logo
Walker & Dunlop Closes $240 Million LIHTC Investment Fund for Affordable Housing Across Ten States

Walker & Dunlop Closes $240 Million LIHTC Investment Fund for Affordable Housing Across Ten States

Yahoo01-07-2025
BETHESDA, Md., July 01, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Walker & Dunlop, Inc. announced today the successful closing of Fund 124, a $240 million Multi-Investor Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) Investment Fund aimed at advancing affordable housing solutions in fifteen key markets across the United States.
The largest Walker & Dunlop LIHTC fund to-date, Fund 124 will support the development of 18 properties in ten states: California, Texas, Maryland, Utah, Missouri, Michigan, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, and Kansas totaling 1,701 affordable housing units. This fund will provide critically needed housing while also creating significant local economic impact. The Walker & Dunlop Affordable Equity team, led by Dudley Benoit, Peter Antonopoulos, Elizabeth Ronayne, Caitlin Crowe, Bob Rice, Edward Jenkins, Emily Moraga, and Marcus Law, arranged the fund.
Key Highlights of Fund 124:
Geographic Reach: The fund supports 18 properties across ten states, strategically targeting markets in need of affordable housing.
Developer Expertise: 62% of the fund's developer partners are repeat clients of Walker & Dunlop, underscoring the company's strong relationships with experienced and trusted developers.
Debt and Equity Structure: The fund maintains a weighted average hard debt leverage ratio of 32% (as a percentage of hard debt to total development cost), ensuring a balanced capital structure that supports long-term stability.
Section 8 Subsidization: 44% of the units in the fund's properties will be subsidized with project-based Section 8 contracts, ensuring long-term affordability for residents.
Job Creation & Economic Impact: The development of these properties will create approximately 4,542 jobs and generate an estimated $898 million in economic impact, strengthening local economies and communities.
Resident Services & Support: The fund provides essential services such as case management, after-school programs, financial literacy courses, meal programs, and community-based activities to enhance resident well-being.
Inclusive Housing Priorities: Set asides are designated for seniors (55+), low-income individuals, and those requiring subsidized housing, with dedicated equity supporting formerly homeless residents and individuals with special needs.
"Fund 124 represents an exciting milestone that will create meaningful and lasting change in communities across the U.S," said Benoit, senior managing director of Affordable Equity Investor Relations at Walker & Dunlop. "The fund's focus on affordable housing, along with our long-standing partnerships with experienced developers, underscores our dedication to providing safe, high-quality housing to those who need it most."
Its predecessor, Fund 119, closed last year with $167 million in commitments. The vehicle backed 19 communities encompassing 1,044 units throughout 12 states.
Walker & Dunlop, the #2 multifamily finance lender in the US, has a long-standing commitment to affordable housing and continues to invest in its affordable platform to provide clients with unparalleled solutions for all of their needs. The team originated over $6.3 billion in affordable and workforce financing from 2021-2024 through HUD, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and capital markets sources. To date, the platform has raised over $10 billion in LIHTC equity and sold more than 275 affordable properties across 40 states. To learn more about the team's capabilities and financing options, visit our website.
About Walker & Dunlop
Walker & Dunlop (NYSE: WD) is one of the largest commercial real estate finance and advisory services firms in the United States and internationally. Our ideas and capital create communities where people live, work, shop, and play. Our innovative people, breadth of our brand, and our technological capabilities make us one of the most insightful and client-focused firms in the commercial real estate industry.
View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250701105849/en/
Contacts
Investors:Kelsey DuffeyInvestor RelationsPhone 301.202.3207investorrelations@walkeranddunlop.com
Media:Nina H. von WaldeggVP, Public RelationsPhone 301.564.3291nhvwaldegg@walkerdunlop.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion: How the Trump tax cut law will hurt the working class
Opinion: How the Trump tax cut law will hurt the working class

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: How the Trump tax cut law will hurt the working class

Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska said it was 'agonizing' to vote for the tax cut bill President Trump signed on July 4. As details of the legislation come into focus, it's obvious why it might cause heartburn even for Republicans who passed it, with no Democratic votes. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, as the law is clumsily known, will literally make the rich better off and the poor worse off. Some conservatives who want to pare the 'welfare state' may not care. But imposing austerity on millions of working-class voters is a stunning political risk for a party that is supposedly following President Trump's populist instincts. The law has two main elements. The first is a sweeping series of tax cuts and tax cut extensions that will generally benefit everybody but add trillions of dollars to the national debt. The second is a set of benefit cuts that are meant to reduce the overall cost of the bill. Those will hit working-class Americans and make the net effect of the bill punishing to them. The biggest part of the OBBBA is an extension of the tax cuts Trump signed into law in 2017. Those were due to expire at the end of this year. The OBBBA makes the current individual income tax rates permanent. Those are not 'tax cuts' per se, since tax rates will be the same in future years as they are in 2025. But the law does prevent what would have been a de facto tax hike if the 2017 rates expired and the higher 2016 rates went back into effect. The law also includes some new tax breaks, such as the elimination of tax on income from tips and overtime pay, up to certain limits. There's also a new tax break for some seniors and a much higher cap for deducting state and local taxes, which will mostly benefit wealthy homeowners who itemize deductions on their tax returns. The tax provisions generally benefit everybody, but the wealthy will gain the most. The average savings for all taxpayers will be about $2,900, compared with what the tax bill would have been if current rates expired, according to the Tax Policy Center. Those with incomes above $1 million would save nearly $60,000 on average. But the savings for workers with incomes below $30,000 would be less than $200 per year. Those provisions, at least, do no harm to most taxpayers. But the harm arrives when factoring in cuts to Medicaid, subsidies for people to buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act, and food aid known as SNAP. The healthcare cutbacks will leave an additional 16 million people without coverage by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Cutbacks to the SNAP program could reduce or eliminate food aid going to 22 million families, according to the Urban Institute. Those changes will leave millions of Americans worse off. When accounting for the tax changes and benefit cuts combined, people in the lowest income quintile, with incomes below $13,500, will lose an average of $600 per year, according to the Yale Budget Lab. The next quintile will lose $65 per year. The healthcare and food aid cuts will have little impact on top earners, for obvious reasons. The top quintile will gain $6,500 in after-tax savings from all of the law's provisions, while the top 1% will net more than $30,000. This is what economists call a 'regressive' policy change because the economic burden falls more heavily on those with lower incomes. 'The bill has four overriding characteristics,' Howard Gleckman of the Tax Policy Center wrote recently. 'It is regressive, expensive, complicated, and it treats people who make roughly the same amount of money in very different ways.'Tax cut defenders often point out that the wealthy typically get the biggest tax cuts because they pay the most taxes in the first place. That's generally true. But the wealthy are a distinct minority, which means a regressive law such as the OBBBA dis-serves millions of voters, and possibly a majority of them. The bottom two income quintiles, for instance, include roughly 92 million taxpaying units, whether singles, married couples, or other designations. There are only 26 million taxpaying units in the top quintile. Maybe that's what Murkowski found so agonizing. 'Do I like this bill? No,' she told a reporter on July 2. 'I know in many parts of the country there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill.' Trump can point to working-class provisions such as the elimination of taxes on tip income and overtime pay, with limitations based on the type of work and the amount of income. Some workers will in fact benefit from those carve-outs. But tax analysts argue that favoring certain types of work in that manner violates the principle of 'horizontal equity,' the idea that similar incomes should be taxed in similar ways. To use the example of a restaurant, a waiter earning tip income would get a tax break that a cook paid hourly would not. That distorts the tax code, creates incentives to cheat, and generates legitimate grievances among the unlucky workers not gifted a tax break. The OBBBA is already unpopular, with 64% of Americans disapproving and just 35% approving, in one poll. The real vote will come in the 2026 midterm elections, when Americans will express whether they feel better off or worse off under unified Republican control of government. Getting Americans to like this law might be a more agonizing ideal than passing it. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.

Elon Musk's xAI apologizes for Grok chatbot's antisemitic responses
Elon Musk's xAI apologizes for Grok chatbot's antisemitic responses

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's xAI apologizes for Grok chatbot's antisemitic responses

Elon Musk's Grok AI chatbot feature issued an apology after it made several antisemitic posts on the social media site X this week. In a statement posted to X on July 12, xAI, the artificial intelligence company that makes the chatbot program, apologized for "horrific behavior" on the platform. Users reported receiving responses that praised Hitler, used antisemitic phrases and attacked users with traditionally Jewish surnames. More: Grok coming to Tesla vehicles 'next week at the latest,' Musk says "We deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many experienced," the company's statement said. "Our intent for @grok is to provide helpful and truthful responses to users. After careful investigation, we discovered the root cause was an update to a code path upstream of the @grok bot." The company, founded by Musk in 2023 as a challenger to Microsoft-backed OpenAI and Alphabet's Google, said the update to the program resulted in a deviation in the AI chatbot's behavior. It was operational for 16 hours before it was removed as a result of the reported extremist language. Users on X shared multiple posts July 8 in which Grok repeated antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish people, among various other antisemitic comments. It's not the first time xAI's chatbot has raised alarm for its responses. In May, the chatbot mentioned "white genocide" in South Africa in unrelated conversations. At the time, xAI said the incident was the result of an 'unauthorized modification' to its online code. A day after the alarming posts last week, Musk unveiled a new version of the chatbot, Grok 4, on July 9. The Tesla billionaire and former adviser to President Donald Trump, said in June he would retrain the AI platform after expressing frustration with the way Grok answered questions. Musk said the tweaks his xAI company had made to Grok made the chatbot too susceptible to being manipulated by users' questions. AI News: MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell's lawyers fined for AI-generated court filing More: 'MechaHitler': Elon Musk AI firm scrubs chatbot Grok's antisemitic rants 'Grok was too compliant to user prompts,' Musk wrote in a post on X after announcing the new version. 'Too eager to please and be manipulated, essentially. That is being addressed.' Grok 3, which was released in February, is available for free, while the new versions Grok 4 and Grok 4 Heavy, go for $30 and $300 a month, respectively. Contributing: Jessica Guynn, USA TODAY. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Musk's xAI apologizes for Grok chatbot's antisemitic responses

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store