&w=3840&q=100)
Mineral, metal output continues growth momentum in early FY26
Iron ore, which accounts for 70 per cent of the total value of minerals governed by the Mineral Conservation and Development Rules (MCDR), rose marginally to 53 million metric tonnes (MMT) in FY26 (April–May), from 52.7 MMT in the same period last year, according to a statement by the Ministry of Mines. Manganese ore output increased by 1.4 per cent to 0.70 MMT, while bauxite production rose by 0.9 per cent to 4.73 MMT.
Zinc concentrate and limestone also recorded growth of 3.7 per cent and 1.6 per cent, respectively, in FY26 (April–May). In April alone, bauxite output surged 13.6 per cent year-on-year to 2.13 MMT, while zinc concentrate and limestone rose 5.8 per cent and 1.2 per cent, respectively.
In the non-ferrous metal segment, refined copper production jumped by 43.5 per cent to 0.99 lakh tonnes during FY26 (April–May), compared to 0.69 lakh tonnes in the year-ago period. Aluminium production rose 1.3 per cent to 7.07 lakh tonnes from 6.98 lakh tonnes during the same period.
India ranks among the top producers globally in aluminium, copper, and iron ore.
Continued growth in the production of iron ore in the current financial year reflects the 'robust demand conditions' in the user industry, such as steel, said the statement. 'Coupled with growth in aluminium and copper, these growth trends point towards continued strong economic activity in user sectors such as energy, infrastructure, construction, automotive and machinery,' it added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
3 days ago
- United News of India
No plan for IREL, HCL, NALCO merger into NCMC: Centre
New Delhi, July 24 (UNI) The Central government is yet to chalk out a plan for the merger of Indian Rare Earth Limited (IREL), Hindustan Copper Limited (HCL) and National Aluminum Company Limited (NALCO) into a 'National Critical Minerals Corporation', Union Minister for Coal and Mines Kishan Reddy told the Lok Sabha. The union minister replying to a query said the Central Government through a notification on November 22, 2010 appointed a Commission of Inquiry under the Chairmanship of Justice M. B. Shah for the purpose of making inquiry of illegal mining of iron ore and manganese ore in contravention of the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 or other rules or licenses or guidelines issued there under referred to as illegal mining. The Justice M.B. Shah Commission submitted the report to the Ministry of Mines, which was subsequently laid in the Parliament, the minister said. The Section 23C of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) (MMDR) Act, 1957 empowers the State Government to frame rules to prevent illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals and for purposes connected therewith. Therefore, the control of illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals and purposes connected therewith is primarily the responsibility of the State Government, added the minister. The Central Government supports and augments these efforts through policy initiatives from time to time. Some of the steps taken by the Central Government for the prevention and control of the frauds like fake transportation permits, under invoiced exports etc. are as under the MMDR Act, 1957 was amended through the MMDR (Amendment) Act, 2015, wherein Section 30B and 30C read with Section 21 and 23C, inter-alia, provide stringent punitive provisions for illegal mining, transportation and storage, added the minister. Altogether, 21 State Governments including Odisha have framed rules under section 23C of MMDR Act,1957 to curb illegal mining, transportation and storage of minerals. Further 22 State Governments including Odisha have set up Task Forces, specially constituted to control illegal mining and review the action taken by member departments for checking the illegal mining, transportation and storage activities, added the minister. The Ministry of Mines launched the Mining Surveillance System (MSS) in October 2016 through IBM. The MSS system detects likely incidences of illegal mining using space technology. The Ministry of Mines also issued guidelines on 3 October 2023 to major mineral rich States for prevention of misclassification of grades of iron ore and other minerals by using technology, added the minister. UNI XC SSP
India.com
3 days ago
- India.com
India gets BIG lead on super magnets, signs deals with eight countries to...; bad news for China due to...
(File) India rare earth magnets: In a significant move that could deal a severe blow to China's monopoly over rare earth elements (REEs), India is in talks with several countries who have sufficient reserves of rare earth minerals. The development comes after China restricted the export of rare earth magnets to India following Operation Sindoor, citing 'national security' concerns. Which countries has India signed agreements with? In a written reply during the ongoing monsoon session of the Parliament, Union Minister Jitendra Singh informed the House that India has already agreements to procure super magnets aka rare earth magnets and other rare earth minerals from at least eight countries and talks are underway with Brazil and Dominican Republic. 'To develop bilateral cooperation with countries rich in mineral resources, the Ministry of Mines has signed agreements with the governments of many countries. These countries include Australia, Argentina, Zambia, Peru, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, Malawi, Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast) and organizations like the International Energy Agency (IEA),' Singh revealed. Jitendra Singh, who is the Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Department of Atomic Energy, further stated that the Ministry of Mines has also initiated the process of entering into Government-to-Government (G2G) MoUs with Brazil and Dominican Republic to develop cooperation in the field of rare earth minerals and critical minerals. 'The primary objective of these agreements is to create a developed framework for research, development and innovations in the mining sector, with a special focus on rare earth elements (REE) and critical minerals,' he added. How India is working to develop new supply chain of rare minerals? According to the minister, the Indian government is working strengthen the supply chain of critical minerals with initiatives like Mineral Security Partnership, Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), India-UK Technology and Security Initiative (TSI), Quad and Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET). Does India have rare mineral reserves? As per official data, India has around 7.23 million tonnes of rare earth element oxides and 13.15 million tonnes of monazite– an important source of thorium used in generating nuclear energy. Monazite reserves have been discovered in coastal areas, red sand and alluvial soil areas of Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, West Bengal, Jharkhand, Gujarat and Maharashtra. Singh stated that about 1.29 million tonnes of rare earth minerals have been found in parts of Gujarat and Rajasthan, adding that the Geological Survey of India (GSI) has discovered a whopping 482.6 million tonnes of resources of rare earth element (REE) ore at various cut-off grades in 34 exploration projects. Why India needs rare earth magnets? Super magnets or rare earth magnets are used in the manufacturing of ll kinds of advanced equipment ranging from electric vehicles (EV) to military drones and radar systems. According to industry estimates, India expects to import 700 tonnes of magnets worth $30 million this year, a major chunk of which comes from China. As per customs data, Chinese exports of permanent magnets fell 51% to 2,626 tonnes in April after the export ban came into force, while India imported 460 tonnes of rare earth magnets, most of which came from China, in the financial year that ended on March 31, 2025. According to official estimates, China controls more than 90% production of rare earth magnets, but imposed restrictions on their export in April in response to the tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump.
Indian Express
4 days ago
- Indian Express
Critical minerals are a strategic asset – India must not fall behind
Critical minerals are emerging as the defining geoeconomic axis of the 21st century. These are no longer peripheral to industrial development but lie at the heart of advanced manufacturing, clean energy systems, strategic technologies and national security. Energy transition, digitalisation and the pursuit of supply chain resilience are rapidly amplifying the demand for minerals such as lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite and rare earth elements. Their availability and accessibility will determine the pace and quality of growth for all major economies. Unlike fossil fuels, critical minerals are characterised by high geographical concentration, limited transparency and complex value chains. China dominates the midstream processing stage for most key minerals, accounting for over 90 per cent of rare earth refining, 70 per cent of cobalt processing and close to 60 per cent of lithium conversion capacity. These are not incidental advantages but outcomes of decades of strategic investment, policy coherence and state-backed industrial planning. With China 20 years ahead in the supply chain race, India cannot afford to anchor its future energy, mobility or technology aspirations on supply chains that remain opaque, concentrated and subject to political risk. In 2022, the Ministry of Mines identified 30 critical minerals based on their strategic importance to clean energy and future technologies, high import dependence, domestic resource constraints and relevance for agricultural and industrial needs. In January, the National Critical Mineral Mission (NCMM) was announced to secure critical mineral supply chains by ensuring mineral availability. Its success will rest on how effectively it translates intent into action. Currently, India is 100 per cent import dependent for lithium, cobalt, nickel, rare earth elements and silicon. At the same time, India's domestic resource base for critical minerals is underdeveloped. The Geological Survey of India has ramped up exploration, with 195 projects underway over the past year and another 227 approved for the upcoming year. In response to the inclusion of critical minerals in the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, the government launched four tranches of auctions for critical mineral blocks last year, and a fifth was concluded in January 2025. However, the auctions revealed persistent challenges. A large number of blocks were annulled as high capital costs, limited domestic processing capacity and a shortage of technically qualified bidders dampened participation. These outcomes underscore the need for policy refinement to attract credible investment and build industry confidence in the viability of critical mineral development. As India seeks to scale up domestic exploration, it must also confront a major structural limitation: Lack of sufficient capacity to refine and process minerals into battery-grade or component-ready materials. This midstream bottleneck risks locking the country into a dependence on foreign processors, especially for lithium, cobalt and rare earths. To address this, the NCMM plans to set up dedicated mineral processing zones with modern infrastructure. Within these, production incentives modelled on PLI schemes could be used to catalyse private investment into refining, separation and chemical conversion facilities. Amid growing concern over mineral security, recent export restrictions on rare earth elements by China have also exposed the vulnerability of India's automotive sector, with some firms already indicating potential production cuts. Rare earth magnets are essential to electric and internal combustion vehicles alike. To mitigate this risk, India must accelerate investments in independent supply chains, including targeted exploration, processing capacity and strategic partnerships. Given the demand intensity and India's current reserves, international engagement and friendshoring will be vital to the creation of a diversified and resilient supply chain. India has taken steps by joining the Mineral Security Partnership and initiating collaborations with Australia, Argentina and others. These partnerships signal a deeper alignment with global efforts to diversify supply chains away from China. India should leverage geopolitical platforms such as the Quad and G20 to secure further stable mineral trade relationships, promote joint ventures and facilitate best-practice sharing. Developing a critical mineral stockpiling framework will also be essential to buffer against supply disruptions and price volatility. These efforts must remain strategically aligned with broader foreign policy objectives. India must also build domestic self-sufficiency in critical minerals through more sustainable and circular approaches. Recycling offers a promising path to reduce import dependency. The recycling chain for batteries and electronics is fragmented and largely informal. Without investment in formal collection, dismantling and high-efficiency recovery, circularity will remain aspirational. India must also prioritise resource recovery by incentivising recyclers and by expanding formal infrastructure for waste collection. Sustainable mining practices and responsible sourcing of critical minerals are crucial. Several critical mineral reserves lie in tribal or ecologically sensitive areas where inadequate environmental, social and governance (ESG) compliance has led to delays, protests and legal challenges. India must adopt comprehensive ESG frameworks in mining, incorporating community trust-building and third-party audit mechanisms. Strengthening community participation through local benefit-sharing and decision-making will be key to fostering enduring community trust and support for mining activities. Policymaking must be informed by rigorous, sector-specific assessments of future demand, supply and technological developments. India should periodically reassess its critical mineral list and adjust sourcing strategies in line with domestic and global shifts. The contest for critical minerals will shape the contours of future economic resilience and technological sovereignty. India has the market scale, industrial ambition and diplomatic leverage to lead. It must now ensure timely execution, sustained institutional support and a clear commitment to self-reliance, sustainability and global alignment. Kant is former G20 sherpa of India and former CEO of Niti Aayog and Chhina is a policy specialist — climate and energy
