logo
Trump's crypto mania poses a risk for our super

Trump's crypto mania poses a risk for our super

The Age10 hours ago
This distinct lack of guardrails, and the well-known volatility of crypto – data shows that over the past decade the cryptocurrency market has been almost five times as volatile as the US sharemarket – is one thing when it's young investors who are eager to take high risk for possible high reward. But it's another when people's retirements are involved.
One of the most likely reasons for this loosening of regulations (gold and private investments are also set to be added to what US funds can invest in) is that the industry is under increasing pressure globally to find new investment options and maximise returns because of our ageing population. The pension system in the UK, for example, is expected to reach a crisis point within the next two decades, with many people predicted to retire with less than they may have expected.
Loading
You can see, then, why cryptocurrency suddenly looks promising. But here is where another likely reason for this shift also arises and, depending on your politics, is either a problem so glaring it might as well be an entire herd of elephants in the room, or is simply shrewd business ingenuity.
The US government is currently led by a man who, along with his family, has a bitcoin mining farm and reserve. They have launched their own crypto coins, stablecoin and crypto trading app. It's estimated that $US2.9 billion ($4.5 billion) of the Trump family's wealth – roughly 40 per cent – is tied to their digital investments. And on Wednesday, the White House launched a 160-page document outlining how the government will bring to life the president's promise to bolster digital assets. Trump isn't just pro-crypto, he's driving the pro-crypto bus.
Again, investing and being hungry for risk is one thing. But when the money being invested is retirement funds, it's a different ball game. Considering cryptocurrencies are still such a new asset class, there's no long-term performance data to assess their suitability for super investments. But already, there is a cautionary tale to look to.
In 2022, a Canadian pension plan for teachers that invested in crypto lost $147 million in invested funds following the collapse of digital currency exchange FTX. While retirement funds are worth billions and $147 million might not sound like all that much in the grand scheme of things, try telling that to the hardworking teacher who was a year away from retirement and suddenly faced working longer due to bad investments.
Currently in Australia, the only way to invest in crypto using superannuation is through a self-managed fund. But two things are worth noting here. The first is that there are more than 600,000 self-managed funds, and that with more than $750 billion in assets, they represent roughly a third of our national super sector.
The second is that in February, soon after Trump's return to the White House, Australia's industry leaders and Treasurer Jim Chalmers travelled to the US for a 'super summit', in an attempt to try to win over American financial executives and the US government.
Loading
Currently, about $US400 billion of our super is invested in US assets, which translates to roughly 14 per cent of all Australian investments. However, that's expected to grow to more than $US1 trillion over the next decade.
Whether these assets will one day include crypto remains to be seen. But the fact that American funds – which have the biggest pool of money in the world – now can more freely look to crypto than ever before, and that Australia is so hungry to remain economically close to the US, is something that should make us sit up and pay attention.
Victoria Devine is an award-winning retired financial adviser, bestselling author and host of Australia's No.1 finance podcast, She's on the Money. She is also founder and director of Zella Money.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Smithsonian removes Trump impeachment references
Smithsonian removes Trump impeachment references

The Advertiser

time25 minutes ago

  • The Advertiser

Smithsonian removes Trump impeachment references

The White House says it didn't pressure the Smithsonian to remove references to President Donald Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit and will include him in an updated presentation "in the coming weeks". The revelation that Trump was no longer listed among impeached presidents sparked concern that history was being whitewashed to appease the president. "We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit," the Smithsonian statement said on Saturday. A museum spokesperson, Phillip Zimmerman, had previously pledged that "a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments" but it was not clear when the new exhibit would be installed. The museum did not say when in the coming weeks the new exhibit will be ready. A label referring to Trump's impeachments had been added in 2021 to the National Museum for American History's exhibit on the American presidency, in a section called "Limits of Presidential Power". The section includes materials on the impeachment of Presidents Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson and the Watergate scandal that helped lead to President Richard Nixon's resignation. "The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation," the statement said. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." Trump is the only president to have been impeached twice - in 2019, for pushing Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Joe Biden, who would later defeat Trump in the 2020 presidential election; and in 2021 for "incitement of insurrection", a reference to the January 6 siege of the US Capitol by Trump supporters attempting to halt congressional certification of Biden's victory. The Democratic majority in the House voted each time for impeachment. The Republican-led Senate each time acquitted Trump. The White House says it didn't pressure the Smithsonian to remove references to President Donald Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit and will include him in an updated presentation "in the coming weeks". The revelation that Trump was no longer listed among impeached presidents sparked concern that history was being whitewashed to appease the president. "We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit," the Smithsonian statement said on Saturday. A museum spokesperson, Phillip Zimmerman, had previously pledged that "a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments" but it was not clear when the new exhibit would be installed. The museum did not say when in the coming weeks the new exhibit will be ready. A label referring to Trump's impeachments had been added in 2021 to the National Museum for American History's exhibit on the American presidency, in a section called "Limits of Presidential Power". The section includes materials on the impeachment of Presidents Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson and the Watergate scandal that helped lead to President Richard Nixon's resignation. "The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation," the statement said. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." Trump is the only president to have been impeached twice - in 2019, for pushing Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Joe Biden, who would later defeat Trump in the 2020 presidential election; and in 2021 for "incitement of insurrection", a reference to the January 6 siege of the US Capitol by Trump supporters attempting to halt congressional certification of Biden's victory. The Democratic majority in the House voted each time for impeachment. The Republican-led Senate each time acquitted Trump. The White House says it didn't pressure the Smithsonian to remove references to President Donald Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit and will include him in an updated presentation "in the coming weeks". The revelation that Trump was no longer listed among impeached presidents sparked concern that history was being whitewashed to appease the president. "We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit," the Smithsonian statement said on Saturday. A museum spokesperson, Phillip Zimmerman, had previously pledged that "a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments" but it was not clear when the new exhibit would be installed. The museum did not say when in the coming weeks the new exhibit will be ready. A label referring to Trump's impeachments had been added in 2021 to the National Museum for American History's exhibit on the American presidency, in a section called "Limits of Presidential Power". The section includes materials on the impeachment of Presidents Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson and the Watergate scandal that helped lead to President Richard Nixon's resignation. "The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation," the statement said. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." Trump is the only president to have been impeached twice - in 2019, for pushing Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Joe Biden, who would later defeat Trump in the 2020 presidential election; and in 2021 for "incitement of insurrection", a reference to the January 6 siege of the US Capitol by Trump supporters attempting to halt congressional certification of Biden's victory. The Democratic majority in the House voted each time for impeachment. The Republican-led Senate each time acquitted Trump. The White House says it didn't pressure the Smithsonian to remove references to President Donald Trump's two impeachments from an exhibit and will include him in an updated presentation "in the coming weeks". The revelation that Trump was no longer listed among impeached presidents sparked concern that history was being whitewashed to appease the president. "We were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit," the Smithsonian statement said on Saturday. A museum spokesperson, Phillip Zimmerman, had previously pledged that "a future and updated exhibit will include all impeachments" but it was not clear when the new exhibit would be installed. The museum did not say when in the coming weeks the new exhibit will be ready. A label referring to Trump's impeachments had been added in 2021 to the National Museum for American History's exhibit on the American presidency, in a section called "Limits of Presidential Power". The section includes materials on the impeachment of Presidents Bill Clinton and Andrew Johnson and the Watergate scandal that helped lead to President Richard Nixon's resignation. "The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a twenty-five year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation," the statement said. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." Trump is the only president to have been impeached twice - in 2019, for pushing Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to investigate Joe Biden, who would later defeat Trump in the 2020 presidential election; and in 2021 for "incitement of insurrection", a reference to the January 6 siege of the US Capitol by Trump supporters attempting to halt congressional certification of Biden's victory. The Democratic majority in the House voted each time for impeachment. The Republican-led Senate each time acquitted Trump.

PM weighs up Palestinian statehood call
PM weighs up Palestinian statehood call

Perth Now

time40 minutes ago

  • Perth Now

PM weighs up Palestinian statehood call

Anthony Albanese is seeking a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the government weighs up whether it will join international allies to recognise Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly. The Prime Minister is yet to confirm the move, despite the UK, France, and Canada all indicating they will make such a call. Mr Albanese has sought a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – something praised by Senior Coalition frontbencher Dan Tehan, who says current Australian-Israel relations have 'clearly been lacking' since the October 7 attacks in relation to communications at a 'prime ministerial level and a senior ministerial level'. 'Any dialogue which will enable both governments to put their case, and my hope is that the Prime Minister will be open to listening to Benjamin Netanyahu, so that he can get an Israeli view of what is happening on the ground and what they're trying to do to bring peace to Gaza,' he told Sky. Anthony Albanese has requested a call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. X Credit: Supplied Earlier, Sussan Ley told the ABC that the Coalition would only support the formal recognition of Palestinian statehood once 'peace' had been achieved, meaning Hamas would need to surrender and release the hostages. 'Everyone wants to see this war end … Everyone wants to say the bloodshed stop. Everyone wants to see critical food aid get to Gazans who desperately need it, and I'm pleased to see that that's happening,' she said. 'But this is critical – the war could end tomorrow if Hamas surrenders and releases the hostages.' The Prime Minister's potential call with Mr Netanyahu comes as Mr Albanese faces growing international pressure to recognising Palestinian statehood, with the UK and Canada joining France this week. This follows global condemnation of Israel for the starvation and the withholding of aid from Gazan civilians, something Mr Netanyahu has rejected and labelled a 'bold-faced lie'. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who Mr Albanese has been in contact with since the announcement, said the UK would support the motion unless Israel 'takes substantive steps to ed the appalling situation in Gaza and agrees to a ceasefire'. Canadian Prime Minister while Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said his position was incumbent on While Australia supports a two-state solution, acknowledging Palestine's statehood could not be 'just a gesture,' but done to forward the peaceful existence of Israel and Palestine. Mr Albanese has said the formal recognition of statehood cannot be 'just a gesture'. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia Speaking to the ABC on Thursday, he said Australia would only be able to make that statement 'once,' adding that 'once you make that declaration, you lose your capacity to negotiate and to influence outcomes to some extent'. 'We won't be driven by a time frame. What we'll be driven by is when the recognition of Palestine can make a contribution to the creation of two states,' he said. 'We think that arising out of what is a crisis, the world needs to look at the opportunity that there is not just to solve the current crisis, but how do we create security for both the state of Israel and the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinians for their own state to be realised.'

ACTU boss Sally McManus calls for five-year plan to limit negative gearing, CGT concessions to one investment property
ACTU boss Sally McManus calls for five-year plan to limit negative gearing, CGT concessions to one investment property

The Australian

time3 hours ago

  • The Australian

ACTU boss Sally McManus calls for five-year plan to limit negative gearing, CGT concessions to one investment property

Union boss Sally McManus has urged Labor to 'bite the bullet' and slash tax benefits for Australians with invest properties through a five-year plan which would only allow people to access the tax incentives on one home. Speaking to the ABC, the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) secretary said the changes were needed to tackle intergenerational inequity and calm soaring house prices which have locked young people out of the market. Under the ACTU's proposal, which will be debated at the Jim Chalmers' Economic Reform Roundtable in August, both negative gearing and capital gains tax concessions would be limited to one investment property. Current conditions would be grandfathered for the next five years for existing homes 'to allow people to adjust'. The move would also annually add about $1.5bn to the budget, or $6bn over the forward estimates. 'One of the biggest issues in terms of living standards for younger people in Australia is the issue of housing affordability. It's the number one issue. We need to address it,' Ms McManus said on Sunday. ACTU secretary Sally McManus urged Labor to 'bite the bullet' and enact the changes. Picture: NewsWire/ Ian Currie 'Young people should have the same aspirations as the generations before them, and at the moment, then don't. It's been wiped out by the fact that the housing prices have gone up twice the rate of wages over the last 25 years.' She said the provisions would target the 'small number of investors' who own '25 per cent of investment properties'. Ms McManus quoted a study from the NSW Productivity Commission in 2024, which found the state was losing about 7000 people aged between 30 to 40 years old a year - something that could result in Sydney being a city with no grandchildren. 'That has been driving or fuelling the housing prices. I don't think that we ever intended even for this to happen as a result of these tax measures but this is where we're at,' she said. 'Unless we change it, unless we change it, working people can't live where they work. They can't live where they grew up.' Asked whether Labor had the political will to enact the changes, she urged Labor to 'bite bullet' and be 'brave enough to do something about it'. It not, they would be at risk of 'abandoning' the younger generations,' she added. 'We're going to go and argue it. We're going to advocate for it. In the end, the Government will make their decisions based on what they think is the national interest. We would say that it is in the national interest,' she said. Previously, Labor has unsuccessfully taken changes to negative gearing and capital gains concessions to the 2016 and 2019 federal elections under former opposition leader Bill Shorten, before Anthony Albanese ended the policies. However the government has faced pressure from grassroots advocacy group Labor for Housing to reconsider the concessions. Jessica Wang NewsWire Federal Politics Reporter Jessica Wang is a federal politics reporter for NewsWire based in the Canberra Press Gallery. She previously covered NSW state politics for the Wire and has also worked at and Mamamia covering breaking news, entertainment, and lifestyle. @imjesswang_ Jessica Wang

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store