logo
Factor VIII was advertised as a wonder drug

Factor VIII was advertised as a wonder drug

Telegraph09-07-2025
Scroll to begin
It was said to offer people with haemophilia a passport to a normal life
But in reality, it was a poison made by American pharmaceutical companies using thousands of high-risk donors
One infected plasma donor was all it took to contaminate an entire batch
Supplies were imported into Britain in the 1970s and 1980s for use by doctors facing a shortage of blood-clotting treatments
Thousands of people were infected with HIV and hepatitis C as a result
Many died. Others struggle on, still awaiting justice
This is their story
Cara McGoogan
09 July 2025 2:00pm BST
Gift this article free
The infected blood scandal can only be described as a catalogue of heartbreak.
More than 30,000 people in the United Kingdom were affected by contaminated blood products or transfusions, nearly 3,000 of whom have died. More die each year, while survivors continue their decades-long battle for truth and compensation in the face of cover-up and dismissal.
In May 2024, after five years of investigation, an inquiry into the worst treatment disaster in NHS history will publish its final report. Victims are hoping for answers on how the crisis was allowed to unfold.
But the heart of the story had already been written, in the shape of distorted lives, pain, stigma, sickness and loss. And as a new report released on Wednesday said, its victims are being "harmed further" still by long waits for money promised to them by the state.
Gwynneth and Steven Walker
'There was never a future for him, it was always just a few more months or another year if you were lucky.'
Steven Walker was three years old in 1983 when he was found to have severe haemophilia A.
The diagnosis came after months of being shuttled back and forth to the doctors with unexplained bruises, a result of the genetic bleeding disorder, which prevents the body from forming clots.
It was almost a relief to his mother, Gwynneth, who had faced accusations of harming her son. 'We tried to wrap him up in cotton wool,' she recalls. With a diagnosis, Steven could start treatment with cryoprecipitate, a frozen plasma product made from the blood of a single donor.
But in June 1984, after the family had moved to Norwich, he began a new regime – one that would ultimately prove deadly. Steven received his first dose of Factor VIII on the recommendation of a local doctor, who suggested he be treated at home with the blood-clotting protein.
Like many parents of children with haemophilia, Gwynneth learnt to mix the Factor VIII concentrate with sterile water and inject it into her son's arm.
While she was completely unaware of the risk in doing so, by 1984, it was already known that acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (Aids) was caused by a blood-borne virus, HTLV-III, which could be passed on through the type of treatment he was receiving.
At that stage, there was an alternative, safe version of the imported Factor VIII available, which had been heat-treated to kill off potential viruses. The UK had been slow to fully adopt it, in part because of cost, but haemophilia treatment guidelines set out that new patients should be given the heat-treated product or cryoprecipitate.
Still, Gwynneth took her doctor's word, and did as they had suggested, unwittingly using the contaminated version of Factor VIII. Many other patients would receive the same, into 1985, because of a sluggish response by officials and the NHS to adopt the new, more expensive but safe treatment.
Within a year, serious illness had gripped the family.
In December 1985, her skin turned yellow with jaundice. While receiving treatment in hospital, she was told she should be tested for hepatitis B – a liver infection – because of Steven's haemophilia. 'I had never heard of hepatitis,' Gwynneth, 67, says.
Doctors and the government had known Factor VIII could contain hepatitis since the 1970s, but had continued to import higher risk American supplies, rather than building up UK stocks of the plasma treatment.
Both Gwynneth and Steven, then four, tested positive for the illness. She had contracted it by removing a splinter from her son's finger with her mouth.
'You wouldn't do that if you thought you were at risk, would you?' she says.
But worse was still to come. Further tests revealed Steven had contracted HIV.
In the wake of the diagnosis, Gwynneth was told by doctors that she had to protect her son from his younger brother, then aged one. Steven was given 'two years to live', she says, 'and not much more'.
For six weeks Gwynneth locked herself away at home with her sons, trying to process the news. She decided not to tell Steven the news of his diagnosis, choosing to put off doing so for as long as she could.
'I was absolutely distraught,' Gwynneth says. 'I was looking at my child, planning his funeral. And wondering about the little one and how I could protect him.
'You look at your own flesh and blood and you're frightened to cuddle him. It ended up crippling me. You put your trust in doctors and they told me untruths.'
In an attempt to slow his deterioration to Aids-related illness, Steven was prescribed the antiretroviral drug AZT, a retired cancer treatment that often had the opposite effect because it was prescribed in dangerously high doses in the early days of the Aids crisis.
But the entire course of his life had changed and by 13, he was too frail to go to school, forced to watch on as his little brother ticked off childhood landmarks, such as riding a bike and getting a first girlfriend, that he was unable to match.
'He was brutally wounded by that,' says Gwynneth. 'He was starting to get angry and annoyed, so it seemed he was getting to an age where maybe he needed to know [about his diagnosis].'
On learning that he had HIV, Steven was 'horrified'.
'He felt cheated,' says Gwynneth, and retreated into himself as his teenage years progressed.
She taught her son to lie about his condition, in order to try to protect him from the stigma that surrounded it.
'I'd been teaching them [her sons] how to keep secrets since they were small about trivial stuff, so that when the biggie came along they'd keep the secret,' she says.
He couldn't make friends, go to university or get a job because he was too unwell. The only guests at his 18th birthday party were his nurse and his driving instructor.
'There was never a future for him, it was always just a few more months or another year if you were lucky. There are several times I reflect back on and wish he'd died sooner because he suffered so much and was so ill,' says Gwynneth.
'From 13, his life was really over. He died at 37, but after 13 the rest of it was just suffering.'
Gwynneth recalls one of several recurring nightmares Steven would endure – of making breakfast for two daughters he would never be able to have.
'He felt that his life had been robbed from him and he felt angry,' she says.
As an adult, Steven turned to alcohol and drugs, including heroin. For the last six years of his life, he would fall asleep on his sofa each night after drinking several bottles of wine, topped off with whiskey.
'We just watched him waste away,' says Gwynneth. 'He was about 5ft 11 and when he died he was under seven stone.'
In July 2017, two months before Steven died, then-prime minister Theresa May announced the Infected Blood Inquiry.
It was the smallest measure of relief, Gwynneth says, for a life pockmarked by avoidable agony. The inquiry had raised Steven's hopes for compensation, which he dreamed of using to buy himself an apartment, but years of government inaction meant nothing was forthcoming before he died.
'He used to say: 'The government has done this to me',' she says. 'At every step of the way there were people at fault: from the doctors who knew [the risks and didn't tell us] to the government ministers who have failed us ever since.
'I feel like he was murdered,' says Gwynneth. 'He didn't live long enough, and now my son will never get justice.'
Jo-Anne Cohrs and Keith Proud
'I whispered in his ear that Jesus loved him, that he'd done a good job, and to go when he'd had enough.'
Keith Proud entered Jo-Anne Cohrs' life with uncharacteristic confidence in 1980, when he gatecrashed her 21st birthday party.
Keith was 10 years older but, like Jo-Anne, an undergraduate at Sunderland Polytechnic. He joined as a mature student after a childhood interrupted by haemophilia A.
Keith was a shy media studies student. Jo-Anne was a lively musician and member of a Christian rock band. They were exact opposites: she thought he was quiet, he didn't quite know what to make of her high energy.
'But funnily enough we both rubbed off on each other quite well,' says Jo-Anne, 64. 'I sort of tamed down a bit as I got to know him and he became a bit more outward.'
After university, Jo-Anne and Keith toured Europe, driving to Italy and back again. Every other day on the trip, Keith would inject himself with Factor VIII, which he had been using since it first became available in the mid-1970s.
Within three years, they were planning their wedding. But shortly before the big day in December 1983, Keith came down with what appeared at first to be a heavy flu. 'He was very cold,' says Jo-Anne. 'Looking back, I think he might have even had it then.'
It was a new illness that had emerged in the US among gay men – Aids.
Totally unaware of the true severity of his condition at the time, Keith eventually bounced back from what had developed into a bout of pneumonia and returned to work as a lecturer in 1984.
For a few months, life for the couple was good. Jo-Anne was a teacher's special needs assistant and after years of muddling their way through studies, the couple suddenly felt flush with cash. 'We had so much money we didn't know what to do with it,' she says.
For Christmas, they splashed out on gifts for their family.
But almost immediately after their 'fantastic' festive period with loved ones, the couple received a life-altering letter from Keith's local hospital.
'He had HIV,' says Jo-Anne. 'We were both shocked.'
'Over the next two or three months, Keith started to get very, very afraid,' she says. 'He started to come down with things: red dots in his mouth, then his skin had lumps and bumps from Kaposi's sarcoma, lots of candida and thrush in his mouth. He couldn't keep anything down, the tablets made him sick; everything made him sick.'
Physical pain and symptoms were accompanied by the vicious stigma that defined the early days of the Aids crisis, leaving many who suffered with the condition socially outcast and isolated.
Jo-Anne tried to shield Keith from as much of it as she could. She even stopped letting him watch live television at home, for fear he would see a public health advert or coverage of the crisis that would upset him.
'I didn't want him to be frightened,' she says. 'I wanted him at least to have peace at home.'
But the outside world was impossible to control, and when Keith told his dentist he had HIV, they refused to treat him.
They told him 'don't bring your wife back either', says Jo-Anne. 'Those words are cemented in my brain.'
Within a year of his diagnosis Keith and Jo-Anne were forced to leave their jobs; he had become too unwell to work and she opted to stay at home to care for him.
Their social life ground to a complete halt and their increasingly precarious financial situation forced the couple to apply for benefits.
The local church became a vital lifeline of support. Fellow congregants would visit daily, and go to the shops on their behalf.
Meanwhile, doctors advised Jo-Anne to wear gloves to protect herself from Keith. She refused.
'I'm not going to treat my husband with gloves,' she recalls thinking. 'If he needs a cuddle or a kiss or closeness, whatever he needs I'll be there.'
Despite Jo-Anne's care, Keith's health continued to decline over the next two years and by the beginning of 1987, the pair became aware his death was fast approaching.
He passed away in the spring, on March 6, with his wife, then 27, and family at his side.
'I whispered in his ear that Jesus loved him, that he'd done a good job, and to go when he'd had enough,' Jo-Anne says.
After years of anguish that followed, Jo-Anne painstakingly rebuilt her life, remarrying and having a daughter with her new partner. But she still only lives half a mile from where she first met Keith at the party in Sunderland.
'I'm not over how things turned out,' says Jo-Anne, adding that what upsets her most deeply now is the 'incredulous amount of time' it has taken the Government to compensate victims.
The government has set aside £11.8bn for those affected by the scandal, but many have expressed concerns about the way the scheme has been managed to date. The long wait times some have endured, or continue to endure, for payment is a particular issue.
'There are still a lot of people who are seriously ill and who are going to meet an untimely, undignified death,' says Jo-Anne. 'And for those people, they should be given everything they need until they die. It's upsetting for me. But at least I'm not facing a relative who's going to slip away with that cruel death right in front of me, right now.'
Christopher, Gary and Kelvin Marsh
'I'm still here and no one else is. My world has just fallen apart.'
Haemophilia often affects more than one child within a family, passing most commonly from mothers to sons. That was the case for the Marsh family – Gary, Kelvin and their youngest brother Christopher, all three of whom were born with haemophilia A.
As a child, Christopher says, he hated having treatment for his illness. 'I used to run around the hospital not wanting it,' he says. 'But Mum and Dad would say I'd have to sleep there if I didn't.'
He remembers being given cryoprecipitate. His brothers, meanwhile, received Factor VIII.
What they shared was a refusal to let illness get in the way of life – playing rugby, skateboarding and riding motorbikes instead.
That was, until Gary and Kelvin tested positive for HIV – a by-product of the Factor VIII they had been given – in the 1980s. Christopher had avoided contracting the illness but was found to have been infected with hepatitis C, which slowly attacks the liver and can lead to cirrhosis and cancer.
'It changed our lives instantly,' says Christopher, 49. 'We were living with the fact that they were like a ticking time bomb and could die at any time.'
While Christopher's elder brothers both went on to marry and have families of their own, the family's worst fears were realised when Gary became the first of the three to fall seriously ill at the beginning of the 1990s.
He initially tried to maintain the partygoer spirit that had defined his life until that point, but eventually realised those days were behind him when he was forced to leave his stepdaughter's wedding because of sickness.
'That really upset me because I couldn't understand,' says Christopher. 'He had been so healthy and loved life, then I saw him deteriorating.' His brother, 13 years his elder, suffered with ulcers, contracted pneumonia and 'became gaunt' as his condition took hold.
On Boxing Day 1992, Gary died from Aids-related illness, aged 30.
He was never able to take the trip to the US and the Bahamas the siblings had been planning together, shortly before he passed away.
'Kelvin said, 'Gary would have wanted us to go',' recalls Christopher. 'So we still went.'
But being positive for HIV himself, Kelvin couldn't help but see his own future in his brother's death. He was in his late-20s and married with two young children, a girl and a boy.
'I remember being on holiday and him sitting there saying he wasn't scared of dying himself, but for the ones he would leave behind,' says Christopher.
Eight years later, Kelvin's HIV progressed to Aids. After a failed liver transplant, he died in April 2000, aged 35. By the end of the year, their mother had also passed away.
'Everyone said it was from a broken heart, but obviously you can't prove that,' says Christopher.
In the wake of repeated tragedy, Christopher sunk into depression.
'I thought, as soon as I hit my 30s I'm going to die,' he says. 'Because both my brothers were in their 30s when they died.
'We never got a choice. We believed we were given the best care we could have been, not knowing it was contaminated.'
Christopher is currently undergoing treatment to try to clear his hepatitis C, but had to stop work as a painter and decorator last year because of pain in his lower abdomen.
His life has been curtailed in more profound ways, too. While Christopher has a partner, step-children and grandchildren, he never had children of his own. He was too scared to try, in case he transmitted his illness to them via his partner.
And like so many others in the infected blood scandal, he remains plagued by survivor's guilt.
'I'm still here and no one else is,' he says. 'My world has just fallen apart. I feel alone. I had two brothers and now it's just me and my sister left. I miss them so much.'
Gary Webster
'We'd had Factor VIII pumped into us; people were going yellow; people were getting ill and we knew there was something wrong.'
Life changed overnight for Gary Webster in 1975 when, aged nine, he started boarding at the Lord Mayor Treloar College in Hampshire, a school for children with physical disabilities. He learnt to sail, struck up friendships and ran wild in the dormitories at night. He also had his first dose of Factor VIII.
The treatment initially gave him a sense of freedom after a childhood defined by haemophilia – one spent waiting hours for cryoprecipitate to defrost, transfuse and take effect.
Similarly relishing in the newfound liberation was Gary's best friend Stephen, whose family were farmers in Norfolk.
The pair stayed up late talking to local people on their CB radio and, when they were older, snuck up to London to watch David Bowie in concert. They planned to live together after leaving school at 18.
Whenever they had a bleed, day or night, they could go to the onsite NHS-run haemophilia centre for treatment.
But amid the idyllic life Treloar's initially appeared to offer, there were also signs that things were, in fact, going badly wrong.
Gary and other boys were regularly bed-ridden for weeks with serious illnesses, including hepatitis and glandular fever. And by the outset of the 1980s, Gary noticed the amount of Factor VIII they were given dramatically increased.
'I'd have to give myself injections every other day,' he says. 'It was so monotonous. I thought, 'Why do I need it when I haven't got a bleed?''
When Gary questioned the school's doctors over the regime, he was told it was to prevent bleeds. But his friend Stephen had another theory: 'I'm sure they're bloody experimenting on us,' he said.
In their final few months at the school, in springtime 1983, Gary and Stephen, then 17, were abruptly called out of class. The doctor wanted to see them.
'I've got something to tell you,' said Dr Mounir Wassef. Both the boys had signs of a newly emerging illness, Aids. 'It is incurable and we cannot guarantee you will be alive in two to three years,' he said.
They were among the first people in Britain to be diagnosed with the life-threatening condition, a year before HTLV-III was discovered and the link between Factor VIII and the illness was accepted by the government.
'We just couldn't believe what he was saying,' recalls Gary, 59. 'We were shocked but we were young. We looked at each other and half smiled. Then we went back to class.'
The doctors left it to Gary and Stephen to inform their parents.
'My mum and dad had to inject me when I was a young lad,' says Gary. 'They put their trust in the college, the doctors and the staff. They felt guilty and upset.'
His parents were told little about their son's treatment by the doctors at Treloar's. They didn't know what brand of Factor VIII he was receiving, or how often he was being treated, and nothing of the associated risks.
They were even kept in the dark when Gary contracted hepatitis and glandular fever.
'If it wasn't for me telling them what was going on while I was at the college, they wouldn't know anything,' he says.
After receiving their diagnoses, Stephen's health declined more rapidly than Gary's and by 1991 he was suffering with Aids-related illness. For a while, he tried to hide it, but eventually he confided in his friend.
'I think I've got it,' Stephen said. 'Join the club,' replied Gary, whose own descent into illness was also quickening.
Later that year, Gary was told by Stephen's father that his friend had been hospitalised with pneumonia. Knowing Stephen would never make it out, he made the long, sorrowful journey from Hampshire to Norfolk to say goodbye.
Like other Treloar's boys, Gary had grown accustomed to seeing school friends grow poorly, witnessing their decline at regular reunions, and paying his respects at the funerals that followed. After Stephen's death he stopped going to both.
'It got too hard,' he says. 'Every time you went to the reunions there were less and less people. The funerals were every year from the late Eighties into the Nineties.
'I had a big group of friends who were haemophiliacs – and [then] there weren't that many of them any more.'
In 1996, an effective antiretroviral treatment based on a new combination of drugs was introduced, helping Gary to come back from the brink.
'It was pot luck that treatment came in when it did,' he says. 'Others got ill too early.'
But 15 years later, in 2011, he was forced to retire, aged 46, from his job at the Red Cross because of hepatitis C. It was a second, major professional blow, having earlier been forced to abandon his dream career as a tailor in the 1990s.
'It was so difficult to get up and go to appointments,' he says. 'The fatigue and brain fog was just awful.'
Without work, Gary turned his focus to campaigning, joining a group of boys from Treloar's who had come together to demand answers over how 122 of the school's pupils had been allowed to contract viruses including hepatitis C and HIV.
He was fuelled by anger about his own condition, and the fate met by Stephen, one of 80 boys from the school who died as a direct result of the infected blood scandal.
'I went on my first campaign demonstration to [then-Prime Minister] David Cameron's constituency,' he says.
In 2017, Gary was one of more than 1,000 survivors and bereaved relatives who came together and sued the Department of Health for misfeasance in public office. Soon after, Theresa May announced the Infected Blood Inquiry.
'I campaigned to get the inquiry going with Theresa May,' says Gary. 'I've made posters and press releases, written to MPs and travelled to London with my MP and local councillor.'
The inquiry opened in 2019. Two years later, it dedicated a week of hearings to Treloar's, during which evidence emerged confirming that children at the school had been part of research, including how effective preventative treatment was for haemophiliacs, and what brands of Factor VIII were more likely to transmit hepatitis. Both these trials involved being injected with high-risk Factor VIII imported from the United States and, at times, placebos.
Present at the hearings, Gary realised he had been put onto a trial in his first year at the school, without being told. Its former headmaster, Alec Macpherson, said he had known about the research but avoided probing the school's NHS-affiliated doctors because he trusted them.
'We knew our own story; we'd lived it,' says Gary. 'We'd had Factor VIII pumped into us; people were going yellow; people were getting ill; we knew there was something wrong.
'We also knew we could have been on cryoprecipitate. But that week, Alec Macpherson said 'doctors are gods' and [admitted] that he didn't question them in his weekly meetings. We found out we had been on placebos for trials.'
On the back of the revelations, Gary moved to sue Treloar's for breaching its duty of care.
'Treloar's have to answer for what happened under their watch,' he says. 'We were at school without our parents – they basically were our parents.'
Looking ahead, he wants to see a memorial built at Treloar's for the pupils who died – a measure of justice, in other words, at long last.
'It has to be a life-changing amount of money,' he says of the promised compensation. 'Eighty boys have passed and that's only going to increase over the next few years. People's lives have been ruined; people have lost loved ones – how much [value] do you put on that?'
Listen to Bed of Lies, a six-part Telegraph podcast laying bare one of the biggest medical disasters in history, on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or your preferred podcast app.
Header video credit: Bad Blood: A Cautionary Tale, Blood Brothers - The America Blood Scandal / Image Productions film / H.O.P.E films.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trans doctor 'tried to mislead' tribunal over phone notes on Sandie Peggie
Trans doctor 'tried to mislead' tribunal over phone notes on Sandie Peggie

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trans doctor 'tried to mislead' tribunal over phone notes on Sandie Peggie

A trans doctor was trying to 'mislead' the landmark Sandie Peggie tribunal, it has been told. Phone notes made by female-identifying Dr Beth Upton following a dispute with the nurse had been edited, it was claimed. Ms Peggie was suspended from work at Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, after she objected to the trans medic using the female changing area on Christmas Eve 2023. The 51-year-old has since launched an employment tribunal against NHS Fife and Dr Beth Upton. Yesterday it heard that NHS Fife did not commission a forensic or in-person check of Dr Upton's phone in May 2025. The health board's security analyst 'did not have a technical answer' for discrepancies on dates on Google Notes made by Dr Upton, the hearing was told. And IT expert Jim Borwick agreed with the suggestion the trans doctor 'was trying to mislead' the tribunal. Mr Borwick, director of KJB Computer Forensics Consultancy, had been commissioned by Ms Peggie's representatives to compile a report in to the notes. Mr Borwick wrote, 'Dr Upton is silent on fact that Notes can be rearranged with relative ease', and that he was 'perplexed' and 'at a loss' as to how the discrepancies had occurred, and was told 'notes did not include patient care allegations Dr Upton made about Ms Peggie'. One note from December 18, 2023, logged: 'Working nights, won't make eye contact, won't acknowledge my presence, haven't had direct conversation but can feel the dismissal/hostility.' But the tribunal heard it was edited on December 26 at 1.21am. Mr Borwick told the hearing: 'In addition to text on that date, this had been added so it is not contemporaneous.' Jane Russell, KC, for NHS Fife and Dr Upton, asked: 'When you said Dr Upton is silent on fact that notes can be re-arranged, you're suggesting that Dr Upton is trying to mislead the tribunal?' The IT expert told her: 'I suppose that's my comment, yes.' Ms Russell asked Mr Borwick if he had been instructed to come up with an 'explanation that there were lies on the part of Dr Upton' and to 'undermine Dr Upton's account of patient care allegations'. But the witness told her he was not 'trying to undermine anything', and added: 'I was told to recover notes about patient care allegations; no reason was given, just to recover those notes.' Ms Russell said in one screenshot, 'the conundrum is that the edited date predates the created date', and asked the witness if 'the only explanation for discrepancy is that Dr Upton is lying about creation dates?'. He said he could not recreate this, and nor could NHS Fife's information security manager Peter Donaldson. The tribunal heard a note entitled 'weird incident 26.08.23' was timestamped showing it was created on October 26, 2023, according to Google. Mr Donaldson told the tribunal: 'I don't believe Dr Upton was trying to mislead us in any way. 'I completely agree this is how Google presents; on the face of it the October date is the earliest date. I don't dispute that. The notes supplementary to that are the same.'

NHS strike chaos threatens to spread as paramedics REJECT pay offer on first day of doctors' walkout
NHS strike chaos threatens to spread as paramedics REJECT pay offer on first day of doctors' walkout

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

NHS strike chaos threatens to spread as paramedics REJECT pay offer on first day of doctors' walkout

NHS strikes threatened to spread yesterday as paramedics in the GMB union voted to reject their annual pay offer. It came as a five-day walkout by hospital resident doctors began over pay, led by the British Medical Association union. NHS chiefs said the health service was still 'open for business'. But ambulance crews and other NHS staff in the GMB union yesterday voted 67 per cent in favour of rejecting their 3.6 per cent offer for this year's pay rise. Paramedics joined nursing strikes in the winter of 2022-23 and could vote to do so again if they cannot get a better offer from Health Secretary Wes Streeting. National Secretary Rachel Harrison said: 'We have written to Wes Streeting, asking him to meet with us to discuss pay and other issues.' The Royal College of Nursing is also angry at getting a lower wage rise than doctors — and hospital consultants with the BMA are also considering striking again. As resident doctors, formerly called junior doctors, kicked off their strike to demand for a 29 per cent pay rise over the 5.4 per cent offer, Mr Streeting warned he could not guarantee patient safety. He said: 'I'm really proud of the way that NHS leaders and frontline staff have mobilised to minimise the disruption and the risk of harm to patients. 'What I can't do is guarantee there will be none. That's why the BMA's action is so irresponsible.' The BMA has made one exception for its strike so far. It allowed resident doctors to be called in to cover neo-natal intensive care at Nottingham City Hospital to protect newborn babies' lives. Strike leader Dr Melissa Ryan, who works there, said: 'We don't have enough senior staff to cover the doctors that aren't there. "It is important to us that those very sick babies get a lot of care.'

Hospitals face paying £8,000 a shift to cover striking doctors
Hospitals face paying £8,000 a shift to cover striking doctors

Times

time3 hours ago

  • Times

Hospitals face paying £8,000 a shift to cover striking doctors

Hospitals could be forced to pay as much as £8,000 to cover the shift of a single striking doctor if multiple consultants are needed to staff some wards overnight. Advice on the British Medical Association (BMA) website says consultants asked to cover shifts overnight in a hospital should have a second consultant on call with them to cover higher-level duties. According to the BMA's rate card, for each junior doctor's overnight shift during the strike, two consultants in London would cover it for £334 per hour, or £4,008 for an overnight shift, totalling £8,016 for both consultants. Hospital leaders described it as 'worrying' and said the funds needed to cover a striking doctor were 'unacceptable'. One junior doctor, who is not striking in this round of industrial action but did last year, said some consultants were 'slower' at day-to-day activities on the ward, which sometimes led to multiple consultants covering one overnight shift. 'The type of things that you are doing overnight [are] quite different to the job that you do as a consultant during the day [but] something that the junior, the resident doctors, core and foundation trainees do all the time. Some of these might be quite practical and logistical things that if you're a consultant [you are] not physically used to doing on the computer system. They're the kind of things you need to do quickly overnight,' the doctor said. While consultants could very ably clinically assess patients, they might be 'a bit slow' at the tasks needed overnight, the doctor suggested. 'Sometimes they feel safer, I think … having more of them on because, more from a speed perspective,' the doctor added. • How much do NHS doctors really earn? Here are the facts BMA guidance says some consultants may have 'concerns' about working on wards. ''Acting down' to provide cover for absent resident doctor colleagues may involve tasks that you have not had to perform for many years, and you may have concerns about the ability to carry out certain tasks involved in ward work,' the advice states. 'A consultant has a professional obligation to act within their sphere of competence. As such, you need to be clear with your employer that you do not feel that you can safely and competently perform the work required and that doing [so] may expose you to enhanced risk of medico-legal consequences. If your employer refuses to take the necessary action to make alternative arrangements […] then, as above, you will need to follow our guidance on raising concerns.' One hospital executive said that while the hospital had not used more than one consultant to cover shifts, the cost of cover ran 'into the millions' and further cuts to NHS services might be needed as a result. 'The cost of consultant cover during the period, which runs into millions of pounds, [is a] huge amount of money that is unfunded. It's well publicised that there's a real tension at the moment in the NHS between safe timely services and financial viability,' said the executive, who did not wish to be named. • Striking doctor called off picket line to treat 'very sick' babies 'We're trying to navigate our way along that. Inevitably, if we accumulate debt as a result of paying consultants more to pick up these shifts, that money is not going to be funded by our NHS. So it would be down for each individual NHS organisation to make further cuts to offset the cost of the strikes.' Saffron Cordery, the deputy chief executive of NHS Providers, said: 'Trust leaders are working to minimise the harm and disruption caused by the strike. Ensuring adequate cover to keep patients safe is expensive and there is no extra money to cover this so the unexpected cost is bound to impact on the services they can provide. 'It's really worrying to see the demands for excessive rates to provide this cover. The withdrawal of labour by one staff group should not be seen as a financial opportunity for another. That is totally unacceptable.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store