Villagers win battle against 200m ‘Great Wall' at Welsh beauty spot
The 200m-long, 6ft-high steel fence was dubbed the 'Great Wall of Clydach' after it was built by a Labour-led council without notice at a cost of £40,000.
But weeks later, officials have agreed to tear it down – and will spend £20,000 on its removal.
The roadside structure blocks views of the mountains and valleys within Wales's Brecon Beacons National Park (now known as Bannau Brycheiniog) and close to the Unesco World Heritage site of Blaenavon.
Locals described the fence, made of galvanised steel with sharp spikes on top, as 'disgusting' and criticised the council for a lack of consultation.
Officials said it was erected along Pwll Du Road, which has been closed to traffic for five years, over fears it could collapse.
Resident Clive Thomas said: 'It's just an eyesore. When the sun is on it and everything, it just looks out of place.'
Simon Elliott added: 'There was no consultation with anyone. The fence has been put up with no understanding at all of what the area is.
'All it needed was a low-level fencing to stop any cattle or people going over the edge into the quarry.'
Monmouthshire County Council has agreed to remove the fence and replace it with a shorter structure that will 'blend in' with the surroundings.
Independent councillor Simon Howarth said he was pleased with the council's decision, but added: 'We shouldn't have got here' and claimed huge bills could have been avoided.
He said: 'Overall, we are where we should have started, but around £50,000 to £70,000 worse off.'
A council spokesman said: 'Following a positive meeting, the local community and the council agreed with the proposal to reduce the height of the back line of the palisade fencing, replacing it with stock proof fencing and painting the reveals and pillars with a suitable colour to blend in with the landscape.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Water regulation should be overhauled, review recommends
The system for regulating water companies should be overhauled and Ofwat replaced, a landmark review of the sector has advised. The much-anticipated final report from the Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, outlined 88 recommendations to the UK and Welsh governments to turn around the ailing industry. The Government-commissioned team was tasked to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses, although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies. Water minister Emma Hardy told broadcasters on Monday that the system is 'broken', but did not commit to how many of the 88 suggestions would be accepted by Whitehall. The report, published on Monday morning, recommended far-reaching changes to the way the water system is regulated as it called the current landscape 'fragmented and overlapping'. For England, proposals include abolishing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, and the Drinking Water Inspectorate, which ensures that public water supplies are safe. The report also advises removing the regulatory roles of the Environment Agency and Natural England, which monitor the sector's impact on nature, such as companies illegally dumping sewage into waterways. Instead, a 'joined-up' and 'powerful' single integrated water regulator should be established, according to the recommendations. In Wales, Ofwat's economic responsibilities would be integrated into Natural Resources Wales, the review said. Ms Hardy told BBC Breakfast that ministers would be taking 'a proper look' at the paper 'all the way through the summer'. Asked if all the recommendations would be made law, she told the programme: 'What we'll do is we'll have a proper look at it all the way through the summer and the intention is that we're going to introduce a White Paper to spell out exactly what we're going to do on water reform.' Ms Hardy said that the Government would 'introduce a water Bill next year, which will change the law', but added: 'Exactly how many out of the 88 we're going to do or not going to do, then we'll work that out in the next few months.' The current system has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years they paid out shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. Author Sir Jon said the review has 'tried to attack the problem from all sides' but warned that bills are going to rise by 30% over the next five years. 'There are some inescapable facts here,' he said. 'The cost of producing water and dealing with our wastewater is going up.' Sir Jon later told Times Radio that regulators have failed to work together to make the sector deliver and blamed the Government for not giving clear direction. 'It's the failure of Government to balance out all the different pressures on water,' he said, adding that firms 'need to perform better' and 'be funded to invest'. The Government backed the commission's findings, with Ms Hardy saying consumers have been 'failed time and time again'. Speaking on Times Radio, she said 'root-and-branch reform' is needed to fix the crisis and told listeners the Government is considering a piece of primary legislation to deliver many of the proposed changes. Ms Hardy also described trust in the water industry as at 'the lowest ever level' and criticised executives for handing out pay rises and bonuses. 'Everyone knows the system is broken,' she said. 'And they give themselves huge pay rises.' However, the minister also ruled out supporting Government intervention to cap pay in the private sector. Ms Hardy said: 'I don't think as Government we should say what private companies should pay. 'But I will say – read the room. Look how angry and furious people are.' Other key recommendations in the review include: – Expanding the role of the voluntary Consumer Council for Water into an ombudsman to give stronger protection to customers and a clearer route to resolving complaints. – Significant improvements to environmental regulation, including the process where companies collect and analyse wastewater discharges they make into waterways, by introducing more digitalisation, automation, third-party assurance and inspections. – Tightening oversight of water company ownership and governance through measures such as new regulatory powers to block changes to water company ownership and 'minimum capital' requirements so that companies are less reliant on debt. – Introducing legislative reforms to better manage public health risks in water, recognising the many people who swim, surf and enjoy other water-based activities. – Fundamentally resetting economic regulation, including a new 'supervisory' approach that supports tailored decisions and earlier interventions in water company oversight.
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK water regulation overhaul offers hope for stricken Thames Water
LONDON, July 21 (Reuters) - Britain should overhaul water regulation to better protect the environment, investors and consumers, while giving companies breathing space on sewage fines, according to an official report which also set a path to prevent the collapse of Thames Water. The privatised water industry in England and Wales has provoked public fury by releasing record levels of sewage into rivers and lakes, prompting the Labour government to promise major reforms when it was elected last year. At the centre of a sector the government describes as "broken" is Thames Water, the country's biggest water supplier with 16 million customers, whose debt pile has left it teetering on the brink of nationalisation. Former Bank of England Deputy Governor Jon Cunliffe, who led a review of the sector published on Monday, said the current separate financial and environmental regulation of the industry had failed, and financial regulator Ofwat should be replaced. He also suggested that a formal turnaround regime should be established, giving struggling companies space to recover under so-called "regulatory forbearance". Thames Water has warned that under the current regime, it is facing 1.4 billion pounds in pollution fines and penalties over the next five years, pushing it towards financial collapse. While Cunliffe called his proposals "significant", critics said they did not go far enough. Environmental campaigners blame water companies for prioritising profits over sewage, and want more radical change such as nationalisation. "Abolishing Ofwat and replacing it with a shinier regulator won't stop sewage dumping or profiteering if the finance and ownership structures stay the same," said Giles Bristow, the CEO of campaign group Surfers Against Sewage. Cunliffe's remit was set by the government and did not allow him to consider nationalising the water sector, which has been privately owned by regional water companies since 1989. Under plans already set out by Ofwat, British water companies will get more than 100 billion pounds ($134 billion) of investment in the next five years to respond to population growth and climate change, funded by an average 36% increase in customer bills. Cunliffe told the BBC that the major leap in bills would not have been needed if the industry and regulator had steadily increased investment over the years. Environment Minister Steve Reed, who on Sunday promised to halve sewage pollution by 2030, will respond later on Monday. The government wants to avoid Thames Water from entering special administration, a form of temporary nationalisation, because it does not want its 17 billion pounds of debt on the national balance sheet. In a last ditch attempt to avoid administration, a group of Thames Water senior creditors are trying to take over the company. It welcomed Cunliffe's report. "It is in the public interest to recognise that regulatory support is needed to reset struggling companies and return them back to compliance and performance while retaining long-term investor confidence," a source close to a Thames bondholder said. Under Cunliffe's recommendations, the government would direct the new regulator to set out returns, improving investor confidence, while also protecting consumers and the environment, and setting up regional water planning authorities. ($1 = 0.7460 pounds)
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
What are the key recommendations in the landmark water sector review?
The much-anticipated final report from the Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, has outlined 88 recommendations to the UK and Welsh governments to turn around the ailing industry. The Government has so far backed the review and is considering a piece of primary legislation to deliver many of the proposed changes. Here the PA news agency takes a look at the key recommendations in the report: – Overhauling the current system of regulation The review recommends overhauling the regulators and replacing them with one body for England and one body for Wales. For England, this would see Ofwat and the Drinking Water Inspectorate abolished, and the removal of the environmental regulation functions for the Environment Agency and Natural England. Instead, a 'joined-up' and 'powerful' single integrated water regulator would be established. In Wales, Ofwat's economic responsibilities would be integrated into Natural Resources Wales, the review said. – Setting up regional planning authorities Eight new regional water system planning authorities in England and one national authority in Wales should be set up, the review says. This would involve devolving current planning responsibilities and transferring resources from the regulators to these new authorities, which would be responsible for developing water investment plans that reflect local priorities and voices. – Introducing stronger consumer protections The commission recommends measures such as expanding the role of the voluntary Consumer Council for Water into an ombudsman to give stronger protection to customers and a clearer route to resolving complaints. It also proposes the introduction of a national social tariff to provide consistent support for low-income customers who need help to pay their bills and to transfer responsibility for consumer advocacy to Citizens Advice. – Stronger environmental regulations The report proposes stronger regulation on abstraction, sludge, drinking water standards and water supply. It also recommends improving the process where companies collect and analyse wastewater discharges they make into waterways by introducing more digitalisation, automation, third-party assurance and inspections. After one of the driest springs on record, it recommends compulsory water metering, changes to wholesale tariffs for industrial users and greater water reuse and rainwater harvesting schemes. – Tightening oversight of water company ownership and governance The commission recommends new regulatory powers to block changes to water company ownership, for example, where investors are not seen to be prioritising the long-term interests of the company and its customers. It also suggests new 'public benefit' clauses in water company licences and recommends the regulator set 'minimum capital' requirements so that companies are less reliant on debt and more financially resilient. – Public health reforms The report covers legislative reforms to better manage public health risks in water, recognising the many people who swim, surf and enjoy other water-based activities. These include public health objectives in water quality legislation, senior public health representation on regional water planning authorities and legislative changes to address emerging pollutants such as PFAs, also known as forever chemicals, micropollutants and microplastics. – Fundamentally resetting economic regulation This recommendation includes a new 'supervisory' approach that supports tailored decisions and earlier interventions in water company oversight. The report also makes recommendations on the Price Review process, including changes to ensure companies are investing in and maintaining assets and to help attract long-term, low-risk investment. – Providing a clear strategic direction The commission said both the UK and Welsh governments should publish a new long-term National Water Strategy with a minimum horizon of 25 years and interim milestones. It also says a set of ministerial priorities specifically for the water industry should be issued to regulators every five years, replacing the current strategic policy statement. – Infrastructure and asset health reforms The report sets out changes in how water infrastructure is managed, monitored and delivered to better safeguard the provision of water and management of wastewater for future generations. They include new requirements for companies to map and assess their assets – such as pipes, treatment works and pumping stations. It also calls for resilience standards that are forward-looking and applied consistently across the industry.
