Meet world's richest man Elon Musk's sister who is a style icon, as beautiful as any Hollywood actress, her name is...
After the Pran Pratishtha ceremony, lakhs of devotees are thronging the holy city Ayodhya to visit Ram Mandir and take blessings of Lord Ram. Recently, the father and sister of the world's richest person Elon Musk were also seen at the Ram Temple. The father and daughter duo took the blessings of Lord Ram and left the holy city. While Elon Musk is always in the news because of his work or verbal spats, his beautiful sister also makes headlines. She is an entrepreneur and is also very active on social media.
Alexandra has a specialty that makes her different from everyone else is her attire. She is known for her stylish dresses and the way she carries them. She understands style and fashion very well. She is always seen in unique outfits, flaunting her beauty. Alexandra Reached Ram Mandir Wearing Top Trousers
Alexandra visited Ram Mandir to have darshan of Lord Ram. She was seen wearing a light beige coloured short top. The round neckline and cut sleeves style of top were also worth watching. Along with this, she chose to wear high waist trousers, whose straight style seemed to complete her look. Alexandra's Education Qualification
After completing her graduation from college in Colorado, Alexandra started working as an environmental analyst. She then started philanthropic work at a nonprofit organisation that supports the Andes and the Amazon rainforest, as per her LinkedIn bio.
Alexandra joined SolarWindow Technologies in 2020, focusing on developing strategic partnerships and engaging with industry leaders, policymakers, and family offices.
'Ms. Alexandra Musk, Vice President, supports SolarWindow strategic partnerships and engagement with industry, policy influencers, and family offices. She brings experience with brand positioning and business development with a specific expertise in global environmental sustainability in the United States, South America, and Africa,' SolarWindow website said.
Since November 2020, Alexendra Musk has held several positions at SolarWindow, enhancing the company's profile and securing beneficial industry collaborations and partnerships.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
How Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' will make China great again
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Can you hear it -- that loud roar coming from the East? It's the sound of 1.4 billion Chinese laughing at Chinese simply can't believe their luck: that at the dawn of the electricity-guzzling era of artificial intelligence, the U.S. president and his party have decided to engage in one of the greatest acts of strategic self-harm imaginable. They have passed a giant bill that, among other craziness, deliberately undermines America's ability to generate electricity through renewables -- solar, battery and wind power in why? Because they view those as "liberal" energy sources, even though today they are the quickest and cheapest ways to boost our electricity grid to meet the explosion of demand from AI data is exactly the opposite of what China is doing. Indeed, Beijing may have to make July 4 its own national holiday going forward: American Electricity Dependence cannot make this up: Even Saudi Arabia is doubling down on solar power to meet the needs of the A.I. data centers it wants to recruit from the West, while Trump's "big, beautiful bill" actually does just the opposite. It quickly phases out tax credits enjoyed by utility-scale solar and wind -- as well as electric vehicle tax credits. This virtually guarantees that China will own the future of solar energy, wind power, and electric cars and trucks, as well as autonomous Trump and friends did keep until 2036 a major Biden-era tax credit for companies that build other emissions-free technologies such as nuclear reactors, hydroelectric dams, geothermal plants and battery storage. The problem is that it can take up to 10 years to build a nuclear plant in America, and, as The New York Times reported, the bill added "complex restrictions" to the battery credits "that bar recipients from having ties to 'prohibited foreign entities' like China.'' As a result, "some worry that the restrictions are so complicated that the credits could end up being unusable for many projects."In sum, this dog's breakfast of a bill -- rushed through without a single congressional hearing with independent energy experts or even one scientist -- is sure to put at risk billions of dollars of investments in renewable energy, mostly in Republican states, and potentially kill the jobs of tens of thousands of U.S. workers. By the way, the bill also bans for 10 years a first-ever fee on excess methane emissions from oil and gas production, a key driver of global in one fell swoop, this bill will make your home hotter, your air conditioning bill higher, your clean energy job scarcer, America's auto industry weaker and China happier. How does that make sense?It doesn't. And the person in America who knows that best is actually Elon Musk. It is really sad to me that Musk -- who is without question one of America's greatest manufacturing innovators, having started globally leading companies making electric vehicles, renewable rockets, battery storage and telecommunications satellites -- has discredited himself with so many voters because of his dalliance with Trump and because of his Department of Government Efficiency 's capricious cuts to the government workforce. Because of that, many will not understand the vital truth that Musk has been shouting to his fellow Americans: Trump's bill is "utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future."This is not complicated and this is what China knows: There has never been a more intimate connection than there is now between a nation's ability to generate huge amounts of electricity at affordable prices (and in the cleanest way possible) and its ability to develop AI engines that consume huge amounts of electricity as they learn and generate answers that could give us the tools we need to cure diseases, discover new materials and even produce the holy grail of cheap, clean, climate-saving fusion put it differently, there has never been a more intimate connection between the amount of cheap, clean electricity a nation can generate for AI models and its future economic and military is why Musk and many others find it so "insane and destructive" that Trump and his GOP cult have rejected an energy policy of "all of the above as clean as possible as fast as possible" -- oil, natural gas, coal, wind, hydro, nuclear, solar, geothermal, hydrogen -- that is always working to phase out the dirtiest for the cleanest, the way China often has. Instead, Trump has chosen instead to kneecap America's renewable energy industry the way China has not. The president has even called clean energy tax credits a "scam," saying he'd rather spend the money anywhere else. This is industrial-scale foolishness.I was struck by a quote from an energy expert in The Wall Street Journal the other day. "The big-picture outlook for energy is we are going to be less competitive because of this law," said Nick Nigro of Atlas Public Policy. "Ten years from now, we could look back on this moment as the time in which the U.S. pulled back and essentially lost the transition to clean energy."Alas, truth be told, Democratic Party progressives helped to make Trump and his party this foolish on energy with their own crazy fantasies. Too many of them behaved as if we could go cold turkey from a fossil fuel economy to a clean and green one, without scaling cleaner fuels to bridge the transition, such as natural gas and nuclear, and without loosening permitting standards for more transmission lines to get clean power from the middle of the desert to the cities where it is Americans understand how far ahead of us China already is in this realm and moving further ahead, and faster, every this snapshot: In 2000 China produced just over 1,300 terawatt hours of electricity while the U.S. produced nearly 3,800 (a terawatt is equal to 1 million megawatts). Fast forward to today, China produces over 10,000 terawatt hours while the U.S., since 2000, has added only 500 -- an increase of only 13% in 2 1/2 decades. Much of China's electricity growth originally came from expanded coal-fired generation, but in recent years, it has been driven by expanding hydro, solar, wind and battery sources, which are easier, cheaper and quicker to build and also help the a recent article from Shanghai in the Financial Times put it: "China is on its way to becoming the world's first 'electrostate,' with a growing share of its energy coming from electricity and an economy increasingly driven by clean technologies. It offers China a strategic buffer from trade decoupling and rising geopolitical tensions with the U.S."As for Trump's goal of making America globally energy dominant during his term of office, his bill just made that impossible. There is no path to energy dominance in the next five years without say you want to generate additional electricity for more data centers just through natural gas today. Even if you have an abundance of gas, as America does, you need more giant turbines to convert the gas to electricity. If you ask the major manufacturers of those turbines -- GE Vernova Siemens Energy and Mitsubishi Power -- they will probably tell you that they will be very happy to deliver you one, but you will be lucky to have it installed by 2030. That is how long their backlogs are. And there is no telling what that turbine will cost with all of Trump's new steel and aluminum contrast, you can build and put online a new solar farm with battery storage in Texas in just 18 months."During the past quarter, Texas took the lead in clean power installations, adding an impressive 2,596 MW of new utility-scale solar, wind and storage capacity," reads an October research report from Texas A&M, referring to megawatts of power. "This milestone marks the first time Texas has surpassed California to become the top solar state in the nation.'"A Texas energy expert, Doug Lewin, posted last week that the Texas grid, known as ERCOT, recently reported that the state had added 10,000 megawatts of power in just the last year -- most of it from supercheap solar power with battery storage, so energy can be distributed at night when the sun is not shining. As a result, Texas has seen a drop in brownouts on its grid because of more renewables combined with bigger storage batteries. Texas can still deploy solar-plus-batteries in the future, but now the electricity will cost consumers a lot more, thanks to the Trump that higher monthly electricity bill bothers you, call Energy Secretary Chris Wright. He assuredly knows better, but like every other sycophant in Trump's Cabinet, he seems to have just told the boss what he wanted to hear. As Wright must know, solar energy plus storage batteries made up 81% of the new electricity capacity added in the U.S. in 2024, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Now Trump's idiotic bill will slash that result for Americans? The research firm Energy Innovation , whose peer-reviewed energy modeling is widely respected, projects that Trump's effort to diminish America's renewable energy industry will cause wholesale electric power prices to increase roughly 50% by 2035, and that cumulative annual consumer energy costs will increase more than $16 billion by 2030. It also projects that about 830,000 renewable energy jobs will be lost or not created by all of these reasons, I am certain there are only two political parties in the world today cheering the passage of this bill: Trump's Republican Party and the Chinese Communist Party -- because nothing is more destined to make China great again than Trump's "big, beautiful, America surrenders the future of electricity to Beijing" article originally appeared in The New York Times.
India.com
8 hours ago
- India.com
Startup owner cancels Rs 22 lakh job offer due to candidate's religious comment on social media, says candidate is...
In a shocking turn of events that has taken the internet by storm, Mohammed Ahmed Bhati, an Indian startup founder of recruitment platform Jobbie, revoked a Rs 22 lakh-per-annum job offer to a candidate despite their impressive performance. As per media reports, Bhati rejected the candidate after finding a derogatory LinkedIn comments about religious communities during a routine background check. Here are all the details you need to know about the recent case. Why Ahmed Bhati rejected the candidate? 'No matter how talented someone is, respect and basic decency matter to us more. Talent gets you in the door, but values decide if you stay,' Bhati wrote in a widely circulated post, as reported by LiveMint. 'We were ready to extend an offer above our budget. But during the final background check, we found public posts that included remarks which could hurt religious sentiments. That's not a value we are willing to compromise on,' Bhati explained. Bhati said the candidate applied after coming across Jobbie's viral Reddit post detailing the company's 450 interviews for over 12,000 applicants. What set the individual apart was not only their technical skills but also their proactive approach—they built their resume using Jobbie's tools and even recommended improvements to the platform. What does the rejection note says? Bhati posted the rejection note which said, 'We came across some recent public posts on LinkedIn that included comments from you which will deeply hurt the religious sentiments of certain communities'. Social media users share reaction 'Revoking an offer letter for a professional position based on someone's social media activity goes out to show how this cancel culture can actually affect organisation when wrong people get in leadership position. And posting it here isn't virtue signalling either. It simply shows how immature and insecure you are as a leader. Good luck finding good candidates', an user shared his reaction to the whole scenario.
Time of India
12 hours ago
- Time of India
They paid Rs 50 lakh for MBA, tech degrees but only 'polished skill' is PPT: Entrepreneur after hiring 3 students
When Sanket S, founder of Scandolous Foods, decided to hire fresh graduates from some of India's most prestigious private colleges, he expected talent that could keep up with the demands of his growing startup. Instead, what he found was disheartening. In a viral LinkedIn post, Sanket shared how hiring three students—an MBA graduate, a hotel management student, and a tech degree holder—left him more concerned than optimistic. 'These kids paid ₹40–50 lakh for degrees from India's top private MBA, food, and hospitality colleges,' Sanket wrote. 'But they walked out knowing… nothing that actually matters.' What was meant to be an onboarding of future industry shapers quickly turned into a revelation about the stark mismatch between academic credentials and workplace readiness . The Only 'Polished Skill'? Making PowerPoint Slides Sanket explained that the MBA graduate couldn't grasp basic financial concepts like profit and loss or cash flow. The hotel management student had never been inside a food processing facility. Even basic knowledge about precision fermentation—vital in a food-tech startup—was missing. 'All of them are brilliant at making PPTs. That too, stuff Gemini or ChatGPT can do in seconds now,' he added, expressing how automation had surpassed the one skill they came equipped with. You Might Also Like: Hotmail cofounder Sabeer Bhatia blasts Indian education system: 'We are producing an army of useless kids' A Broken Pipeline, Not a Broken Batch The reaction to Sanket's post underscored a wider problem—India's education system, not its students, may be failing the job market . Netizens argued that graduates aren't inherently lacking, but are products of outdated curricula that prioritise rote learning over real-world application. One user called the system 'a bottleneck,' especially in emerging sectors like food tech and biotech, where theory-heavy teaching leaves students unprepared for practical challenges. Another pointed out the mismatch in expectations, noting, 'Most of these graduates are fit for Fortune 1000 companies, not startups that demand flexibility and critical thinking.' Several commenters also criticised how both schools and colleges suppress creativity and curiosity in favour of memorisation. 'There's little focus on inventions, discoveries or deep research,' one said, while another called for a bottom-up overhaul through a robust STEAM education strategy. The consensus is clear: India may be producing degrees, not doers. Unless systemic reforms take place, young professionals will continue entering the workforce ill-equipped—not because they lack talent, but because they were never trained to apply it where it matters. You Might Also Like: Choosing Computer Science in college? Nobel Laureate Geoffrey Hinton has a stark warning for aspiring coders Startups Want Builders, Not Bookworms For startups, the gap between a glowing résumé and on-ground ability comes at a cost. Founders who are trying to build cutting-edge ventures in medtech, biotech, and climate tech need team members who can hit the ground running—not those who need to be trained from scratch. 'Train them from scratch, then I'm not running a company, I'm running a classroom,' Sanket wrote, highlighting the dilemma founders face—whether to invest time in training underprepared local talent or look abroad, betraying their 'Make in India' dreams. A Call for Urgent Reform The post has also reignited the conversation around STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, Mathematics) education and the need to shift from outdated curricula to skills that matter in the modern world. One commenter emphasized that unless India builds a bottom-up education strategy rooted in innovation, 'we will lose the global innovation competition.' Sanket ended his post with a strong cautionary note: 'At this rate, we're not just 10 years behind—we're raising a generation that doesn't even know what the world looks like today.' You Might Also Like: Schools and universities to go obsolete? Godfather of AI, Greoffrey Hinton says 'we won't need them' As the debate rages on, one thing is clear—India's talent pipeline might need more than a polish. It needs a full-scale reboot.
