
US Senate referee allows measure to slash CFPB budget, lawmakers say
June 27 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate's nonpartisan referee has allowed Republicans to proceed with a measure to slash funding for the government's top watchdog agency for consumer finance by almost half, a week after blocking an effort to eliminate funding completely, top lawmakers said late on Thursday.
If adopted, the measure could add to Republican efforts this year to cut the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau's workforce and substantially limit its powers. A top Democrat immediately vowed to try to block the measure.
Republican Tim Scott, chair of the Senate Banking Committee, said Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough had ruled that a measure to lower the legal cap on CFPB funding could be approved by a simple majority vote, paving the way for its inclusion in a sweeping tax-cut and spending bill driven by President Donald Trump.
MacDonough's role is to ensure lawmakers follow proper legislative procedure.
If approved, the measure would cut maximum CFPB funding to 6.5% of the Federal Reserve's earnings from 12%, meaning the agency would likely employ many fewer people and have a more limited reach.
Last week, MacDonough had found that a measure reducing this limit to 0% was ineligible for consideration via a simple majority vote as the House and Senate work to reconcile their spending bills.
Scott said in a statement that the change would help cut "waste and duplication in our federal government and save hardworking taxpayer dollars."
The CFPB is funded by the Federal Reserve, so is not supported by taxpayers. The central bank earns income from services it provides the financial system and from interest income on securities it owns.
Republicans have attacked the CFPB since its creation more than a decade ago, saying it is a burden on free enterprise. President Donald Trump called this year for its elimination, accusing it without providing evidence of politicized enforcement.
Democrats have said that since the agency was set up it has returned more than $20 billion to harmed consumers.
Senator Elizabeth Warren, the top Democrat on the Banking Committee and a key proponent of the CFPB, said in a separate statement that Democrats would introduce a measure to eliminate the funding cut. The Republican move amounted to slashing CFPB funding "so they can hand out more tax breaks for billionaires and billionaire corporations," she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
14 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump pushes Senate GOP to pass massive spending bill
President Trump remained in Washington over the weekend to rally Senate Republicans to pass a key spending bill, which he refers to as the 'big, beautiful bill.' It comes after Canada raised steel tariffs on the U.S., escalating the trade war. NBC News' Vaughn Hillyard reports from the White House.


Daily Mail
24 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk blasts new version of Trump's spending bill as 'utter madness'
Elon Musk reignited his feud with Donald Trump as he tore into the president's spending bill in a blistering social media tirade. The world's richest man condemned Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' as 'utter madness', hours before Senate Republicans are expected to hold an initial vote on the latest version of the bill on Saturday afternoon. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country,' Musk wrote in one of his X posts. 'Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future.' Trump's massive spending bill was notably the trigger for Musk and the president's dramatic fall out just three weeks ago, with Musk taking issue with the bill's estimated $2.8 trillion spending increases. Musk - who celebrated his 54th birthday Saturday as he slammed Trump's bill - also criticized the impact the bill will have on the energy industry, with Musk recently pushing for a sharp increase in solar energy in the US. Responding to a post that noted the Senate vote 'could wipe out 500 (Giga Watts) of potential energy generation' by 2030, Musk wrote: 'This would be incredibly destructive to America!' 'At the same time, this bill raises the debt ceiling by $5 TRILLION, the biggest increase in history, putting America in the fast lane to debt slavery!' he added in another post. Earlier this month, Musk's opposition to the legislation saw his time in Trump's White House come to an acrimonious end as he tore into the president. Musk had spent the start of the year slashing the federal government's programs through his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), but saw the $150 billion he claimed to have saved wiped out by the spending increases in Trump's bill. In a shock X post that captured international headlines, Musk vented his fury by writing: '(Trump) is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!' Musk also claimed that Trump couldn't have won the 2024 presidential election without him, and said in a post that Trump's bill showed 'such ingratitude.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told the Daily Mail at the time: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' Trump's sweeping Big Beautiful Bill encapsulates much of his domestic agenda, covering everything from tax breaks and immigration to national defense and energy. Democrats are united against the bill, with Congressional Republicans - who hold majorities in both the House and Senate - set to decide whether President Trump's signature's domestic policy package will become law. Trump told Republicans to skip their holiday vacations and deliver the bill by the Fourth of July. Republicans say the bill is crucial because there would be a massive tax increase after December when tax breaks from Trump's first term expire. The legislation contains roughly $3.8 trillion in tax cuts. The existing tax rates and brackets would become permanent under the bill. It temporarily would add new tax breaks that Trump campaigned on: no taxes on tips, overtime pay or some automotive loans, along with a bigger $6,000 deduction in the Senate draft for older adults who earn no more than $75,000 a year. It would boost the $2,000 child tax credit to $2,200 under the Senate proposal. Families at lower income levels would not see the full amount. The bill would also fund the hiring of 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers, and would provide Homeland Security with a new $10 billion fund for grants for states that help with federal immigration enforcement and deportation actions. For the Pentagon, the bill would provide billions for ship building, munitions systems, and quality of life measures for servicemen and women, as well as $25 billion for the development of the Golden Dome missile defense system. The Defense Department would have $1 billion for border security. To help partly offset the lost tax revenue and new spending, Republicans aim to cut back some long-running government programs: Medicaid, food stamps, green energy incentives and others. It's essentially unraveling the accomplishments of the past two Democratic presidents, Biden and Barack Obama.


Times
38 minutes ago
- Times
Flutter's FanDuel faces US lawsuit over predatory marketing
S ince he took office in December 2020, the mayor of Baltimore, Brandon Scott, has been on a mission to address the the city's challenges. Crime has dropped, with murders falling 20 per cent last year. Scott has also been tackling the city's empty, abandoned houses, investing in youth services and repairing its crumbling infrastructure. This year, he took on another challenge: the damage he says is being done by the growth in online sports betting. In April he launched a lawsuit against gambling firms, including FanDuel, which is owned by Flutter Entertainment, based in Dublin. Scott alleged that FanDuel had been targeting some of the most vulnerable Baltimoreans, inducing them to bet beyond their means and using sophisticated and misleading sales tactics to do so.