Closing arguments heard in $5B First Nations housing class action lawsuit
The lawsuit, which was heard in Federal Court this week in Winnipeg, alleges Canada has "deliberately underfunded housing on reserves," while simultaneously isolating First Nations by imposing restrictions on their ability to provide housing for themselves.
St. Theresa Point First Nation in Manitoba and Sandy Lake First Nation in northwestern Ontario filed the lawsuit in 2023. Over 100 First Nations have opted in to the class action.
Elder Delores Fiddler of Sandy Lake First Nation was one of many to share the impact of the housing crisis has had on her family. Her 19-year-old granddaughter died from Blastomycosis, a fungal infection contracted by inhaling mould spores.
"They did an autopsy on her. They told me why she died. She died of that mould. Do you guys have a mouldy house they told us? Yeah, it's all mouldy," said Fiddler.
"We make a tent outside to have fresh air so we don't have to breathe in whatever is inside our home."
Jonovan Flett, a father of two from St. Theresa Point, grew up in ten different houses in the community. Flett explained that he had to constantly move because everywhere his family ended up was overcrowded.
"None of this is normal," said said Flett. "It's not normal for babies to be covered in rashes because their houses are infested with mould."
Grand Chief Alex McDougall of Anisininew Okimawin, an organization that represents St. Theresa Point and other Anisininew Nations in the same region, said, the issue is a "longstanding failure" of the federal government and the provincial partners "who must be reminded of the sacred obligation embedded in our treaties."
"Canada forced us onto the reserves, which were slivers of our traditional territories and they deprived us from maintaining our self-sustaining ways of life that have been practised by our ancestors for thousands of years," said co-lead plaintiff, Chief Raymond Flett of St. Theresa Point.
"Now, Canada says it has no responsibility to provide housing on reserve."
The class action is seeking $5 billion in damages.
"The Plaintiffs urged the Court to recognize that the housing crisis on reserve is the direct result of state conduct, and asked the Court to recognize that Canada has a legal duty to take reasonable measures to ensure the Class has access to adequate housing," said Alana Robert, plaintiff's legal counsel, in an email sent to CBC Indigenous.
Canada said in its statement of defense it acknowledges St. Theresa Point's claim that some housing sub-divisions lack running water and sewerage service today but that the claim should be dismissed.
"Canada does not owe any legal obligations or duties to build and maintain houses on-reserve," the statement of defense read.
The final arguments were heard on Thursday. A final decision is expected in the coming months.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Vancouver Sun
2 days ago
- Vancouver Sun
Conversations That Matter: Group wants Site C work camp for mental health centre
'We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to create Canada's premier centre for excellence in mental health and additions in B.C.'s Northeast,' says Mukhtar Latif, of Pomegranate Housing Consultancy. The North Wind Wellness Centre Society and Treaty 8 First Nations have put forward a plan to repurpose the Site C workers camp into a permanent asset that would deliver transformational health care services. The worker accommodation facility was built to house 1,600 workers and it came with a wide range of services and utilities. Now that the work of building the dam is complete, the site is about to be decommissioned. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'This facility will address a more than six month wait-list for people needing treatment in Northern B.C.,' says Latif. If the group is successful in their bid to have B.C. Hydro endorse the plan to repurpose the site, the benefits are multi-dimensional. 'The centre will generate new treatments and best practices, train more than 200 people in critical health-care roles, save the health-care system more than $30 Million.' says Latif. Latif joined a Conversation That Matters about the innovative plan to reuse the Site C work camp as a place of healing. See the video at Learn More about our guests career at Join us Sept. 16 for Conversations Live , Investing in B.C. in Partnership with First Nations. For more health news and content around diseases, conditions, wellness, healthy living, drugs, treatments and more, head to – a member of the Postmedia Network.
CTV News
4 days ago
- CTV News
Federal Court dismisses claim military vaccine mandate led to spiritual discrimination
A Federal Court judge has thrown out a lawsuit filed by a former soldier who alleged spiritual discrimination and wrongful dismissal by the Canadian Armed Forces due to its COVID-19 vaccine mandate. Liam Jarbeau had spent five years in the army when, in October 2021, the chief of the defence staff introduced the mandatory vaccination policy for all military members. Jarbeau objected to the mandate, requesting an exemption based on his spiritual beliefs. The soldier's exemption request was denied, prompting him to eventually file a grievance with the Canadian Forces. Jarbeau left the military in March 2024, apparently before the grievance process was exhausted. One year later, he filed suit against the federal government, alleging the CAF had breached his Charter rights protecting him from spiritual discrimination. He also accused the military of constructive dismissal, an illegal labour practice in which an employer fundamentally alters the terms of an employee's job, such that the worker feels compelled to resign. Jarbeau further contended that undue delays in resolving his grievance denied him due process. 'Significant harm' Representing himself before the court, the former soldier told Justice William Pentney that he was denied training opportunities and promotions, and was given undesirable postings due to his unvaccinated status. He argued this hobbled his military career and ultimately prevented him from signing on to complete his remaining 18 years of service because the CAF refused to acknowledge or guard against further mistreatment. 'The Canadian Armed Forces represent far more than just a career; it is an integral part of an individual's identity,' Pentney wrote in a summary of Jarbeau's statements to the court. 'Therefore, the loss of this role, especially when imposed against his will, constitutes not just a career disruption, but a significant harm to his character and sense of self.' The Attorney General of Canada moved to strike Jarbeau's claims, arguing, in part, that he failed to identify a specific religious belief or practice that conflicted with the vaccine mandate. 'The plaintiff makes repeated references to his 'spirituality' but does not elaborate on the nature of his belief system or his adherence,' the judge wrote in his July 18 decision to strike the former soldier's claims. Jarbeau countered that the nature of his spirituality and its importance to him were detailed in his initial grievance with the military. But the judge stated that he could not consider any external evidence, including evidence within the grievance itself, while hearing the government's motion. 'The plaintiff's claim must stand or fall based on a generous reading of the pleading itself,' Pentney wrote. 'He says that this is all explained in the affidavits he submitted, but I cannot have regard to those at this stage of the analysis. Reading the claim generously, and with a view to understanding the essence of what the plaintiff asserts, I find that he has failed to plead the necessary material facts to support a cause of action.' The judge cautioned that his ruling didn't question the sincerity of Jarbeau's spiritual beliefs, saying any such finding was beyond the scope of the present hearing. Crown not contractually bound to CAF members Turning to the allegations of wrongful dismissal and denial of due process, the judge cited 'abundant' legal precedent affirming that traditional labour law remedies do not extend to members of the Canadian Forces. 'The terms of service to which CAF members are subject are unique in some respects. They can be called to perform their duties at virtually any time, in any place, and even where doing their duty will place their lives at risk,' the judge wrote. 'As a matter of law, however, they serve 'at pleasure,'' Pentney continued. 'The Crown is in no way contractually bound to the members of the Armed Forces,' and anyone who joins the military is entering a one-sided commitment with no obligations for the Crown. 'As a CAF member, the plaintiff knew that he could be posted to different locations and given different assignments,' Pentney wrote. 'The fact that he was subjected to temporary postings, even unfavourable ones, does not engage the type of security interests that Sec. 7 (of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, protecting life, liberty and security of the person) is meant to protect.' The judge further found no material basis to support the former soldier's argument that administrative delays amounted to a denial of due process, finding instead that the claims brought to the court should have been pursued fully through the military's internal grievance process. 'The record before me is incomplete as to the nature and scope of his grievance or its outcome, but there can be no doubt that he had taken the step to pursue a grievance,' the judge ruled. 'There is also no doubt that the CAF grievance process was sufficiently broad in scope to deal with all aspects of the plaintiff's claims.' The attorney general sought an order on the reimbursement of its costs in the case, but the judge denied the request, finding the former soldier 'pursued his claim in good faith and should not bear the additional costs of this motion.' 'Each party shall bear their own costs,' Pentney concluded.
National Post
4 days ago
- National Post
Peter MacKinnon: Nurses warned of 'imbalances' in 'colonial' health-care system
Two centuries ago, liberal theorist John Stuart Mill wrote in his classic, On Liberty, that human liberty requires freedom of conscience, thought and feeling: 'absolute freedom of opinion and sentiment on all subjects, practical or speculative, scientific, moral or theological.' His thinking has recently taken a battering, not least in our universities, but that beating is now joined by the foray of the Canadian Nurses Association into political thought. Article content Article content In its 2025 Code of Ethics, the association compels nurses to include a broad set of progressive political beliefs in their professional duties. Among these: nurses must respect the principles of social justice; advocate for the stewardship of the environment; advocate for freedom from oppression; and pursue truth and reconciliation. Article content Article content Article content On the subject of truth and reconciliation, nurses are encouraged to 'develop awareness of the Calls to Action contained in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada report to address racism and health inequity; understand the history of and the ongoing impacts of colonial policies and nursing practices on First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples' health and well-being; and acknowledge the power imbalances that exist due to historical contexts leading to the mistrust of colonial systems such as the health-care system …' Article content These are political quests which, depending on context, may be worthy of pursuit, but to establish them as professional duties for the nursing profession strays far beyond the requirements of conscientious individual patient care. Article content Article content Three observations are pertinent. First, these requirements do not have a settled meaning: nurses, like the rest of us, have different views about what constitutes social justice, environmental stewardship, reconciliation and freedom from oppression. If there is a prevailing orthodoxy in the association's leadership, it is not shared with the rest of us. Article content Article content Second, as with Lewis Carroll's Humpty Dumpty, these new duties will mean what the association says they mean at a given time. The consequence is that the association can hold its members to account for departures from current orthodoxies or the opinions of the leadership; members may not know what their transgressions are until after the fact when they are summoned for discipline. Article content Third and most important, what business does the association have in establishing these professional duties? It has an undoubted interest in its members' professional knowledge and skills, their willingness to work collaboratively in the health-care system and their ability to relate to patients including those from many and diverse backgrounds. But, their interest should not extend to telling them what to think, believe and advocate. Article content
