Luxon snaps back at 'frickin' Hipkins over FamilyBoost
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has challenged Labour to front up with any policy at all as he comes under pressure over National's struggling childcare support scheme.
The comment was made after Labour revealed just 153 families had received the maximum FamilyBoost rebate - well short of National's pre-election promise that 21,000 families would be eligible for the full amount.
Speaking on his way into a caucus meeting this morning, Luxon rejected Labour's characterisation of the policy as a failure.
"I'm not taking any any lectures from frickin' Chris Hipkins or the Labour Party," he told reporters. "They have no idea what to do. They put us in this mess.
"You can stand on the other side and criticise as much as you like, but I don't see any policy from Labour."
Luxon said 60,000 families had received some support from the FamilyBoost policy and another 20,000 would soon be eligible due to recent tweaks to the eligibility settings.
"Isn't that great? We have put a programme in place which Labour didn't support, didn't vote, don't back, because they don't back low-and-middle-income working New Zealanders."
The former Labour government extended cheaper childcare to parents of two-year-olds, giving them access to 20 hours a week of free early childhood education.
On taking office, the coalition reversed that policy and instead rolled out its more targeted FamilyBoost scheme - a weekly rebate on childcare costs. 'Absolute flop'
Responding to Luxon's comments, Labour leader Chris Hipkins said National's refusal to admit the FamilyBoost scheme was "an absolute flop" showed it was completely out of touch.
"They're getting really desperate. On a daily basis, they're attacking me and attacking the Labour Party rather than talking about their own track record."
He defended Labour's lack of public policy, saying that would all be laid out in full before next year's general election.
"We're not even close to an election campaign at the moment," Hipkins said. "But unlike him, when we go into the election campaign next year, I will make sure that the policies that we have add up."
Labour wanted to see the government's next Budget before it outlined significant policies which would cost money, he said, and suggested a lot of policy work was under way in the background.
"The National Party desperately wants to talk about the Labour Party's policy at the moment because their own policies are turning into an absolute disaster zone."
National also came under criticism when it was in opposition for a paucity of policy heading into the 2023 election year, but it had released elements of its tax plan and several discussion documents indicating a direction of travel.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
44 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Government warned of even longer election counts without reforms, but Māori and young people likely to be hit hard by change
Goldsmith, along with the rest of the coalition, expressed frustration at the length of the count at the last election, and asked officials to look at changes. 'If we leave things as they are, it could well take even longer in future elections. The 20-day timeframe for a final result will likely already be challenging to achieve at the next election without changes,' Goldsmith said. Labour and the Greens criticised the changes, with Labour's justice spokesman Duncan Webb saying they were an 'appalling change that will make it harder for a lot of people to exercise their democratic right'. A Regulatory Impact Statement from the Ministry of Justice said there had been an explosion in special votes as more and more people enrolled or updated their details on the day they voted. There were about 300,000 to 350,000 of these votes at the last election. In the 2023 election, 602,000 votes cast were special votes, or about 20.9% of all votes. If nothing were to change, the Electoral Commission forecasts this to rise to 739,000 special votes in the 2026 election, or 24% of the total. By the 2032 election, the Electoral Commission forecasts 999,000 special votes, or 30% of the total. Officials noted a general trend towards people getting their enrolment sorted far later in the cycle, with 66% of enrolment 'transactions' in the 2023 election occurring after writ day, the Governor-General's official instruction to hold an election. This compared to 52% in 2017 and 42% in 2020. The change may go deeper than mere laziness. Officials said that New Zealanders move around a lot more than in the past. At the last census, about a fifth of people had lived in their house for a year or less and 53% of people had lived in their house for less than five years. Moving house more means updating your enrolment details more. If people do this on the day, it means more special votes and a longer count. Officials shared Goldsmith's concern about ballooning numbers of special votes leading to a longer counting period. If a third of votes were special votes, the count could take longer than it does now — although they did not estimate a time. They warned that a longer vote count and more special votes could delay the start of coalition negotiations prolonging uncertainty and affecting everything from the functioning of charities to investment in the economy. 'Special votes often affect the final number of seats allocated to parties. For that reason, government formation negotiations may be constrained until special votes have been counted,' officials said. 'The level of uncertainty about election outcomes will always depend on how close the results are for each election. 'Likewise, the degree to which parties may be able to progress government formation negotiations while awaiting the official results will depend on the closeness of the results as well as other political considerations,' officials said. '[E]lections are by nature a time of uncertainty in democracies, and there is value in a timely and smooth transfer of power following an election. A change of government and associated changes in policies can have broad impacts — for example, on the general public, Māori, businesses, the voluntary sector, public services and more. 'Some international studies have indicated that political uncertainty around national elections can have an impact on economic factors, such as reduced investment and spending,' officials said. These challenges are particularly acute for New Zealand, which because of the coalition negotiations period that is almost guaranteed by an MMP election, will always have a period of post-election uncertainty. New Zealand also has relatively short three-year terms, meaning elections come around frequently. Campaigns take about six weeks from the last day of Parliament to election day. If the vote count takes three weeks and coalition negotiations take another five, then New Zealand will spend about one month in every 20 either in the midst of an election campaign or waiting for a government to be formed — the period of uncertainty is even longer considering how little governments tend to do between delivering their final budget and getting out on the hustings. Officials also warned the pressures of these enormous special vote counts could lead to errors, undermining confidence in the electoral system. A move to different counting methods might be desirable. The current model is 'largely manual', officials said. 'This model may be nearing the end of its capacity to cope with increasing volume and processing requirements,' they said. Officials warned the changes could have serious consequences on turnout. The Electoral Commission advised that special votes are more likely to come from areas with high Māori, Asian, and Pacific communities. Younger people are also far more likely to cast special votes — particularly first-time voters. In 2023, 33% of 18- to 19-year-old voters enrolled or updated their details during the voting period, including 48% of Māori voters aged 18 to 19. In 2023, 17.3% of Māori voters updated their details or enrolled during the voting period. The same figure for the general population is 18.9%. Officials raised some concerns about whether the changes might raise Treaty of Waitangi problems, as the Treaty 'provides for equal citizenship rights for Māori'. 'These rights include the right to political representation. Setting an earlier enrolment deadline will increase the administrative requirements to exercise this right,' they said. Officials were also concerned that based on 'previous trends' there may be an 'increased likelihood' that votes cast by Māori would be disallowed at a higher rate than those cast by non-Māori, depending on how people responded to the new deadline for updating their details. As part of Goldsmith's changes, the Government will introduce automatic enrolment updates, making it more likely for people to have their enrolments kept current automatically. Officials recommended this option on its own as their preferred method to reduce vote counting timeframes. Instead, it was paired with decisions to close enrolment 13 days before election day. Officials also considered closing enrolment on writ day and requiring people to vote in their electorate, rather than casting a vote from somewhere else.
RNZ News
44 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Nearly half of Kiwis applying for Australian citizenship born elsewhere
Max Siqueira (second from right), during his New Zealand citizenship ceremony - he has now moved to Australia. Photo: Neil Macbeth / SUPPLIED Nearly half of the New Zealanders applying for Australian citizenship weren't born here, according to data from the Australian government. Between July 2023 and June 2025, more than 92,000 New Zealand citizens applied for Australian citizenship, its Department of Home Affairs said. The figures raised questions about whether New Zealand had become a launch pad for migrants aiming to settle in Australia . When Max Siqueira moved from Brazil to New Zealand in 2016, he had no firm plans. He arrived on a visitor visa, but after landing a job, he stayed long enough to gain permanent residency and eventually became a New Zealand citizen last year. Soon after, his family went on holiday to Australia - they liked it so much they decided to move there and now live on the Gold Coast. Australia's Gold Coast. (File photo) Photo: 123rf "It's really easy once you get the New Zealand passport," Siqueira said. "I just bought a plane ticket. At the airport, I gave them my passport and said I was moving to Australia. They said 'Welcome, good luck' - that's it. The next day, I applied for a tax number and started working. It was that easy." His case was not unique. In 2024 alone, nearly 30,000 New Zealanders moved to Australia - the highest number in more than a decade . Since July 2023, New Zealand citizens on a Special Category Visa (SCV) had been able to apply directly for Australian citizenship after four years of residence, without first needing to become permanent residents. Australia did not cap the number of SCVs issued, and nearly every New Zealand citizen was eligible for one upon arrival. While Siqueira believed most migrants came to New Zealand intending to settle, he agreed some planned to move on. "It happens, but not as much as people might think. I know a few who had that plan from day one, go to New Zealand, then move to Australia once they get the passport. "But most didn't plan that. They were happy in New Zealand and only thought about moving once they visited Australia or realised how easy it would be with the passport. "I can't speak for all nationalities, but among Brazilians I know, the main reason people move to Australia is the weather. It reminds us of home," Siqueira said. Stats NZ said since the early 2000s, migrants born outside of New Zealand have made up a growing share of New Zealand citizens moving across the Tasman. Of New Zealand citizens who migrated to Australia in 2024, 35 percent were foreign-born. Data form the Department of Home Affairs showed, from 1 July 2023 to 30 June 2025, more than 92,000 New Zealand nationals who hold a Special Category Visa (SVC) applied for Australian citizenship. Of these, 48 percent were born outside of New Zealand. Emeritus Professor Richard Bedford, a population geographer, said while New Zealand had a net loss of citizens to Australia, it had also a considerable net gain of citizens from other countries during the same period. "There's sometimes an assumption all the people going to Australia are highly skilled, and those coming here are not, but that's incorrect", he said. "We bring in many highly skilled migrants, and it does help balance the overall flow." But retaining that talent was a real challenge, he said. "We need to take very seriously the factors that attract skilled migrants. It's not always about money, but money is a big one. "We must ensure that highly skilled migrants we bring in get good jobs and are well paid. But we're a small country with a smaller economy, and we can't compete on everything. "What we can offer is a good lifestyle, a welcoming environment, and a strong sense of community, things that also matter to many migrants." Immigration rules were an important factor, he said. "Many barriers to skilled employment in New Zealand come from our own professional associations, like medical or engineering boards. "If we're not letting these skilled people work, we shouldn't be inviting them in the first place. "And once someone has residency, they have the same rights as anyone else. If they don't want to stay in the job they came for, or if they want to move to Australia, they have every right to do so. Bedford, who had been working on migration issues since the 1960s, said it's too difficult to tell if more immigrants are using this country as a stepping stone across the Tasman. He said the real challenge was making New Zealand a place people want to stay. "Not just with good pay, but with access to housing, a welcoming culture, and opportunities. If we want migrants to commit to staying, we have to make it worth their while beyond just the job offer." Emeritus Professor Jacques Poot, a population economist at the University of Waikato, said New Zealand and Australia had long functioned as two closely linked labour markets, and New Zealand had typically come out on the losing side. "Australia's economy is about five times bigger, and wages tend to be higher due to slightly greater productivity." Poot said it was unfair to assume migrants who left had always intended to do so. "People migrate for all kinds of reasons. Some move on, some return home, and others stay. There's a lot of churn in modern labour markets. Migration today is often temporary." Still, he said New Zealand should improve its ability to retain people who wanted to settle. "We should revisit our pathways to residency. We need to make sure people who want to settle here have every opportunity to do so." He also pointed to New Zealand's wage gap as a long-standing push factor. "Australia offers higher wages, and that's tied to their larger economy and more populous cities. Cities like Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane generate what we call 'agglomeration advantages', with more productivity, more opportunities, better pay." Even so, he said the narrative of a mass exodus from New Zealand was overstated. "If you look at the numbers in proportion to our total population, the real exodus happened in the late 1970s, when we only had 3 million people. Now we have over 5 million. So while the numbers may look big, they're not records in relative terms. "One of the things that struck me in 1979 was the big headline in two papers in Wellington: 'Last one to turn off the light.' Because they were really amazed about the out migration from New Zealand. "Well, since then, we're still having the lights on in New Zealand, so I wouldn't worry too much about it." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
A prescription for dismay, disbelief
Everything is going up. The costs of butter, milk and cheese, fruit and vegetables, rents, rates and electricity are rising, some of them faster than belief. Annual inflation has lifted to 2.7%, according to the consumer price index. There can be no doubt New Zealanders are grappling with the escalating cost of living. The government says it is all about cutting costs for Kiwis, something we have seen with its policies and its energetic drive to cut the public service and put thousands of skilled workers out of jobs. However, despite its much-vaunted approach to trim things, some of which didn't need much pruning, the coalition is still releasing big pots of money for projects which have its favour and tickle its fancy, or the fancies of its cadres. As a consequence of that favouritism, something else is going up. Advice be blowed, let's have a third medical school in New Zealand at a time when the government has been doing everything it can to minimise the importance of, and squeeze the life out of, Dunedin's desperately needed new hospital. Until Monday afternoon's announcement that the University of Waikato's persistent and somewhat personal bid for a medical school had been approved, there had been perhaps a hope that surely common sense might prevail and the government wouldn't, after all, go along with the proposal. Such sanguine thinking, however, was always held in check by the knowledge that this government has already shown several times that logic, facts and evidence to the contrary will not stop it supporting something which it is hell-bent on delivering for its followers. At the heart of Waikato's proposal was something few could disagree with — that the country urgently needs to do something about the state and delivery of rural healthcare. Access to timely and effective medical services for those communities has been a big concern for many years, one which has only continued to grow. But does it take a spanking new medical school costing several hundred million dollars, and growing, to ensure rural targets will be met? No. There is no reason why the medical schools at the University of Otago and the University of Auckland could not have been funded to train more doctors at a significantly lower cost than launching a new school, a point they clearly made to the government. Even the Treasury advised against the wisdom of proceeding with this pet project, as did the Ministry of Education and the Tertiary Education Commission, warning that the expense, the duplication and the logistical challenges raised red flags for them. In spite of that, the government and Waikato University forged on regardless. Health Minister Simeon Brown announced a development with costs which have changed significantly from those pledged by the National Party before the last election. Then, National said it would provide $280 million for the new school and the university would need to find $100m. Now, the government will disburse $82.85m towards it, and Waikato will have to stump up more than $150m. The final cost, of course, is bound to be higher than current expectations. A lot has been written about links between National and the university and its vice-chancellor Neil Quigley, and also with consultant Steven Joyce, a former National government minister. Without getting too deeply into that, we are concerned that this is little more than an overt example of pork-barrel politics. We are also troubled and disappointed, yet again, at the lack of transparency around the government's decision-making, particularly over health matters. Whenever it makes pronouncements which it knows are likely to be contentious, the accompanying documents seem to take ages to surface — if they ever do. That in itself probably speaks volumes about the consideration of the evidence. It's difficult to stay calm and reasoned and attempt to rise above the feeling this government cares not a jot for the South. When one sees what a charmed life this Waikato proposal has apparently had through the coalition's approval process, and compare that with the absolute shambles it has promulgated with the new Dunedin hospital and its obvious level of disinterest in the project, it is hard to remain philosophical. Once again, this government has let us down.
