Women's app makes case to 'disadvantage' for equality
The Giggle for Girls app is seeking to overturn a 2024 finding that it discriminated against a transgender user by removing her from the women-only platform in September 2021.
The platform was a "special measure" exempt from discrimination law as it sought to achieve substantial equality between men and women, an appeal court was told on Monday.
The ability to create these kinds of special measures to promote equality would be frustrated if Justice Robert Bromwich's findings remained because they would - by definition - discriminate against some group of people, Noel Hutley SC said.
"A special measure will exclude someone necessarily because it's otherwise not special," he told the Full Court of the Federal Court on Monday.
Lawyers from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner have challenged this, telling the court that this would permit "invidious discrimination" to take place under the shield of a special measure.
When Mr Hutley said this was an "extreme example" and did not need to be considered, one judge pushed back - asking why someone seeking to actively harm another group would be protected.
"Why would the (Sex Discrimination Act) then say that's OK?" Justice Melissa Perry asked.
Mr Hutley replied by saying parliament had to form a compromise when enacting the legislation.
"So you say as long as you have a purpose of achieving substantive equality between one of the protected groups, you're in, irrespective of the nature of any other purpose?" the judge asked.
"Quite," Mr Hutley replied.
"If your purpose was to advance women, (if another) purpose was to disadvantage men then there's nothing wrong with that."
Roxanne Tickle - who was born male but identifies as female - was removed from the app in September 2021.
Ms Tickle has also filed her own challenge to Justice Bromwich's decision, seeking to increase the $10,000 in damages he awarded her in August 2024.
She further claims the judge wrongly found that she was not directly discriminated against by Giggle and its founder Sall Grover.
The judge found that a condition by the platform that its members had the appearance of cisgender women did not specifically target Ms Tickle but indirectly discriminated against her.
The hearing continues.
Lifeline 13 11 14
Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Tycoon who brought F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in graft case
A Malaysian hotel tycoon who helped bring Formula One to Singapore pleaded guilty Monday to abetting the obstruction of justice, in a rare corruption case in the city-state that saw a former transport minister jailed last year. Singapore-based billionaire Ong Beng Seng, 79, was charged in October last year with helping former transport minister S. Iswaran cover up evidence in a graft investigation. He was also accused of showering Iswaran with lavish gifts, including tickets to the 2017 Singapore Formula One Grand Prix, flights on a private jet, business class travel and a luxury hotel stay. Ong entered his guilty plea from a glass-encased dock at a district court in downtown Singapore on Monday. Prosecutors sought a two-month jail term after Ong agreed to plead guilty. He will be sentenced on August 15. But prosecutors also agreed with defence lawyers that the court could exercise "judicial mercy" in view of Ong's poor health -- which could further reduce any sentence. Defence lawyers pleaded for clemency, saying their septuagenarian client suffered from a litany of serious ailments, including an incurable form of cancer. They asked for a "stiff fine" instead of actual jail time. "The risks to Mr. Ong's life increase dramatically in prison," lawyer Cavinder Bull told the court, saying prison could not give his client sufficient care. "This man is living on the edge," Bull added. The Attorney General's Chambers said in a statement that after "considering the medical evidence before the Court", the prosecutors did not object to imposing a fine instead of jail time. The trial of Malaysia-born Ong had attracted significant media attention due to his links with Iswaran and the affluent city-state's reputation as one of the world's least corrupt nations. Ong owns Singapore-based Hotel Properties Limited and is the rights holder to the Singapore Grand Prix Formula One race. He and Iswaran were instrumental in bringing the Formula One night race on a street circuit to Singapore in 2008. In July 2023, Ong was arrested as part of a graft probe involving Iswaran and was subsequently released on bail. In October last year, Iswaran was jailed for 12 months after he pleaded guilty to accepting illegal gifts worth more than Sg$400,000 ($310,000). He was also found guilty of obstructing justice, in the city-state's first political graft trial in nearly half a century. Iswaran completed his sentence on June 6.
The Australian
9 hours ago
- The Australian
Tycoon who brought F1 to Singapore pleads guilty in graft case
A Malaysian hotel tycoon who helped bring Formula One to Singapore pleaded guilty Monday to abetting the obstruction of justice, in a rare corruption case in the city-state that saw a former transport minister jailed last year. Singapore-based billionaire Ong Beng Seng, 79, was charged in October last year with helping former transport minister S. Iswaran cover up evidence in a graft investigation. He was also accused of showering Iswaran with lavish gifts, including tickets to the 2017 Singapore Formula One Grand Prix, flights on a private jet, business class travel and a luxury hotel stay. Ong entered his guilty plea from a glass-encased dock at a district court in downtown Singapore on Monday. Prosecutors sought a two-month jail term after Ong agreed to plead guilty. He will be sentenced on August 15. But prosecutors also agreed with defence lawyers that the court could exercise "judicial mercy" in view of Ong's poor health -- which could further reduce any sentence. Defence lawyers pleaded for clemency, saying their septuagenarian client suffered from a litany of serious ailments, including an incurable form of cancer. They asked for a "stiff fine" instead of actual jail time. "The risks to Mr. Ong's life increase dramatically in prison," lawyer Cavinder Bull told the court, saying prison could not give his client sufficient care. "This man is living on the edge," Bull added. The Attorney General's Chambers said in a statement that after "considering the medical evidence before the Court", the prosecutors did not object to imposing a fine instead of jail time. The trial of Malaysia-born Ong had attracted significant media attention due to his links with Iswaran and the affluent city-state's reputation as one of the world's least corrupt nations. Ong owns Singapore-based Hotel Properties Limited and is the rights holder to the Singapore Grand Prix Formula One race. He and Iswaran were instrumental in bringing the Formula One night race on a street circuit to Singapore in 2008. In July 2023, Ong was arrested as part of a graft probe involving Iswaran and was subsequently released on bail. In October last year, Iswaran was jailed for 12 months after he pleaded guilty to accepting illegal gifts worth more than Sg$400,000 ($310,000). He was also found guilty of obstructing justice, in the city-state's first political graft trial in nearly half a century. Iswaran completed his sentence on June 6. mba/lb
The Advertiser
15 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Female 'safe space' app defends booting trans woman
A social media app has defended the ejection of a transgender woman, claiming the platform was needed as a safe space against "deplorable" behaviour from men. The Giggle for Girls app and founder Sall Grover are seeking to overturn a 2024 finding it discriminated against a transgender user by removing her from the women-only platform in September 2021. The platform was a "special measure" exempt from discrimination law because it sought to achieve substantial equality between men and women, an appeal court was told on Monday. The ability to create these kinds of special measures to promote equality would be frustrated if Justice Robert Bromwich's findings remained because they would - by definition - discriminate against some group of people, Noel Hutley SC said. "A special measure will exclude someone necessarily because it's otherwise not special," he told the Full Court of the Federal Court on Monday. The barrister said Ms Grover's intention behind the app was to provide a "safe space" for women. Evidence was shown to the court from women of sexual abuse, alcoholism, trolling and harassment from men who had found refuge on the Giggle platform. "It's got to the point to say that a by-blow of it is that certain people couldn't get onto it and were hurt by it - that's unfortunate," Mr Hutley said. The evidence showed "the most deplorable behaviour of men on the internet," he told a panel of three judges. The need for this type of space was "manifest" and it was a special measure despite excluding certain groups. Lawyers from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner have challenged this in court, saying "invidious discrimination" could be - on Giggle's view of the world - permitted to take place under the guise of a special measure. When Mr Hutley said this was an "extreme example" and did not need to be considered, one judge pushed back - asking why someone seeking to actively harm another group would be protected. "Why would the (Sex Discrimination Act) then say that's OK?" Justice Melissa Perry asked. Mr Hutley replied by saying parliament had to form a compromise when enacting the legislation. "So you say as long as you have a purpose of achieving substantive equality between one of the protected groups, you're in, irrespective of the nature of any other purpose?" the judge asked. "Quite," Mr Hutley replied. "If your purpose was to advance women, (if another) purpose was to disadvantage men then there's nothing wrong with that." Justice Perry asked what Ms Grover meant when she said she wanted Giggle to be a women-only safe space. "Women who she had judged to look like women," Mr Hutley replied. "No, but you're going in circles," the judge noted. Ms Grover denies findings she rejected Roxanne Tickle - who was born male but identifies as female - from the app in September 2021 because she did not look like a cisgender woman. Rather, she simply weeded out people who did not "appear female," Mr Hutley said. "Isn't that a distinction without a difference?" Justice Perry asked. Ms Tickle has also filed her own challenge to Justice Bromwich's decision, seeking to increase the $10,000 in damages he awarded her in August 2024. She further claims the judge wrongly found she was not directly discriminated against by Giggle and Ms Grover. The judge found that a condition by the platform that its members had the appearance of cisgender women did not specifically target Ms Tickle but indirectly discriminated against her. Her barrister Georgina Costello KC gave short submissions that her client was in fact a woman and that the definition of "sex" was not confined to a biological concept. The hearing continues on Tuesday. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578 A social media app has defended the ejection of a transgender woman, claiming the platform was needed as a safe space against "deplorable" behaviour from men. The Giggle for Girls app and founder Sall Grover are seeking to overturn a 2024 finding it discriminated against a transgender user by removing her from the women-only platform in September 2021. The platform was a "special measure" exempt from discrimination law because it sought to achieve substantial equality between men and women, an appeal court was told on Monday. The ability to create these kinds of special measures to promote equality would be frustrated if Justice Robert Bromwich's findings remained because they would - by definition - discriminate against some group of people, Noel Hutley SC said. "A special measure will exclude someone necessarily because it's otherwise not special," he told the Full Court of the Federal Court on Monday. The barrister said Ms Grover's intention behind the app was to provide a "safe space" for women. Evidence was shown to the court from women of sexual abuse, alcoholism, trolling and harassment from men who had found refuge on the Giggle platform. "It's got to the point to say that a by-blow of it is that certain people couldn't get onto it and were hurt by it - that's unfortunate," Mr Hutley said. The evidence showed "the most deplorable behaviour of men on the internet," he told a panel of three judges. The need for this type of space was "manifest" and it was a special measure despite excluding certain groups. Lawyers from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner have challenged this in court, saying "invidious discrimination" could be - on Giggle's view of the world - permitted to take place under the guise of a special measure. When Mr Hutley said this was an "extreme example" and did not need to be considered, one judge pushed back - asking why someone seeking to actively harm another group would be protected. "Why would the (Sex Discrimination Act) then say that's OK?" Justice Melissa Perry asked. Mr Hutley replied by saying parliament had to form a compromise when enacting the legislation. "So you say as long as you have a purpose of achieving substantive equality between one of the protected groups, you're in, irrespective of the nature of any other purpose?" the judge asked. "Quite," Mr Hutley replied. "If your purpose was to advance women, (if another) purpose was to disadvantage men then there's nothing wrong with that." Justice Perry asked what Ms Grover meant when she said she wanted Giggle to be a women-only safe space. "Women who she had judged to look like women," Mr Hutley replied. "No, but you're going in circles," the judge noted. Ms Grover denies findings she rejected Roxanne Tickle - who was born male but identifies as female - from the app in September 2021 because she did not look like a cisgender woman. Rather, she simply weeded out people who did not "appear female," Mr Hutley said. "Isn't that a distinction without a difference?" Justice Perry asked. Ms Tickle has also filed her own challenge to Justice Bromwich's decision, seeking to increase the $10,000 in damages he awarded her in August 2024. She further claims the judge wrongly found she was not directly discriminated against by Giggle and Ms Grover. The judge found that a condition by the platform that its members had the appearance of cisgender women did not specifically target Ms Tickle but indirectly discriminated against her. Her barrister Georgina Costello KC gave short submissions that her client was in fact a woman and that the definition of "sex" was not confined to a biological concept. The hearing continues on Tuesday. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578 A social media app has defended the ejection of a transgender woman, claiming the platform was needed as a safe space against "deplorable" behaviour from men. The Giggle for Girls app and founder Sall Grover are seeking to overturn a 2024 finding it discriminated against a transgender user by removing her from the women-only platform in September 2021. The platform was a "special measure" exempt from discrimination law because it sought to achieve substantial equality between men and women, an appeal court was told on Monday. The ability to create these kinds of special measures to promote equality would be frustrated if Justice Robert Bromwich's findings remained because they would - by definition - discriminate against some group of people, Noel Hutley SC said. "A special measure will exclude someone necessarily because it's otherwise not special," he told the Full Court of the Federal Court on Monday. The barrister said Ms Grover's intention behind the app was to provide a "safe space" for women. Evidence was shown to the court from women of sexual abuse, alcoholism, trolling and harassment from men who had found refuge on the Giggle platform. "It's got to the point to say that a by-blow of it is that certain people couldn't get onto it and were hurt by it - that's unfortunate," Mr Hutley said. The evidence showed "the most deplorable behaviour of men on the internet," he told a panel of three judges. The need for this type of space was "manifest" and it was a special measure despite excluding certain groups. Lawyers from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner have challenged this in court, saying "invidious discrimination" could be - on Giggle's view of the world - permitted to take place under the guise of a special measure. When Mr Hutley said this was an "extreme example" and did not need to be considered, one judge pushed back - asking why someone seeking to actively harm another group would be protected. "Why would the (Sex Discrimination Act) then say that's OK?" Justice Melissa Perry asked. Mr Hutley replied by saying parliament had to form a compromise when enacting the legislation. "So you say as long as you have a purpose of achieving substantive equality between one of the protected groups, you're in, irrespective of the nature of any other purpose?" the judge asked. "Quite," Mr Hutley replied. "If your purpose was to advance women, (if another) purpose was to disadvantage men then there's nothing wrong with that." Justice Perry asked what Ms Grover meant when she said she wanted Giggle to be a women-only safe space. "Women who she had judged to look like women," Mr Hutley replied. "No, but you're going in circles," the judge noted. Ms Grover denies findings she rejected Roxanne Tickle - who was born male but identifies as female - from the app in September 2021 because she did not look like a cisgender woman. Rather, she simply weeded out people who did not "appear female," Mr Hutley said. "Isn't that a distinction without a difference?" Justice Perry asked. Ms Tickle has also filed her own challenge to Justice Bromwich's decision, seeking to increase the $10,000 in damages he awarded her in August 2024. She further claims the judge wrongly found she was not directly discriminated against by Giggle and Ms Grover. The judge found that a condition by the platform that its members had the appearance of cisgender women did not specifically target Ms Tickle but indirectly discriminated against her. Her barrister Georgina Costello KC gave short submissions that her client was in fact a woman and that the definition of "sex" was not confined to a biological concept. The hearing continues on Tuesday. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578 A social media app has defended the ejection of a transgender woman, claiming the platform was needed as a safe space against "deplorable" behaviour from men. The Giggle for Girls app and founder Sall Grover are seeking to overturn a 2024 finding it discriminated against a transgender user by removing her from the women-only platform in September 2021. The platform was a "special measure" exempt from discrimination law because it sought to achieve substantial equality between men and women, an appeal court was told on Monday. The ability to create these kinds of special measures to promote equality would be frustrated if Justice Robert Bromwich's findings remained because they would - by definition - discriminate against some group of people, Noel Hutley SC said. "A special measure will exclude someone necessarily because it's otherwise not special," he told the Full Court of the Federal Court on Monday. The barrister said Ms Grover's intention behind the app was to provide a "safe space" for women. Evidence was shown to the court from women of sexual abuse, alcoholism, trolling and harassment from men who had found refuge on the Giggle platform. "It's got to the point to say that a by-blow of it is that certain people couldn't get onto it and were hurt by it - that's unfortunate," Mr Hutley said. The evidence showed "the most deplorable behaviour of men on the internet," he told a panel of three judges. The need for this type of space was "manifest" and it was a special measure despite excluding certain groups. Lawyers from the Sex Discrimination Commissioner have challenged this in court, saying "invidious discrimination" could be - on Giggle's view of the world - permitted to take place under the guise of a special measure. When Mr Hutley said this was an "extreme example" and did not need to be considered, one judge pushed back - asking why someone seeking to actively harm another group would be protected. "Why would the (Sex Discrimination Act) then say that's OK?" Justice Melissa Perry asked. Mr Hutley replied by saying parliament had to form a compromise when enacting the legislation. "So you say as long as you have a purpose of achieving substantive equality between one of the protected groups, you're in, irrespective of the nature of any other purpose?" the judge asked. "Quite," Mr Hutley replied. "If your purpose was to advance women, (if another) purpose was to disadvantage men then there's nothing wrong with that." Justice Perry asked what Ms Grover meant when she said she wanted Giggle to be a women-only safe space. "Women who she had judged to look like women," Mr Hutley replied. "No, but you're going in circles," the judge noted. Ms Grover denies findings she rejected Roxanne Tickle - who was born male but identifies as female - from the app in September 2021 because she did not look like a cisgender woman. Rather, she simply weeded out people who did not "appear female," Mr Hutley said. "Isn't that a distinction without a difference?" Justice Perry asked. Ms Tickle has also filed her own challenge to Justice Bromwich's decision, seeking to increase the $10,000 in damages he awarded her in August 2024. She further claims the judge wrongly found she was not directly discriminated against by Giggle and Ms Grover. The judge found that a condition by the platform that its members had the appearance of cisgender women did not specifically target Ms Tickle but indirectly discriminated against her. Her barrister Georgina Costello KC gave short submissions that her client was in fact a woman and that the definition of "sex" was not confined to a biological concept. The hearing continues on Tuesday. Lifeline 13 11 14 Fullstop Australia 1800 385 578
