Which Workers Will A.I. Hurt Most: The Young or the Experienced?
That artificial intelligence is poised to displace white-collar workers is indisputable. But what kind of workers, exactly? Mr. Jassy's announcement landed in the middle of a debate over just this question.
Some experts argue that A.I. is most likely to affect novice workers, whose tasks are generally simplest and therefore easiest to automate. Dario Amodei, the chief executive of the A.I. company Anthropic, recently told Axios that the technology could cannibalize half of all entry-level white-collar roles within five years. An uptick in the unemployment rate for recent college graduates has aggravated this concern, even if it doesn't prove that A.I. is the cause of their job-market struggles.
But other captains of the A.I. industry have taken the opposite view, arguing that younger workers are likely to benefit from A.I. and that experienced workers will ultimately be more vulnerable. In an interview at a New York Times event in late June, Brad Lightcap, the chief operating officer of OpenAI, suggested that the technology could pose problems for 'a class of worker that I think is more tenured, is more oriented toward a routine in a certain way of doing things.'
The ultimate answer to this question will have vast implications. If entry-level jobs are most at risk, it could require a rethinking of how we educate college students, or even the value of college itself. And if older workers are most at risk, it could lead to economic and even political instability as large-scale layoffs become a persistent feature of the labor market.
David Furlonger, a vice president at the research firm Gartner who helps oversee its survey of chief executives, has considered the implications if A.I. displaces more experienced workers.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
FBI Probes Detroit Pistons' Malik Beasley Over Wire Fraud and Illegal Gambling
Federal authorities are investigating former Detroit Pistons guard Malik Beasley's alleged involvement in wire fraud, gambling, and illegal prop betting, according to ESPN. The allegations stem from Beasley's time playing for the Milwaukee Bucks during the 2023-2024 season, sources told the outlet, with the focus on 'unusually heavy betting interest on Beasley's statistics' starting in January 2024. A gambling industry source shared that one or more prominent U.S. sportsbooks noticed the activity. Advertisement The 18-month investigation is being led by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York, Beasley's lawyer Steve Haney told The Detroit News. 'It's a gambling investigation involving Malik. No criminal charges have been issued. It's nothing but an investigation and Malik is entitled to the presumption of innocence,' Haney said, per the outlet. The investigation has reportedly resulted in the Pistons withdrawing a three-year, $42 million contract offer to Beasley. While on the court, it appeared Beasley was fairing well. The free agent has played for six teams throughout his nine-career in the NBA and has earned nearly $60 million, including his recent one-year, $6 million deal with the Pistons, according to Spotrac. However, behind the scenes, a different story unfolded. Advertisement In April 2025, Hazan Sports Management Group Inc. sued Beasley, alleging he failed to repay a $650,000 cash advance for marketing revenue from using his name, image, and likeness. Hazan made 'a substantial investment of time, effort, and resources in a player with known issues (including and especially financial issues)…when they took him on as a client and provided him with a substantial marketing advance in anticipation of helping Beasley become one of the premier players at his position,' the lawsuit reads, per The Detroit News. The company added that when Beasley allegedly fired the firm, '…(Hazan) made several attempts to collect the full amount of the marketing advance but received little more than drips and drabs of sporadic payments and vague promises to repay the balance over time.' The firm is now seeking a minimum of $2.5 million, alleging that he failed to uphold their contract agreement. Advertisement Additional claims against Beasley include a lawsuit from The Stott apartments, stating he owes $7,355 in unpaid rent, as well as a $26,827 judgment won by a celebrity barbershop, Cairo Cuts, that provided him with a loan. Dentist Hassan Alshehabi of Delicate Smiles also won a $34,390 default judgment against Beasley related to a loan. The Detroit News reports Beasley's financial troubles total more than $8 million. 'I have been with Malik for a long time, I have seen a lot of people around him come and go, but I have stayed away from any of his financial management or mismanagement or decisions he would make with money,' Haney told the outlet. Haney clarified that he doesn't handle his client's finances and noted that while his goal is to connect his clients with top business experts, it's ultimately the client's decision to seek guidance. Advertisement The post FBI Probes Detroit Pistons' Malik Beasley Over Wire Fraud and Illegal Gambling appeared first on AfroTech. The post FBI Probes Detroit Pistons' Malik Beasley Over Wire Fraud and Illegal Gambling appeared first on AfroTech.
Boston Globe
31 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Amazon extends Prime Day discounts to 4 days as retailers weigh tariff-related price increases
Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Amazon executives declined to comment on the potential impact of tariffs on Prime Day deals. The event is taking place two and a half months after an online news report sparked speculation that Amazon planned to display added tariff costs next to product prices on its website. Advertisement White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt denounced the purported change as a 'hostile and political act' before Amazon clarified the idea had been floated for its low-cost Haul storefront but never approved. Amazon's past success with using Prime Day to drive sales and attract new members spurred other major retail chains to schedule competing sales in July. Best Buy, Target and Walmart are repeating the practice this year. Advertisement Like Amazon, Walmart is adding two more days to its promotional period, which starts Tuesday and runs through July 13. The nation's largest retailer is making its summer deals available in stores as well as online for the first time. Here's what to expect: Will a longer Prime event lessen the urgency? Amazon expanded Prime Day this year because shoppers 'wanted more time to shop and save,' Amazon Prime Vice President Jamil Ghani recently told The Associated Press. Analysts are unsure the extra days will translate into more purchases given that renewed inflation worries and potential price increases from tariffs may make consumers less willing to spend. Amazon doesn't disclose Prime Day sales figures but said last year that the event achieved record global sales. Adobe Digital Insights predicts that the sales event will drive $23.8 billion in overall online spending from July 8 to July 11, 28.4% more than the similar period last year. In 2024 and 2023, online sales increased 11% and 6.1% during the comparable four days of July. Vivek Pandya, lead analyst at Adobe Digital Insights, noted that Amazon's move to stretch the sales event to four days is a big opportunity to 'really amplify and accelerate the spending velocity.' Caila Schwartz, director of consumer insights and strategy at software company Salesforce, noted that July sales in general have lost some momentum in recent years. Amazon is not a Salesforce customer, so the business software company is not privy to Prime Day figures. 'What we saw last year was that (shoppers) bought and then they were done, ' Schwartz said. 'We know that the consumer is still really cautious. So it's likely we could see a similar pattern where they come out early, they're ready to buy and then they take a step back.' Advertisement How will rising costs from tariffs affect discounts? Amazon executives reported in May that the company and many of its third-party sellers tried to beat big import tax bills by stocking up on foreign goods before President Donald Trump's tariffs took effect. And because of that move, a fair number of third-party sellers hadn't changed their pricing at that time, Amazon said. Adobe Digital Insights' Pandya expects discounts to remain on par with last year and for other U.S. retail companies to mark 10% to 24% off the manufacturers' suggested retail price between Tuesday and Friday. Salesforce's Schwartz said she's noticed retailers becoming more precise with their discounts, such as offering promotion codes that apply to selected products instead of their entire websites. Will shoppers stick to necessities or splurge? Amazon Prime and other July sales have historically helped jump-start back-to-school spending and encouraged advance planners to buy other seasonal merchandise earlier. Analysts said they expected U.S. consumers to make purchases this week out of fear that tariffs will make items more expensive later. Brett Rose, CEO of United National Consumer Supplies, a wholesale distributor of overstocked goods like toys and beauty products, thinks shoppers will go for items like beauty essentials. 'They're going to buy more everyday items,' he said. What are some of the deals? As in past years, Amazon offered early deals leading up to Prime Day. For the big event, Amazon said it would have special discounts on Alexa-enabled products like Echo, Fire TV and Fire tablets. Walmart said its July sale would include a 32-inch Samsung smart monitor priced at $199 instead of $299.99; and $50 off a 50-Inch Vizio Smart TV with a standard retail price of $298.00. Target said it was maintaining its 2024 prices on key back-to-school items, including a $5 backpack and a selection of 20 school supplies totaling less than $20. Advertisement How will Amazon's third-party sellers fare? Independent businesses that sell goods through Amazon account for more than 60% of the company's retail sales. Some third-party sellers are expected to sit out Prime Day and not offer discounts to preserve their profit margins during the ongoing tariff uncertainty, analysts said. Rose, of United National Consumer Supplies, said he spoke with third-party sellers who said they would rather take a sales hit this week than use up a lot of their pre-tariffs inventory now and risk seeing their profit margins suffer later. However, some independent businesses that market their products on Amazon are looking to Prime Day to make a dent in the inventory they built up earlier in the year to avoid tariffs. Home fragrance company Outdoor Fellow, which makes about 30% of its sales through Amazon's marketplace, gets most of its candle lids, labels, jars, reed diffusers and other items from China, founder Patrick Jones said. Fearing high costs from tariffs, Jones stocked up at the beginning of the year, roughly doubling his inventory. For Prime Day, he plans to offer bigger discounts, such as 32% off the price of a candle normally priced at $34, Jones said. 'All the product that we have on Amazon right now is still from the inventory that we got before the tariffs went into effect,' he said. 'So we're still able to offer the discount that we're planning on doing.' Jones said he was waiting to find out if the order he placed in June will incur large customs duties when the goods arrive from China in a few weeks. Advertisement AP Business Writer Mae Anderson contributed to this report.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The stock-market rally is broadening beyond Big Tech. Will consumer stocks bounce back in the second half of the year?
After months of leadership by megacap technology stocks, Wall Street kicked off the second half of 2025 with a powerful, yet potentially healthier, shift in the U.S. stock market, as the rally has broadened. From cyclicals to small caps, more stocks have been joining the charge that has sent the S&P 500 SPX and the Nasdaq Composite COMP to new all-time highs, suggesting that this market's recovery from April lows may have deeper roots than many anticipated. 'Today is my 61st birthday': I have my ex-spouse's Social Security benefits. Should I retire at 65 and travel? 'I'm single': At 70, I have $500,000 in stocks and $220,000 in savings. How do I invest my $130,000 windfall? 'She's in a shaky marriage that could soon end': Will my daughter's husband get my IRA when I die? My wife and I are in our late 60s. Do I sell stocks to pay our $30,000 credit-card debt — or do it gradually over 3 years? I put my $500K inheritance into a joint account with my husband. Can I leave half of it to my son from a previous marriage? Investors have begun rotating out of richly valued technology names and into cyclical sectors when the calendar turned to the second half of the year. The S&P 500's materials sector XX:SP500.15 was the best performer among the large-cap index's 11 sectors last week, up 3.6%, while the S&P 500 only rose 1.7%. The financials XX:SP500.40 and energy XX:SP500.10 sectors also gained 2.4% and 2.1% in the same period, respectively, according to FactSet data. Small-cap stocks also have shown signs of rebounding in the second half. The benchmark Russell 2000 index RUT has popped 3.5% so far this month, outperforming other major large-cap equity indexes. The small-cap index on Thursday also closed in the green for 2025 for the first time since Feb. 20, according to Dow Jones Market Data. 'While the 'buy everything' approach worked really well off the April lows, and part of that was simply just a mean reversion trade after tech got asymmetrically punished … so going forward, stock selection is going to be more important and other areas of the market are starting to catch a bid,' said Talley Leger, chief market strategist for the Wealth Consulting Group. The broadening of the tech rally beyond the so-called Magnificent Seven cohort is a sign of 'a broader, healthier market,' he said. Meanwhile, some sectors that lagged in the year's first half could be poised for a meaningful rebound in the rest of 2025. The S&P 500's consumer-discretionary sector XX:SP500.25 was at the bottom of the large-cap index's 11 sectors in the first six months of 2025, off 4.2% to log its worst first-half performance in three years, according to FactSet data. However, a look beneath the surface shows the story wasn't so bleak: Many consumer-related stocks have held steady, and U.S. consumers might be in better shape than sector performance suggests. The S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary Index XX:SP500EW.25 — which gives equal value to all 51 stocks that are included in the sector, regardless of the size of the company — has actually risen 2.5% this year, according to FactSet data. Of course, Tesla Inc. TSLA — one of the largest-weighted stocks in the S&P 500's consumer discretionary sector — has been largely to blame. Comprising 18.6% of the total assets within the market-cap-weighted sector index, shares of Tesla have tumbled nearly 22% this year, as weak EV sales, lower demand, intensifying competition from other automakers and Elon Musk's political involvement have rattled investors. See: Opinion: Elon Musk takes us for fools as he renews his verbal assault on Trump Another megacap tech name — Inc. AMZN — accounts for roughly 42% of the weighting in the discretionary sector, but its shares have remained relatively steady, rising 1.8% year to date, according to FactSet data. To be sure, Tesla and Amazon stand on their own perch within the consumer-discretionary sector, which also includes restaurant chains, apparel, luxury goods and travel stocks. Among those are McDonald's Corp. MCD, Lululemon Athletica Inc. LULU and Airbnb Inc. ABNB, which all can rise in a resilient economy and labor market when consumers tend to spend more, but fall when unemployment rises. See: The June jobs report is grimy under the hood. Here's the down and dirty. The U.S. economy added a stronger-than-expected 147,000 jobs in June, and the unemployment rate ticked down to 4.1% from 4.2%, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data released Thursday. Meanwhile, the University of Michigan's closely watched gauge of U.S. consumer sentiment rose to 60.5 in a preliminary June reading from 52.2 in the prior month. This was the first improvement in six months. The Wealth Consulting Group's Leger sees the previously negative consumer sentiment as a potential buying opportunity for the consumer-discretionary sector (see chart below). 'The connection between the University of Michigan consumer-sentiment index and the performance of the consumer-discretionary sector fell into the contrarian buy zone on our radar when everything was at its worst [in April]. Now they are rebounding off those lows, and sentiment or morale is improving,' he told MarketWatch via phone on Wednesday. In Leger's view, the surging stock market also adds to 'the wealth effect,' which could increase consumer spending power. That, along with the improving consumer sentiment, falling oil prices, cooling headline inflation and potential interest-rate cuts from the Federal Reserve later this year 'should release more money for spending on discretionary items,' and 'help brighten the earnings outlook' for the sector, he said. However, Marta Norton, chief investment strategist at Empower, said it's still too early to 'make heads or tails' of consumers' emotions, as even the potential tariff threat doesn't feel as concerning as it did when it first made headlines a few months ago. Americans cut spending in May after buying lots of new cars and other goods earlier in the year to beat U.S. tariffs, underscoring how ongoing trade wars are disrupting the economy. Personal spending fell 0.1% in May, the government said in a June 27 report. It was the first decline since January. 'I wouldn't describe the consumer as unhealthy at all,' Norton said, but added there has been a marginal deterioration this year. 'There is still a certain measure of uncertainty around what that trade policy ultimately looks like,' she said. That also casts a shadow over the long run for earnings of discretionary stocks. Yet despite recent weakness, the consumer-discretionary sector remains expensive on a price-to-forward-earnings (P/E) basis. The forward P/E multiple of the discretionary sector, calculated by dividing its current price by Wall Street analysts' consensus estimate for its earnings per share (EPS) for the next 12 months, was pegged at 29.07 as of Wednesday afternoon, up from around 22.56 on April 8. Furthermore, the equal-weighted version of the discretionary index was trading at 17.57 times forward P/E, compared with 13.7 in early April, according to FactSet. When you add in that the sector's not necessarily cheap, and that tariff headwinds remain, Norton said it looks tough to see a catalyst for meaningful moves higher for consumer-discretionary stocks. U.S. stocks finished higher on Thursday as investors digested the June employment report. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA jumped nearly 0.8%, ending only 0.4% off its prior record. The S&P 500 ended up 0.8%, while the Nasdaq Composite gained 1%, with both scoring fresh record closes, according to FactSet data. Major U.S. stock exchanges were closed on Friday for the July 4 holiday. 'I do all the yard work, cooking and cleaning': I live with my daughter and her lazy boyfriend. She wants me to buy her house. Do I say yes? The stock-market rally is broadening beyond Big Tech. Will consumer stocks bounce back in the second half of the year? My job is offering me a payout. Should I take a $61,000 lump sum — or $355 a month for life? 'Finance makes me break out in hives': I inherited $240K from my parents. Do I pay off my $258K mortgage and give up my job? My life partner is 18 years my senior. He wants to leave his $4.5 million fortune to me — not his two kids. Do we tell them? Sign in to access your portfolio
