44 days on, Gulzar Houz fire probe panel awaits direction; another formed for Sangareddy blast
The committee was expected to investigate the incident, assess departmental lapses, and recommend safety measures. It comprised Director General of Telangana State Disaster Response and Fire Services Y. Nagi Reddy, Commissioner of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation R.V. Karnan, Commissioner of Hyderabad City Police C.V. Anand; Chairman and Managing Director of Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited Musharraf Faruqui; Commissioner of Hyderabad Disaster Response and Asset Protection Agency A.V. Ranganath and Hyderabad District Collector Anudeep Durishetty.
As per a public statement issued by Hyderabad in-charge Minister Ponnam Prabhakar on the day of the committee's formation, the report was to be submitted to Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy and followed by a review meeting involving Deputy Chief Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka and senior officials.
However, senior officials confirmed that no Government Order was issued, and no communication issued to the committee members. 'Since no formal instructions were received, no official action has been taken. There have been informal discussions, but no structured effort or report has followed,' an official said, seeking anonymity.
'Although the announcement was made, no official communication ever followed from the government,' said another official.
A fresh committee has been formed following a deadly blast at Sigachi Industries Pvt. Ltd. in Pashamylaram industrial area on Monday. The explosion, which killed at least 36 workers and injured several others, triggered immediate government response and the announcement of a high-level probe.
The Chief Minister announced the formation of a five-member committee to probe the Sangareddy industrial disaster. The panel comprises the Chief Secretary, Special Chief Secretary (Disaster Management), Principal Secretary (Labour), Principal Secretary (Health) and Additional Director General of Police (Fire Services).
The committee will not only investigate the underlying causes of the blast but also submit a report recommending preventive measures to avoid recurrence of such industrial tragedies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 days ago
- The Hindu
Employers in Coimbatore directed to form internal committees to address workplace sexual harassment
The Directorate of Industrial Safety and Health, Coimbatore, has issued a statement urging all employers to comply with the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013. The Act is intended to protect women from sexual harassment at workplace and to establish mechanisms for addressing such complaints. According to the Act, establishments with 10 or more employees are required to constitute an Internal Committee (IC) to inquire into complaints of sexual harassment. Employers who fail to constitute the committee or follow the required procedures may face a penalty of up to ₹50,000. The Directorate has instructed all factories and construction sites in and around Coimbatore to immediately form Internal Committees and fully implement the provisions of the Act. Details of IC members and the complaint redressal procedures must be displayed prominently in locations accessible to all employees. The release, also refers to Government Order (Standing) No. 64, issued by the Department of Social Welfare and Women's Rights (SW3-2), which outlines the standard operating procedures to be followed by establishments. All employers have been directed to strictly adhere to these guidelines.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Cabinet to discuss stadium stampede report today; KSCA, police and organisers likely to face heat
Bengaluru: The cabinet, which meets Thursday, is expected to initiate action against those found responsible for the stampede outside M Chinnaswamy stadium on June 4, in which 11 people were killed during Royal Challengers Bengaluru's (RCB) IPL victory celebrations. The one-man inquiry commission led by Justice John Michael D'Cunha submitted its report on July 7. Though it was tabled during the cabinet meeting on July 17, a final decision was deferred. The report has reportedly held Royal Challengers Sports Pvt Ltd (RCB franchise owner), event managers DNA Entertainment Networks, Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), and senior police officers responsible for lapses that led to the tragedy. Chief minister Siddaramaiah met legal experts Wednesday to discuss the report ahead of the cabinet meeting. "The govt has studied the report in detail and required action will be taken on recommendations of ministers and considering provisions under the law," said AS Ponnanna, Congress MLA and legal adviser to the CM. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Sources say the commission has specifically recommended legal action against KSCA president Raghuram Bhat, DNA Entertainment Networks MD Venkat Vardhan, and Bengaluru city police commissioner B Dayananda. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Enhance Online Presence and Get Customers [Try Now] Undo The report criticised the choice of venue, calling the stadium infrastructure inadequate for large gatherings, and reportedly suggested shifting crowd-heavy events to better-equipped venues. "Since the govt has already taken some action including suspension of four police officers, the cabinet will deliberate on Justice Cunha's report and make recommendations. While a case is pending in the high court, the cabinet will also decide on filing a fresh petition if needed," said HK Patil, law and parliamentary affairs minister. Officials said more legal action is likely, especially since the report accused KSCA and event organisers of violating the Licensing and Controlling of Assemblies and Processions (Bengaluru City) Order, 2009. Despite lacking police permission, organisers proceeded with the event. The commission also pulled up police for deploying only about 70 personnel — far below the required strength. Casting a long shadow, the report's findings could impact upcoming events at the venue, including key matches of the ICC World Cup. The Maharaja Cup, slated for Aug 11-28, will now be held without spectators. Other items on agenda Besides the stampede report, the cabinet is also likely to consider key proposals, including amendments to the Global Capability Centers (GCC) Policy 2024-29, establishment of a Centre of Excellence for space technologies in Bengaluru, and implementation of the local economy accelerator programme at an estimated cost of Rs 100 crore to drive tech innovation. "These steps are being taken to enhance jobs and the proposed amendment to the GCC policy is in line with the industrial policy aimed at creating a pro-people and industry-friendly ecosystem," said IT-BT minister Priyank Kharge.
United News of India
6 days ago
- United News of India
SC tells Isha Foundation to seek Deli HC relief against magazine's defamatory reports
New Delhi, July 21 (UNI) The Supreme Court today directed Sadhguru's Isha Foundation to approach the Delhi High Court for its plea seeking to restrain Tamil media outlet Nakkheeran Publications from publishing allegedly defamatory content against it. The court also directed Nakkheeran to raise its contentions, including the issue of maintainability, in the Delhi High Court. A bench comprising Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi disposed of the transfer petition filed by Nakkheeran Publications as well as the interlocutory application filed by Isha Foundation in the matter. Nakkheeran Publications had filed a petition in the Supreme Court to transfer the Rs. 3 crore defamation suit against it in the Delhi High Court to Chennai High Court. Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Isha Foundation, argued that despite a defamation suit pending before the Delhi High Court, Nakkheeran continued publishing defamatory material, including allegations of organ trade against the Foundation. Isha Foundation opposed the transfer of the case to Chennai, stating that such grounds were impermissible. On the other hand, Senior Advocate R Balasubramaniam, representing Nakkheeran, submitted that Isha Foundation secured listing of its application without notice to the respondent and was seeking the same relief that had already been denied by the Delhi High Court. He argued that the question of jurisdiction should be decided first. 'For the last 8 months, they have been happy because there is no injunction granted to them. But in my petition, they are seeking the same relief which was denied by High Court… the next date is in August,' he submitted. Justice Kant observed that grounds such as lack of jurisdiction may not justify transfer of the suit. He suggested that Nakkheeran raise these issues before the Delhi High Court through an application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. Accepting the bench's suggestion, Balasubramaniam withdrew the transfer petition, resulting in the disposal of Isha Foundation's interlocutory application as well. Last year, Isha Foundation filed a Rs. 3 crore defamation suit against Nakkheeran Publications in the Delhi High Court, alleging that its publications tarnished the Foundation's reputation. In response, Nakkheeran Publications filed a transfer petition before the Supreme Court seeking to shift the defamation case to Chennai. During the hearing, Rohatgi highlighted that Nakkheeran continued its 'vilification campaign' on social media despite the pending suit, adding, 'We are a charitable organisation with disciples all across the world… today, on social media, he's going on and on…' The Supreme Court, however, clarified that the Delhi High Court should decide the pending applications of both parties expeditiously. UNI SNG SSP
