logo
Palestinian ambassador wants concrete EU measures on Gaza before summer break

Palestinian ambassador wants concrete EU measures on Gaza before summer break

The National13 hours ago
Foreign ministers from the European Union's 27 countries must take concrete steps to pressure Israel to end its war on Gaza, including a suspension of weapons exports or academic research relations, a senior Palestinian diplomat has told The National.
"It's not only about what is happening to the Palestinians and the genocide that Palestinians have to endure, but about the EU actually respecting its own commitments," said Palestine's ambassador to the bloc, Amal Jadou.
The EU should not restrict itself to a financial role, but to a more active political role
Amal Jadou,
Palestine's ambassador to the EU
"If it really is satisfactory for leaders to go home and enjoy vacations while a nation is being killed and massacred, I think that we have a real issue with our humanity."
Gaza will be high on the agenda at Tuesday's gathering in Brussels, the last formal meeting before a summer break. Nearly a week has passed since the EU's foreign affairs chief, Kaja Kallas, struck a deal with Israel to allow more aid into the embattled enclave.
The deal came after her services circulated on June 20 an eight-page document that found that Israel had breached its human rights obligations in Gaza, following a request for a review of relations with Israel by a majority of EU countries. They had expressed concern over Israel's months-long aid blockade and breach of a ceasefire agreed with Hamas in March.
New deal concerns
A few days later, Ms Kallas then launched discussions with Israel was to allow more aid into Gaza, adding that that if that was achieved, no action would be taken against Israel. The agreement struck last week laid out Israeli promises of a "substantial increase" in aid lorries delivering food and other supplies, in addition to opening more border crossing points.
This was supposed to have been introduced "within days" but has yet to materialise. More than 30 Gazans were killed by Israel on Sunday as they were collecting aid, bringing the total number of dead in Gaza to nearly 58,400. Ms Kallas' team have insisted the deal remains relevant, describing it to news website Politico as a "vital step forward."
Yet the lack of a clear timetable is a worrying signal, Ms Jadou said. "We welcome any agreement that allows the basic needs of Gazans to be met," she said. "But it really depends on Israel abiding by this agreement and we have seen it break many agreements in the past."
There can be no role for the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, she added, and the UN must be reinstated as the main aid distributor.
The agreement announced by Ms Kallas made no reference to the GHF, despite most EU members voicing their displeasure at the UN being sidelined and the high death rate associated with the GHF's distribution activities.
Nearly 800 people have been killed by the Israeli army in the vicinity of distribution hubs or on the route of aid convoys since late May, the UN says - a figure rejected by the GHF and Israel. Israel also rejects the use of the word "genocide", increasingly used by human rights organisations and countries such as Ireland.
Ministers at dinner
Tuesday's meeting is to be preceded by a dinner involving EU foreign ministers and their counterparts from Palestine and Israel as part of an EU-Southern neighbourhood ministerial meeting. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar and his Palestinian counterpart Varsen Aghabekian Shahin will be in the same room but will not speak.
Issues that Ms Shahin will raise include an ongoing review of relations between the EU and Israel, and the need to implement an embargo on weapons sales to Israel, Ms Jadou said. "She's here to bring all these issues from the ground to the table of foreign ministers," she added.
This is the first meeting between the EU and the 10 partner countries region in a new format aimed at revitalising relations that will be announced by Commissioner for the Mediterranean Dubravka Suica in October. Gulf countries will be invited to join the so-called New Pact.
The EU's inertia on Gaza is fuelled by its own divisions, with a number of nations, including Germany, refusing to appear critical of Israel because of the country's historic role in the Second World War.
This has led some countries to make decisions at national level, such as Ireland's recent move towards complying with an advisory opinion by the International Court of Justice to stop trading with occupied territories.
Last month, nine countries, led by Belgium, asked the European Commission to analyse the impact of the year-old ICJ's decision on the common market. In a letter to Ms Kallas, they pointed out that there had been no follow-up after a statement by the EU Commission issued in January saying it would do so.
"This discrepancy, in my opinion, will impact the way the international community perceives the EU and its standing, especially in its geopolitical relations with the [Global] South," Ms Jadou said. "We see that when there are other conflicts in Europe, the EU takes a very strong stance. But when the conflict is outside Europe, then the EU hesitates to take strong steps."
At the same time, the EU is the biggest financial contributor to the Palestinian Authority, with a €1.6 billion ($1.75 billion) package announced in April. It views the organisation as the only viable option to replace Hamas rule in Gaza though it has called for governing reforms.
"We're grateful to the EU for taking such a step," Ms Jadou said. "I also think that the EU should not restrict itself to a financial role but to a more active political role in line with international law, and with its values and principles."
Yet another issue that will be raised by Ms Shahin in Brussels will be the blockage of taxes collected by Israel on behalf of the PA by Israel's far-right Finance minister Bezalel Smotrich.
Ms Jadou added that she hoped more European countries would recognise Palestinian statehood, as France and Saudi Arabia prepare to co-chair a UN conference on the two-state solution. So far, 11 EU countries have recognised Palestine.
European diplomats welcomed last week's deal and said that while they would look closely at its implementation by Israel, it was unlikely that any further decisions would be made on Tuesday. Ms Kallas had also circulated a paper outlining 10 possible retaliatory options to Israel's human rights breaches.
They included a full suspension of relations, which necessitates an unlikely consensus from the EU's 27 countries. Decisions based on a qualified majority vote, such as suspending preferential trade relations, Israel's participation in the Erasmus+ student exchange or Horizon academic research programmes, were also listed.
Ms Jadou said that while she backed a full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, she understood this was impossible because it would be vetoed by a number of member states. But other options outlined in Ms Kallas option paper should remain on the table. "Why should the EU be complicit in the crimes that Israel is committing?" Ms Jadou said.
Speaking ahead of the meeting, a senior EU diplomat said the options paper would be discussed, but declined to elaborate on further steps. "Whether the discussion on Tuesday will lead to concrete decision on specific measures, I don't know," he said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

For Europe, 30% US tariff would hammer trade, force export model rethink
For Europe, 30% US tariff would hammer trade, force export model rethink

Zawya

timean hour ago

  • Zawya

For Europe, 30% US tariff would hammer trade, force export model rethink

BRUSSELS - The 30% tariff on European goods threatened by U.S. President Donald Trump would, if implemented, be a game-changer for Europe, wiping out whole chunks of transatlantic commerce and forcing a rethink of its export-led economic model. European ministers meeting in Brussels on Monday remained convinced they can bring Trump back from the brink before his Aug. 1 deadline and reach a deal that would keep the $1.7 trillion two-way trading relationship broadly intact. But the wild swings in Trump's mood towards the European Union - which he has sometimes labelled as friendly and at other times accused of being set up specifically to destroy the United States - keep the 30% threat very much alive for now. "It will be almost impossible to continue the trading as we are used to in a transatlantic relationship," EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said of the 30% rate before meeting ministers and officials of the 27 EU capitals to give them an update. "Practically it prohibits the trade." EU officials had been hoping they could limit the damage by agreeing a baseline tariff around 10% - the one currently in place - with additional carve-outs for key sectors like autos. Last year the United States accounted for a fifth of all EU exports - its largest partner. Trump's bugbear is the $235 billion U.S. deficit generated by the goods component of that trade, even though the U.S. earns a surplus on services. UPEND POLICY PLANS The impact of making European exports - from pharmaceuticals to autos, machinery or wine - too expensive to be viable for American consumers would be instantly tangible. Economists at Barclays estimate an average tariff rate on EU goods of 35% including both reciprocal and sectoral duties combined with a 10% retaliation from Brussels would shave 0.7 percentage points off euro zone output. This would eat up most of the euro zone's already meagre growth and likely lead the European Central Bank to cut its 2% deposit rate further. "Inflation would likely undershoot the 2% target more deeply, and for longer, prompting a more accommodative monetary policy stance – with the deposit rate potentially reaching 1% by (March 2026)," the Barclays economists said. An earlier estimate by German economic institute IW found tariffs of 20% to 50% would cost Germany's 4.3 trillion euro economy more than 200 billion euros between now and 2028. While arguably small in percentage terms, that lost activity could still upend Chancellor Friedrich Merz's plans to push through tax cuts and spend more on renewing the country's long neglected infrastructure. "We would have to postpone large parts of our economic policy efforts because it would interfere with everything and hit the German export industry to the core," Merz said at the weekend of a 30% rate. NOWHERE TO RUN Further down the line, it raises bigger questions over how Europe recoups the lost activity to generate the tax revenues and jobs needed to fund ambitions ranging from caring for ageing populations to military rearmament. Under its existing policy of trade diversification, the EU has done well in striking preliminary deals with new partners but - as the continued delay over completion of the giant EU-Mercosur trade pact shows - it has struggled to get them fully signed and sealed. "The EU does not have different markets to pull up to and sell into," Varg Folkman, policy analyst at the European Policy Centre think tank said of the long and complex timelines involved in classic free trade deals. Some observers have argued the stand-off with Trump is what the EU needs to complete long-delayed reforms of its single market, boosting domestic demand and rebalancing its economy away from the exports which account for around half of output. The International Monetary Fund has estimated the EU's own internal barriers to the free flow of activity are the equivalent of tariffs of 44% for goods and 110% for services. Mooted reforms such as creating freer cross-border capital markets have made little headway in more than a decade. "It is easier said than done. There isn't an agreement to deepen. The barriers are imposed by the EU members themselves to benefit their own," Folkman said of the web of national regulations. How all this plays into the EU's negotiating strategy in the less than three weeks ahead remains to be seen - but for now, the bloc has stuck to its line of being open to talks while readying retaliatory measures if they break down. One thing that might persuade Trump to reach a deal, some European observers suggest, is that the lingering uncertainty may by itself push back the timing of the Federal Reserve interest rate cut the U.S. president so desires. "The latest developments on the trade war suggest that it will take more time to get a sense of the 'landing zone' on of course raises uncertainty for everyone, including the Fed," AXA chief economist Gilles Moec said. "With this new for cutting quickly get even harder to justify."

Mideast factors to watch on July 15
Mideast factors to watch on July 15

Zawya

timean hour ago

  • Zawya

Mideast factors to watch on July 15

Here are some factors that may affect Middle East stock markets on Tuesday. Reuters has not verified the press reports and does not vouch for their accuracy. INTERNATIONAL/REGIONAL * GLOBAL MARKETS-Asian shares rise, dollar strengthens ahead of US earnings; JGB yields surge * Oil falls as Trump's 50-day deadline for Russia eases supply fears * PRECIOUS-Gold ticks higher with focus on US inflation data * MIDEAST STOCKS-Gulf stocks subdued as Trump steps up tariff threats * Israeli ultra-Orthodox party leaves government over conscription bill * OPEC projects 'very strong' third-quarter oil demand, followed by tight balance, RIA reports ISRAEL * Clerics accuse West Bank settlers of attacking Christian sites * Gazans' daily struggle for water after deadly strike * Israel's Bezeq to buy local telecoms firm for $160 million * Netanyahu aide faces indictment over Gaza leak SAUDI ARABIA * BRIEF-Mubadala Announces Significant Reinvestment In PCI Pharma Services * Rescued crew of Greek ship sunk by Houthis taken to Saudi Arabia UNITED ARAB EMIRATES * UAE lender ADCB reports 11% jump in second-quarter profit * Wizz Air pulls out of Abu Dhabi as instability wipes out hope of Middle East profits * BRIEF-Etihad H1 Passengers At 10.2 Million IRAQ * Two drones fall in Khurmala oilfield in Iraqi Kurdistan, counter-terrorism service says SUDAN * Sudanese RSF forces kill almost 300 in North Kordofan, activists say SYRIA * Attacks on Syrian security forces sent to quell sectarian clashes leave 18 dead as Israel strikes targets to protect Druze IRAN * Iranian lawmaker says Strait of Hormuz still under review, no decision yet to close it * Blast caused by gas leak injures 7 in Iranian city of Qom * Iran says it will respond to reimposition of UN sanctions LIBYA * More than 100 migrants freed in Libya after being held captive by gang, officials say (Compiled by Bangalore newsroom)

Towards a peaceful and stable Middle East
Towards a peaceful and stable Middle East

The National

time2 hours ago

  • The National

Towards a peaceful and stable Middle East

Throughout the Middle East, pundits and public alike are wondering how the changes that the region is witnessing may affect the fragile existing balance of power and whether they can open the door, finally, for an era of peaceful co-existence and prosperity. It is well established that the strategic weight of our region is not confined to politics or security. It also lies in its increasingly pivotal role in the global economy. Key maritime routes, including the Strait of Hormuz and the Suez Canal, serve as vital arteries of global trade and energy supplies. At the same time, many Arab Gulf states are investing heavily in emerging industries such as renewable energy and advanced technologies. It is clear that bringing peace and stability to the Middle East is no longer a regional aspiration, but a global imperative intertwined with international prosperity. For the Arab League, a new strategic reality in the Middle East can only come about when a true vision for peace is implemented. The vision we have in mind is one based on the two-state solution: restoration of Palestinian rights for independence and dignity, followed by the implementation of the engagement of peace outlined in the Arab Peace Initiative, thus opening the door for an era of true peace and stability in the region. But regional security has been viewed differently by various parties in the region. For the Arabs, based on Arab Summit resolutions, the notion of regional security has always been based on five major pillars: a) An end to the Arab-Israeli conflict and the emergence of an independent contiguous Palestine, b) Respect of sovereignty and non-interference in the internal affairs of States, c) The establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the region, d) Relentless combatting of terrorism and the preservation of nation-states, and e) Security guarantees for all and shared interests as applicable. From an Arab perspective, while all these elements are essential for reaching a viable and sustainable formula for regional security, we view this equation as a win-win for all parties. Unfortunately, we cannot say the same about the perspective offered by other parties in our region, such as Israel. For years, and in particular after the '93 Oslo accords, the concept of regional security for Israel was based primarily on achieving military and security superiority while 'postponing indefinitely' any viable solution for the Palestinian question and without producing any real vision for achieving just and comprehensive peace. Since October 7, 2023, it appears that 'postponing indefinitely' a solution to the Palestinian question was replaced by 'eliminating' it altogether. Achieving a sustainable peace requires addressing broader geopolitical dynamics, particularly those involving Iran Driven by its extreme right-wing forces and its advancement in the past two decades, such a vision is a considerable impediment for peace and prosperity in the region. Enabling those forces to continue on such a path is nothing but a recipe for continued conflict and instability. Such a zero-sum equation with no room for a win-win formula is no salvation for our region and certainly meets no aspiration for peaceful co-existence in it. At the same time, achieving a sustainable peace requires addressing broader geopolitical dynamics, particularly those involving Iran. Over the past few years, several Arab countries have taken steps toward de-escalation and restoring dialogue with Tehran, aiming to establish a framework of mutual respect and non-interference. This approach must be preserved and reinforced, as it offers the potential to reduce tensions and prevent wider regional confrontation. For peace to take root, all regional actors must abandon policies of provocation and ideological dominance, and instead commit to principles of co-existence and balanced co-operation. I acknowledge that in my numerous encounters throughout the Arab World, and in particular after witnessing the horrors committed by Israel in Gaza through 21 months of genocidal war, I often reach the unhappy conclusion that many Arabs, in particular the youth, have ceased to believe that peace will be the order of the day in our region in the foreseeable future and that it is somehow condemned to perpetual instability and turmoil. The brief moments of peace of the 1990s seem like such distant memories. It's impossible to envisage any possibility of reliving them. All powerful players, in the region and outside it, should try and change such desperate views, if we are to seek a better and more prosperous future for the coming generations. To my understanding, a number of Arab countries who play a major role in the region have expressed readiness to engage in meaningful discussions on the matter. However, in the absence of an Israeli willingness to engage on a viable path for peace, it can be an exercise in futility. The hope remains that an active and motivated US president may intervene to tip the balance not only for the sake of morality and law, but also for shared interests and a win-for-all formula which addresses the concerns of all parties. It is still possible. Let us not waste the opportunity.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store