How disinformation affects the communal fabric of South Asia
In a time scarred by communal division, gestures of unity can be healing. At a press conference held by the Ministry of Defence of the Government of India, where Sikh, Muslim, and Hindu officers — Commodore Raghu R Nair, Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, and Colonel Sofia Qureshi — stood shoulder to shoulder to brief the press, there was a fleeting glimpse of a pluralist nation that stands against any communal onslaught.
Meanwhile, Mohammad Zubair of Alt News, a fact-checker, earned rare acclaim for dismantling disinformation on X, a small victory for truth in a fractured public square. But social media platforms erupted with toxic lies, smearing minorities as disloyal, while TV anchors turned newsrooms into battlegrounds, peddling falsehoods. Unverified claims of Indian strikes on Islamabad and Karachi made headlines.
In Pakistan, Hindu minorities faced a raw deal. Just a week before the Pahalgam attack, Pakistan Army Chief General Syed Asim Munir declared, 'We differ from Hindus in every way'. The blunt Hindu-Muslim divide, articulated days before the attack, obliterated Pakistan's claims of restraint and any hope for diplomacy. Disinformation permeated press briefings. Media intensified falsehoods with concocted footage of Pakistani strikes on Delhi's airport, while the Deputy Prime Minister stoked national fervour for the air force, wielding a falsified Daily Telegraph clipping.
Bangladesh, with 13 million Hindus, sidestepped the recent conflagration but could not escape its tremors. The interim government stayed neutral, yet public opinion leaned toward Pakistan, as per a few reports of The Diplomat.
Also Read | In Trump vs Harvard, America is diminished
It is a meticulously crafted crucible, designed to render every minority an alien in their own land. Disinformation surged to alarming extremes. Quite visible are the recycled Gaza explosions passed off as Indian strikes or video game clips and ARMA 3, floated as Pakistani military success, racking up millions of views on X before fact-checkers called them out. Algorithms, indifferent to truth, amplified engagement to turn smartphones into conduits of hate, silencing voices of peace.
How to contain such a spread of disinformation? First, governments must cease tolerating a disinformation ecosystem that festers unchecked. Censoring media and imprisoning journalists only deepens public mistrust, while social media accounts spreading lies during conflict must cease their operation. Media literacy initiatives must lead the charge, equipping civil society with the tools to sharpen digital discernment. Second, countries need to protect the vulnerable. It would be beneficial to form task forces that would only track disinformation. The Pahalgam attack exposed how terror, hate, and disinformation can push South Asia's vibrant diversity into tatters. With nearly 220 million Hindu and Muslim minorities across three countries and a history of bad blood, South Asia cannot afford any communal flare-up through disinformation.
The writer is a German Chancellor Fellow at the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation, based in Berlin
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
23 minutes ago
- Indian Express
C Raja Mohan writes: PM Modi in the UK: Let go of the bilateral baggage
The formal signing of the India-UK Free Trade Agreement during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to London this week marks a long-awaited turning point in bilateral relations. The early 1990s opened a new opportunity for Delhi and London to move beyond the bitter legacies of Partition and the Cold War and build on the fresh possibilities offered by India's economic liberalisation. Only after multiple twists and turns has the wide gap between promise and performance in the relationship begun to close. If Queen Elizabeth II's 1997 visit to India — meant to commemorate the 50th anniversary of Independence — turned into a political fiasco, Modi's meeting this week with King Charles III could mark the beginning of a new and more productive phase. And it comes at a particularly opportune moment. The trade pact, along with expanding cooperation in technology, defence, and education, will help both countries navigate the turbulent effects of US President Donald Trump's political upheaval — whether one sees it as a revolution or a counterrevolution — on American global engagement and the international order. London, the US's closest and most enduring ally, and Delhi, which has built a new foundation for strategic cooperation with Washington, have both been significantly impacted by Trump's policies. Efforts to reboot India-UK ties began promisingly in the 1990s, when Conservative Prime Minister John Major strongly supported India's economic reforms. But the momentum faltered in the early years of the Labour governments (1997-2010), which continued to view India through an outdated colonial lens. What should have been a celebratory and reflective moment during the Queen's 1997 visit was marred by then Foreign Secretary Robin Cook's gratuitous meddling in the Kashmir issue and Indo-Pakistani relations. The resulting outrage was memorably captured by Indian Prime Minister I K Gujral, who called Britain a 'third-rate power'. Gujral was right to object to British overreach, but his characterisation of Britain was far off the mark. In the mid-1990s, the UK ranked among the world's top five economies, with a GDP exceeding the combined economic output of China, India, and Russia at the time. Britain had lost its empire but has remained a power of considerable global influence. Three decades later, it is still the world's sixth-largest economy. Its per capita income — around $55,000—compares starkly with India's $3,000, China's $14,000, and Russia's $15,000. The perception in Delhi of Britain as a 'diminished power' stands in sharp contrast to India's enduring view of Russia as a 'superpower'. This disconnect reflects a lingering anti-colonial mindset and a romanticised view of Russia in Delhi but has little grounding in present-day realities. It ignores the large interface between Indian and British societies that stands in contrast to a narrow government-to-government relationship with Moscow. One of the key drivers of the evolving India-UK relationship has been the effort to shed the lingering colonial condescension in London and entrenched anti-imperial resentment in Delhi. The focus has now shifted to building a pragmatic, forward-looking partnership based on shared interests. It has also meant confronting Delhi's own double standards. While the Indian elite never misses an opportunity to denounce British colonialism, it continues to seek validation from Britain and its institutions. Across the political spectrum, leaders denounce the English language but educate their children in English-medium schools, aspire for admissions to Oxbridge and the Ivy League, and dream of emigration to the Anglosphere. This is not even to mention the popular fascination with Britain in states like Bengal, Gujarat, and Punjab. Overcoming this love-hate relationship was not easy. But the return of the Conservatives to power in 2010 saw an effort to transcend the old entanglements of Kashmir and Pakistan. Prime Minister David Cameron's 2010 visit aimed to reboot bilateral ties. However, the British establishment was not fully prepared for a shift, and the UPA government in Delhi failed to seize the moment. The arrival of the Modi government in 2014 brought a new readiness to reassess Britain. Successive Conservative Prime Ministers — especially Boris Johnson — actively worked with India to imagine a shared future, outlined in the '2030 Roadmap for India-UK Relations'. The free trade agreement being signed this week, the 2024 technology security initiative, and the joint defence industrial roadmap announced this year are all fruits of that vision. Implementing the 2030 roadmap would not have been possible without greater responsiveness from the British establishment. Particularly significant in addressing Delhi's concerns about anti-India extremism is Prime Minister Keir Starmer's reining in the extremist factions within the Labour Party that had taken a hostile stance on India carrying forward the 2030 Roadmap initiated by the Tories. Modi's visit is also an opportunity to reflect on the deep economic and political turbulence within Britain. The Starmer government is struggling to revive a stagnating economy. It has abandoned the strategy of total reliance on services and launched an industrial policy aimed at innovation-led growth in eight key sectors, including advanced manufacturing, defence, clean energy, life sciences, and creative industries. This opens new possibilities for India-UK collaboration. Britain remains a global leader in higher education, scientific research, and technology — and Modi's visit could help identify fresh avenues for partnership in these domains. It is also set to play a critical role in European security amid American retrenchment under Trump. India should recognise the internal political fragmentation in Britain amid mounting pressures on the two-party system. Delhi should also be aware of the rising anti-immigration sentiment in a rapidly changing Britain. It should focus less on sending more students and workers to Britain. Instead, Delhi should be drawing British universities into India and building collaboration with British capital to expand opportunities at home. For too long, Delhi and London have underestimated what they could do for each other. Briefly before Independence, some in both capitals imagined that a partnership between a free India and a post-imperial Britain could preserve London's global stature, amid the rise of America and Soviet Russia, and facilitate India's emergence as a dominant power in the Indian Ocean and beyond. That bold vision was derailed by the trauma of Partition, the chaos of decolonisation, and the polarising currents of the Cold War. But eight decades later, India and Britain stand once again at an inflexion point. As middle powers, they are now better positioned to pursue a more modest, pragmatic goal: To act as force multipliers for each other in a world increasingly shaped by an assertive China and an unpredictable America. The writer is contributing editor on international affairs for The Indian Express and distinguished fellow at the Council on Strategic and Defence Research
News18
23 minutes ago
- News18
'Steeped In Terrorism': India Slams Pakistan's Rhetoric On Kashmir, Indus Waters Treaty At UNSC
Curated By : Last Updated: July 23, 2025, 07:01 IST India's fresh push in the UNSC for sanctioning TRF following the Pahalgam attack represents a key test of the international community's commitment against terrorism. File pic/AP India strongly rebutted Pakistan's renewed attempt to internationalise the Kashmir issue and raise objections over the Indus Waters Treaty at the United Nations Security Council. Responding to Pakistani Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar's remarks, India's Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador P Harish, called out Pakistan's duplicity on issues of terrorism and international peace. Dar, while addressing the UNSC, claimed that Kashmir is an 'internationally recognised disputed territory" and termed India's recent moves on the Indus Waters Treaty 'regrettable and unjustified." He urged the UN to push for a resolution of the Kashmir issue based on what he described as relevant Security Council resolutions. India hit back sharply. In his statement, Ambassador Harish underscored the stark contrast between the two nations. 'On one hand, there is India — a matured democracy, a surging economy, a pluralistic and inclusive society. At the other extreme is Pakistan, steeped in fanaticism and terrorism, and a serial borrower from the IMF," he said. He further added that as the Council discusses peace and security, it must universally uphold the principle of zero tolerance for terrorism. 'It ill behoves the member of the Council to offer homilies while indulging in practices that are unacceptable to the international community," he remarked, in a direct reference to Pakistan's record on sponsoring terrorism. India reiterated that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of the country and any attempt to question its sovereignty is unacceptable. It also emphasised that the Indus Waters Treaty, a longstanding bilateral agreement, is not a matter for international arbitration unless Pakistan first addresses violations on its part. Swipe Left For Next Video View all This is not the first time Pakistan has attempted to use international platforms to raise the Kashmir issue. However, such efforts have largely failed to gather traction, with most global powers recognising the matter as bilateral. India's firm and composed response reinforces its image on the global stage as a responsible democracy focused on growth and peace, while exposing Pakistan's continued reliance on diversionary tactics. Abhro Banerjee Covering day-to-day national and international news for the last nine years across print and digital. Associated with as Chief Sub-Editor since 2022, covering innumerable big and small events, includ... Read More Covering day-to-day national and international news for the last nine years across print and digital. Associated with as Chief Sub-Editor since 2022, covering innumerable big and small events, includ... Read More view comments News world 'Steeped In Terrorism': India Slams Pakistan's Rhetoric On Kashmir, Indus Waters Treaty At UNSC Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
India.com
23 minutes ago
- India.com
India Extends Medical Support To Bangladesh Following Dhaka Fighter Jet Crash; PM Modi Expresses Condolences
India has extended medical support to Bangladesh following the devastating fighter jet crash in Dhaka on July 21, which claimed at least 31 lives and injured over 170 people, many of them children. The crash occurred when a Bangladesh Air Force F-7 BGI training aircraft slammed into the Milestone School and College campus in Uttara, a densely populated suburb of the capital, triggering a massive explosion and fire. Prime Minister Narendra Modi expressed deep condolences over the tragedy and assured Bangladesh of India's full support. In a follow-up to his message, the Indian High Commission in Dhaka formally reached out to the Bangladeshi government, offering critical medical assistance for the injured. A specialised team of burn-care doctors and nurses is scheduled to arrive in Dhaka shortly, equipped with advanced medical supplies and diagnostic tools. The team will assess the condition of the victims and recommend further treatment, including possible transfer to Indian medical facilities for specialised care. Additional medical teams may be dispatched based on the initial findings. The crash has sparked national mourning in Bangladesh, with flags flown at half-mast and widespread public grief. The pilot, Flight Lieutenant Toukir Islam, reportedly attempted to divert the aircraft away from populated areas before impact. Among the deceased were 25 schoolchildren and a teacher who died while rescuing students. Many of the injured are being treated at the National Institute of Burn and Plastic Surgery, where doctors report critical burn cases requiring long-term care. India's swift response underscores the humanitarian dimension of its regional diplomacy and reflects the strong bilateral ties between the two nations. The gesture has been widely welcomed in Bangladesh, where public anger is mounting over the use of ageing aircraft for training missions in urban zones. As investigations continue into the cause of the crash, India's medical outreach is expected to play a vital role in the recovery of survivors and the broader healing process. The tragedy has reignited calls for stricter aviation safety protocols and better urban planning to prevent future disasters.
