Proposed Model For Future Delivery Of Water Services To Go Before Council
Queenstown Lakes District Councils (QLDC) elected members will be asked to agree to consult on a proposal to establish a Water Services Council Controlled Organisation (WSCCO). Consultation would begin Monday 2 June 2025, decision pending.
A report on the proposed future water service delivery model for Queenstown Lakes District will go before Council on Thursday 29 May 2025, as required by the Local Government (Water Services Preliminary Arrangements) Act 2024 (WSPA Act).
Queenstown Lakes District Council's (QLDC) elected members will be asked to agree to consult on a proposal to establish a Water Services Council Controlled Organisation (WSCCO). Consultation would begin Monday 2 June 2025, decision pending.
QLDC Property & Infrastructure General Manager, Tony Avery said as part of central government's Local Water Done Well plan to address Aotearoa New Zealand's water infrastructure challenges, Council had carefully assessed options for the future delivery of water services in Queenstown Lakes District.
'Given costs are already projected to increase significantly as outlined in the QLDC Long Term Plan (LTP) 2024-2034, we wanted to ensure the proposed model we plan to share for public consultation considered financial implications for consumers, amongst several other factors,' said Mr Avery.
'The assessments and modelling we have undertaken shows a WSCCO would provide the greatest opportunity to deliver high quality, resilient, sustainable and reliable water services and provide certainty for our communities on the provision of water services.'
A WSSCO would operate as a Council Controlled Organisation specifically established to manage and deliver drinking water, wastewater, and stormwater services in the district, and to own QLDC's current water assets and their associated debt and liabilities.
While the proposed organisation would operate independently from Council and have its own specialist board and management, legislation specifically prevents it from being privatised or paying a dividend.
Council would set the organisation's strategic priorities and establish measures to ensure it performs to expectations, while the Commerce Commission would use various regulatory tools to ensure water charges are fair, cost-reflective, and transparent.
The other shortlisted option evaluated was for QLDC to continue to deliver water services in-house, recognising that changes would need to be made to enable Council to respond to the new regulatory environment if such a model was progressed with. An in-house model would be similarly subject to the Commerce Commission regulatory requirements.
In addition to cost to households, the WSCCO and the in-house model were assessed on their ability to attract and retain staff, adapt to changing requirements, maximise value and minimise waste, effectively and efficiently manage water services, and deliver to community priorities.
Mr Avery said Council needed to be confident that the model chosen would be capable of delivering financially sustainable water services to meet the increased financial requirements in legislation intended to be passed by central government.
'Under all scenarios, including Council's current Long-Term Plan, water charges are projected to increase substantially. The modelling undertaken shows that when compared with the in-house model, the proposed WSCCO model would initially result in higher water charges for households through to 2034, but long-term would lead to lower charges on average from 2034 to 2044,' said Mr Avery.
The report recommending consultation on the proposed future water service delivery model is to go before Council on Thursday and details on the assessments carried out is available online at https://www.qldc.govt.nz/your-council/council-meetings/29-may-2025-full-council-meeting/.
Given the strong public interest in Local Water Done Well and the future delivery of water services in the district, those interested are encouraged to attend the Full Council meeting being hosted at Arrowtown Community Centre, starting from 1.00pm. The venue does not have livestreaming capabilities, but a recording of the meeting will be uploaded to QLDC's Youtube channel as soon as possible after the meeting has ended.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Earthquake-Prone Building Notice Confirmed For Embassy Theatre – But It's Business As Usual
The Seismic Assessment for Wellington's iconic Embassy Theatre has confirmed parts of the building are below the 34% NBS threshold for being earthquake prone, but the building can operate as usual. In October 2024, Wellington City Council – in its capacity as the regulator – requested a Seismic Assessment to give the Embassy Theatre a formal New Building Standard (NBS) rating. An earthquake-prone notice was issued and displayed on the entrance to the Embassy Theatre in lieu of the assessment. The findings of the assessment have parts of the building below the 34% NBS threshold for being earthquake prone. Under the NBS a building's seismic performance rating is given based on its seismically weakest part. The building's NBS rating is 30%. A review of the latest advice, in conjunction with the MBIE Seismic Risk Guidance for Buildings, indicates the Embassy Theatre can operate as usual, prior to the work being carried out. The assessment states there is a 1.8% chance an earthquake could cause damage and a 0.3% chance the building would be occupied should an earthquake occur. Strengthening work above the main auditorium and on the Marjoribanks Steet façade would bring the building up to standard. The notice gives the Wellington City Council – as the building's owner – 16 years to plan and carry out remedial works on the building. Council's Chief Infrastructure Officer Jenny Chetwynd says: 'The Embassy Theatre is a much-loved venue in Wellington's entertainment district. 'We have concluded, on reviewing the latest advice in conjunction with the MBIE Seismic Risk Guidance for Buildings, that there is nothing within either assessment that indicates the building cannot continue to operate as normal.' The Embassy Theatre, on the corner of Marjoribank Street and Kent Terrace, is Wellington's oldest and most iconic cinemas. It is one of the only pre-World War II large-screen cinemas remaining in the country. Originally known as the De Luxe Cinema, it celebrated its centenary in 2024. It has been strengthened twice before, most recently in 2009 to 80% NBS. Standards have become more stringent since those works were carried out. The Council will review its options for the building over the coming months. An EPB notice will be displayed at every public entrance to the building. Related links:
RNZ News
17 hours ago
- RNZ News
Whanganui backs new water services body with Ruapehu
Whanganui District Council is the last among neighbouring councils to choose a new delivery model for water services. Photo: Tuakana Te Tana Whanganui councillors have voted 8-5 to form a new entity with Ruapehu to manage the delivery of water services. Whanganui and Ruapehu district councils will be the shareholders of the new council-controlled organisation (CCO) that will own the water assets. "This is a big moment in this council's history," Mayor Andrew Tripe said. The entity will include drinking water, wastewater and possibly stormwater assets and services, and operate on non-harmonised or 'local pricing'. This means residents will be charged only for the cost-of-service delivery in their own district, while still benefiting from a share of the savings gained through scale. Whanganui was the last among neighbouring authorities to choose a delivery model. At a meeting on Tuesday, councillors debated balancing cost efficiencies gained in a larger grouping with the opportunity for local voice and the council's obligations to Te Awa Tupua legislation. Following the decisions of other councils, Whanganui weighed up four options: Council staff recommended a joint entity with Ruapehu. The council's Local Water Done Well transition manager Kathryn Stewart said the joint models were projected to outperform an in-house business unit. The two-council model would save water users an estimated $620 a year or $18,000 over a 30-year period. A five-council model would deliver customer savings of $870 a year. Chief executive David Langford told councillors that cost efficiency modelling did not set precise savings but was a mechanism for comparing options. "The numbers are there to help you compare options, they're not predictions for the future. Hanging your hopes on exactly $620 per year for 30 years is an erroneous use of the model." Langford said joining a bigger grouping of councils would likely provide greater savings for households but "bigger is better" was a misnomer. He cautioned councillors against making a decision on cost savings alone. "It's not cost efficiency at any cost. As you get bigger, your ability to influence and the size of your voice gets smaller. [It is] a trade-off between how much you make in savings and how much voice you retain." Much consideration had been given to Te Awa Tupua legislation, Langford said. The two-council model with Ruapehu would create a water service delivery entity that was exclusively focused on the Whanganui catchment. It would ensure governance remained close to the community and was not consumed by a larger entity. Stewart said all joint options would bring opportunity, including increased collaboration, resilience, and staff and technical capacity. But the two-council model would also preserve local voice and influence and put Te Awa Tupua and the wellbeing "of all our connected communities" at the centre of decision-making. The CCO would manage the delivery of water services for about 24,000 connections. The councils would appoint a board of independent, professional directors who would be responsible for making decisions. The board would be informed by expectations set out and agreed upon by the two councils. Advantages included improved ability to fund infrastructure investment, maintenance and compliance costs and improve environmental outcomes, and greater ability to respond to emergencies, manage risks and adapt to future challenges like climate change. In favour of the two-council partnership were: Tripe, Glenda Brown, Josh Chandulal-Mackay, Jenny Duncan, Ross Fallen, Kate Joblin, Charlotte Melser, Peter Oskam. Against were: Deputy mayor Helen Craig, Charlie Anderson, Philippa Baker-Hogan, Michael Law and Rob Vinsen. The Ruapehu council voted 6-4 in favour of the two-council model last week. Chief executive Clive Manley welcomed Whanganui's decision and said it was an important milestone that enabled both councils to begin work on detailed planning and implementation. While Whanganui voted to include stormwater in the new CCO, Ruapehu was still considering whether to transfer its stormwater services or retain them in-house. This decision would not affect setting up the new CCO, Manley said. "We'll make a decision on stormwater in due course, but it doesn't prevent us from moving forward with the rest," Manley said. "Both councils are committed to continuing to explore opportunities that improve efficiency and reduce costs for our communities." Whanganui council officers will now finalise a Water Services Delivery Plan for adoption at the next council meeting in August. The council will then submit its final Water Services Delivery Plan to central government by the early-September deadline. If approved, implementation will begin later this year. The new water services CCO could be established by mid-2026 and fully operational by mid-2027. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air
Scoop
20 hours ago
- Scoop
Local Government Amendment Bill Introduced To Remove Council Wellbeing Provisions
Article – RNZ Requirements on councils to prioritise core services will also be imposed. The local government Minister is introducing a bill to remove four wellbeing provisions from the Local Government Act to 'refocus' councils on their core functions. Minister Simon Watts said the Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill would help restore discipline and transparency, and push councils to focus on things like roading, core infrastructure, water and rubbish. 'Kiwis are frustrated with rising rates, expanding bureaucracy, and poor value for money. This bill puts councils back to work on the basics, their core services, so ratepayers see real results for what they pay,' Watts said. The bill will remove four well-being provisions – social, economic, environmental and cultural – which were reintroduced by Labour in 2019 after being removed by the previous National government in 2012. It will also impose a requirement on councils to prioritise core services when managing finances and setting rates. Other reforms New financial performance measures for councils, with a requirement for regular public reporting. Mandatory disclosure of contractor and consultant spending. Stronger transparency and accountability requirements. Regulatory relief to reduce unnecessary compliance burdens. 'Local government has drifted from their core responsibilities. This bill draws a line in the sand – focus on the essentials and deliver value for your community,' Watts said. 'This refocusing of our councils will help to deliver better value for money, and ultimately help address the number one issue people are dealing with right now, which is cost of living.' Watts said the bill was a major milestone for local government reform.
