After months of turmoil, Senate committee approves Stitt's OSBE nominations: How we got here
The nominations of Michael Tinney, of Norman; Ryan Deatherage, of Kingfisher; and Becky Carson, of Edmond are advancing to the full Senate for a final vote. Under state law, the Senate must be finished with its work by May 30. Acting on executive nominations typically is done in the final days of the annual legislative session.
Tinney, Deatherage and Chris Van Denhende, of Tulsa, have served on the board, which oversees public education in Oklahoma, since February — clashing frequently with the board's chair, state schools Superintendent Ryan Walters — while Carson's first board meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, May 21.
Van Denhende had his nomination confirmed earlier in May by the Senate committee during a fiery meeting.
'This shouldn't be a controversial board,' Senate President Pro Tempore Lonnie Paxton said, 'but unfortunately it has become that way.'
When the Senate Education Committee met Tuesday, May 20, Tinney's nomination passed 10-2, with Deatherage's nomination advancing on a 9-2 vote. Carson sailed through with a 10-0 vote. The only senators voting against the nominations of Deatherage and Tinney were the committee's most far-right members, Sen. Dusty Deevers, R-Elgin, and Sen. Kendal Sacchieri, R-Blanchard.
Stitt had named Tinney, Deatherage and Van Denhende to the board on Feb. 11 to replace three sitting members. He named a fourth new member, Carson, to fill an open seat on April 28. The governor said in February the board shakeup was due to 'ongoing controversy' at the Oklahoma State Department of Education and disappointing standardized test scores.
During his first two years in office, Walters received no pushback from the board on multiple controversial decisions, such as issuing a statewide Bible-teaching mandate or seeking to create an administrative rule that would allow the state Education Department to not just ask for the immigration status of students, but also of their parents.
That's changed since Stitt appointed Tinney, Deatherage and Van Denhende to the board. During two meetings, the three men have challenged Walters on multiple occasions.
The circumstances regarding Tinney's nomination featured significant additional political drama. Senate tradition requires the nomination be carried by the senator for the district in which the nominee resides, or by the Senate president pro tempore. But Sen. Lisa Standridge, R-Norman, declined to carry the nomination of Tinney, who lives in her district. Standridge has cited her friendship with Kendra Wesson, one of the three board members ousted by Stitt in February, as her reason.
The Senate president pro tempore, in such cases, can also carry a nomination, but initially, Paxton, R-Tuttle, declined to do so. But after discussions with Stitt and others, Paxton changed his mind. He said Tuesday that Standridge had asked him to carry Tinney's nomination.
'We've had some time to see him on the board and see how he performs on it, so he looks like the right person for the job and (we) wanted to make sure that that we were able to get that through,' Paxton said.
Paxton said he discussed Tinney's nomination with Stitt.
"The governor feels very confident that he made the right appointment and would love to see that appointment to stay on there,' Paxton said of their conversation. 'He said, 'We can find somebody else, but why go find somebody else when you have a qualified person that's willing to serve?''
Tinney said he was in far southwestern Oklahoma when he heard the news.
'You guys know the kind of hurdles my nomination overcame and I don't want to rehash all that, but I'm just thankful that things got worked out and thankful I got the opportunity to be heard,' Tinney said after his hearing. 'I'm just going to hope I'll be confirmed by the Senate and then I'll get over to doing my job.'
During Tinney's 37-minute hearing, Deevers grilled him about whether it might be a conflict of interest for Tinney to serve on the state board, given that Tinney's wife, Ginger, serves as the executive director of Professional Oklahoma Educators, a union-like professional organization. He also asked about a vote Tinney took in a recent board meeting against suspending the license of the teacher accused of child neglect. Tinney said everyone deserves due process in such a setting.
Deevers remained unconvinced, saying Tinney had 'too severe a conflict of interest' to serve on the board.
In response to a question from Sacchieri about his loyalty to the governor, Tinney replied, 'I will not be a 'yes' man.'
Deatherage's hearing lasted about 23 minutes. Deevers asked him about what Title 70 — a portion of state law that governs education and the board — says concerning the board's role. Deatherage likened board members to coaches, who tell the team captain — the superintendent — what plays to run.
'The board guides and checks and makes sure … schools are winning,' Deatherage said.
Deevers also asked Deatherage about a recent controversy regarding how Walters pushed through new state social studies academic standards. Deatherage, Tinney and Van Denhende all have said they didn't have sufficient time to read the final version of the standards, and that they felt deceived when Walters said they had to vote during the February meeting to meet legislative deadlines, when the actual deadline wasn't until the end of April.
Carson's hearing lasted only 13 minutes. Deevers asked her only one question and Sacchieri offered a couple of others. Carson said her mantra in education was the question, 'Is it good for kids?'
She also said 'our children … are watching us. What message are we sending them?'
The committee also approved, without opposition, the nomination of Tulsa venture capitalist Tracy Poole to the OSU/A&M Board of Regents, which governs Oklahoma State University, Langston University, Oklahoma Panhandle State University, Northeastern Oklahoma A&M College and Connors State College. OSU President James Hess joined three other system presidents at the hearing to support Poole's nomination.
Also approved was the re-nomination of current Regional University System of Oklahoma Regent Connie Reilly, of Okemah.
This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Gov. Stitt's OSBE nominations get Senate committee confirmation
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
28 minutes ago
- CBS News
Senate approves $9 billion in cuts to foreign aid, public media funding
Washington — The Senate passed President Trump's request to rescind $9 billion in foreign aid and public broadcasting funding early Thursday, culminating an hours-long "vote-a-rama" and sending it back to the House ahead of a Friday deadline. In a 51-48 vote, Republicans Susan Collins, of Maine, and Lisa Murkowski, of Alaska, joined all Democrats in opposing the package. Vice President JD Vance, who cast two tie-breaking votes Tuesday for the measure to clear procedural hurdles, was not needed for final passage. Democratic Sen. Tina Smith of Minnesota was hospitalized and missed the vote. Both chambers need to approve the request before it expires at the end of the week, or the funds will have to be spent as lawmakers previously intended. The House approved the original $9.4 billion rescissions request last month, but it has faced pushback in the Senate, where some Republicans opposed slashing global health assistance and funding for local radio and television stations. The Senate held a lengthy vote series beginning Wednesday afternoon, rejecting dozens of amendments on retaining international aid and sparing public broadcasting from cuts. The Senate's version targets roughly $8 billion for foreign assistance programs, including the United States Agency for International Development, or USAID. The package also includes about $1 billion in cuts for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports public radio and television stations, including NPR and PBS. Senate Republicans met with Mr. Trump's budget director, Russell Vought, on Tuesday as GOP leaders worked to get holdouts on board ahead of the procedural votes later in the day. Vought left the meeting saying there would be a substitute amendment that would eliminate $400 million in cuts to an AIDS prevention program, one of the main concerns of Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, said he hoped the House would accept the "small modification." When asked about the $400 million change, House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, told reporters, "we wanted them to pass it unaltered like we did." "We need to claw back funding, and we'll do as much as we're able," Johnson added. But the change did not satisfy Collins and Murkowski. The holdouts said the administration's request lacks details about how the cuts will be implemented. "To carry out our Constitutional responsibility, we should know exactly what programs are affected and the consequences of rescissions," Collins said in a statement Tuesday. In a floor speech ahead of the procedural votes, Murkowski also said Congress should not give up its budget oversight. "I don't want us to go from one reconciliation bill to a rescissions package to another rescissions package to a reconciliation package to a continuing resolution," she said. "We're lawmakers. We should be legislating. What we're getting now is a direction from the White House and being told, 'This is the priority, we want you to execute on it, we'll be back with you with another round.' I don't accept that." Cuts to local radio and television stations, especially in rural areas where they are critical for communicating emergency messages, was another point of contention in the Senate. Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota, who had concerns about the cuts, said funding would be reallocated from climate funds to keep stations in tribal areas operating "without interruption." Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who voted for the package, said he expected that Congress would later have to try to fix some of the cuts once they determine the impacts. "I suspect we're going to find out there are some things that we're going to regret," he said Wednesday on the Senate floor. "I suspect that when we do we'll have to come back and fix it, similar to what I'm trying to do with the bill I voted against a couple of weeks ago — the so-called big, beautiful bill, that I think we're going to have to go back and work on."
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate votes to cut $9 billion from public broadcasting and foreign aid
Senate Republicans early Thursday greenlit President Donald Trump's proposal to claw back billions in global health and public media funding, pushing past frustrations within the GOP conference about the White House's transparency during the process. The White House-requested spending cuts narrowly made it through the Senate in a 51-48 vote after GOP Sens. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine voted 'no' alongside Democrats. Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) missed the vote, with her staff disclosing Wednesday that she was being kept in the hospital overnight "out of an abundance of caution." Because Senate Republicans made changes to the legislation it will need to bounce back to the House, which is expected to vote on it later Thursday. Trump will need to sign the recissions bill by the end of Friday, otherwise he will be forced to spend the money Congress previously approved. 'What we are talking about is one-tenth of one percent of all federal spending … but it's a step in the right direction and it's the first time we have done anything like this in 35 years,' Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said early Thursday morning. It marks the first time in decades that a rescissions package has been approved by the Senate. In 2018, the GOP-controlled chamber narrowly blocked a $15 billion request from Trump, after Collins and then-Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina opposed it. Even though Trump was successful now, however, there was still plenty of drama. To help address a swath of GOP concerns, the administration agreed to drop a $400 million cut to the global AIDS fighting program, PEPFAR, from the original, $9.4 billion proposal. That brought the Senate GOP bill down to roughly $9 billion. Republicans added language vowing that other areas related to food aid, maternal health, malaria and tuberculosis wouldn't be impacted and that certain food assistance programs would be administration also privately vowed to move around other funding to help offset funding cuts to rural public news stations to win over Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D). As part of their roughly 12 hour marathon voting session, Republicans also defeated attempts by Democrats, and some of their GOP colleagues, to strip out spending cuts to global health funds, public broadcasting and international disasters. GOP Sens. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Collins and Murkowski supported some of these amendments, but they needed more Republicans to join them. Not enough of them did. And McConnell, who had been viewed as likely to oppose the rescissions package, ultimately voted for it on final passage. Murkowski offered one doomed amendment that would have restored most of the money for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which largely funds PBS and NPR. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) put forward another amendment originally authored by Collins that would have further reduced the size of the clawback from $9 billion to $6.5 billion. Collins had decided not to offer that amendment herself over questions about whether it would sink the overall bill —and compel the Senate to revert back to original plans to cut $9.4 billion in previously-approved federal funding, which she opposes even more. Yet even as most Republicans voted for the package, several did so only after voicing their displeasure. Though White House budget director Russ Vought provided a 'matrix' of accounts that would be impacted in the closed door Senate lunch, Republicans remained widely frustrated with the Office of Management and Budget, which they felt had not provided sufficient details about the scope of the funding cuts on the table. 'Let's not consider this a precedent,' said Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), who said he was supporting the bill 'with reservation.' Wicker added, from the chamber floor, 'if you come back to us again, Mr. Director of the OMB — if you come back to us again from the executive branch — give us the specific amounts and the specific programs that will be cut.' Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), hours before voting for the package, said, 'I suspect we're going to find out there are some things that we're going to regret. … And I suspect that when we do we'll have to come back and fix it.' Hanging over Republicans in consideration of the bill was a dual political threat. First, Vought has been flirting with trying to leapfrog Congress altogether on spending cuts by challenging the Impoundment Control Act. The 1974 law prevents the executive branch from pulling back federal funding that's already been appropriated, but Vought has questioned its constitutionality. Rejecting the $9 billion rescissions request could have exacerbated this tension between Republicans and the administration. Second, Trump's GOP allies were also openly warning the president would become incensed if Congress failed to enact a major priority, opening up a political breach with the party's standard-bearer heading into a crucial government funding fight this fall. Trump had gone so far as to warn he would not endorse Republicans who voted against it. That wasn't enough to win over every Republican, though. Collins, who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee, singled out OMB for not providing enough information when she announced her opposition. She said in a statement that the rescissions package 'has a big problem – nobody really knows what program reductions are in it.' Murkowski, meanwhile, said Congress should be 'doing more when it comes down to our own authorities, our constitutional authorities, when it comes to the power of the purse.' Democrats, and some Republicans, have also warned that passing a rescissions package largely along party lines undercuts their larger government funding talks, where they will likely need bipartisan support to get even a short-term funding patch through the Senate. The Senate Appropriations Committee has advanced two bills and are expected to vote on two more Thursday: a measure to fund Department of Veterans' Affairs as well as the legislation to fund activities within the Departments of Commerce and Justice, which was derailed last week over a fight around funding for relocating the FBI headquarters. 'Republicans are putting a blindfold over their own eyes and leading rural Americans off a cliff, just to make Donald Trump and his billionaire friends happy,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday. 'Well, Democrats are not here to merely rubber stamp whatever Donald Trump does, just like the Republicans are doing.' Schumer sent a letter to Senate Democrats earlier this month warning that Republicans should not bank on Democrats supporting the larger government funding effort if GOP senators vote to approve the Trump-requested cuts. Democratic senators are already under enormous pressure from their base to not agree to a funding deal negotiated only by Republicans — even a short-term funding patch — after their leadership faced a whirlwind of backlash earlier this year for paving the way for passage of a GOP-negotiated continuing resolution. 'It will become hard, maybe even impossible, to write a bipartisan budget ever again, because the minority party knows they can get double crossed,' said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). He warned his GOP colleagues they should expect Democrats to use rescissions in a similar way: 'Democrats will do it to you when we are back in charge.' Jennifer Scholtes contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Senate Votes To Cut Federal Funding To PBS, NPR And Public Stations
The Senate passed Donald Trump's set of spending cuts to rescind $1.1 billion from public media, despite warnings that the funding rollbacks will devastate the PBS, NPR and public station ecosystem. The vote early on Thursday was 51-48, with Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME) and Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) joining all Democrats and independents in voting against. The bill now goes to the House for final passage. More from Deadline Trump Fires Top Sean "Diddy" Combs & Jeffrey Epstein Prosecutor Maurene Comey Senate Starts "Vote-A-Rama" As It Heads For Final Roll Call On Rescinding Federal Funding For PBS, NPR And Public Media Stations Democrats To Introduce Bill To Restrict Contributions To Presidential Libraries; Legislation Follows Trump Settlements With Paramount, Disney The cuts were part of a $9 billion rescissions package, with Republicans also voting to slash foreign aid and health programs. Public media has faced funding battles throughout its history, dating to the 1960s, but they have so far beat back such efforts when bipartisan support came through in Congress. This time around, Trump has threatened to withhold support and endorsements from any lawmaker who doesn't vote for the cuts, as he has attacked PBS and NPR for alleged left-wing bias. It's just his latest effort to try to undermine media outlets for coverage he dislikes. But advocates of public media say that, if federal funding is eliminated, it's the stations, including those in rural markets, that will face the greatest crisis, as they rely more heavily on funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. The CPB is the entity set up by Congress to distribute grants to public media outlets. Throughout the day on Wednesday, senators debated the rescissions package and voted on a series of amendments, including those that would retain funding for rural stations and those on tribal lands. But those amendments were defeated. As the final vote neared, Murkowski sought to sway fellow Republicans, noting that public media stations in her state helped warn residents after a 7.3 earthquake struck off the Alaska Peninsula. 'Some colleagues claim they are targeting 'radical leftist organizations' with these cuts, but in Alaska, these are simply organizations dedicated to their communities,' she wrote on X. 'Their response to today's earthquake is a perfect example of the incredible public service these stations provide. They deliver local news, weather updates, and, yes, emergency alerts that save human lives.' She added, 'The tsunami warnings are now thankfully canceled, but the warning to the U.S. Senate remains in effect. Today of all days, we should vote down these misguided cuts to public broadcasting.' Earlier, she had written that 'we are lawmakers. Our responsibility is to legislate, not to shrug our shoulders and take direction from the White House.' Paula Kerger, the president of PBS, and Katherine Maher, the president of NPR, appeared on news shows on Tuesday in a last-minute lobby to try to convince lawmakers to retain the funding. They have pointed to the public service aspects of broadcast stations, including in communities where there are few options for local content. More to come. Best of Deadline Everything We Know About 'Stranger Things' Season 5 So Far 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery
