DHS terminating temporary protected status for Afghanistan, what it means for Utah
Utah took in hundreds after Afghanistan fell to the Taliban in 2021. The Catholic Community Services here in Salt Lake City works to assist the refugees.
'We've been helping between, I would say 200 to 400 Afghans every year,' Immigration Program Manager and attorney for Catholic Community Services, Alyssa Williams, says.
Remains found in Salt Lake confirmed to be University of Utah student who disappeared in 1973
Now, the Trump administration says conditions have improved in Afghanistan. To the point where the refugees no longer need protected status.
'That's not something that the Afghans that we have here believe is true,' Williams says.
The announcement on May 12th from the Department of Homeland Security included the following quote from Secretary Kristi Noem.
'This administration is returning TPS to its original temporary intent,' said Secretary Kristi Noem. 'We've reviewed the conditions in Afghanistan with our interagency partners, and they do not meet the requirements for a TPS designation. Afghanistan has had an improved security situation, and its stabilizing economy no longer prevent them from returning to their home country. Additionally, the termination furthers the national interest as DHS records indicate that there are recipients who have been under investigation for fraud and threatening our public safety and national security. Reviewing TPS designations is a key part of restoring integrity in our immigration system.'
Secretary Kristi Noem, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Police ramp up education for rural teens ahead of deadliest time on Utah roads
Williams said that it's not a surprise, and she sees the situation very differently from Noem.
'I think that they are shocked that anybody would call this a security situation in Afghanistan, something that's improving, and we're usually seeing that it's deteriorating,' Williams explained.
Williams believes that not many refugees in Utah will be sent back due to their application statuses.
'A lot of people have moved into a green card application or an asylum application to be able to get a more permanent status because they've been able to express that terror and that fear of the current Taliban government,' Williams says.
Can't go forward, can't go back: Afghan refugees stuck in Qatar wait for a way forward
The International Rescue Committee responded to the termination of temporary protected status for Afghanistan.
Since 2021, the IRC has provided case management, housing, employment support, and legal services for around 12,000 Afghan children and adults in the US, helping them reunite with family, receive critical legal protections such as TPS and asylum, pursue a path to citizenship, and gain or maintain employment authorization. The IRC remains committed to providing these vital services for individuals who have fled conflict and persecution and seek to rebuild their lives in the US.
We urgently call on the US government to reconsider this harmful policy change and maintain this life-saving humanitarian protection for people from Afghanistan.
The International Rescue Committee's statement
The termination will go into effect on July 12, 2025, according to the Department of Homeland Security.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Surge in Afghans driven from Iran in spy hunt after Israel attacks
The United Nations refugee agency estimates Iran deported home an average of more than 30,000 Afghans each day during the war, up 15-fold from about 2,000 earlier. Afghan citizen Enayatullah Asghari watched dismayed after Israel and Iran launched strikes on each other last month, as the Gulf nation where he had sought refuge turned more hostile, work on Tehran building sites dried up and he was accused of spying. Asghari, 35, is among tens of thousands of Afghans whom Iran has deported home in the past few weeks, in the fallout of a conflict the United Nations says risks further destabilizing Afghanistan, already battling a humanitarian crisis. "It is hard to even find a place to rent, and if you find one, the price is unaffordable ... and there is no work at all," Asghari said at the end of his family's long journey back to western Afghanistan. He said he had no idea what to do next in his home country, marooned in international isolation since the Islamist Taliban terror group took over in 2021. The United Nations refugee agency estimates Iran deported home an average of more than 30,000 Afghans each day during the war, up 15-fold from about 2,000 earlier. "We've always striven to be good hosts, but national security is a priority, and naturally illegal nationals must return," Iran's government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani said on Tuesday. That did not mean expulsion, however, but rather a return to their homeland, the spokesperson added, without mention of a hunt for spies. There was no immediate comment from the Afghanistan government. Before a ceasefire was struck last week in their 12-day war, Iran and Israel traded strikes, which the US joined with an attack on Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities. On national security grounds, Iran had already been cracking down this year on foreign nationals, including Afghans, but stepped up its efforts during the conflict, deported Afghans and humanitarian officials said in interviews. Iranian authorities estimated about 2.6 million Afghans were living in the country without legal documentation in 2022, following the fall of Kabul as US-led foreign forces withdrew. "They saw us as suspected spies and treated us with contempt," Asghari said. "From ordinary people to the police and the government, they were always saying you Afghans are our first enemies, you destroyed us from inside." In an interview, Arafat Jamal, the UNHCR representative for Afghanistan, said he was concerned about the pushback, as anger at the strikes could have spilled over on Afghans in Iran. "They have undergone a very frightening war, we understand that but we also feel that perhaps the Afghans are being scapegoated and some of the anger is being taken out on them," he told Reuters in Kabul. He warned of increasing concern of a "pefect storm" brewing for Afghanistan as neighboring Pakistan also pushed back displaced Afghans in a huge repatriation drive begun in 2023. Compounding Afghanistan's woes, its economy, crippled by sanctions on the banking sector since the Taliban took over, now faces severe aid cuts by Western capitals, he added. "This is a recipe for a great amount of instability in the region for sure," said Jamal. UNHCR's Afghanistan operations have received less than a quarter of the funding needed this year. Afghanistan's aid program has shrunk to just $538 million from $3.2 billion three years ago. More than 1.2 million Afghans have returned from Iran and Pakistan this year, often with just the clothes on their backs and any belongings they could carry. Iran says it will keep up the action on illegal immigrants. "We have legal migrants, many of them poets, writers, doctors, skilled workers and don't want to push everyone out," the government spokesperson added. "But when it comes to illegals, national policies that have been taken will be implemented." Ahmad Fawad Rahimi, 26, said he had a valid work visa for Iran but decided to return last month as his family worried about the war. En route he was picked up and placed in a detention camp, where he said inmates received little food and water, had their mobile telephones taken from them during their stay and were then charged high prices for transport across the border. "Before the war, at least we would receive a warning the first time, and on the second arrest we would be deported," he said. "But now we are all treated as spies. They say Afghans have sided with their enemies and must go back."
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Worst Part of Trump's Big Bill Is Getting Almost No Attention
For many weeks now, Senate Democrats have been trying to home in on the right message against the Republicans' preposterously titled Big Beautiful Bill. While the budget bill narrowly cleared the House after some false starts, its deficit-busting characteristics have thus far kept it from the unified GOP support it needs to clear the Senate. Yet the Democrats similarly are not united on the best strategy to turn the bill into a political loser among voters: The bill is a tax break for the rich. It will kick millions of people off Medicaid and food stamps. It will explode the federal deficit. All of this is true. But the Democrats have been largely silent on perhaps the bill's most ominous characteristic: an orgy of resources for Kristi Noem and Stephen Miller's shock troops to carry out President Trump's indiscriminate crackdown on immigration and protest. My sense is that Democrats are used to their Republican counterparts (and some within their own ranks) pushing for increased 'border security' and immigration enforcement funding during budget negotiations and think the public will view it as old hat. This is a sort of learned defeatism, but it also ignores that we are talking about an entirely different scale here. Taking into account previously allocated funding this fiscal year, we're looking at some $200 billion in spending on immigration enforcement, far above what's allocated to any other federal law enforcement function and more than has ever been spent on immigration enforcement. The bill is effectively a blank check, funding pretty much every aspect of the administration's ramp-up of enforcement, detention, and surveillance: hiring nearly 20,000 additional immigration agents across Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection, constructing more border walls, building detention facilities for tens of thousands of additional people, and so on. It would take everything we've seen so far—the targeting of activists for their speech, masked agents grabbing people off the street, sudden flights to Guantánamo or out of the country, ramping up detentions—and crank it to 11. Beyond that, the bill furthers the transformation of federal law enforcement toward a focus on immigration enforcement specifically. The Cato Institute estimates that immigration and border funding would equal about eight times the FBI's entire budget and 36 times more than tax and financial crimes enforcement. That funding disparity is compounded by Trump's penchant for pulling agents from other functions to the all-encompassing immigration dragnet: For months now, thousands of federal agents who work on everything from child abuse to money laundering have been reassigned to raiding businesses in search of undocumented workers. Meanwhile, ICE is spending so wildly on its crackdown that it may run out of money next month—unless Republicans manage to pass this bill. These elements should be slam dunks for Democrats as they fight the bill without majorities in either chamber. The masked and unidentified agents trawling around in tactical gear, breaking windows, raiding Home Depot, dragging away soon-to-graduate high schoolers, and arresting protesters? Republicans want tens of thousands more of them, and quickly, which will almost certainly mean lowering hiring standards (just as Trump did during his first term when quickly trying to ramp up the immigration agent head count). Trump and his minions want to cram tens of thousands more people who mostly have either no criminal contact or minor infractions into slapdash new facilities as they already struggle to provide basic safety and living standards in existing detention spaces while illegally preventing oversight. And they want to do all of this while making it the best time in generations to be a child predator—the most infamous of whom, Jeffrey Epstein, Trump's former BFF Elon Musk just publicly tied him to—or a financial scammer or a bona fide terrorist as the Trump administration surges resources away from policing all that and toward dragging off your bodega guy or your child's teacher while breaking your skull if you use your constitutionally protected right to protest it. And still, presented with this ready-made argument that appeals to Americans' foundational disdain for authoritarianism and natural distaste for a secret police, Democratic leaders have largely ignored it, preferring instead to focus on the bill's cuts to social services, raising of prices, explosion of the deficit, and the wealth transfer up to the rich, all of which are valid criticisms. Cuts to services like Medicaid directly threaten lives, a reality to which Republican counterparts have had very unsatisfactory answers, most infamously Iowa Senator Joni Ernst, in her retort that 'we all are going to die.' But a lot of the fiscal responsibility stuff that the Dems are most comfortable harping on seems frankly pedestrian in comparison to a massive expansion of Trump's police—nay, military—state. Democrats clearly are still reeling from Trump's victory, which convinced them that immigration is his most popular issue and thus their own weakest line of attack. The leadership's strategy seems to be that the less they say about immigration, the better—which explains why they've been largely silent on the Los Angeles protests, as if waiting for some more politically advantageous news to emerge. If it were up to these leaders, the party would talk only about Medicaid cuts and egg prices every day. Democrats are failing to grasp that, despite their minority power, they're able to shape political opinion rather than simply responding to it. Their timid strategy on immigration also ignores two key facts. The first is that this is only tangentially about immigration. Immigration enforcement is just the pretext for, and the mechanism to execute, an autocratic power grab to crush civil society and democratic constraints, as we're seeing now in Los Angeles. Democrats don't even have to tease out this argument; officials in the administration reportedly are talking about using the resources provided by the legislation to make an L.A.-style assault happen in every oppositional blue city, a prospect Trump apparatchik Stephen Miller is practically frothing at the mouth over. Second, Trump is not really that popular on immigration; he's been underwater for a while and dropping fast, with a Quinnipiac poll of registered voters this past week putting him at 54 percent disapproval on immigration and 56 percent disapproval on deportations specifically, basically matching his terrible numbers on the economy. The public pushback and the panic from businesses that rely on immigrant workers has gotten so acute that the administration reportedly is ordering agents to cool off on raids in the agriculture and hospitality industries. Trump's supposed political strength on immigration is proving to be a weakness, and his bumbling deployments in L.A., which seem to be further sinking his popularity, are the perfect opportunity for Democratic leaders to drive the point home, in the process striking not only at the Big Ugly Bill but at Trump's broader project to make himself look invincible. If they can associate the bill in Americans' minds with images of armed, masked men racially profiling a U.S. citizen who's minding his own business on the sidewalk and drawing their guns on a church pastor (after stuffing one of her parishioners into a black SUV), the bill is probably dead in the water.
Wall Street Journal
8 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump's Lawfare Against the Free Press
President Trump has taunted the media for years, and some of his jibes are deserved given the groupthink in most newsrooms. What's happening now, though, is different: The President is using government to intimidate news outlets that publish stories he doesn't like. It's a low move in a free country with a free press. On Tuesday Mr. Trump and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem suggested CNN might be prosecuted for publishing a report about an app called ICEBlock, which lets users flag locations where they've spotted operations by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
