Putin names regional Russian airport Stalingrad
"In order to perpetuate the Victory of the Soviet people in the Great Patriotic War of 1941-1945, I hereby decree ... to assign the historical name 'Stalingrad' to Volgograd International Airport," the decree published on the Kremlin's website said.
World War Two, in which around 22-25 million Soviet citizens are estimated to have died, is known in Russia as The Great Patriotic War. For many Russians, Stalingrad conjures memories both of the war's sacrifice and the murderous rule of dictator Josef Stalin.
Putin has often compared his invasion of Ukraine to the fight against Nazis, presenting the war to Russians as a "special military operation" to "demilitarize" and "denazify" Ukraine.
Ukraine - which was part of the Soviet Union and itself suffered devastation at the hands of Adolf Hitler's forces - rejects those parallels as spurious pretexts for a war of imperial conquest.
In a fiery 2023 speech in Volgograd marking the 80th anniversary of the battle of Stalingrad, Putin lambasted Germany for helping to arm Ukraine and reiterated that he was ready to draw on Russia's entire arsenal, which includes nuclear weapons.
Stalingrad, which was renamed Volgograd in 1961, was the bloodiest battle of the war, when the Soviet Red Army, at a cost of over 1 million casualties, broke the back of German invasion forces in 1942-43.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
33 minutes ago
- Axios
Amid budget deficit, Miami activists again call for divestment of Israeli bonds
With Miami-Dade's budget season underway, calls for the county to liquidate its Israeli bonds are again ramping up. Why it matters: Activists, including members of the Break the Bonds Miami campaign, argue the county is sending resident taxpayer dollars to support an ongoing war and what critics describe as genocide. Continuing such investments, they argue, is not only immoral but a poor economic decision. Last month, Moody's maintained its rating and negative outlook for Israel bonds, Reuters reported. Catch up quick: The county began investing in Israeli bonds in 2016, after it amended its policies to allow investments in the foreign government, purchasing two bonds for a combined $50 million. Today, it has multiple bond investments totaling more than $151 million, including a $25 million bond it purchased Feb. 1. The big picture: The calls to divest come as the county weighs a budget that calls for cuts between 10% and 35% for some departments to offset a more than $400 million deficit. Activists have argued the budget gaps further underscore the need to divest from what they say is an irresponsible and immoral investment and reinvest in county programs. The latest: During Mayor Daniella Levine Cava's first budget town hall last week, community members called on her to recommend that commissioners change the county's investment policy to exclude Israel and not reinvest the bonds once they mature. While commissioners approve the investment policy, the board doesn't direct which specific investments are made. What they're saying: "The purpose of our county's investments is to increase liquidity," one speaker said. "Israel bonds do the opposite." Even outside of the war against Gaza, activists claim better economic investments would be in local funds, such as housing bonds. The other side: At the hearing, Levine Cava touted the county's 2023 investment and said the operating budget and investment portfolio were separate funds, according to multiple people at the meeting.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Russia says it no longer will abide by its self-imposed moratorium on intermediate-range missiles
MOSCOW (AP) — Russia has declared that it no longer considers itself bound by a self-imposed moratorium on the deployment of nuclear-capable intermediate range missiles, a warning that potentially sets the stage for a new arms race as tensions between Moscow and Washington rise again over Ukraine. In a statement Monday, the Russian Foreign Ministry linked the decision to efforts by the U.S. and its allies to develop intermediate range weapons and preparations for their deployment in Europe and other parts of the world. It specifically cited U.S. plans to deploy Typhoon and Dark Eagle missiles in Germany starting next year. The ministry noted that such actions by the U.S. and its allies create 'destabilizing missile potentials" near Russia, creating a "direct threat to the security of our country' and carry 'significant harmful consequences for regional and global stability, including a dangerous escalation of tensions between nuclear powers.' It didn't say what specific moves the Kremlin might take, but President Vladimir Putin has previously announced that Moscow was planning to deploy its new Oreshnik missiles on the territory of its neighbor and ally Belarus later this year. Asked where and when Russia could potentially deploy intermediate-range weapons, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that it's not something to be announced in advance. 'Russia no longer has any limitations, Russia no longer considers itself to be constrained by anything,' Peskov told reporters. 'Therefore Russia believes it has the right to take respective steps if necessary.' 'Decisions on specific parameters of response measures will be made by the leadership of the Russian Federation based on an interdepartmental analysis of the scale of deployment of American and other Western land-based intermediate-range missiles, as well as the development of the overall situation in the area of international security and strategic stability,' the Foreign Ministry said. Russia's move follows Trump's nuclear messaging The Russian statement follows President Donald Trump's announcement Friday that he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of Dmitry Medvedev, who was president in 2008-12 to allow Putin, bound by term limits, to later return to the office. Trump's statement came as his deadline for the Kremlin to reach a peace deal in Ukraine approaches later this week. Trump said he was alarmed by Medvedev's attitude. Medvedev, who serves as deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council chaired by Putin, has apparently sought to curry favor with his mentor by making provocative statements and frequently lobbing nuclear threats. Last week. he responded to Trump's deadline for Russia to accept a peace deal in Ukraine or face sanctions by warning him against 'playing the ultimatum game with Russia' and declaring that 'each new ultimatum is a threat and a step toward war.' Medvedev also commented on the Foreign Ministry's statement, describing Moscow's withdrawal from the moratorium as 'the result of NATO countries' anti-Russian policy.' 'This is a new reality all our opponents will have to reckon with,' he wrote on X. 'Expect further steps.' INF treaty abandoned in 2019 Intermediate-range missiles can fly between 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,400 miles). Such land-based weapons were banned under the 1987 Intermediate-range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. Washington and Moscow abandoned the pact in 2019, accusing each other of violations, but Moscow declared its self-imposed moratorium on their deployment until the U.S. makes such a move. The collapse of the INF Treaty has stoked fears of a replay of a Cold War-era European missile crisis, when the U.S. and the Soviet Union both deployed intermediate-range missiles on the continent in the 1980s. Such weapons are seen as particularly destabilizing because they take less time to reach targets, compared with intercontinental ballistic missiles, leaving no time for decision-makers and raising the likelihood of a global nuclear conflict over a false launch warning. Russia's missile forces chief has declared that the new Oreshnik intermediate range missile, which Russia first used against Ukraine in November, has a range to reach all of Europe. Oreshnik can carry conventional or nuclear warheads. Putin has praised the Oreshnik's capabilities, saying its multiple warheads that plunge to a target at speeds up to Mach 10 are immune to being intercepted and are so powerful that the use of several of them in one conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack. Putin has warned the West that Moscow could use it against Ukraine's NATO allies who allowed Kyiv to use their longer-range missiles to strike inside Russia. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape:
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump hones in on energy in trade talks, but specifics are scarce
President Trump is seeking to promote U.S. energy in his trade negotiations, but announcements about agreements so far have been light on details, and actual outcomes are largely mysterious. Recently, the Trump administration and the European Union announced a trade deal under which the EU will buy '$750 billion in U.S. energy' by 2028. An EU webpage said that the deal 'includes the intention to procure more US liquified natural gas (LNG), oil, and nuclear fuels and cutting-edge technologies and investments over the next three years.' On Wednesday, the administration announced another deal with South Korea that included the purchase of '$100 Billion Dollars of LNG, or other Energy products' Trump said on social media. The latest agreements come after one with Japan last month. That deal amounted to $550 billion in Japanese investments in U.S. industries, including energy infrastructure and production, semiconductors and mining. Reuters reported Monday that the administration also reached a trade deal with Malaysia that included an agreement under which state energy company Petroliam Nasional Berhad will buy $3.4 billion a year of U.S. LNG. While there appears to be a focus on energy in these deals, in many of them it's not clear exactly what kind of energy will be purchased in what quantities, who will supply it or who will buy it. 'There are a lot of still open questions,' said Aaron Bartnick, who served as an economic security official in the Biden White House. Clara Gillispie, a senior fellow for climate and energy at the Council on Foreign Relations, said, 'There's still a lot we don't know about what these deals look like, including in terms of how ambitious these actually are.' She said part of the issue is that it's not clear what even counts as 'energy.' 'You have in some of the detail deals references to energy products. Some say energy exports from the U.S. LNG is often referenced as part of a suggestive, but not necessarily all inclusive list.' Bartnick, who is now a fellow at Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy, said that the deals would be expected to result in the purchase of more U.S. energy 'if the terms as outlined, are executed.' But that's a big if. 'I'll be very interested to see how these foreign governments work with the private companies in their respective countries in order to coordinate these investments,' he said. On the U.S. side as well, decisions are made by private companies, rather than anything run by the state, and in many cases, if deals were economic, it's possible they would have already been made with or without a trade deal. However, Gillispie noted that 'there are things that governments can do to more positively influence the competitiveness of U.S. energy supplies in their own markets.' 'You could, for example, see governments look at waiving of certain import taxes or other fees that might be levied against energy imports, specific to waiving them in the U.S. case,' she said. Olympe Mattei-d'Ornano, a European gas analyst at BNEF, said in a statement shared with The Hill that the EU deal in particular may be difficult to actually achieve. 'Total energy imports from the US accounted for less than $80 billion last year vs $250 billion promised. The pledge is not legally binding but could spur a gesture from the EU's side to provide incentives/guidelines to increase EU buyers' contracts with US LNG projects,' said Mattei-d'Ornano. She indicated that at least some of the purchases may have happened anyway, 'given the pivot away from Russia in recent years.' However, the U.S. energy industry has appeared supportive of the Trump administration's efforts. 'We welcome President Trump's announcement of new trade frameworks that will expand new export market opportunities and support American energy development,' said Rob Jennings, vice president of natural gas markets at the American Petroleum Institute, a major oil and gas lobbying organization, in a statement to The Hill. Jennings, however, also called for a faster infrastructure buildout in the U.S., saying 'we can provide even more of that supply to our allies with more infrastructure.'
