Altered news report falsely claims victim of Duterte's drug crackdown 'still alive'
The clip also appears to show the same man -- who claimed to be her ex-boyfriend -- saying she lied that he was killed during Duterte's drug crackdown.
"You even told people that I was dead when I am just here working," he said in Visayan.
The Tagalog-language news chyron says: "Family members of drug war victims believe justice will be served".
The clip also shows text that reads, "Another victim that they claim to be dead but is still alive."
Duterte's supporters published dozens of online posts targeting the families of drug war victims, seeking to discredit their accounts of extrajudicial killings after the former president's arrest (archived link).
Sheerah Escudero, the woman in the video, said people on social media had accused her of being a liar and a drug addict, with some even sending personal messages telling her she deserved to be killed and beheaded.
Her brother Ephraim was found dead in 2017 at the height of the crackdown.
Escudero and other kin of drug war victims filed complaints with Philippine authorities on April 4, demanding an investigation into the threats.
The false video spread elsewhere on TikTok and Facebook.
Comments suggest some users believed the man in the false post was related to Escudero and was still alive.
"File charges on that person who misused your picture...you're not an addict but they made you appear one," one user said.
"They say 30,000 were victims of EJK (extrajudicial killings). And then they show a picture of someone who's still alive," another wrote.
Google keyword searches of the news chyron in the false video found it originated from a report aired by Philippine broadcaster News5 on March 15, 2025 (archived link).
It shows Escudero holding a different picture.
News5 said on its official Facebook page that the false video was edited from "a report aired on #FrontlineWeekend on March 15 about the loved ones of the victims of the drug war" (archived link).
It asked the public to be more critical of social media posts.
Subsequent keyword searches led to the same video in a Facebook post uploaded on the account of a digital creator named Jay Borge Mercado Ugay on March 17 (archived link).
A photo similar to the one in the altered video can be seen on his account (archived link).
Escudero took to social media on March 18 to dismiss the false video (archived link).
"When did you become my ex, Jay Borge Mercado Ugay?" she said. "Also, look at that face -- it looks nothing like Ephraim."
Duterte's arrest sparked a firestorm of online misinformation, many of which AFP has debunked.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
5 hours ago
- New York Times
Trump's A.I. Challenge: Focus on World's Most Dangerous Weapons or Woke-ism?
When the Biden administration created an 'A.I. Safety Institute' two years ago, its charge was to act as a kind of consumer safety commission for artificial intelligence, making sure that the app on your phone would not also make it easier for a terrorist to produce a chemical or biological weapon from easily-acquired ingredients. President Trump and his aides appear animated by a different threat: 'woke' A.I. They cite the embarrassing incident last year when Google's A.I. tool Gemini, asked to show a picture of America's founding fathers, portrayed a Black rendition of George Washington and some of his fellow revolutionaries. Google shut down the tool's image generator amid some mockery, but it became a rallying call for Mr. Trump's MAGA movement and led to demands from the White House that the country's A.I. giants cleanse their code so that answers are not infused with the language of diversity and inclusion or critical race theory. So when Mr. Trump issued three executive orders on Wednesday to spur what his administration calls 'A.I. dominance,' one of them addressed what his A.I. adviser told reporters was 'political bias,' though it is not clear who — human or bot — will make that judgment. 'The American people do not want woke Marxist lunacy in the A.I. models,' Mr. Trump said Wednesday at a summit on the subject. The weapons-of-mass-destruction concern, the administration has concluded, is well understood enough that it doesn't require similarly urgent presidential intervention. Few examples more vividly illustrate how the approach to managing perhaps the greatest technological shift in the world since the invention of the internal combustion engine or the airplane is being dealt with by a new administration. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNET
5 hours ago
- CNET
Trump's AI Action Plan Is Here: 5 Key Takeaways
The Trump administration on Wednesday laid out the steps it plans to take to ensure "global AI dominance" for the US, with an AI Action Plan that calls for cutting regulations to speed up the development of artificial intelligence tools and the infrastructure to power them. Critics said the plan is a handout to tech and fossil fuel companies, slashing rules that could protect consumers, prevent pollution and fight climate change. Though the plan itself isn't binding (it includes dozens of policy recommendations), Trump did sign three executive orders to put some of these steps into action. The changes and proposals follow how the Trump administration has approached AI and technology over the past six months -- giving tech companies a largely free hand; focusing on beating China; and prioritizing the construction of data centers, factories and fossil fuel power plants over environmental regulations. It's seizing on the moment created by the arrival of ChatGPT less than three years ago and the ensuing wave of generative AI efforts by Google, Meta and others. "My administration will use every tool at our disposal to ensure that the United States can build and maintain the largest and most powerful and advanced AI infrastructure anywhere on the planet," Trump said during remarks Wednesday evening at a summit presented by the Hill and Valley Forum and the All-In Podcast. He signed the three executive orders at the event. The administration and tech industry groups touted the plan as a framework for US success in a race against China. "President Trump's AI Action Plan presents a blueprint to usher in a new era of US AI dominance," Jason Oxman, president and CEO of the tech industry trade group ITI, said in a statement. Consumer groups said the plan focuses on deregulation and would hurt consumers by reducing the rules that could protect them. "Whether it's promoting the use of federal land for dirty data centers, giving the FTC orders to question past cases, or attempting to revive some version of the soundly defeated AI moratorium by tying federal funds to not having 'onerous regulation' according to the FCC, this is an unwelcome distraction at a critical time for government to get consumer protection right with increasing AI use and abuse," Ben Winters, director of AI and privacy at the Consumer Federation of America, said in a statement. Here's a look at the proposals in the plan. Slashing regulations for AI infrastructure The plan says AI growth will require infrastructure, including chip factories, data centers and more energy generation. And it blames environmental regulations for getting in the way. In response, it proposes exemptions for AI-related construction from certain environmental regulations, including those aimed at protecting clean water and air. It also suggests making federal lands available for data center construction and related power plants. To provide energy for all those data centers, the plan calls for steps to prevent the "premature decommissioning of critical power generation resources." This likely refers to keeping coal-fired power plants and other mostly fossil-fuel-driven infrastructure online for longer. In his remarks, Trump specifically touted his support for coal and nuclear power plants. The administration also called to prioritize the connection of new "reliable, dispatchable power sources" to the grid and specifically named nuclear fission and fusion and advanced geothermal generation. Earlier this month, the president signed a bill that would end many tax credits and incentives for renewable energy -- wind and solar -- years earlier than planned. Wind and solar make up the bulk of the new energy generation being added to the US grid right now. "This US AI Action Plan doesn't just open the door for Big Tech and Big Oil to team up, it unhinges and removes any and all doors -- it opens the floodgates, continuing to kneecap our communities' rights to protect ourselves," KD Chavez, executive director of the Climate Justice Alliance, said in a statement. "With tech and oil's track records on human rights and their role in the climate crisis, and what they are already doing now to force AI dominance, we need more corporate and environmental oversight, not less." Fewer rules around AI technology Congress ended up not including a moratorium on state AI rules in the recently passed tax and spending bill but efforts to cut regulations around AI continue from the executive branch in the action plan. "AI is far too important to smother in bureaucracy at this early stage, whether at the state or Federal level," the plan says. The plan recommends that several federal agencies review whether existing or proposed rules would interfere with the development and deployment of AI. The feds would consider whether states' regulatory climate is favorable for AI when deciding to award funding. Federal Trade Commission investigations and orders would be reviewed to determine that they don't "advance theories of liability that unduly burden AI innovation." Those rule changes could undermine efforts to protect consumers from problems caused by AI, critics said. "Companies -- including AI companies -- have a legal obligation to protect their products from being used for harm," Justin Brookman, director of tech policy at Consumer Reports, said in a statement. "When a company makes design choices that increase the risk their product will be used for harm, or when the risks are particularly serious, companies should bear legal responsibility." Ideology and large language models The plan proposes some steps around ensuring AI "protects free speech and American values," further steps in the Trump administration's efforts to roll back federal policies around what it refers to as "diversity, equity and inclusion," along with references to the problems of misinformation and climate change. It calls for eliminating references to those items in the National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework. Federal agencies would only be allowed to contract with AI developers who "ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias." The Trump administration has recently announced contracts of up to $200 million each to developers Anthropic, Google, OpenAI and xAI. Grok, the model from Elon Musk's xAI, has recently come under fire for spouting antisemitism and hate speech. Dealing with workforce challenges The plan acknowledges that AI will "transform how work gets done across all industries and occupations, demanding a serious workforce response to help workers navigate that transition" and recommends actions by federal agencies including the Department of Labor intended to mitigate the harms of AI-driven job displacement. The plan calls for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census Bureau and Bureau of Economic Analysis to monitor how AI affects the labor market using data already collected. An AI Workforce Research Hub under the Department of Labor would lead monitoring and issue policy recommendations. Most of the actual plans to help workers displaced by AI involve retraining those workers for other jobs or to help states do the same. Other jobs-related recommendations are aimed at boosting the kinds of jobs needed for all those data centers and chip manufacturing plants -- like electricians and HVAC technicians. These plans and others to encourage AI literacy and AI use in education drew praise from the Software & Information Industry Association, a tech industry trade group. "These are key components for building trust and ensuring all communities can participate in and benefit from AI's potential," Paul Lekas, SIIA's senior vice president of global public policy, said in a statement. More AI in government The plan envisions more use of AI by the federal government. A talent exchange program would allow employees with experience or talent in AI to be detailed to other agencies in need. The General Services Administration would create a toolbox of AI models that would help agencies see models to choose from and use cases in other parts of the government. Every government agency would also be required to ensure employees who could use AI in their jobs have access to and training for AI tools. Many recommendations focus specifically on the Department of Defense, including creating a virtual proving ground for AI and autonomous systems. AI companies have already been signing contracts with the DOD to develop AI tools for the military.
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Trump administration plans to give AI developers a free hand
Advertisement The report signals that the Trump administration has embraced AI and the tech industry's arguments that it must be allowed to work with few guardrails for the United States to dominate a new era defined by the technology. It is a forceful repudiation of other governments, including the European Commission, that have approved regulations to govern the development of the technology. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up But it also points to how the administration wants to shape the way AI tools present information. Conservatives have accused some tech companies of developing AI models with a baked-in liberal bias. Most AI models are already trained on copious amounts of data from across the web, which informs their responses, making any shift in focus difficult. On Wednesday afternoon, Trump delivered his first major speech on AI, a technology that experts have said could upend communications, geopolitics and the economy in the coming years. The president also signed executive orders related to the technology. Advertisement 'We believe we're in an AI race,' David Sacks, the White House AI and crypto czar, said on a call with reporters. 'And we want the United States to win that race.' The changes outlined Wednesday would benefit tech giants locked in a fierce contest to produce generative AI products and persuade consumers to weave the tools into their daily lives. Since OpenAI's public release of ChatGPT in late 2022, tech companies have raced to produce their own versions of the technology, which can write humanlike texts and produce realistic images and videos. Google, Microsoft, Meta, OpenAI, and others are jockeying for access to computing power, typically from huge data centers filled with computers that can stress local communities' resources. And the companies are facing increased competition from rivals such as Chinese startup DeepSeek, which sent shock waves around the world this year after it created a powerful AI model with far less money than many thought possible. The fight over resources in Silicon Valley has run alongside an equally charged debate in Washington over how to confront the societal transformations that AI could bring. Critics worry that if left unchecked, the technology could be a potent tool for scammers and extremists and lay waste to the economy as more jobs are automated. News outlets and artists have sued AI companies over claims that they illegally trained their technology using copyrighted works and articles. Trump previously warned of China's potential to outpace American progress on the technology. He has said that the federal government must support AI companies with tax incentives, more foreign investment and less focus on safety regulations that could hamper progress. Advertisement President Biden took one major action on artificial intelligence: a 2023 executive order that mandated safety and security standards for the development and use of AI across the federal government. But hours after his inauguration in January, Trump rolled back that order. Days later, he signed another executive order, 'Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence,' which called for an acceleration of AI development by US tech companies and for versions of the technology that operated without ideological bias. The order included a mandate for administration officials to come up with 'an artificial intelligence action plan,' with policy guidelines to encourage the growth of the AI industry. The administration solicited comments from companies while it considered its plan. OpenAI called for the administration to expand its list of countries eligible to import AI technologies from the United States, a list that has been limited by controls designed to stop China from gaining access to American technology. OpenAI and Google called for greater support in building AI data centers through tax breaks and fewer barriers for foreign investment. OpenAI, Google, and Meta also said they believed they had legal access to copyrighted works like books, films and art for training their AI. Meta asked the White House to issue an executive order or other action to 'clarify that the use of publicly available data to train models is unequivocally fair use.' The plan released Wednesday did not include mentions of copyright law. But it did outline a wide range of policy shifts, divided into moves that the administration said would speed up the development of AI, make it easier to build and power data centers and promote the interests of American companies abroad. Advertisement This article originally appeared in
