Philadelphia paper warns Fetterman to take Senate job seriously – ‘or step away'
In a strongly worded piece published on Sunday, the editorial board of the Philadelphia Inquirer, which endorsed Fetterman during his 2022 Senate campaign, said the first-term Democrat 'has missed more votes than nearly every other senator in the past two years' and 'regularly skips committee hearings, cancels meetings, avoids the daily caucus lunches with colleagues, and rarely goes on the Senate floor'.
The editorial board also wrote that six former Fetterman staffers told an Inquirer reporter that Fetterman was frequently absent or spent hours alone in his office, avoiding colleagues and meetings.
'Being an elected official comes with public scrutiny,' the board wrote. 'If Fetterman can't handle the attention or perform his job, then in the best interest of the country and the nearly 13 million residents of Pennsylvania he represents, he should step aside.'
Related: Republican senator criticized for mock apology after saying 'we all are going to die'
'Being an elected representative is a privilege, not an entitlement,' it added. 'Being a US senator is a serious job that requires full-time engagement.'
Fetterman responded to the piece and allegations on Monday during a Fox News debate with Republican senator David McCormick.
'For me, it's very clear, it's just part of like this weird – this weird smear,' Fetterman said. 'The more kinds of, left kind of media continues to have these kinds of an attack, and it's just part of a smear and that's just not … it's just not accurate.'
He continued: 'I've always been there, and for me, if I miss some of those votes, I've made 90% of them, and we all know those votes that I've missed were on Monday. Those are travel days and I have three young kids and … those are throwaway procedural votes that … they were never determined if they were important. That's a choice that I made.'
Fetterman also reportedly claimed senators Bernie Sanders and Patty Murray had missed more votes than he has.
'Why aren't the left media yelling and demanding them and claiming they're not doing their job?' Fetterman said.
In response, a spokesperson for Murray told Politico that most of her missed votes occurred during a vote-a-rama when her husband was hospitalized.
A spokesperson for Sanders did not immediately respond to request for comment from Politico, but the outlet pointed out that according to data from GovTrack.us, a government transparency site, Sanders has missed 836 of 6,226 rollcall votes since 1991, or about 13.4%. Murray has missed 290 of 11,106 rollcall votes since 1993, or roughly 2.6%.
By comparison, Politico reported that Fetterman has missed 174 of 961 rollcall votes, approximately 18.1%, in his first term, according to GovTrack.us.
The editorial on Sunday comes as last month, New York magazine published an article on Fetterman which quoted several former and current Fetterman staffers who expressed concerns about the Senator's mental and physical health, and his behavior.
In response, Fetterman dismissed the piece, calling it 'a one-source story, with a couple anonymous sources' and labeling it a 'hit piece from a very left publication'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
13 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Congress Is Raising Electricity Bills to Pay for Tax Cuts
Of all the elements of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, perhaps none is as obviously self-defeating as getting rid of tax credits for clean energy. That decision will not simply set back the fight against climate change. Congressional Republicans could also be setting America up for the worst energy-affordability crisis since the 1970s. Unlike then, this time we'll have imposed it on ourselves. Electricity demand in the United States is rising faster than it has in at least two decades. AI data centers are using huge amounts of power to train new models. More Americans are plugging their electric cars and hybrids into the grid. Rising temperatures mean more air-conditioning use. Failure to meet this rising demand with adequate supply results in higher prices. From 2000 to 2022, U.S. electricity prices rose by an average of about 2.8 percent a year; since 2022, they have risen by 13 percent annually. Fortunately, the timing of this demand spike coincided with a boom in renewable energy. According to the federal Energy Information Administration, 93 percent of the electricity capacity added to the grid this year will come from a combination of wind, solar, and battery storage. That trend was set to accelerate dramatically in the coming years thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act, which provided tax credits that made building clean power sources cheaper. Investment in those sources has accordingly spiked, and hundreds of new projects could begin generating power over the next decade. The IRA is generally seen as a climate bill, but it was also an energy bill. It provided a jolt to the American power sector at a moment when the sector desperately needed new supply. Or so it seemed. The Senate version of Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill repeals the clean-energy tax credits in the IRA for all wind and solar projects that don't begin construction within a year of the bill's passage or become fully operational by 2028. (And even if a project begins construction in the first half of 2026, it will need to meet extremely onerous domestic-sourcing requirements that many experts believe will be nearly impossible to satisfy.) As a result, future clean-energy projects, including many that have been announced but not yet built, will cost about 50 percent more than those that received the credits, according to an analysis by Jesse Jenkins, who leads the Princeton ZERO Lab. The inevitable result is that far fewer will come into existence. 'It's hard to think of a bigger self-own,' Jenkins told me. 'We're effectively raising taxes on the country's main sources of new power at a time when electricity prices are already rising.' Jonathan Chait: They didn't have to do this The purported justification for these cuts is that renewables are unreliable energy sources pushed by woke environmentalists, and the country would be better served by doubling down on coal and natural gas. 'More wind and solar brings us the worst of two worlds: less reliable energy delivery and higher electric bills,' wrote Trump's Energy Secretary Chris Wright in an op-ed last week. In fact, renewable energy is cheap and getting cheaper. Even without the tax credits, the price of onshore wind has fallen by 70 percent, solar energy by 90 percent, and batteries by more than 90 percent over the past decade. The IRA, by making these sources even more affordable, was projected to save American consumers an average of $220 a year in the decade after its passage. The cost savings from renewables are so great that in Texas— Texas, mind you—all of the electricity growth over the past decade has come from wind and solar alone. This has made energy grids more reliable, not less. During the summer of 2023, the state faced several near failures of its electricity grid; officials had to call on residents to conserve energy. The state responded by building out new renewable energy sources to stabilize the grid. It worked. 'The electrical grid in Texas has breezed through a summer in which, despite milder temperatures, the state again reached record levels of energy demand,' The New York Times reported last September. 'It did so largely thanks to the substantial expansion of new solar farms.' In fact, the energy secretary's description of wind and solar—as unreliable and expensive—is more aptly applied to fossil fuels. Coal is so costly relative to other energy sources that investment in building new plants has dried up. The natural-gas industry is facing such a crippling supply-chain crisis that the wait time for a new gas turbine—the combustion engine that converts natural gas to usable energy—can be as long as seven years. 'What we've consistently heard from the industry is that, right now, there is just no way to get a new natural-gas plant running before 2030, and quite possibly even later,' Robbie Orvis, the senior director for modeling and analysis at the think tank Energy Innovation, told me. The cost of actually building one of those plants, meanwhile, has more than doubled in the past few years, pushing utilities to invest heavily in renewable sources, which can be built much faster and often at a lower cost. Now Congress has decided to kneecap the energy sources that are available to meet rising demand. Orvis predicts that this could result in one of the fastest, sharpest rises in energy prices since the Arab oil embargo of the 1970s, which featured record-high oil prices, long lines and rationing at gas stations, and a nationwide inflation spike. An Energy Innovation analysis of an earlier, similar version of the bill found that, by 2035, the average yearly energy bill will be $473 higher in Michigan, $590 higher in Maryland, $668 higher in California, and $777 higher in Texas than it would have been if the IRA credits had remained in place. (Several other sources have produced similar results, including analyses of the final Senate bill.) Blackouts and grid outages will become more frequent. Power-intensive industries such as AI and manufacturing will struggle under the weight of higher energy costs. China will solidify its dominance over clean-energy supply chains. 'Just think of Trump's own priorities: lower energy prices, becoming an AI superpower, reindustrializing America, outcompeting China,' Princeton's Jenkins said. 'Getting rid of these credits hurts all of those goals.' But there is one priority missing from that list: owning the libs. Partisan polarization around clean energy has grown so extreme since the passage of the IRA that Trump and many other Republicans apparently see destroying it as an end in itself. An earlier version of the Senate bill went further than repealing subsidies. It included an excise tax on solar and wind energy—the Republican Party, taxing energy—that would have added an additional 10–20 percent cost onto most projects. That provision was scrapped after a handful of moderate senators objected, but the fact that it ever existed is stunning enough. As the bill headed to the House of Representatives for final consideration, some members claimed that they wouldn't support it without even harsher restrictions on clean energy. Representative Chip Roy of Texas attacked the Senate bill for not targeting clean-energy tax credits more aggressively, calling it 'a deal-killer of an already bad deal' and setting up the absurd possibility that the IRA would be saved only by Republicans' inability to agree on how badly to eviscerate it. Jessica Riedl: Congressional Republicans might set off the debt bomb The desire to stick it to liberals is so intense that Republicans are evidently willing to inflict disproportionate economic pain on their own voters. The Energy Innovation analysis found that the states that will experience the sharpest increase in electricity costs as a result of the bill are Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Missouri, and Kentucky. A separate analysis found that of the 10 states that will lose the most total renewable energy capacity as a result of the repeal, nine voted for Trump last year. Congressional Republicans might be betting that the consequences of their legislation will take long enough to materialize that they won't be blamed. Thanks to the numerous clean-energy projects in the pipeline today, the sharpest energy-price increases won't come into effect until after 2030. By that time, a Democratic president could very well be in office, stuck with the higher energy costs sown by their predecessor, reaping the political whirlwind.
Newsweek
16 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Vulnerable to Losing Their Seats After Voting Yes on Trump Bill
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Republicans representing districts with high Medicaid enrollment rates could face losing their seats in the 2026 midterms if they vote for Trump's "Big, Beautiful Bill." Recent changes to the bill would cut roughly $1.1 trillion in health-care spending and result in 11.8 million people losing Medicaid health insurance over the next decade, according to new estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The bill also mandates that able-bodied adults ages 19 to 64—including some parents of older children—complete and report at least 80 hours per month of work, job training, volunteering, or education to keep their coverage. Nearly 80 million children, senior citizens, people with disabilities, parents and adults without dependents rely on Medicaid and the related Children's Health Insurance Program. Rep. Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz (L) and Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif are two of the Republicans who could lose their seats over Trump's Medicaid bill. Rep. Juan Ciscomani, R-Ariz (L) and Rep. Ken Calvert, R-Calif are two of the Republicans who could lose their seats over Trump's Medicaid bill. AP Why It Matters If Republican lawmakers lose their seats in the midterms, it could tip the balance of power in Congress, which is currently controlled by the GOP in both chambers. The party has particularly low margins in the House, where Trump's bill now faces a major test after it narrowly cleared the Senate on Tuesday, thanks to Vice President JD Vance's tiebreaking vote. What To Know More than 60 House Republicans represent districts where Medicaid enrollment is higher than the national average, according to a CNN analysis of enrollment data and 2024 election results. Among these 64 GOP lawmakers, five—Representatives Nick Begich, Juan Ciscomani, Ken Calvert, Jeff Hurd, and Rob Bresnahan—won their seats last November by slim margins of five points or less. So if they back Trump's bill, they could face a serious risk of losing their seats in next year's election. All five lawmakers are up for re-election in 2026. Rob Bresnahan Bresnahan won by 1.6 percent in 2024, and 26.2 percent of his district is enrolled in Medicaid. He previously joined four other Republican members of the Congressional Hispanic Conference in signing a letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson warning against cuts to Medicaid. In response to budget reconciliation negotiations, Bresnahan said, "If a bill is put in front of me that guts the benefits my neighbors rely on, I will not vote for it." He emphasized in a February 13 news release, "These benefits are promises that were made to the people of NEPA, and where I come from, people keep their word." The release noted that more than 200,000 Medicaid recipients live in the 8th Congressional District, more than a quarter of its population. Bresnahan also said in a February 26 Facebook post, "I will fight to protect working-class families in Northeastern Pennsylvania and stand with President Trump in opposing gutting Medicaid. My position on this has not and will not change." However, in an April 17 letter to House Republican leaders, Bresnahan and 11 fellow Republicans said they favor reforming Medicaid so "it is a strong and long-lasting program for years to come." They added, "However, we cannot and will not support a final reconciliation bill that includes any reduction in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations." On May 22, Bresnahan and all of Pennsylvania's Republican House members voted for President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Bresnahan said, "Medicaid will be protected while ensuring taxpayer dollars are spent prudently. During this process, I fought to protect social safety net programs from the waste, fraud, and abuse that have threatened their long-term solvency. By ensuring states are not using Medicaid dollars on illegal aliens, conducting more frequent eligibility checks, and requiring work for able-bodied recipients, we are securing Medicaid for those who truly need it." Nick Begich Begich won by 2 percent in 2024, and 33.5 percent of his district is enrolled in Medicaid. He has been a vocal supporter of the bill. Shortly after the vote, Begich said in his Washington, D.C. office, "This is a great bill for Alaska. It preserves the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, so it keeps taxes low for working Americans, working Alaskans. It also drives some accountability in some of the government programs that are safety-net programs." In a post on X, he added, "The American people are counting on Congress to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act and deliver on the America First promises that will make our nation prosperous, strong, and safe again." Juan Ciscomani Ciscomani won by 2.5 percent in 2024, with 22.9 percent of the district enrolled in Medicaid. In May, he voted to approve President Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," which included cuts to Medicaid services. Ciscomani also joined the letter opposing reductions in Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations. Ken Calvert Calvert won by 3.4 percent in 2024, with 27.4 percent Medicaid enrollment in his district. He defended the bill, telling News Channel 3, "Medicaid is fine. We're not doing anything to Medicaid other than people that are able-bodied, men and women under the age of 65 that are in good health with no children, have 20 hour a week work requirement or 20 hours of volunteer work. That's not too much to ask to get Medicaid insurance on your behalf." He also said in a post on X, "I don't believe it's fair to ask a taxpayer who works 40 hours a week to support their family to send their tax dollars to provide Medicaid benefits for healthy working-age adults without children who refuse to work. Like most Americans, I support reasonable work requirements." Jeff Hurd Hurd won by 5 percent in 2024, and 26.3 percent of his district is enrolled in Medicaid. He joined the letter opposing Medicaid coverage reductions and voted for the bill in the House. His 3rd Congressional District has the highest rate of Medicaid recipients in Colorado. A spokesperson confirmed that Representative Hurd plans to vote "yes" on the bill, according to The Colorado Sun. What Happens Next The One Big Beautiful Bill Act passed a key procedural vote in the early hours of Thursday. It remains to be seen whether Johnson can rally the necessary votes to approve the package and move it to Trump's desk, where it would be signed into law.
UPI
32 minutes ago
- UPI
Hakeem Jeffries launches marathon speech to delay Trump megabill
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., has been in an hours-long speech to stall the passage of the Republican megabill. File Photo by Annabelle Gordon/UPI. | License Photo July 3 (UPI) -- House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries launched a marathon speech on the House floor Thursday, seeking to delay a final vote on President Donald Trump's budget and legislative agenda bill. Jeffries, D-N.Y., began speaking at 4:52 a.m. EDT, describing frustration with the leaders of the House GOP, who only allowed one hour of debate over the more than 900-page bill. "It had been my hope, Mr. Speaker, that we'd be able to have a robust debate, passionate support, or passionate opposition in connection with this bill. That hundreds of members on both sides of the aisle could participate in, and instead we have a limited debate where the relevant committees of jurisdiction have been given 15 minutes each on a bill of such significant magnitude as it relates to the health, the safety, and the well-being of the American people," The Hill reported that Jeffries said. "And because that debate was so limited, I feel the obligation, Mr. Speaker, to stand on this House floor and take my sweet time to tell the stories of the American people. And that's exactly what I intend to do - take my sweet time." As the party leader, he has unlimited time on the House floor. Jeffries spent his speaking time telling the stories of people who will be harmed by the bill, focusing on those in Republican districts and calling out the House members who represent them. House Democrats have declined to say how long Jeffries plans to speak. As of this writing, he has spoken for seven hours. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., planned to take the floor after Jeffries, but when he continued to speak, Republicans began leaving the House floor. Jeffries has represented New York's 8th congressional district since 2013.
