Who is Behind 8446720673? A Full Breakdown You Should Know
To help you out, we've done a complete investigation — and trust us, the truth is important to know. Here's what we found, step-by-step: The number 8446720673 is a toll-free number.
It uses the 844 area code, which is often used by businesses, call centers, and automated systems across the U.S.
While some legit companies use it, scammers also exploit toll-free numbers to look trustworthy.
Still unsure? We ran a trace and shared more details at Fit4Mag.com
After reviewing multiple user reports, here's what we found: Frequent robocalls with no human response
with no human response Fake debt collection attempts pretending to be from banks or utility companies
pretending to be from banks or utility companies Phishing tactics, where users are asked to 'verify' sensitive info like Social Security numbers
Real user review (posted online):
'They said I owe money to a company I've never heard of. Sounded robotic, then asked for my birth date!'
If you receive a call from this number: Do NOT give any personal info (even if they say it's urgent). Don't press any button if it's a robocall — just hang up. Block the number through your phone settings. Report it at the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) website if the call is threatening or manipulative.
Want safe-call strategies? We've posted a detailed guide at Fit4Mag.com to keep you protected.
Yes, some users say the call was from a service provider (like a loan company or online subscription reminder).
But even then, always double-check: Visit the official company website
Use official support emails or chat
Never trust someone just because they know your name or phone number
At Fit4Mag.com, we've added examples of real vs. fake service calls using numbers like 8446720673.
Maybe. Maybe not. But one thing is clear:
If someone asks for your info without proof of who they are — it's a red flag.
That's why we recommend all readers to:Stay informedKnow your rights
Read the full report on Fit4Mag.com for screenshots, reports, and protection tools
Ready to protect yourself?
Visit Fit4Mag.com and search '8446720673' for the full investigation and tips that can save you from scams.
TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
6 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Republicans stooped to Democrats' level using Trump's tax bill to buy votes
Now that President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act has been signed into law, we can get into analyzing what is actually in the legislation. There are a few things that are clear to me as a conservative who hoped Republicans would push sound fiscal policies. Primarily, this is a flawed conservative policy. While it is a good thing that the 2017 Trump tax cuts were extended, there remain a ton of problems with the bill. Many of the tax break provisions have less to do with economics and more to do with pandering to the American people. Congressional Republicans seemingly made little attempt to justify their poor fiscal ideas, choosing instead to pass Trump's agenda by any means necessary. More: Data centers are inevitable, but why should Indiana pay for their energy demand? | Opinion However, the law goes further, creating new tax exemptions for Social Security, tips and overtime pay. These policies, in addition to the poor policy of an increased cap on state and local taxes, are little more than bribes to the American people. Opinion: Trump's tax bill will crush the rural voters who chose him I'm all for new tax cuts, provided we are reducing spending at the same time. But there is no economic rationale for exempting any of these forms of income from taxation. These incomes are not unique in their impact on the economy and should not be treated as such. The only reason for not taxing tips or overtime in favor of other forms of income is that MAGA lawmakers think they can buy votes. It's a tactic often employed by congressional Democrats, who promise either student loan forgiveness or taxing the ultrawealthy in order to buy middle-class and youth votes. Conservatives should not be proud of our leaders for stooping so low. Not only are these cuts not coherent in theory, they aren't even fiscally sound conservative policies. The issue with this law is that it overlooks the increasingly massive deficit that will be incurred to fund it, as well as the aforementioned new tax breaks. While it attempts to bridge this gap with good policies, such as work requirements for Medicaid and food stamp benefits, it isn't enough. Even after accounting for the economic growth the tax cuts are anticipated to generate, the bill is estimated to add $3.8 trillion to the deficit over the next decade. Tax cuts paid for through deficit spending aren't really tax cuts. The cuts still need to be paid for, and both options for doing so would be an additional burden on the American people. The first option is through borrowing money, which not only further increases the national debt but also increases the revenue required later to repay that debt. Second, this is achieved through printing more money, which is inflationary and places further costs on Americans. There is no magic third way that allows the government to cut taxes and keep spending without, at some point, hurting Americans. The only way to truly create tax cuts is by commensurately cutting spending at the same time. However, responsible budgets are not the goal of the current GOP. The main goal is to deliver on Trump's populist attempts to bribe voters, even if, ultimately, this will hurt those voters.
New York Post
17 hours ago
- New York Post
Here's how much money New Yorkers need to retire comfortably: new study
Retired New Yorkers need an average of $50,997 per year to cover their living expenses after factoring in Social Security payments, new research has found. GOBankingRates gathered national average annual expenditures data for people 65 and older from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Missouri Economic Research and Information Center in order to calculate the eye-popping figure. Thus, for a comfortable 25-year retirement, New Yorkers need a total of $1.27 million in savings. Advertisement 3 for a comfortable 25-year retirement, New Yorkers need a total of $1.27 million in savings. Daniel – A 2024 study revealed many Americans believe they should have about $1.46 million stashed away before giving up work — and that figure isn't far removed from reality if you live in the Empire State. However, most Americans have less than $89,000 saved for retirement, according to a Northwestern Mutual study released last year. Advertisement New York is the fifth most expensive state in which to retire, according to the study. 3 New York is the fifth most expensive state in which to retire, according to the study. Monkey Business – New Yorkers looking for cheaper places to retire will have to go further than the tri-state area, because your money won't stretch much further there. New Jersey retirees need $45,829 per year after Social Security to cover expenses, while Connecticut residents should budget $43,697 annually. Advertisement Hawaii is the most expensive state for retirees, where an eye-popping $87,770 is needed for annual expenses after factoring in Social Security. There, $2 million in savings won't even stretch for 23 years of retirement. Meanwhile, Massachusetts and California came in as the second and most expensive states for retirees, respectively. 3 Rochester, New York is pictured. Retirement costs differ wildly between and within states, but New York ranks as the fifth most expensive state in which to retire. SeanPavonePhoto – Advertisement On the other end of the spectrum, West Virginia was crowned as the cheapest state in which to retire. In the Mountain State, annual expenditures after Social Security are estimated to be just $27,803 — nearly half the estimated costs incurred in New York. Kansas was named the second least expensive state for retirees, followed by Mississippi, Oklahoma and Alabamba.
Epoch Times
18 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Hiring a Financial Advisor for Retirement: Is It Worth It?
We often feel like we're navigating a complex maze without a clear map when it comes to financial decisions. Many people feel overwhelmed with tax laws, optimizing Social Security benefits, making wise investment choices, and planning for future healthcare needs. The natural inclination for most people is to turn to a financial advisor. However, there's a big question: Do you really need one? Or, could you chart your own course to a financially secure retirement? As with retirement itself, there is no one-size-fits-all answer. An experienced financial advisor can provide valuable insight and help to avoid potential pitfalls for some. Some, however, may consider the associated costs an unnecessary drain on their savings.
