Trump's deportation crusade is a death knell for the American dream
'The politics in Bangladesh is corrupt,' wrote Tamjid. 'Schools are always closed because of strikes. Many students are afraid to go to school.'
'We came here because my father was threatened and my family was afraid they would hurt us,' Miguel of Colombia wrote.
Such were the 81 cards — hand-made, hand-written and colorfully illustrated in crayon — carrying personal messages to me from immigrant children now living in the U.S.
Six years ago, I gave a talk in front of some 150 students, teachers and parents at the Academy for New Americans, a public middle school for grades six through eight in New York City. The school educates recently arrived immigrant children who enroll knowing little or no English but who then graduate speaking English fluently. Afterward, one of the students handed me a large manila envelope containing the 81 cards.
The other day, provoked by the new deportation policy rolling out so thunderously nationwide, I looked at the cards once more.
Those adolescents had migrated to the U.S. from dozens of countries: Albania, Bangladesh, Chile, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Mauritania, Mexico, Morocco, Nepal, Paraguay, Pakistan, Peru, Spain, Tibet, Venezuela and Vietnam. Some of the families, the children wrote to me, had fled poverty, violent crime, civil war and other hardships. The cards provided a telling snapshot, a multi-cultural cross-section of immigrant youth in America yearning to breathe free.
The students told me where they hoped to go in life here in the U.S. Almost all said they intended to pursue educational and economic opportunities unavailable back home. They declared ambitions to become physicians, lawyers, entrepreneurs, computer scientists, dentists, mechanical engineers and, yes, professional soccer players.
'My mother, father and me are so happy to be here in the United States,' one student wrote. 'Soon we will be citizens.' Another told me, 'I come to New York to be someone in my life.' Yet another said on the back of her card, 'Follow your dreams.'
How have these 81 kids, now roughly ages 18 to 24, fared since composing those notes to me? Did they graduate from high school? Are they attending college? Are they still dreaming the American dream?
I tried to find out. I emailed the teacher who originally invited me. No response. I also reached out to the school's principal seeking updates on the kids. No answer. I followed up several times, always to no avail.
I suspect they're scared — scared of the questions I might ask and scared to speak for the record, but scared less for themselves than for those kids. I have no idea whether the parents of these 81 children came here legally or illegally, are documented or undocumented, or have criminal records. Whatever the case, it may be that they're all — students, parents, teachers and principals alike — now running scared.
I am neither a lawyer nor an expert on immigration policy, but what I'm given to understand could happen to those 81 kids is this: Even children who came here legally could be deported in certain circumstances, such as a visa expiring. The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, designed to protect undocumented individuals brought to the U.S. as children, could be terminated. If children have parents who are to be deported, the children may have to choose between going back home with them, or being separated from family for who knows how long.
Widespread concern persists about how humanely the new deportation policy is being enacted and enforced. The current campaign has run into considerable public opposition, with the courts intervening and voicing legal challenges that call for some flexibility. More than a few immigrant families with children who can afford to do so have consulted immigration attorneys to navigate the growing threat.
Make no mistake: the law is the law, and the law should be upheld. But the law is subject to interpretation, discretion and leeway. And at its heart the law is about the pursuit of justice, and should thereby acknowledge that some circumstances are special if not singular.
Our country is endowed with an immigrant heritage that is first in class around the world. The spirit of fairness demands that we demonstrate mercy and compassion, especially toward children who are guilty of nothing except being children.
The covers of the cards I received from those 81 kids frequently featured a certain word of greeting toward me. It's the very word they still deserve to hear from all of us. That word is 'welcome.'
Bob Brody, a consultant and essayist, is a former New Yorker and author of the memoir 'Playing Catch with Strangers: A Family Guy (Reluctantly) Comes of Age.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
19 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
What if killing Canada's digital services tax is just the beginning for Donald Trump?
OTTAWA—Call it a prudent climbdown, a show of weakness, or an unavoidable concession. There are several ways to look at Prime Minister Mark Carney's 11th-hour decision to cancel the federal government's Digital Services Tax last weekend. But what if it's also a tangible example of exactly what Carney warned would happen? The Liberal leader won a minority government on April 28 with a pitch that no one was better placed than himself to protect Canada from Donald Trump. The U.S. president has mused about using 'economic force' to annex Canada. As if taunting or teasing this country, he questions why it exists, and keeps floating the prospect of it becoming the '51st state' of the U.S. Two days before the election, Carney spelled out how he understood all of this. 'The U.S. is trying to put economic pressure on us to gain major concessions, to the extreme of a level of integration of our countries that would impinge our sovereignty,' Carney said that day in King City, north of Toronto. Carney, in his final campaign conference, ruled out any prospect the U.S. would use military Flash forward to last week. There was Trump, posting on social media that Canada's incoming Digital Services Tax — a policy that would force American tech giants and other firms, including Canadian ones, to pay up — was nothing short of a 'blatant attack' on the United States. Trump declared he had cut off all negotiations to resolve the trade war that started earlier this year with his wave of tariffs on Canadian goods. In other words, Canada's most important commercial and military partner, the destination for 76 per cent of all exports last year , was willing to ditch talks and dictate terms that could jeopardize thousands of jobs and hundreds of billions of dollars in economic activity. All over a domestic policy the Americans didn't like. Barely 48 hours later, shortly before midnight on a Sunday, the government announced the tax was dead. Not only would Canada not implement the policy as planned, it would repeal the 2024 law that created it. Is this Trump using economic pressure to force Canada's hand? 'It is exactly that,' said Lawrence Herman, a veteran trade lawyer and special counsel with the firm, Cassidy Levy Kent. 'It's an example of, on a particular issue, how much pressure can be brought to bear to force Canada to abandon not only a policy, but a law that has been in force for 18 months.' In Herman's view, the decision looks like a 'significant retreat' by the government, which shows 'how dependent we are on a reasonable relationship' with Canada's largest trading partner. Other policies that Trump has complained about, such as the supply management system for dairy and poultry, could be next, he said. Pete Hoekstra, the U.S. ambassador to Canada, told the CBC this week that he has a 'strong belief' Canada could water down that system by changing a law designed to protect it if that becomes part of a new trade deal. 'It's not a particularly good start to this so-called new economic and security relationship,' Herman said. He was referring to Carney's stated goal of talks that are now continuing under an agreement struck at the Group of 7 summit in the Alberta Rockies last month to strive for a deal to redefine the relationship by July 21. Others have been harsher in their judgment. Lloyd Axworthy, a former Liberal foreign affairs minister, posted online that Carney was acquiescing to Trump in a way that contradicts his 'elbows up' mantra on the campaign trail. 'Forget any dreams of a more sovereign, self-directed Canada. We're doubling down on the corporate cosiness and U.S. dependency that's defined our last half-century,' he wrote on Substack. Axworthy did not respond to an interview request Thursday. For Jean Charest, a former Quebec premier who sits on the government's Canada-U.S. advisory council, the situation illustrates the 'chaos' of dealing with Trump, whose administration is grappling with trade talks and tariffs threats against most countries on the planet. This meant that Carney's government was operating 'in a world of very bad choices,' Charest said. Deciding to scrap the Digital Services Tax, in that context, was 'certainly a legitimate choice,' he said. 'We are not in an ordinary world of negotiations,' Charest added. 'It would be nice to think, 'You give, I give ... we compromise.' It doesn't work that way with Donald Trump, and we're making our way through this by trying to protect essentially what's the most important for us in the short term, and that's a negotiation that has some legs.' Charest noted that there was opposition inside Canada to the Digital Services Tax, which would have applied back to 2022 with a three per cent tax on Canadian revenues from digital services companies with more than $1.1 billion in global earnings and $20 million inside Canada. The U.S. also pushed back against the policy when Joe Biden was in power. David Pierce, vice-president of government relations with the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said his business lobby group felt the Digital Services Tax should be paused. He also said it would have been wrong to proceed with it after the U.S. dropped a controversial provision from Trump's major budget bill last week: the so-called 'revenge tax' that would have hit the U.S. assets of foreign businesses and individuals. That decision came as the G7 agreed to exempt American firms from a co-ordinated effort to ensure corporations pay a minimum tax, which was 'absolutely a win' for the U.S. Even so, Pierce said Canada likely had no choice but to drop the policy, given Trump's exploitation of Canada's 'weakness' — its major economic reliance on trade with the U.S. 'We just hope that this now paves the way for a good renewed deal,' said Pierce. The ultimate goal of the federal government in that deal, at least publicly, has been to return to the terms of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA), which Trump signed in 2018 during his first term, after disparaging North American free trade as unfair to his country. That would mean lifting the rounds of tariffs Trump has imposed since the winter, with import duties tied to concerns about drugs and migration over the border, and others that Trump slapped on Canadian autos, steel and aluminum in a bid to promote those sectors in the U.S. Canada has responded with countertariffs on its own that the government says hit more than $80 billion worth of American imports to Canada. Canada's lead trade negotiator with the Trump administration, Ambassador Kirsten Hillman, was not available for an interview this week, the embassy in Washington told the Star. Charest, however, said he believes it is possible that Canada could accept some level of tariffs in a July 21 deal, so long as they have no material effect. Such 'zero-effect' tariffs could only kick in at levels of trade that Canada doesn't or likely won't achieve, for example. Yet there's a question of how much any deal can be relied upon, so long as Trump is in the White House, unilaterally imposing tariffs that Canada views as 'illegal' violations of the 2018 trade deal. 'Trump is arguing about supply management and the (Digital Services Tax), but it's the U.S. that is in flagrant breach of its trade obligations. It's abandoned the CUSMA, virtually behaving as if it did not exist and the U.S. signature has no meaning,' Herman said. 'So we are in a world where rules and the rules-based system, and the stability that that treaty was supposed to provide, have gone by the board.' That means, at least for now, the Carney government is operating in a world where Canada's foremost ally, the colossus to the south, will use economic force to get what it wants.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
How $45 billion in ‘big, beautiful bill' funding aids ICE detention
More than $45 billion in the 'big, beautiful bill' that President Trump signed Friday is earmarked for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention space, which officials say will add up tens of thousands of beds for migrants being held in federal custody. An estimated $170 billion of the bill has been designated for immigration enforcement as the Trump administration has promised to orchestrate the largest mass deportation effort in American history. But the funding that has been devoted to ICE detention space in the final bill. passed by the House on Thursday, is more than the government spent on housing migrants during the Obama, Biden and first Trump administrations combined, The Washington Post reported. Federal officials estimate the $45 billion will provide an additional 100,000 beds in ICE facilities at a time when ICE has nearly 56,400 migrants in its detention centers nationwide as of mid-June, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse. The number of detainees increased by more than 5,000 during the first two weeks of June. Data showed that of those detained, 28 percent have a prior criminal conviction, while 25 percent have pending criminal charges. The funding bump in the bill was approved after Trump and Department of Homeland Security Secretary (DHS) Kristi Noem toured a new detention facility that administration officials have called 'Alligator Alcatraz.' White House Border Czar Tom Homan told NewsNation's 'CUOMO' this week that the facility in the Florida Everglades will cost an estimated $450 million to operate each year. But officials said the facility could be a blueprint for more ICE detention centers that the government plans to open now that funding has been approved. President Donald Trump, Gov. Ron DeSantis, R-Fla., Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and others, tour 'Alligator Alcatraz,' a new migrant detention facility at Dade-Collier Training and Transition facility, Tuesday, July 1, 2025, in Ochopee, Fla. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci) 'Everybody we arrest, we need a bed, because they're going to be in detention from several days to several months, depending on the case,' Homan said. 'So, this will give us a little breathing room, give us extra beds so we can target more criminals throughout the country.' The border czar had previously called on Congress to provide more funding for detention that would allow ICE to detain migrants taken into federal custody. In June, the agency published a list of more than 40 contractors that could assist with the 'emergency acquisition' of space for migrant detainees, the Post reported. In addition to the $45 billion set aside for ICE detention and agents, the funding bill that was approved by Congress this week allocates another $46 billion for continued construction of the border wall along the U.S.-Mexico border. Real Clear Politics reported this week that the $45 billion that will be devoted to ICE represents a 265 percent increase in its current detention budget, which will be higher than that of the American prison system. The current load of detainees is the highest since that data has been compiled by ICE since the first time Trump was in office. In addition to providing more beds, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in an emailed statement to the Post that the funding for ICE in the bill will allow the agency to hire an additional 10,000 federal agents. Officials announced earlier this year that the agency's migrant detention centers were at capacity. The government contracts with private prison companies to operate detention facilities. The two main companies, CoreCivic and the GEO Group, have been awarded nine contracts by ICE for expanded detention, per the Post. Contracts have also been awarded to companies to produce temporary tent structures, which would be used to house migrants, the report said. Last year, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) determined through a Freedom of Information Act request that private companies were looking to enter into government contracts in states like Michigan, California, Kansas, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas and Washington state. The Post's report indicated that CoreCivic and the Geo Group already own prisons that are sitting empty in several states, including Kansas (Leavenworth), Colorado, Minnesota, North Carolina, and Oklahoma. The ACLU also reported that in 2022, the GEO Group made $1.05 billion in revenue from ICE contracts alone, while CoreCivic made $552.2 million during the same year. 'Never in our 42-year company history have we had so much activity and demand for our services as we are seeing right now,' said CoreCivic CEO Damon Hininger during an earnings call in May with shareholders, according to The Associated Press. The expansion of detention space comes at a time when more than a dozen people have died in ICE facilities since October, including 10 during 2025. In 2024, an ACLU report indicated that 95 percent of deaths that took place in ICE facilities between 2017 and 2021 could have been prevented or possibly prevented. That investigation, which was conducted by the ACLU, American Oversight and Physicians for Human Rights, analyzed the deaths of the 52 people who died in ICE custody during that time frame.
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
How Trump's Megabill Affects Your Taxes
On Thursday, the House voted 218-214 in favor of passing President Trump's bill. Today, Trump will hold a bill signing ceremony at 5 p.m. Eastern Time to sign the bill into law. Don't Miss TipRanks' Half-Year Sale Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence. Make smarter investment decisions with TipRanks' Smart Investor Picks, delivered to your inbox every week. Of course, the topic that many American citizens are concerned about is the tax implications of the bill. Let's dive in. First, the standard deduction will increase to $15,750 from $15,000 for single filers and $31,500 from $30,000 for married couples filing jointly. Next, the maximum state and local tax (SALT) deduction will rise to $40,000 from $10,000. It will increase by 1% through 2029 before reverting to $10,000 in 2030. However, all filers making more than $500,000 per year will be subject to SALT deduction phase-outs. The deduction only applies to people who choose to file an itemized tax return. Specific Tax Breaks from Trump's Megabill Parents will benefit from the bill, as the child tax credit will increase by 10% to $2,200 from $2,000 beginning next year. Workers who receive tips will be able to deduct up to $25,000 of tip money from their taxes. The deduction is lower for workers making more than $150,000. Overtime workers will receive a maximum overtime pay deduction of $12,500 for single filers making up to $150,000 and $25,000 for married couples. The new policies for tip and overtime workers only apply on a federal level and not on a state level; they will be in effect from 2025 to 2028. For car buyers, the $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit for new vehicles and $4,000 tax credit for used EVs will expire on September 30. At the same time, taxpayers will be able to deduct up to $10,000 in auto loan interest payments from their taxable income if the purchased vehicle is made in the U.S. The deduction decreases for those with an income above $100,000. Finally, people above the age of 65 making $75,000 or less will be able to deduct $6,000 from their taxable income. Married seniors making $150,000 or less will be able to do the same.
