Bangladesh rape case sparks outrage; HC orders video removal, police protection for survivor
Survivor support grows; political row intensifies
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
The alleged rape of a 26-year-old Hindu woman in Bangladesh's Cumilla district has triggered widespread public anger and renewed calls for action against gender-based violence, particularly involving vulnerable communities.Reports state that the assault took place on Thursday night and that the accused, identified as Fazar Ali, has been arrested on charges of rape. Four others have been booked for allegedly recording and circulating a video of the assault, which surfaced online on Saturday night.Taking note of the incident, the country's High Court on Monday directed authorities to ensure the removal of the video from all platforms and provide the survivor with immediate police protection and medical assistance. It also asked officials to submit a progress report on the investigation within 15 days.According to police, the woman, a member of the country's Hindu minority, had travelled with her children to visit her parents when the assault occurred. In her complaint, she alleged that the accused came to the house late Thursday and demanded that she open the door.When she refused, he broke the door, entered the house and raped her.The case has led to protests in Dhaka and other parts of the country, with university students and civil society groups demanding swift justice.Women's rights group Naripokkho urged citizens to 'break silence and resist violence against women,' while organisations such as Ain o-Salish Kendra and Manusher Jonno Foundation called for a 'swift trial and exemplary punishment.'Fazar Ali is reportedly a political supporter of former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia's opposition party, the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP).Photographs show him at the December 14 inauguration of BNP's Ramchandrapur South Union office. Political sources said he had started attending BNP programmes after the Awami League lost power last year and had begun identifying himself as a BNP member.BNP secretary general Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, reacting to the case, said: 'There is a dangerous conspiracy afoot to damage BNP's reputation.' The party has yet to clarify whether Fazar was an official member. Fakhrul further claimed that the survivor was a Hindu expatriate's wife.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
16 minutes ago
- News18
'Cryptic Reasoning': SC Sets Aside HC Order On Bail To Murder Accused For Carrying Victim To Hospital
The High Court, however, allowed the said applications by way of the common impugned order of November 14, 2024, thereby enlarging the respondents on bail The Supreme Court has said the Punjab and Haryana High Court's order allowing bail to two persons in a murder case, by a cryptic reasoning and having noted they have carried the victim to the hospital after the incident, holding that the trial court has rightly noted the said aspect and declined to grant relief to them. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma said the respondent-accused have been alleged to have committed the offence under Section 302 of the IPC. It may be a fact that they may have carried the injured victim, who later died, to the hospital but he was actually brought dead to the hospital. This fact will have to be considered de hors from the fact as to who actually had committed the offence in the first place in the instant case. 'In the circumstances, we find that the order of the High Court calls for interference and therefore, the same is set aside. Consequently, the order of the Sessions Court is restored," the bench said. By the impugned order, the High Court has set aside the order of the Trial Court declining to grant regular bail to the respondents herein and consequently, has allowed the petitions for bail. An FIR was registered on March 22, 2023 under Sections 302, 323, 148, 149 (Sections 148 and 149 deleted and Sections 34, 427, 120B added later on) of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Nangal, District Rupnagar. The said FIR was registered based on the statement given by the complainant-appellant Baljinder Singh alias Aman against accused No. 1 – Mandeep Singh alias Bhoda and accused No.2- Narinder Kumar alias Nindi. The appellant alleged that he received a telephonic call at about 11.30 p.m. to the effect that the respondents, accompanied by 7-8 other persons, were using filthy language against the appellant and trespassed onto his land by dismantling the barbed wire fencing on his property. He claimed that after receiving the said call, the appellant along with his driver Anil (deceased), Deepak Kumar and Chowkidar Bahadur Singh had gone to the appellant's land at Taraf Majri in his Land Cruiser vehicle when the respondents rammed their Fortuner car into the car of the appellant. When the appellant came out from his car, accused No. 1 hit the deceased with their car and threw him down. It was alleged that all the accused persons were armed with wooden sticks when they stepped out of their car. Accused No.1 gave a wooden stick blow on the head of the deceased whereas accused No.2 inflicted injuries to the deceased and other persons accompanying the appellant. The appellant witnessed the entire occurrence but fearing for his life, fled the scene and later discovered that the respondents took the deceased to the hospital where he was found to be dead. The respondents were arrested in connection with FIR on March 23, 2023 and were sent to judicial custody. The Inspector General (IG) Rupnagar Range, Rupnagar, on receipt of complaint from Dev Raj (father of accused No. 2) transferred the investigation in the present matter to Ms Darpan Ahluwalia, IPS, Assistant Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar, Mohali. A charge sheet was submitted by the SHO, Police Station Nangal before the competent court on June 20, 2023. The JMIC, Rupnagar took cognizance and the matter was committed to Additional Sessions Judge, Rupnagar for trial and adjudication. Thereafter, a supplementary charge sheet was filed on October 09, 2023 based on subsequent investigation conducted by Assistant Superintendent of Police, Dera Bassi, District SAS Nagar. On a petition filed by the respondents under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the High Court dismissed it on July 16, 2024. However, an order was passed in interim restraining the trial court from proceeding further. This order remained in operation. The respondents filed separate bail applications before the trial court which came to be dismissed by orders on May 21, 2024 and May 24, 2024 respectively, finding that accused No. 1 is a habitual offender as eight other criminal cases have also been registered against him and keeping in view the gravity of the offences in this case and the heinous crime alleged to have been committed by them. The High Court, however, allowed the said applications by way of the common impugned order of November 14, 2024, thereby enlarging the respondents on bail. Being aggrieved, the appellant-complainant has preferred the instant appeal before this court. Challenging the order, the appellant contended that the impugned order is lacking in reasons for granting relief of bail to the respondents herein inasmuch as paragraph 12 of the impugned order only records the submissions in a cryptic manner, the reasoning given in paragraphs 13 and 14 and consequently, the relief of bail was granted to the respondents herein. He submitted that the reasons are erroneous in as they do not make merit a case for grant of bail. The counsel said the respondents have been, inter alia, alleged to have committed the offence under Section 302 IPC, the manner in which the offence was committed itself is gruesome and was planned and executed in a manner which reflects that there was a criminal conspiracy amongst the accused. The appellant said the respondents were in jail for a period of one year and eight months; the chargesheet had been filed and the supplementary chargesheet had also been filed. His counsel said the respondents-accused have been granted the relief of bail and on the other hand, there is a stay of trial. The said orders would require interference at the hands of this court inasmuch as the respondents herein have criminal antecedents and they are not entitled to the relief of bail having regard to the manner in which the deceased was put to death. The State counsel supported the case of the appellant-complainant herein and therefore, having regard to the merits of the case, appropriate orders may be made in these appeals. Defending the High Court's order, the respondents counsel said the fact the accused themselves carried the deceased to the hospital and saw to it that he was given treatment immediately showed that there was no criminal intent in their mind; they further submitted that the High Court has recorded in detail the submissions of the counsel for the respective parties and has come to a right conclusion and hence there is no merit in these appeals and the same may be dismissed. Allowing the appeal, the bench directed the respondent-accused to surrender before the Court of the Jurisdictional Magistrate or the concerned Police Station since they have been on bail pursuant to the impugned order. About the Author Sanya Talwar Sanya Talwar, Editor at Lawbeat, has been heading the organisation since its inception. After practising in courts for over four years, she discovered her affinity for legal journalism. She has worked More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 02, 2025, 21:12 IST News india 'Cryptic Reasoning': SC Sets Aside HC Order On Bail To Murder Accused For Carrying Victim To Hospital
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Who is Arun Subramanian, the judge overseeing Sean Diddy Combs' trial?
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Sean "Diddy" Combs was recently acquitted of serious charges including sex trafficking and racketeering but was convicted of a prostitution-related offense. While spared a potential life sentence, Combs still faces up to 10 years in prison. Following the mixed verdict, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian , who is presiding over the case, is now considering whether to grant Combs who is Judge Arun Subramanian—the man at the center of one of the year's most high-profile trials?Arun Subramanian made history in 2022 when he became the first South Asian judge to be appointed to the Southern District of New York. Nominated by President Joe Biden, Subramanian's background is as impressive as it is in 1979 in Pittsburgh to Indian immigrant parents, Subramanian was raised with strong family values—something he emphasized during his Senate Judiciary Committee hearing. He is known not only for his legal brilliance but also for his humility and sense of his appointment to the bench, Subramanian built a distinguished legal career. He clerked for some of the most respected judges in the country, including:Judge Dennis Jacobs, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second CircuitJudge Gerard E. Lynch, Southern District of New YorkThe late Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader GinsburgThese experiences helped shape his legal philosophy and meticulous attention to holds a bachelor's degree in Computer Science and English from Case Western Reserve University, and earned his Juris Doctor from Columbia Law School, where he was named both a James Kent and Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar. He also served as Executive Articles Editor for the Columbia Law a civil attorney, Subramanian played a key role in high-impact litigation. According to his former firm, he helped recover over $1 billion for victims of fraud and corporate abuse. His work wasn't limited to financial victories; he also took on meaningful pro bono his serious responsibilities, Judge Subramanian is known for his approachable demeanor. According to TMZ, he brought a calm and relaxed presence during jury selection in the Diddy trial, helping put potential jurors at ease. He's been spotted walking with earphones in, suggesting a man who balances focus with calm.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
'Digvijaya calls Hafiz 'sahab', finds communalism in Kanwar Yatra': BJP's Sudhanshu Trivedi
New Delhi: Political mercury soared over remarks made by senior Congress leader Digvijaya Singh and Samajwadi Party leader ST Hasan on the annual Kanwar Yatra, prompting a sharp counterattack from the BJP. Addressing the media, BJP MP and national spokesperson Dr Sudhanshu Trivedi accused both leaders of spreading an anti-Hindu narrative and attempting to defame a long-standing spiritual tradition. Sudhanshu Trivedi said the statements made by both Singh and Hasan reflect the same ideological framework that has repeatedly opposed Hindu traditions. He alleged that Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's participation in foreign conferences like 'Dismantling Global Hindutva' and events aimed at 'eradicating Sanatan Dharma' in Chennai stems from this mindset. 'Digvijaya Singh sees Zakir Naik as a 'messenger of peace,' refers to Osama bin Laden as 'Osama ji,' and calls Hafiz Saeed 'Hafiz Sahab'. But when it comes to the Kanwar Yatra, he suddenly finds communalism in it,' Trivedi said. He questioned ST Hasan's alignment with groups allegedly concealing their identity. 'Why does he stand with people who hide their names and religious affiliation?' Trivedi asked. Continuing his attack, the BJP leader remarked that the Congress is so consumed by anti-Modi sentiment that its leaders are unable to differentiate between truth and misinformation. 'This is the result of being gripped by a distorted 'Modi-Virodhi' mindset,' he said, adding that such an obsession leads to a poor understanding of basic facts. Congress veteran Digvijaya Singh had earlier said that while there is no objection to state governments facilitating the yatra, trouble arises when such religious events are allegedly used to spread hatred. 'In a civilised society, the spread of hatred cannot be justified,' he stated. Former MP ST Hasan had also alleged that during the Kanwar Yatra in Uttarakhand, some Hindu groups were reportedly questioning the religious identity of hotel staff and local shopkeepers. 'Asking people for their names or making them undress to confirm their religion is a form of terrorism,' Hasan said. He compared the alleged incidents to past terrorist acts where victims were targeted based on their religion, referring to the Pahalgam massacre. Trivedi also took a jibe at former police officer and Congress leader Ajoy Kumar, accusing him of lacking basic knowledge about India's geography. 'How can someone who served in the police force be unaware of India's northeastern region unless blinded by political bias?' he said. Addressing a press conference, Kumar, who is a former MP from Jamshedpur, had talked about India's "deteriorating relations" with neighbouring countries and blamed the BJP-led government at the Centre for the situation. He had cited examples of Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, and ended up naming 'Sikkim' as well. Expressing surprise, the BJP spokesperson said it is ironic that the Congress—under whose regime the Emergency was imposed—now lectures on democratic values. 'They've forgotten that the darkest phase of Indian democracy happened under Indira Gandhi,' he stated. He asked the Congress to remove their 'anti-Modi lens' and look at the true picture of the country. 'Only then will they be able to see the real map and face of the nation,' he added.
