Hisense U8QG vs Hisense U8N: Which Mini-LED TV wins?
The Hisense U8N is a premium Mini-LED TV with a budget-friendly price, boasting incredible brightness and numerous features.
Hisense TVs are known for their incredible brightness and color output built on value prices, and none shine through quite as well as its flagship models.
The 2025 Hisense U8QG and the 2024 Hisense U8N are brilliant sets in their own right, built with Mini-LED backlighting, gaming features galore, plus a trove of luminance. They also have audio that far surpasses most other TVs on the market.
Speced with Google TV and a handy gaming hub, these value-minded offerings are designed for those who want an excellent picture without a significant investment.
While they don't exactly match the performance of some of the best OLED TVs, these Hisense flagships do have some incredible metrics to consider, but it's worth taking a look at which among them might prove the better buy for your next TV upgrade.
Hisense U8N
Hisense U8QG
Sizes
55", 65", 75", 85"
55", 65", 75", 85", 100"
Ports
2x HDMI 2.1, 2x HDMI 2.0
3x HDMI 2.1, 1x USB-C
Resolution
3,840 x 2,160p
3,840 x 2,160p
Refresh rate
144Hz
165Hz
HDR
Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR10, HLG
Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR10, HLG
Smart TV software
Google TV
Google TV
ATSC 3.0 support?
Yes
Yes
Processor
Hi-View Engine Pro
Hi-View Engine Pro
Given that they are both flagship Hisense Mini-LED TVs launched just a year apart, you can expect to see very similar design elements on both sets.
Above is the rear of the U8QG, which boasts two subwoofers at the top and a slew of ports on its right. Interestingly, the USB-C video output is positioned closer to the front of the screen, making it a little easier to charge devices and connect to nearby PCs if you're into that sort of thing.
One thing that immediately stands out, especially considering the side profile of the U8N below, is the bulkiness of the 2025 TV. It has heft and requires at least two people to set it up, with its 65-inch model weighing just under 53 pounds.
Both the U8N and U8QG utilize a pedestal-style stand, which varies in size depending on the TV. It connects to the panel with relative ease, but there's no real way of changing the orientation higher or lower, which makes it a little tough to slot in an accompanying soundbar if needed.
Not that you need one when it comes to the U8QG, as it sports a 4.1.2-channel speaker with a 72W output. This will also vary depending on the size you get, but a 20W subwoofer is quite the all-around audio system that stands against the competition.
Meanwhile, the U8N has just a 2.1.2 audio system on a 50W output, but it does still have a 20W subwoofer. This will meet the demands of most users, as it boasts serious sound, but you will be missing out on a wider surround sound profile.
Unlike the U8QG, which has just three HDMI 2.1 ports and a USB-C video output, the U8N comes equipped with just two HDMI 2.1 and two HDMI 2.0. While the USB-C is nice for PC gamers or those who may want to charge devices close to the TV, it feels a bit too niche to subtract from a whole row of HDMI ports.
A more interesting addition might have been an HDMI 2.2 port, but we may have to wait until next year before we see that on most TVs.
All that being said, I think it's safe to give the U8QG a big thumbs up for this section. While it's bulkier and does miss out on an HDMI port, I think most users would be willing to give that up in favor of increased audio performance.
Plus, it's one extra HDMI 2.1 port over the latter's mere two, and you could plug a Mini PC or one of the best handheld gaming consoles for your gaming pleasure. It's a little too niche for most users, if you ask me, but it's hard to beat those audio specs.
Winner: Hisense U8QG
Before we dive into which of these TVs delivers better picture quality, let's take a look at how their test results stack up.
Hisense U8N
Hisense U8QG
SDR Brightness (10%, in nits)
3,469
2,908
Delta-E (lower is better)
3.2
2.4
HDR Brightness (10%, in nits)
3,397
3,916
UHDA-P3 Gamut Coverage
96.77%
97.53%
Rec. 2020 Gamut Coverage
82.07%
83.98%
Input latency (milliseconds)
13.1
9.7
Similar to design, the U8N and U8QG will bear somewhat identical test metrics; however, it's interesting that the new 2025 set has significantly reduced its brightness output in standard content, while HDR sees a massive boost.
It's important to keep in mind that higher brightness doesn't always equate to better overall performance. In most cases, it should lead to mitigated glare, but that's not quite the case for the U8QG.
At least HDR content looked fantastic on this set, but that's more to do with its color volume. The U8QG improves the Delta-E, which requires a lower score for better performance, but anything lower than a score of 3 is largely imperceptible.
But even at the time of its release, the U8N was likewise just as fantastic in terms of color. It almost shattered our color gamut record at the time, and as the metrics show, the U8QG amplifies these, if only slightly.
A major boon we faced in testing the U8N has more to do with color accuracy, which doesn't bode well for animated content or vibrant shows and movies. Still, it's impressive that both U8-series Mini-LED TVs managed to hit over 80% of the Rec2020 color gamut, which is often relegated to lower scores on most TVs.
That's the quantum dots doing all the heavy lifting.
And when it comes to gaming, the testing here proves the U8QG is simply the better option. We tend to like TVs with input latency under a 10ms rating, and the U8QG's 9.7ms is to be praised, especially given that it lines up with some OLEDs on the market, like the LG B4.
Both offer incredible picture performance, but there are some upscaling concerns to consider on the U8N The higher HDR brightness, enhanced input latency, and improved shadows in darker scenes give the U8QG an edge over its predecessor.
Winner: Hisense U8QG
With Google TV, you'll not only have a slew of free channels to enjoy but many of the best streaming services to dive into. You'll have to contend with some ads, but they're very minimal when compared to other offerings like Roku OS or Fire TV.
But even if you don't find the content you want, there's an ATSC 3.0 tuner for you to dive into 4K broadcasts. You'll need a compatible antenna to get the most out of NextGen TV, but it's a handy option for those who may want extra coverage when it comes to content. One notable feature that few are discussing when it comes to Google TV is its smart home compatibility, which makes it a hub for your entire ecosystem. That means you don't have to splurge on any additional products, like the Google Nest Hub, to get broadened controls over your smart home devices.
When looking past their underlying interface, you'll also find a slew of awesome gaming features that make them ideal candidates to slot among the best gaming TVs.
As already mentioned, you'll be missing out on two HDMI 2.1 ports when going with the U8N, but you'll also be down one with the newer U8QG. It sacrifices this port in favor of a USB-C video output, which doesn't meet the demands of most gamers.
At least it does give you the keys to some unbridled gaming support with a 165Hz refresh rate. It's one of the few TVs to offer that spec this year, sitting next to some major OLED releases in the LG G5 and Samsung S95F. And a low input latency also means you get serious coverage in this regard.
But it's tough to look past the HDMI equation. Would you rather have two HDMI 2.1 ports in favor of three with a USB-C port? Or are you willing to live with those additional HDMI 2.0 ports on the U8N's mere 144Hz? It's a mild dilemma, but one certainly worth thinking about.
As with most modern TVs, both sets come equipped with a range of additional gaming features, like Variable Refresh Rate (VRR) and Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM) as well as Dolby Vision support for select titles. There's also a handy game bar that lets you change settings on the fly and look at particular elements, like FPS and the like.
Even in the face of its rather wonky HDMI dilemma, I still see the U8QG as far surpassing the U8N. You might not be a PC gamer ready to hit those highs on offer with a 165Hz refresh rate, but it doesn't hurt to future-proof your setup.
Winner: Hisense U8QG
Hisense U8N
Hisense U8QG
Specs (25)
21
23
Design (25)
20
22
Performance (25)
21
23
Features (25)
23
24
Total Score (100)
85
92
While this comes down to a preference basis, it's hard to look past the myriad enhancements the U8QG has in store.
The Hisense U8QG simply kills it on a number of levels, most of all in the gaming category. It also largely improves upon many of the issues that were holding the base U8N back, like a subpar sound system and wonky color accuracy.
You also get FreeSync Premium Pro support with a 165Hz refresh rate, which might really only pertain to PC gamers, but definitely gives it a huge leg up. If you're merely a console gamer and don't mind the higher input latency, the cheaper U8N might be a better option.
As for that pricing, a 65-inch Hisense U8N is around $899 on Amazon, while the 65-inch Hisense U8QG is currently $1,498 on Amazon at the time of writing. That's a significant price disparity that will prompt you to consider the compromises.
Both TVs still offer absurd brightness metrics and loads of gaming options, so don't fret too much over the TV of your choice, as it'll be grand no matter what model you go with.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
7 hours ago
- USA Today
MCP Connects, SDP Delivers: The Missing Half of AI Memory is Here
Prescott, Arizona / Syndication Cloud / July 22, 2025 / David Bynon Key Takeaways Model Context Protocol (MCP) creates AI connections to external tools but doesn't define structured memory content Semantic Digest Protocol (SDP) provides trust-scored, fragment-level memory objects for reliable AI operations Multi-agent systems typically fail due to missing shared, verifiable context rather than communication issues MCP and SDP together form a complete memory architecture that stops hallucinations and contextual drift MedicareWire will implement SDP in 2025 as the first major deployment of AI-readable, trust-verified memory in a regulated domain AI's Memory Crisis: Why Today's Systems Can't Remember What Matters Today's AI systems face a critical problem: they process vast information but struggle with reliable memory. This isn't merely a technical issue — it's what causes hallucinations, inconsistency, and unreliability in advanced AI deployments. This problem becomes obvious in multi-agent systems. When specialized AI agents work together, they don't typically fail from poor communication. They fail because they lack shared, scoped, and verifiable context. Without standardized memory architecture, agents lose alignment, reference inconsistent information, and produce unreliable results. David Bynon, founder at MedicareWire, identified this issue early on. In regulated areas like Medicare, incorrect information can seriously impact consumers making healthcare decisions. The solution needs two protocols working together to create a complete memory system for AI. The first protocol, Model Context Protocol (MCP), addresses the connection problem. But it's just half of what's needed for truly reliable AI memory. Understanding Model Context Protocol (MCP) IBM recently recognized the Model Context Protocol (MCP) as core infrastructure for AI systems, describing it as 'USB-C for AI' — a universal connector standard allowing AI models to connect with external tools, data sources, and memory systems. This recognition confirmed what many AI engineers already understood: standardized connections between AI models and external resources build reliable systems at scale. IBM's Recognition: The 'USB-C for AI' Breakthrough The USB-C comparison makes sense. Before USB standardization, connecting devices to computers required numerous proprietary ports and cables. Before MCP, every AI tool integration needed custom code, fragile connections, and ongoing maintenance. IBM's official support of MCP acknowledged that AI's future requires standardized interfaces. Just as USB-C connects any compatible device to any compatible port, MCP creates a standard protocol for AI systems to interact with external tools and data sources. What MCP Solves: The Transport Problem MCP handles the transport problem in AI systems. It standardizes how an AI agent: Negotiates with external systems about needed information Creates secure, reliable connections to tools and data sources Exchanges information in predictable, consistent formats Maintains state across interactions with various resources This standardization allows developers to build tools once for use with any MCP-compliant AI system. Custom integrations for each new model or tool become unnecessary — just consistent connectivity across platforms. The Critical Gap: Missing Content Definition Despite its value, MCP has a major limitation: it defines how AI systems connect, but not what the content should look like. This resembles standardizing a USB port without defining the data format flowing through it. This creates a significant gap in AI memory architecture. While MCP handles connections, it doesn't address: How to structure memory for machine understanding How to encode and verify trust and provenance How to scope and contextualize content How information fragments should relate to each other This explains why AI systems with excellent tool integration still struggle with reliable memory — they have connections but lack content structure for trustworthy recall. Semantic Digest Protocol: The Memory Layer MCP Needs This is where the Semantic Digest Protocol (SDP) fits — built to work with MCP while solving what it leaves unaddressed: defining what memory should actually look like. Trust-Scored Fragment-Level Memory Architecture SDP organizes memory at the fragment level, instead of treating entire documents as single information units. Each fragment — a fact, definition, statistic, or constraint — exists as an independent memory object with its own metadata. These memory objects contain: The actual information content A trust score based on source credibility Complete provenance data showing information origin Scope parameters showing where and when the information applies Contextual relationships to other memory fragments This detailed approach fixes a basic problem: AI systems must know not just what a fact is, but how much to trust it, where it came from, when it applies, and how it connects to other information. Using the 'USB-C for AI' analogy, SDP is a universal, USB-C thumb drive for the Model Context Protocol. It provides data, across multiple surfaces, in a format MCP recognizes and understands Machine-Ingestible Templates in Multiple Formats SDP creates a complete trust payload system with templates in multiple formats: JSON-LD for structured data interchange TTL (Turtle) for RDF graph representations Markdown for lightweight documentation HTML templates for web publication Invented by David Bynon as a solution for MedicareWire, the format flexibility makes SDP work immediately with existing systems while adding the necessary trust layer. For regulated sectors like healthcare, where MedicareWire operates, this trust layer changes AI interactions from educated guesses to verified responses. The Complete AI Memory Loop: MCP + SDP in Action When MCP and SDP work together, they form a complete memory architecture for AI systems. Here's the workflow: From User Query to Trust-Verified Response The process starts with a user query. Example: 'What's the Maximum Out-of-Pocket limit for this Medicare Advantage plan in Los Angeles?' The AI model uses MCP to negotiate context with external resources. It identifies what specific plan information it needs and establishes connections to retrieve that data. The external resource sends back an SDP-formatted response with the requested information. This includes the MOOP value, geographic scope (Los Angeles County), temporal validity (2025), and provenance (directly from CMS data), all with appropriate trust scores. With trust-verified information, the model answers accurately: 'The 2025 Maximum Out-of-Pocket limit for this plan in Los Angeles County is $4,200, according to CMS data.' No hallucination. No vague references. No outdated information. Just verified, scoped, trust-scored memory through standardized connections. Eliminating Hallucinations Through Verified Memory This method addresses what causes hallucinations in AI systems. Rather than relying on statistical patterns from training, the AI retrieves specific, verified information with full context about reliability and applicability. When information changes, there's no need to retrain the model. The external memory layer updates, and the AI immediately accesses new information—complete with trust scoring and provenance tracking. Real-World Implementation: MedicareWire 2025 This isn't theoretical — SDP launches on in August 2025, marking the first major implementation of AI-readable, trust-scored memory in a regulated domain. 1. First Large-Scale Deployment in a Regulated Domain The healthcare industry, especially Medicare, offers an ideal testing ground for trust-verified AI memory. Incorrect information has serious consequences, regulations are complex, and consumers need reliable guidance through a confusing system. MedicareWire's implementation will give AI systems unprecedented accuracy when accessing Medicare plan information. Instead of using potentially outdated training data, AI systems can query MedicareWire's SDP-enabled content for current, verified information about Medicare plans, benefits, and regulations. 2. Solving Healthcare's Critical Information Accuracy Problem Consumers using AI assistants for Medicare options will get consistent, accurate information regardless of which system they use. The SDP implementation ensures any AI agent can retrieve precise details about: Plan coverage specifications Geographic availability Cost structures and limitations Enrollment periods and deadlines Regulatory requirements and exceptions All come with proper attribution, scope, and trust scoring. 3. Creating the Foundation for Multi-Agent Trust Infrastructure Beyond immediate benefits for Medicare consumers, this implementation creates a blueprint for trust infrastructure in other regulated fields. Multi-agent systems will have shared, verifiable context — eliminating drift and hallucination problems that affect complex AI deployments. The combination of MCP's standardized connections and SDP's trust-verified memory builds the foundation for reliable AI systems that can safely operate in highly regulated environments. From Connection to Memory: The Future of Reliable AI Is Here David Bynon, founder of Trust Publishing and architect of SDP, states: 'We didn't just create a format. We created the trust language AI systems can finally understand — and remember.' As AI shapes important decisions in healthcare, finance, legal, and other critical fields, reliable, verifiable memory becomes essential. The MCP+SDP combination shifts from probabilistic guessing to trust-verified information retrieval — defining the next generation of AI applications. SDP will be available as an open protocol for non-directory systems, supporting broad adoption and continued development across the AI ecosystem. As the first major implementation, MedicareWire's deployment marks the beginning of a new phase in trustworthy artificial intelligence. MedicareWire is leading development of trustworthy AI memory systems that help consumers access accurate healthcare information when they need it most. David Bynon 101 W Goodwin St # 2487 Prescott Arizona 86303 United States
WIRED
17 hours ago
- WIRED
This Brand-New TCL QLED Has the World's Slimmest Bezels
The main way to tell how old a TV is? Look at the bezels. Until about 10 years ago, they were thick picture frames, but they've slowly gotten smaller and smaller as the models turned over. With its new QM8K QLED, TCL has removed them entirely. Innovations in panel design mean that this blindingly bright screen looks like it's floating in space on its pedestal mount. It's a classy party trick that makes it easy to hide on the wall with images or artwork on it, and it improves the viewing angle to boot. This flagship model costs a pretty penny more than TCL's other value-first options, but that's for good reason: It competes directly with more expensive mini LED models from Samsung and Sony, and the great viewing angle and brightness even give high-end OLED models a run for their money. If you want a good picture and great apps for less, you can get it with a more affordable Hisense or TCL model, but if you want a great picture, this is the most affordable way to get it this year. Out of the Box Photograph: Parker Hall The experience of setting up the QM8K is basically the same as with any other TV. The QM8K comes in a large cardboard box surrounded by foam, and you'll want two people to pull it out, put it on a soft surface like a bed or table with a blanket, and install the included pedestal mount. It comes with a power cable and backlit (!) remote, but you'll need to supply your own HDMI cables if you want to connect anything to any of its four ports (two HDMI 2.1, two HDMI 2.0). I always love a TV with a pedestal mount, and this mount is sturdy and easy to attach. It also allows you to tilt the TV. Likewise, the included Google TV interface is extremely easy to use, with QR-based logins for essentially every modern streaming app, and speedy swaps between apps (something I had an issue with on last year's TCL models). The TV supports Chromecast and Airplay 2, which makes casting music and YouTube clips super easy for folks who are visiting and on your Wi-Fi. The TV has Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3 support, and it was more than capable of keeping up with 4K streaming on my mesh network at home. It has Ethernet as well, should you want to hard-wire in for the fastest speeds. No Bezels Photograph: Parker Hall The lack of bezels isn't immediately noticeable if you're not looking for it, but once you see that the brushed gunmetal frame of the TV now immediately transitions to screen after just 3.2 millimeters—rather than having a 10 mm-ish black rim—every comparable model seems old and tired. The gorgeous crystal WHVA panel is capable of up to 3,040 local dimming zones (depending on the size of TV you buy), which makes for a stunning image, and the lack of frame makes it look like the picture is hovering in space.
Tom's Guide
19 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
I replaced my laptop with the Galaxy Z Fold 7 — here's what happened
There is a lot to love about some of the best foldable phones, but there's no denying that they're pricey. That goes double for the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7, which costs a whopping $2,000. That's more than some of the best laptops, so you would hope that it could replace them, right? In concept, it should be possible to replace your laptop with a Samsung phone thanks to Samsung DeX. If you've never heard of DeX, it essentially allows you to connect your phone with an external display like a monitor or TV, essentially turning your phone into a mini PC. I've never tried the feature, so I thought I would try replacing my work laptop for a day to see how it all worked out. Here are some of the ground rules I set myself: I would try the phone with both a connected keyboard and mouse, and without them to see which is ideal. I also made sure to write at least one piece of news while using the feature; in this case, it was a story about the Galaxy S26 Ultra reusing the same battery as last year's Galaxy S25 Ultra. So, with my parameters set, let's get into how my morning went. Spoiler: it wasn't great. Honestly, setting up the phone with my monitor was amazingly easy, as I only really had to connect the phone. In my case, I have a pretty ancient monitor, so I needed a USB-C hub with an HDMI connection, which also has USB ports for the keyboard and mouse. All I needed to do was plug them all in and I was good to go. Saying that, I did have one issue. For the most part, I had to use the app versions of certain services like Slack and Google Drive. This led to some complications, primarily with the layout of Slack and the ease of sharing documents via Google Drive. Admittedly, this was more down to my own developed habits, rather than a major issue with Samsung DeX. I can only imagine that this would get easier throughout the morning, and it did. Unfortunately, I had more issues when it came to actually using the phone for my task. Initially, there was no real problem, but the minute I ditched my USB keyboard and mouse, I hit a real wall. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. When it comes to using the phone as a mouse, it technically makes sense. Essentially, you can use the entire screen, which is separated into four quadrants. You can move your finger and tap where you please, and the screen can be split so that you can use the keyboard as well. However, the phone can only really face one way when you try to use it as a mouse. So if the phone is facing a different way, and you move your finger right, the cursor will go down instead. The only indication you have is the small buttons on the side, which are easy to miss when you're looking at the larger screen. Once I figured out the mouse, it was down to figuring out the keyboard and wow, does the keyboard suck. If you have never used the Samsung keyboard before, let me paint you a picture of how it looks. You have your basic QWERTY layout, but with a large gap down the middle that also cuts the space bar in half. Then, below that is the bar that contains all your quick navigation tools. Now, despite the Galaxy Z Fold 7 being bigger than the Galaxy Z Fold 6, this is not a keyboard that you can comfortably use, unless you have a doll's hands. There's no touch typing here; instead, I found myself using two fingers to slowly press the keys like your tech-illiterate aunt. Not only is it uncomfortable to use, but the placement of the navigation buttons becomes a real nightmare. I constantly found myself slowly getting into a flow when it came to typing, only to accidentally brush the home button and lose the keyboard. To say it was infuriating is an understatement. Another problem that soon appeared had to do with just how much battery the phone consumed in this mode. Now, my USB hub does have a charging port, but I found that my phone was constantly losing battery, even when the charger was attached to the hub. In the end, I had to constantly disconnect the phone and charge it for a time, which took up more of my morning than I would like. Speaking of the port, there is a bit of an issue with where it is placed and what that means for balance. In my experience using the Z Fold 7, I found the best way to set it up on the desk was in the L shape, as it allowed me to type without overshooting as much and hitting the mouse section of the screen. However, to make sure the phone was balanced, I needed to place the camera side up, and that side of the phone is also where the USB-C port is. So, I had to choose between either a wobbly keyboard by having the cameras on the table, or suffer a constant threat of the phone tipping over. Here's the thing: using the Galaxy Z Fold 7 as a PC is entirely possible with Samsung DeX, so long as you have a Keyboard and mouse. However, this is where my biggest issue with the idea rears its ugly head. In reality, if I have to carry the phone, keyboard and mouse, then I might as well use a laptop instead. After all, they come with all of these things included, as well as the browser versions of the apps. As such, I think this is a feature that you'll use to watch YouTube on your bigger TV, which, let's be honest, the best smart TVs can do better. It has its purpose, but you shouldn't buy one for that reason alone. However, I am always happy to hear other people's opinions, so let me know if you're a stalwart DeX user, or if you tried it and hated it. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
