
Adjuvant Nivolumab + CRT Improves DFS in HNSCC
This new therapeutic option 'improved high-risk locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck,' said study author Jean Bourhis, MD, PhD, during a press conference at American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2025.
Postoperative nivolumab added to standard-of-care adjuvant CRT 'could be proposed as a new standard treatment for the first time in two decades,' said Bourhis, MD, PhD, of Lausanne University Hospital in Lausanne, Switzerland, while reporting results of NIVOPOSTOP (GORTEC 2018-01) during the press conference.
Agreeing with Bourhis' characterization of the therapeutic regimen followed in the new trial, Stuart Wong, MD, said NIVOPOSTOP 'represents a potential new standard,' in his comments as discussant of the results at the meeting's Plenary Session.
As immunotherapy for head and neck cancers evolve, so must the approach to managing these patients, said Wong, who is director of the Center for Disease Prevention Research at the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee.
'In a world where neoadjuvant and adjuvant anti–PD-1 [programmed cell death 1] are options for patient care, a multidisciplinary tumor board discussion is optimal and should include individual patient and social factors, as well as consideration of individual tumor growth dynamic,' Wong said.
'The NIVOPOSTOP study presents a major turning point,' he added. 'However, we face many steep obstacles ahead of us, foremost among these the completion of ongoing studies.'
Study Design and Results
The study enrolled 680 patients aged 75 years or younger with HNSCC who had complete macroscopic surgical resection of stage III or IV cancer. Half the patients were either smokers or heavy smokers, and the most common tumor site was the oral cavity. About 80% of patients had either stage IVA or IVB disease.
After surgical resection, patients were randomized to one of the two regimens. The treatment group received one dose of 240 mg nivolumab, followed by a dose of 360 mg nivolumab every 3 weeks plus standard-of-care 100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks and 66 grays (Gy) of intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), followed by six doses of 480 mg nivolumab over 4 weeks. The control group received 100 mg/m2 cisplatin every 3 weeks and IMRT 66 Gy.
The rate of 3-year disease-free survival in the nivolumab plus CRT group was 63.1% vs 52.5% in the control group ( P = .034), representing a 24% improvement, Bourhis said.
The nivolumab plus CRT group also had a 37% reduced risk for cumulative incidence of locoregional relapses alone at 3 years, he added.
Compliance rates were similar between both groups. For example, RT compliance rates over 55 days were 95% for nivolumab plus CRT and 97% for CRT.
The proportion of patients experiencing more serious side effects in the 100 days following treatment was higher in the nivolumab plus CRT group than in the control group (13.1% vs 5.6%). The most common grade 4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia and lymphocytopenia. Most treatment-related adverse events were less serious grade 1 or 2 events and were related to chemoradiotherapy in both groups. The nivolumab group had 'a slight increase' in renal toxicity (24% vs 15%) and 'a more pronounced increase' in thyroid disorders (20% vs 2%), Bourhis said.
Evidence Is Growing
NIVOPOSTOP adds to a body of evidence supporting the use of adjuvant immunotherapy in difficult-to-treat disease, Glenn Hanna, MD, director of the Center for Cancer Therapeutic Innovation at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, said at the press conference. He cited results from the KEYNOTE-689 trial, reported in April at American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025, in which patients with HNSCC were given perioperative neoadjuvant pembrolizumab followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab.
'It brings us into a space where we were with kidney cancers and with melanoma, to say what is the right sequence of immunotherapy?' Hanna said. He noted that NIVOPOSTOP and KEYNOTE-689 both reported similar outcomes.
'So do you give the immunotherapy first, or do we wait and do it in the adjuvant setting?' he said. Based on Bourhis' research, 'they are comparable.'
He added, 'I think now immunotherapy will be here and present for our head and neck patients undergoing cancer resection.'
NIVOPOSTOP received support from Bristol Myers Squibb and GORTEC. Bourhis reported having financial relationships with AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Serono, and Merck Sharpe and Dohme.
Hanna reported having relationships with Actuate Therapeutics, Bicara Therapeutics, Boxer Capital, Bristol Myers Squibb, Coherus BioSciences, Elevar Therapeutics, Genentech, Greywolf Therapeutics, ImmunityBio, InhibRx, KSQ Therapeutics, Kura Oncology, Merck, Naveris, Nextech Invest, PDS Biotechnology, Regeneron, Remix Therapeutics, Replimune, Secura Bio, and Surface Oncology. Wong reported receiving research funding from Hookipa Pharma, Merck, and Novartis.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sensata Technologies Board Approves Q3 2025 Dividend of $0.12 per share
SWINDON, United Kingdom, July 17, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sensata Technologies (NYSE: ST) today announced that its Board of Directors approved a quarterly dividend in the amount of $0.12 per share. The Company will pay this third quarter 2025 dividend on August 27, 2025, to shareholders of record as of August 13, 2025. About Sensata Technologies Sensata Technologies is a global industrial technology company striving to create a safer, cleaner, more efficient and electrified world. Through its broad portfolio of mission-critical sensors, electrical protection components and sensor-rich solutions, Sensata helps its customers address increasingly complex engineering and operating performance requirements. With more than 18,000 employees and global operations in 14 countries, Sensata serves customers in the automotive, heavy vehicle & off-road, industrial, and aerospace markets. Learn more at and follow Sensata on LinkedIn, Facebook, X and Instagram. View source version on Contacts Media & Investor Contact:James Entwistle+1 (508) 954-1561jentwistle@ investors@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AM Best Assigns Credit Ratings to Unipol Assicurazioni S.p.A.
AMSTERDAM, July 17, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--AM Best has assigned a Financial Strength Rating of A (Excellent) and a Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating of "a" (Excellent) to Unipol Assicurazioni S.p.A. (Unipol) (Italy). The outlook assigned to these Credit Ratings (ratings) is stable. On 31 December 2024, Unipol incorporated UnipolSai Assicurazioni S.p.A., which was rated previously by AM Best as A- (Excellent) with a stable outlook. The ratings reflect Unipol's balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as its strong operating performance, neutral business profile and appropriate enterprise risk management. Unipol's balance sheet strength is underpinned by its strongest risk-adjusted capitalisation, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR). Furthermore, the company reported a solid Solvency II SCR ratio of 212% as of year-end 2024 (2023: 215%). Factors supporting the balance sheet strength assessment include the company's low reinsurance dependence, good internal capital generation and proven financial flexibility. A partially offsetting rating factor is the material, albeit reducing, concentration of Unipol's investment portfolio in Italian government bonds (30.3% of investments at year-end 2024), which exposes its risk-adjusted capitalisation to volatility. Furthermore, strategic investments in Italian banking affiliates add to overall asset risk. Unipol has a track record of strong and stable operating performance, driven by sound non-life and life segments. The company reported a net result of EUR 1.1 billion in 2024, which translates into a return on equity of 11.5% (as calculated by AM Best) (2023: 14.5%). Non-life technical performance in 2024 was underpinned by a combined ratio of 93.3% (as calculated by AM Best). Life business exhibits healthy margins between the average yield of segregated accounts and the minimum guarantee (2.45% at year-end 2024). Unipol is one of the largest players in the Italian non-life insurance market, with a particularly strong position in the motor segment. The company also benefits from a good competitive position in the local life market. Performance is supported by the company's access to data and sophisticated pricing capabilities, as well as its extensive use of telematics applied to the non-life segment. However, the concentration of its business portfolio in Italy exposes Unipol's operations to any potential adverse changes in the country's economic, political and regulatory environments. This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments. AM Best is a global credit rating agency, news publisher and data analytics provider specialising in the insurance industry. Headquartered in the United States, the company does business in over 100 countries with regional offices in London, Amsterdam, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore and Mexico City. For more information, visit Copyright © 2025 by A.M. Best Rating Services, Inc. and/or its affiliates. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. View source version on Contacts Andrea Porta Senior Financial Analyst +31 20 808 1700 Jose Berenguer Associate Director, Analytics +31 20 808 2276 Christopher Sharkey Associate Director, Public Relations +1 908 882 2310 Al Slavin Senior Public Relations Specialist +1 908 882 2318 Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Medscape
27 minutes ago
- Medscape
How Does Systemic Sclerosis Affect Pregnancy?
TOPLINE: Women with systemic sclerosis faced higher risks for adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia and preterm birth in a Swedish cohort study. METHODOLOGY: A population-based cohort study based on data from Swedish national health registers from 1987 to 2021 assessed pregnancy outcomes in women with and without systemic sclerosis (SSc). Pregnancies were classified as those occurring before or after SSc diagnosis, with further classification as those occurring 0-3 years before diagnosis or more than 3 years before diagnosis. A total of 972 pregnancies in women with SSc (94 occurring after and 878 before diagnosis) were identified and matched with 1440 and 10,118 comparator pregnancies in women without SSc from the general population. Outcome measures included adverse pregnancy outcomes such as preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, preterm birth, and cesarean delivery. TAKEAWAY: Postdiagnosis pregnancies showed increased risks for preeclampsia (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 3.8; 95% CI, 1.8-7.8), preterm birth (aRR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.8-6.1), and cesarean delivery (aRR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.5). Primiparous women with SSc had a 7.5-fold increased risk for preeclampsia and a 5.1-fold increased risk for preterm birth. Pregnancies within 0-3 years before SSc diagnosis showed increased odds of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.6; 95% CI, 1.2-10.6) and small-for-gestational-age births (10th percentile; aOR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.7-10.1). Pregnancies that occurred more than 3 years before SSc diagnosis showed increased odds of preeclampsia (aOR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.1) and preterm birth (aOR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.0-2.4). IN PRACTICE: "Our observations highlight the need for multidisciplinary maternal care and pre-pregnancy counseling also for today's women with SSc, with a special focus on primiparous women for [whom] the risks are the highest," the authors wrote. SOURCE: The study was led by Weng lan Che, PhD, Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden. It was published online on July 8, 2025, in Arthritis & Rheumatology. LIMITATIONS: This register-based study lacked information on disease activity, specific serologic patterns, and treatment. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by the Dr Margaretha Nilsson Foundation, the Swedish Research Council, and the Swedish Cancer Foundation. One author declared being a member of the medical advisory board of the Myositis Association, and another declared part-time employment at the Swedish Medical Products Agency. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.