logo
Letters: Blame those who shoot the gun in killings, not the gun manufacturers

Letters: Blame those who shoot the gun in killings, not the gun manufacturers

The op-ed 'Why not hold gun manufacturers accountable for mass shootings like River North tragedy?' by Anthony Douglas, Selwyn Rogers, Mallory Williams and Arne Duncan makes me wonder where their logic comes from.
Did the gun shoot its victim? No. The gun was the tool a criminal used to cause harm. The weapon didn't fire itself. If we are going to hold gun manufacturers accountable, don't stop there. Automobile companies should be held to the same standards. The accident was the carmaker's fault. Go after all the big names.
You trip and fall on a sidewalk? Let's hold the concrete company accountable. I cut my hand while preparing dinner? It's the knife manufacturer's fault. What happened to common sense?
If for some reason anyone thinks holding the gun manufacturers accountable will decrease gun sales to criminals, think again. Most criminals don't go to the local gun shop to purchase legally. They deal in stolen weapons. These costs for medical services are more than excessive. Maybe we need better laws with higher accountability for the one possessing the gun?
Strengthen the justice system and law enforcement to hold these criminals and careless gun owners accountable. A slap on the wrist for illegal gun possession is the problem. Irresponsible gun owners need education and laws requiring proper storage to keep guns out of children's hands.Arne Duncan and his co-authors seek to hold the makers of inanimate objects — gun manufacturers — 'accountable' for the River North massacre that left four dead and many more injured. But why not also blame auto manufacturers? The massacre was a drive-by shooting after all. And don't forget bullet-makers and steel plants and — well, anything that shifts the blame from the real perpetrators.It's hard to believe op-ed writers would ask: 'Why not hold gun manufacturers accountable for mass shootings?' It is hard to imagine a more inane question.
Gun manufacturers do not pull the trigger, so they can't be charged. Only the shooters are chargeable.
The Second Amendment says that 'the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' To win an anti-gun case in court, that rule must be out-argued, case by case.
Maturation as a nation has not brought about that realization that the right to bear arms is no longer justified as it was at the outset. Our lawmakers would face an uphill battle canceling that right through congressional action. So we live with the anomaly, with hundreds dying annually from guns. Fear rules.
To escape the reality of guns, individuals would have to move outside the USA.Over the Fourth of July weekend, Chicago experienced its least deadly in six years. That's the headline for some, and it's progress to be proud of. But for Black and brown communities across Chicago, that narrative ignores the fact that it was a weekend still filled with trauma, heartbreak and loss.
Three mass shootings occurred during the holiday week and weekend: in River North, Back of the Yards and Little Village. They all left Black and brown people dead or injured. There was no outpouring of public grief or demands for justice. These lives mattered, yet you'd hardly know it from the deafening silence.
As a Black woman and the executive director of Illinois' largest gun violence prevention coalition, I carry both sorrow and deep frustration. Because time and again, I've watched our communities be forced to suffer through violence alone, while similar tragedies in whiter, more affluent neighborhoods spark national outrage.
That's not to say Highland Park; Nashville, Tennessee; or Lewiston, Maine, didn't deserve mourning or attention — they did. But so do the families in Little Village. So do the teens and young adults in Back of the Yards. So do those celebrating an album release in River North.
This country must confront the racial bias that decides whose lives matter after gun violence happens. Who do we grieve publicly? Whose stories do we amplify? Whose safety is prioritized? When the victims of gun violence are Black or brown, the outrage is muted, the urgency slower and the investment often missing.
This disparity isn't just a media problem. It shows up in policy too. When the narrative suggests that violence is a normal feature of life in certain neighborhoods, it becomes easier for policymakers to ignore it. It becomes easier to underfund community-based solutions. It becomes easier to write off the trauma experienced by survivors, children and families simply trying to live their lives.
Our communities are not asking for pity — we are demanding equity. Equity in how violence is covered. Equity in how survivors are supported. Equity in how lifesaving solutions are funded. This includes greater investment in community violence intervention programs that are already saving lives. These programs reduce shootings, interrupt cycles of retaliation and offer real alternatives where inequitable systems have failed.
Until every child can play outside without fear, and every family can celebrate a holiday without mourning, we have more work to do.In the aftermath of unspeakable tragedy in River North, the weight of grief permeates our lives, reminding us of our shared humanity.
The recent massacre that took so many innocent lives serves is a harrowing reminder of the fragility of existence. Entire families have been shattered in an instant, and the echoes of their loss resonate deeply. Having experienced my own losses — my father taken by violence during the Intifada and a cousin lost to a tragic attack — I find myself mourning not just for those directly affected, but also for all of us who share in this collective sorrow.
In these moments, it becomes clear that the struggles faced by different communities are interconnected. The pain of loss knows no boundaries, and it is essential that we come together to support one another. Our shared experiences of mourning and loss create a powerful opportunity for us to stand in solidarity against the cycles of hatred that seek to divide us.
As a Jewish woman, I recognize the importance of acknowledging our histories and the struggles that have shaped our identities. There is a profound strength in unity, and now, more than ever, we must lift each other up. Together, we can challenge the narratives that perpetuate division and instead weave a story of compassion and mutual respect.
Let us transform our grief into action, creating a tapestry of support that honors the memories of those we have lost. It is through these connections that we can challenge violence and work toward a future in which such tragedies are no longer a reality.I believe it's well known that Fourth of July is a favorite holiday of first responders. This past one was especially hard for those in Chicago who responded to a fire alarm at a home in Logan Square (think about all that heavy gear on a 90-plus-degree day) and arrived to find a 4-year-old stabbed to death and his 10- and 13-year-old siblings also stabbed.
Nobody should have to walk in to find that carnage. I'm guessing some of the fire and police officials are parents themselves. How do you process and recuperate from that? The mother has been charged, and, sadly, mental illness is involved. Such a tragedy on what is this nation's birthday.
And then there's the first responders in Texas, again on the Fourth of July weekend, dealing with children. The devastation is beyond comprehension and the heartbreak unimaginable.
So please, let's keep all first responders in our thoughts and prayers and give thanks they are there to help us when we need it.
On that note, a special shout-out to the LaGrange Fire Department, which we had to call twice this winter. You all are the best of the best, and we thank you!
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Don't get upset with Mamdani for trying to take advantage of DEI
Don't get upset with Mamdani for trying to take advantage of DEI

The Hill

time4 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Don't get upset with Mamdani for trying to take advantage of DEI

When he was 17, Zohran Mamdani did what any teenager with a plausible claim to African identity might have done to get into Columbia: he checked both 'Asian' and 'African American' on his application. For that, Mamdani, of Indian extraction but born in Uganda, is being accused of 'pretending to be Black.' The backlash has come largely from the right. Fox jumped at the chance to bash the soon-to-be mayor, calling him a 'racist' and citing the event as evidence that he 'clearly despises America and everything that [it stands] for.' Mayor Eric Adams called Mamdani's racial identification 'deeply offensive.' Andrew Cuomo's people, who are, of course, the paragons of moral integrity, warned this might be 'the tip of the iceberg' of some deeper intellectual fraud. It's funny, because Mamdani is, in some sense, all of those things. But to suggest that this particular college application box debacle is the almighty smoking gun would be incoherent and all too hypocritical. Most of the voices now howling about Mamdani's supposed dishonesty were just two years ago fervently denouncing affirmative action, blanket preference of marginalized groups in admissions, as discriminatory. So what, exactly, is their objection to someone navigating that system strategically? If the policy itself was unjust, then exploiting its flaws has to be a rational decision. Of course, Mamdani's politically correct explanation hasn't exactly reassured anyone beyond his base. 'Most college applications don't have a box for Indian Ugandans,' he said. 'So I checked multiple boxes trying to capture the fullness of my background. Even though these boxes are constraining, I want my college application to reflect who I was.' The fullness of his background? He was 17 and trying to get into Columbia. He knew then, and he certainly knows now, even after the Supreme Court struck down affirmative action in admissions, that identifying as Black on a college application gives you an advantage. You get bonus points. It's easier to get in. Thus, setting his own implausible explanation aside, teenage Mamdani's decision makes sense. He was born in Uganda, and his family later moved to South Africa before immigrating to the U.S. That gives him a plausible de jure claim to the African American label, and he identified himself accordingly. Whether that qualifies him, in any cultural or historical sense, as 'African American' is debatable, but the college admissions process doesn't care much. And Mamdani had a practical reason: his SAT score, as reported by Christopher Rufo, was below the typical threshold for Asian admits but higher than the average for Black applicants at Columbia at the time. So he checked the box. That's not a scandal. The 17-year-old Mamdani responded rationally to a system that was openly perverse. Understandably, he can't exactly admit that he was trying to get admissions points without getting booed off the stage at his next campaign rally. But maybe the rest of us should. Because the question is: If I had been Mamdani, would I have done the same? And if I believed the policy was structurally unjust, wouldn't my actions have been a logical choice — even a moral choice? My answer to both is a resounding yes. If anything, Mamdani's Columbia application shows he wasn't always some doctrinaire radical. He was once a student capable of making normal human decisions. To judge him as if he were already a politician at that time is a ludicrous premise. And above all, if one believes that the racial preferences the government enforced for decades were unjust, why attack a teenager responding strategically to that unfair process? To subvert a discriminatory policy is itself an indictment of that policy. Conservatives should be celebrating the young Mamdani for having had the gumption to do so. Yes, Mamdani is a left-wing radical and socialist. He wants fare-free transit, government-run grocery stores, and to tax the rich until they flee the city. He has floated a rent freeze, a move that would absolutely worsen New York's housing shortage. He won't condemn terrorism, he supports race-based redistribution, and he has backed defunding the police department. There are many good reasons to oppose Mamdani touching on policy, competence, and judgment. He's an easy target. But this? This is the weakest possible attack. For this, he deserves praise. Conservatives grabbing their pitchforks and getting ready to explode over how offensive this is are being hypocrites, both morally and intellectually. If race-based admissions really are unjust, then it is unfair and dishonest to censure the people who worked the system in their own favor. Put down the sticks, grab some popcorn, and join the rest of us awaiting New York's descent into total farce.

Letters: White liberals with Trump anxiety, welcome to the world outside your bubble
Letters: White liberals with Trump anxiety, welcome to the world outside your bubble

San Francisco Chronicle​

time34 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Letters: White liberals with Trump anxiety, welcome to the world outside your bubble

Regarding 'Suffering from Trump anxiety? I'm a psychotherapist, and here's the advice I give my patients' (Open Forum, July 15): When I finished reading the op-ed and looked at the accompanying photo of a white family holding cute 'Dump Trump' signs, I thought it needed a different headline: 'Now that it affects me: a beginner's guide to activism.' The author's message is potent. Community, action and care will be essential in the years ahead. But these ideas aren't new — they're just new to many white, middle-class liberals. That framing erases how BIPOC communities have long practiced these principles for survival. The fear President Donald Trump evokes isn't new. State violence, government neglect and rights violations didn't begin in 2016 — they've long persisted across presidential administrations. When immigration agents terrorized neighborhoods, Latino communities organized watches and mutual aid — because no one else would. Grassroots organizations already had legal support, childcare and language access ready to deploy. In the 1960s, Black communities built church-based mutual aid and neighborhood safety networks. During the AIDS crisis, queer communities created underground caregiving and health networks when the government turned its back. So welcome, fellow liberals. Let's honor those who've done this work — not as inspiration to extract, but as leaders to learn from, with humility and grace Russell Cowan, Oakland The only thing that has changed is access: AI has democratized the ability to craft a near-perfect essay. The obvious way to level the playing field is to introduce a blue-book-style admissions essay to the SAT (or other standardized admissions tests). These handwritten essays would be submitted to colleges along with their other scores. Yes, students would still be able to prepare in advance by studying common themes and practicing general responses — but this format would still showcase their writing skills and personal achievements, without the help of AI tools. Ethan Gallogly, Davis Clarify rules at new park With the focus on the impact of the Great Highway's closure on traffic, the real safety concerns for pedestrians who try to enjoy the new park have been lost. There was news coverage of one injury caused by a bicyclist to a walker at Sunset Dunes, and my friend was slammed to the ground from behind by a child on a bike. The rules for bikers and pedestrians at the park that do exist are unclear, do not have supporting signage or pavement indicators and have no enforcement. Will it take a death for something to change? A bunch of bicyclists mixing with pedestrians with unclear rules is a disaster waiting to happen. Sara Saldana, San Francisco My heart's in the Sunset Regarding 'Look beyond S.F.'s great landmarks to find the real city' (Native Son, July 12): As I read Carl Nolte's column about his trip on the N-Judah, I felt like he had written it exactly for me: an expat San Franciscan who grew up in the Sunset and can still feel the fog in my bones, even though I now live 3,000 miles away. I spent my childhood going to Java Beach Cafe before school with my father. For much of my teenage years, I wished the N train were faster as I rode it out of the Sunset to the parts of the city that I found more exciting. Now, when I return, I appreciate all the ways the Sunset still feels like home in a city that has changed so much in the past 30 years. I don't feel the pull to get away from the neighborhood that my teenage self did. Thank you to Nolte for writing such a lovely ode to the not-so-small neighborhood and Muni line that can sometimes go underappreciated. Ben Lowell, Brookline, Mass.

Willie Wilson: Is Illinois' state procurement being used effectively to stabilize communities of color?
Willie Wilson: Is Illinois' state procurement being used effectively to stabilize communities of color?

Chicago Tribune

time2 hours ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Willie Wilson: Is Illinois' state procurement being used effectively to stabilize communities of color?

Government contracting with local businesses is a widely used tool to help stabilize communities. The effective use of procurement — sourcing, purchasing and managing goods and services a state agency needs to operate — can aid in job and wealth creation and lower crime. The state of Illinois spends billions of dollars annually on procurement. In 2013, African Americans, who represented 9.5% of the ownership of businesses, received less than 1% of the total contracts awarded by the state of Illinois. In 2015, the General Assembly and then-Gov. Bruce Rauner authorized creating the Fair Practices in Contracting Task Force. I served as chairman of the task force, and our final report in 2018 offered recommendations to make contracting more equitable. Our extensive work involved examining the contracting of every state agency. Our goal was to ensure parity in state contracting and boost businesses that have been left out. Gov. JB Pritzker in 2021 authorized creating the Illinois Commission on Equity and Inclusion. The same year, in signing legislation to expand economic opportunity, Pritzker noted that 'these four bills mark significant progress in our efforts to close the racial gaps and eliminate barriers that have for too long unfairly held Black and Brown Illinoisans back.' Illinois House Speaker Emanuel 'Chris' Welch said it was 'a monumental step toward our mission of addressing systemic racism by expanding economic access and opportunity.' The Commission on Equity and Inclusion was created in part to expand access to state contracts for minorities, women, people with disabilities and veterans. Clearly, the commission followed the work of the contracting task force. The governor could have collaborated with the task force since the goals were aligned. It is fair to ask: How has the commission improved state contracting with minority-owned firms? According to the commission's fiscal year 2024 expenditure report, much work remains to be done. A few highlights from the report: There are other examples of Illinois agencies that could do more by way of procurement with Black-owned businesses. But the most egregious example is the Department of Corrections. Consider that African Americans represent 54.5% of the total prison population in Illinois. Black people make up the majority of prisoners in Illinois, and Black businesses receive less than 0.5% of state contracts with the IDOC. Black businesses could supply clothing, food, water, cleaning supplies and other items necessary to run the prison system. An inclusive state requires accountability and removal of systemic barriers for Black businesses. In spite of affirmative action and diversity, equity and inclusion policies, disparities persist in access by Black people to capital, markets and other resources. Consequences of these disparities are high crime, inflation, poverty and double-digit unemployment in the Black community. Black-owned businesses and state governments face existential threats from the current political and legal landscape and uncertain tariff policies. However, elected leaders must not be deterred in correcting past wrongs and ensuring that all communities benefit from the use of public tax dollars through government contracting. The following are recommendations to help sustain and grow the number of Black-owned businesses: Contracting officers and elected leaders must be held accountable for their failure to improve procurement numbers for Black-owned businesses. I will convene 2,000 faith leaders and minority business owners around the state to provide recommendations regarding parity in contracting to elected leaders. Government contracting done right can have an enormous benefit to minority-owned businesses and marginalized communities. As a business owner, I reinvest my profits from contracts back into the community. Small businesses can help provide community stability. I write this commentary to make those comfortable with allowing barriers to limit state procurement contracts for Black-owned businesses uncomfortable. Willie Wilson is a business owner, philanthropist and former mayoral candidate.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store