interview Saturday that citizenship status for babies born on overseas military bases can be "really complicated" and depend on a range of factors including marriage status, parental citizenship status and length of residency, paperwork, and more. Children born on U.S. military bases overseas do not get automatic citizenship, but they typically acquire citizenship through their parents if eligibility requirements are met and proper paperwork is filed. Stock said typically they have to go to the State Department and file certain applications to obtain a "Consular Report of Birth Abroad." "Thomas was admitted to the United States as a lawful permanent resident in July 1989. His visa form listed his nationality as Jamaican," the 2015 court filing noted. Thomas moved around the U.S. a bit from bases and ended up settling in Texas when he was older. The Fifth Circuit ruled against Thomas, finding that he was not born "in the United States" and therefore the 14th Amendment's Citizenship Clause did not apply to his case. The Supreme Court declined to review the decision, leaving the deportation order in place. The court documents also note that "Petitioner has been convicted of several crimes in the United States, including theft and domestic assault causing bodily injury." The filing notes that due to his criminal background, the DHS initiated removal proceedings. Thomas does not hold citizenship in Germany or Jamaica, The Austin Chronicle reported. With the U.S. also denying his claim to citizenship, he is effectively stateless. "There's going to be a lot of people getting deported who are stateless, and a lot of people born on military bases overseas," Stock told Newsweek. Thomas told The Austin Chronicle that he was arrested earlier this year after he was evicted from his apartment and moving stuff onto the lawn with his dog. Killeen police said he was arrested for suspected trespassing. He says he spent a month in jail and then was transferred to ICE detention centers. He told The Austin Chronicle he was deported to Jamaica in late May. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, right, ERO Regional Attaché Guadalupe "Lupita" Serna and U.S. Ambassador to Guatemala Tobin Bradley watch people deported from the United States disembark a repatriation flight, at La Aurora International Airport... Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, right, ERO Regional Attaché Guadalupe "Lupita" Serna and U.S. Ambassador to Guatemala Tobin Bradley watch people deported from the United States disembark a repatriation flight, at La Aurora International Airport in Guatemala City on June 26. More nna Moneymaker/Pool Photo via AP Images) What People Are Saying Jermaine Thomas told The Austin Chronicle: "If you're in the U.S. Army, and the Army deploys you somewhere, and you've gotta have your child over there, and your child makes a mistake after you pass away, and you put your life on the line for this country, are you going to be okay with them just kicking your child out of the country?" U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday: "Coming to America and receiving a visa or green card is a privilege. Our laws and values must be respected. If you advocate for violence, endorse or support terrorist activity, or encourage others to do so, you are no longer eligible to stay in the U.S." What Happens Next? It is unclear if there will be any other legal proceedings in Thomas' case, which brings birthright citizenship to the forefront. The Court's ruling allows the Trump administration to issue guidance on how the executive order on birthright citizenship can be implemented, which can now happen in 30 days. The executive order could still face challenges, with at least two attempts at class action lawsuits filed later Friday.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
First Nations have plan to move problem grizzly but need go-ahead from B.C.
Three coastal First Nations have worked together to come up with a plan to move a grizzly bear that's been causing problems on Texada Island — just off B.C.'s Sunshine Coast — but so far, the province has not signed off. On June 13, the B.C. government said there was no "kill order" for the bear — but also that it was "not a candidate for relocation," because it had already been moved twice, before returning to human-inhabited areas. On Texada, the community of about 1,000 people has been divided on whether the bear should be killed or removed or left alone. But Erik Blaney — a legislator with the Tla'amin Nation — thinks the solution is to trap the bear and move it about one hundred kilometres northwest to Bute Inlet, where it can live with other coastal grizzlies and be far enough away that it can't swim back. Previously, the bear was relocated to Jervis Inlet, which is approximately 75 kilometres away. Blaney said he has worked with his nation, the neighbouring shíshálh Nation, and the Homalco First Nation to craft a plan for the relocation. Texada Island lies near the intersection of Tla'amin and shíshálh territory. Stewardship guardians from the nations would work together to trap the bear, which would then be moved by boat, and possibly plane, to Orford Bay in Bute Inlet, which is in Homalco territory. "We have the plan; we have the funding to do it. What we don't have is the province's assistance and backing," said Erik Blaney. He said they have been meeting with provincial officials and have some support, but have also been told that what they're asking is outside current policy — and that to capture and move the bear without a permit could lead to charges under the Wildlife Act. But he sees this as an opportunity for Tla'amin and shíshálh —both of which have self-governing agreements — to look after their lands and waters. "This really shows unity among coastal guardian programs that are doing exactly, you know, what we should, which is protecting the natural resources and wildlife within our territories." Homalco Chief Darren Blaney, who is a cousin of Erik Blaney, thinks it's a great plan. "When Erik called me to see about this bear that could potentially get killed, I give it a chance in Bute," he told CBC News. The Homalco have a tourism company that runs grizzly tours from Vancouver Island up to Bute Inlet. "We have an area that's about maybe five kilometres where the salmon gets into and we get about 50 to 60 grizzlies that come in there when the salmon runs are going," said Darren Blaney. He said it's a place where the grizzlies fatten up for winter. "So yeah, it's a good place for them and it's good for our tourism." The Ministry of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship said late Friday afternoon in an email that it is aware of the plan and that there are ongoing conversations between First Nations and the Grizzly Bear Foundation about it.
