Census, followed by delimitation or freeze? The road ahead, likely legal challenges
The reason: the Constitution under Article 82 mandates delimitation after each census to readjust the seats as per changes in population. It says, 'Upon the completion of each census, the allocation of seats in the House of the People to the States and the division of each State into territorial constituencies shall be readjusted by such authority and in such manner as Parliament may by law determine.'
Article 81 of the Constitution provides for the 'one person, one vote, one value' principle. Article 81 (2) (a) says, 'There shall be allotted to each State a number of seats in the House of the People in such manner that the ratio between that number and the population of the state is, so far as practicable, the same for all States.' Article 81 (2) (b) says, 'Each State shall be divided into territorial constituencies in such manner that the ratio between the population of each constituency and number of seats allotted to it is, so far as practicable, the same throughout the State.'
With the collection of data for the next census ending by March 1, 2027, the release of census data could coincide with the expiry of the freeze on delimitation. This freeze was put in place first for 25 years through a constitutional amendment in 1976, and again by 25 years through a constitutional amendment in 2002.
The reason for the freeze was the concern of the southern states that because their population had stabilised by then, and the population of some northern states had begun to grow at a brisk pace, their representation in the Lok Sabha would go down.
To freeze or not to freeze
With the Constitution ensuring equality of representation to citizens and not states of the Union, and mandating delimitation every 10 years to adjust the allocation of the seats to population, the only way in which the southern states will not lose representation would have to be another Constitutional amendment.
However, with government sources saying that the idea is to have delimitation and then women's reservation in the Lok Sabha elections of 2029, the census is likely to be followed by delimitation.
The website of the Election Commission of India says, 'Under Article 82 of the Constitution, the Parliament by law enacts a Delimitation Act after every census. After the commencement of the Act, the Central Government constitutes a Delimitation Commission. This Delimitation Commission demarcates the boundaries of the Parliamentary Constituencies as per provisions of the Delimitation Act. The present delimitation of constituencies has been done on the basis of 2001 census figures under the provisions of Delimitation Act, 2002.
Notwithstanding the above, the Constitution of India was specifically amended in 2002 not to have delimitation of constituencies till the first census after 2026. Thus, the present Constituencies carved out on the basis of the 2001 census shall continue to be in operation till the first census after 2026.'
In other words, the release of census data will be followed by the passage of the Delimitation Bill in Parliament, unless Parliament suspends the constitutionally mandated process by amending the Constitution to freeze delimitation by, say, another 25 years.
Potential legal issues
Once the Delimitation Commission is constituted by the Centre, it will use the latest census data to redraw Lok Sabha constituencies. However, it will be bound by Article 81 of the Constitution to redraw these on the basis of the latest population data, unless Article 81 is itself amended.
Article 81 may anyway require amendments. For instance, since it limits the strength of the Lok Sabha to 550 under clauses (a) and (b), the strength will have to revised through a constitutional amendment so as to ensure that one MP does not represent too large a population, and to pave way for the reservation of women without cutting down the seats available to men.
Article 81 as of now makes one exception to the 'one person, one vote, one value' principle, by giving small states and Union Territories at least one seat even if their population is very low. Since the Constitution is clear about the centrality of this principle in all other cases, the only way the south does not lose relative strength in the Lok Sabha will be by amending Article 81 (2) (a).
However, any move to amend Article 81 (2) (a) would be liable to challenge in the Supreme Court as violative of the right to equality enshrined in Articles 14 and 15. The fear in south India is that if delimitation is based purely on population, northern states will get much more seats and thus a very large voice in Parliament. But if the law is amended and they get more seats than they would through the population criterion, then voters in the north and the south are not being treated equally.
Even if the principle of reasonable classification — likes be treated alike — is evoked, it will be based on the argument that better social and economic indicators require special protection for southern states. This logic is exactly opposite to the one that permits reservation on the grounds that the state can make special provisions for the backward classes.
The delimitation question, thus, has no easy answers, and is likely to lead to much litigation.
Vikas Pathak is deputy associate editor with The Indian Express and writes on national politics. He has over 17 years of experience, and has worked earlier with The Hindustan Times and The Hindu, among other publications. He has covered the national BJP, some key central ministries and Parliament for years, and has covered the 2009 and 2019 Lok Sabha polls and many state assembly polls. He has interviewed many Union ministers and Chief Ministers.
Vikas has taught as a full-time faculty member at Asian College of Journalism, Chennai; Symbiosis International University, Pune; Jio Institute, Navi Mumbai; and as a guest professor at Indian Institute of Mass Communication, New Delhi.
Vikas has authored a book, Contesting Nationalisms: Hinduism, Secularism and Untouchability in Colonial Punjab (Primus, 2018), which has been widely reviewed by top academic journals and leading newspapers.
He did his PhD, M Phil and MA from JNU, New Delhi, was Student of the Year (2005-06) at ACJ and gold medalist from University Rajasthan College in Jaipur in graduation. He has been invited to top academic institutions like JNU, St Stephen's College, Delhi, and IIT Delhi as a guest speaker/panellist. ... Read More
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Inspired by Greta Thunberg, Sweden invented flight shaming, now it's desperately begging airlines to come back
Sweden Flight Shaming Backfires as Country Drops Air Tax to Revive Economy- Sweden, the birthplace of the 'flight shaming' movement, has now reversed course by scrapping its aviation tax in hopes of reviving a struggling economy. The move, effective from July 1, 2025, marks a sharp departure from Sweden's climate-focused past, where flying was discouraged to reduce carbon emissions. The air tax, which ranged from 76 to 517 kronor (£5.50–£37.40) per passenger, had been in place since 2018, championed by the then centre-left government. But with Sweden's economy shrinking and regional aviation collapsing, the country is now welcoming airlines back—with open arms and tax breaks. The decision has triggered both praise from the aviation industry and disappointment from climate advocates. Why did Sweden scrap its air tax despite its eco-conscious reputation? Sweden's aviation tax was introduced at a time when environmental awareness was peaking. In 2018, the same year the tax was enforced, Greta Thunberg, then 15, launched her first school climate strike outside the Swedish Parliament. This led to a cultural wave known as 'flygskam' or flight shame, where people deliberately avoided flying to reduce their environmental impact. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Photos Captured the Exact Wrong Moment Read More Undo According to a 2019 survey, nearly 25% of Swedes were avoiding flights, up from 17% in the previous year. The impact was significant: Sweden's national airport operator, Swedavia AB, recorded a seven-month decline in passenger numbers in 2019. That year also saw the slowest growth in airline travel in a decade, while train travel through SJ, the national railway, soared to 32 million passengers as more Swedes opted for 'climate-smart' travel. What were the economic consequences of flight shaming in Sweden? Over the next seven years, international flights to and from Sweden dropped by a third. Smaller airports, especially in northern and remote regions, began to suffer. Ryanair completely exited the domestic market in Sweden, and Bromma Airport, near Stockholm, almost shut down due to lack of use. By 2025, only one regional airline, Västfly, was operating from Bromma. Live Events The situation worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic and a recession in 2023, followed by a 0.3% GDP contraction between April and July 2024. The new right-wing government, elected in 2022, responded by scrapping the air tax and announcing a £76 million investment into aviation infrastructure. Officials claimed there were 'few reasons to feel flight shame' in today's context. How did airlines respond to Sweden's tax reversal? The response from the aviation industry was swift and supportive. Ryanair reintroduced two aircraft to its Swedish operations and announced ten new routes. EasyJet welcomed the move, saying it would help keep flying affordable. Norwegian Airlines added new routes between Norway and Sweden. The International Air Transport Association (IATA) praised the decision, stating: 'Taxation of air passengers is counterproductive economically and ineffective environmentally.' The government now hopes the boost to the aviation sector will support regional development, increase connectivity, and restore consumer confidence. What does this mean for Europe's green aviation efforts? Sweden's reversal is being closely watched by other European countries that introduced their own versions of flight taxes or bans on short-haul flights: Germany raised domestic flight taxes by 75% in 2020. Belgium has a €10 boarding tax on short flights. The Netherlands imposes a €29.40 tax on every flight, no matter the distance. Denmark, as of January 1, 2025, charges 50DK (£5.73) for intra-Europe flights and up to 410DK (£47.55) for long-haul. France banned short domestic flights where train travel takes less than 2 hours 30 minutes. Spain is considering a similar ban that could cut domestic flight emissions by 10%. Still, critics argue these moves don't go far enough. Environmental group Ecologistas en Acción called Spain's proposal 'purely symbolic,' while others say broader, more enforceable bans are needed to meet global climate goals. Can aviation ever be green without hurting economies? This is the central question Sweden now forces the world to confront. The conflict between climate action and economic recovery is more visible than ever. Justin Francis, co-founder of Responsible Travel, commented: 'Some governments' short-term attitudes to regulating aviation have shifted, but the science hasn't. Aviation is still one of the fastest-growing sources of emissions.' Francis argues that taxing aviation fuel, rather than passengers, could be a more balanced approach. The proceeds, he says, should be directed toward low-emission aviation research and expanding rail networks. But until electric or hydrogen-powered planes become commercially viable, countries may struggle to reduce aviation emissions without disrupting connectivity, tourism, and regional economies. What's next for Sweden and Europe's aviation future? Sweden's U-turn offers a real-world lesson on the challenges of balancing environmental goals with economic pressures. The case will likely influence how other countries adjust or reinforce their aviation policies in the coming years. For now, it's clear that while climate ideals sparked the flight shaming movement, economic realities have the final say. FAQs: Q1: Why did Sweden end its flight shame policy and scrap the air tax? Sweden dropped its flight tax to support its economy and revive regional air travel. Q2: How has Sweden's flight shaming reversal affected airlines and travel? Airlines like Ryanair and EasyJet are expanding again as Sweden lifts the aviation tax.
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
Association for Democratic Reforms moves SC challenging EC's Bihar voter roll revision
The Association for Democratic Reforms on Saturday filed a petition in the Supreme Court against the Election Commission conducting a special intensive revision of Bihar's electoral rolls, saying that the order is arbitrary and can disenfranchise millions of voters, Live Law reported. The non-profit organisation sought the quashing of the order, arguing that it violated Articles 14, 19, 21, 325 and 326 of the Constitution and also contravened provisions of the Representation of the People Act and Rule 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules. Article 14 of the Constitution guarantees equality before the law, while Article 19 pertains to freedom of speech and expression and Article 21 to protection of life and personal liberty. Article 325 ensures that there is no discrimination based on religion, race, caste or sex in electoral rolls and Article 326 mandates elections to be based on adult suffrage. Rule 21A of the Registration of Electors Rules pertains to the inclusion of names inadvertently omitted. The special intensive revision of the electoral rolls in Bihar was announced by the Election Commission on June 24, ahead of the Assembly elections expected to be held in the state in October or November. As part of the exercise, persons whose names were not on the 2003 voter list will need to submit proof of eligibility to vote. This means that 2.9 crore out of the state's 7.8 crore voters – or about 37% of the electors – will have to submit documentary evidence. Voters born before July 1, 1987, must show proof of their date and place of birth, while those born between July 1, 1987, and December 2, 2004, must also submit documents establishing the date and place of birth of one of their parents. Those born after December 2, 2004, will need proof of date of birth for themselves and both parents. In its petition, the Association for Democratic Reforms said that revision could 'arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise lakhs of voters from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting free and fair elections and democracy in the country', The Hindu reported. The petition said that the order imposed fresh documentation requirements and shifted the burden of proof from the state to the citizen, Bar and Bench reported. Citing concerns over the exclusion of widely held documents such as Aadhaar and ration cards in the exercise, the election watchdog said that this would disproportionately affect the poor and marginalised voters, especially in rural parts of Bihar. 'The documentation requirements of the directive, lack of due process as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said special intensive revision of electoral roll in Bihar further make this exercise bound to result in removal of names of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their disenfranchisement,' Bar and Bench quoted the petition as saying. Birth registration levels were historically low in Bihar and many voters did not have access to official documents, the petition said. It added that more than three crore voters in the state may not be able to meet the mandated criteria and could end up being removed from the electoral rolls. The Association for Democratic Reforms also noted that the Election Commission had not provided a reason for ordering the revision, Bar and Bench reported. Citing that Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act permitted special revisions only for recorded reasons, the non-profit organisation claimed that the order issued by the poll panel lacked such justification. Stating that a special summary revision had been conducted in Bihar from October 2024 to January 2025, the petition said that no reports of serious irregularities had been flagged. A fresh exercise ahead of the Assembly polls raised concerns about its intent and implementation, it added.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Interpretation of law, Constitution has to be pragmatic, as per society's needs: CJI Gavai
Chief Justice of India Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai on Saturday said the interpretation of law or the Constitution has to be "pragmatic" and in a way that suits the needs of society. Speaking at a felicitation organised for him by the Bombay High Court here, he also mentioned that recently he had received complaints about the rude behaviour of "some of the colleagues", and urged the judges to protect the reputation of the institution. Citing a past Supreme Court judgement, Gavai said any law or the Constitution has to be interpreted in the context of "problems faced by the present generation." "The interpretation has to be pragmatic. It has to be one that suits the needs of society," he added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Remember Him? Sit Down Before You See What He Looks Like Now 33 Bridges Undo Judges are expected to work as per their conscience, the oath of office and law, but "should never be perturbed once the matter is decided", he said. A judge should cut off his mind from the matter and forget what happens to it thereafter, he added. Live Events Talking about the appointment of judges, the CJI asserted that "at no cost the independence of judiciary shall be compromised". While making appointments either to the Supreme court or high courts, the collegium ensures that merit is maintained while there is diversity and inclusiveness, Gavai said. He complimented the Bombay High Court -- where he once practiced as a lawyer and served as a judge -- for its work, and said he feels proud when people appreciate its judgements. The CJI also said that lately he has been "receiving a lot of complaints about the rude behaviour of some of the colleagues." "Being a judge is not a 10 to 5 job, it's an opportunity to serve society. It is an opportunity to serve the nation," he stressed, and urged the judges to be "true to their oath and commitment." "Please do not do anything which brings disrepute to this august institution, whose reputation has been so laboriously built by the devotion and dedication of generations of lawyers and generations of judges," he said.
