Napier: Work starts on new $110m civic precinct
Chucking in two of the region's worst storms – the Napier floods of November 2020 and Cyclone Gabrielle in February 2023 (with the Covid global pandemic lockdowns inbetween and now ongoing uncertainties of the political climate) it was in question even until 'a few months ago' as to quite when construction would begin, and whether it would still be what has been planned, she said, standing in the required health and safety raiment of steel-capped boots, hard hat and fluoro jacket.
Deputy Mayor Annette Brosnan and city council strategic programmes manager Darran Gillies in the former library space being redeveloped in the Napier Civic Precinct project. Photo / Doug Laing.
There's a level of emotion as she recalls: 'I remember the tears when everyone was leaving the building. There was a lot of uncertainty.'
Council staff have since been spread across several mainly-leased sites, and there had been nowhere 'for people to come and see us', she said.
It was also devastating for the food and beverage business in the area, but she's expecting now a revival with work crews numbering up to 300 people over the next two years, followed by the return of the council's own staff, after a decade away.
It is, however, a complex project, as council strategic manager Darran Gillies, and leaders from MCL Stead, the local partnership with the $70.5 million contract for the construction.
It's Stead's crane being set up this week, and expected to be on site for over 12 months, with construction progress likely to be watched by the public daily as the site is transformed from a demolition side retaining just the shell of the library tower, which still carries such signage as 'Non-fiction Section,' 'Large Print' and 'Audio Books' on its pillars, and a sort of ghostly feel where the IRD used to hold fort in leased space upstairs.
Emerging will be a cluster of three buildings, and landscaped outdoor space through to the Hawke's Bay Regional Council building on the opposite side of Dalton St, and walkthough towards Willis House, fronting Dickens St and linking to the CBD beyond.
Doug Laing is a senior reporter based in Napier with Hawke's Bay Today, and has 52 years of journalism experience, 42 of them in Hawke's Bay, in news gathering, including breaking news, sports, local events, issues, and personalities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
How investors can stack the odds in their favour in uncertain times
Despite all this, global share markets remain remarkably resilient – hovering at, or near all-time highs. Investor optimism has been fuelled by fiscal stimulus in Europe (mainly Germany) and the unstoppable rise of artificial intelligence, which just saw Nvidia become the first company to be valued at US$4 trillion. With a constant barrage of headlines and a wall of worry to climb, yet equity markets near all-time highs, investing in the share market can feel a bit like a gamble. Much like a roulette wheel – black you win, red you lose. But is this really true? Is the share market a casino? While it's tempting to see markets as games of chance, the evidence tells a very different story. Unlike the casino, where there is only one winner, the share market is not a zero-sum game. History suggests that patient, long-term investors – rather than lucky punters – stand to win, as share markets tend to rise over time. The house always wins Casino games are typically win or lose affairs, with the probabilities skewed in favour of the house. That's why they say, 'the house always wins'. Take roulette, for example. The wheel, in most instances, has 38 numbers: 1 to 36 in either red or black, plus 0 and 00 in green. The dealer spins the wheel and the ball falls on one of the numbers. The simplest bet is on whether the ball will fall on a red or black number, which has odds just over 47%. If you put $5 on red, and the ball lands on black or green, you lose your entire $5. The win-win game In contrast, for patient investors, the share market tends to be a win-win game. History has shown that share markets have risen through time. $100 invested in the US at the beginning of this century – just before the Dotcom bust – would now be worth around $580, despite the global financial crisis and the Covid pandemic. Data from J.P. Morgan Asset Management underscores the power of a long-term mindset. The worst drop in the US S&P500 stock market index over any year since 1950 is -37%. Yet for those who stayed invested, the lowest annualised return over any 20-year rolling period since then was still +6% a year. All about the long-term Investors should avoid treating the share market like a casino by trying to predict what will happen in the next week, month or even year. Shifting away from long-term investing into short-term speculation pushes investors closer to gambling. Even if an investor could accurately predict an event, they would still need to anticipate how other investors might react. Sometimes bad news is already priced in, causing markets to rise rather than fall. Then comes the challenge of timing both entries and exits to maximise returns. That is four decisions to get consistently right to generate healthy returns – even before considering random or unforeseeable shocks like Covid – an almost impossible feat. Click to trade, easy to gamble As it has become easier to trade shares in companies, more people are approaching investing with a short-term mindset, blurring the lines between stock market investing and gambling. In the 1950s, the average holding period for US shares was around eight years. By the 1980s, that fell to two to three years. Today, the average holding period for retail investors is just six months or even less. It can be hard to sit on your hands and do nothing during volatile times, even though that is exactly the right approach to take, according to history. But please, don't just take my word for it. Listen to Warren Buffett, recently retired, and arguably the greatest investor of all time. 'If you own your stocks as an investment – just like you'd own an apartment, house or a farm – look at them as a business,' he says. 'If you're going to try to buy and sell them based on news or something your neighbour tells you, you're not going to do well. Find a good bunch of businesses and hold them.' Long-term investing is just the opposite of gambling. May the odds be always in your favour.
Otago Daily Times
4 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Woman added to husband's business loan without her consent
By Susan Edmunds of RNZ A woman who discovered she had been added as a guarantor on her husband's business loan without her knowledge or consent complained to Financial Services Complaints Ltd (FSCL) when the business defaulted and she was called on to repay it. It was one of 1469 complaints received by the scheme in the year to 30 June. That is up from 1426 the previous year but almost double the number of five years earlier. In the case of the business loan, the lender offered to extinguish the woman's guarantee and release their security for her half share of the family home. FSCL chief executive Susan Taylor said it highlighted the importance of giving clear explanations and proper disclosure to everyone involved in a loan, including guarantors of business debt. "Especially when small business are borrowing under stress." FSCL was one of the external dispute resolution providers that helped with complaints that cannot be resolved directly between the customer and financial service provider. Taylor said complaints about lenders were the largest share, at 38 percent. Of the 366 cases that were formally investigated, complaints about financial advisers - including mortgage and insurance brokers, as well as wealth advisers - made up the largest proportion at 23 percent, followed by complaints about lenders at 20 percent, and insurers at 17 percent. Taylor said there had been a rise in complaints from small businesses, particularly about loans and insurance products. She said the increase in complaints over the years was partly because people were more aware of their opportunity and right to complain. "But I think it's also a reflection of the wider economic environment, we know that many New Zealanders and small businesses are struggling financially and when people are living with financial stress, they are more likely, I think, to complain. "Also, I think there's still a little bit of a hangover from Covid times in terms of the debt burdens some people are dealing with, particularly small businesses. And I also think there is a lot less tolerance now for when something goes wrong. Some years ago, people might have been prepared to chalk that up to a bad experience, but now they're more likely to want to complain and to have their complaint heard." She said sometimes complaints would alert FSCL to a possible systemic problem that needed to be taken further and referred to a regulator. Taylor said while financial providers' processes had improved, there was still room for more. Some people had to do a Google search or talk to a lawyer or friend before they knew they could take a complaint to FSCL, she said. Providers were meant to refer people to their third-party dispute provider when relevant. Taylor said complaining was difficult for some people. "Often the people have got lots of other things that they're struggling with in life. They're juggling so many balls that making a complaint is just one thing too many and that's difficult… which is where third-party support like financial mentors plays such a vital role."
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Financial complaint numbers at historically high levels
The Financial Services Complaints Limited received 1469 complaints in the year to June 30. Photo / 123RF Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. The Financial Services Complaints Limited received 1469 complaints in the year to June 30. Photo / 123RF Financial complaint numbers remain at historically high numbers and show no sign of easing, the Financial Ombudsman says. New annual figures show the complaints service received 1469 complaints in the year to June 30, up from 1426 the previous year. 'We're not yet seeing signs of complaints reducing since increasing rapidly two years ago in the wake of Covid-19,' said Financial Ombudsman Susan Taylor. 'What's changed is the spread. Complaints are now more evenly distributed across a broader range of financial services, rather than being concentrated in just a few areas like non-bank lenders.' Lenders accounted for the largest share of complaints at 38%, though many were resolved before escalating to a dispute needing formal investigation.
