Under-construction flat not a ‘shared household' under Domestic Violence Act, rules HC
Justice Manjusha Deshpande passed the order on Friday while dismissing a petition filed by a 45-year-old woman from Goregaon. She had sought directions to her estranged husband, a 55-year-old software engineer working in the US, to pay the remaining instalments of a ₹3.52-crore flat in Malad West booked in their joint names.
The court noted that since the possession of the flat had not been handed over and the payments were still incomplete, the property could not be considered a 'shared household' within the meaning of section 2(s) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
The couple married in May 2013 and initially lived in a rented flat in Thane. In 2019, the man moved to the US for work. According to the woman, during his time abroad, he had an extra-marital affair. Despite strained relations, she said she gave the marriage another chance when he returned to India in February 2020 and promised to settle down with her in Mumbai.
As a gesture of commitment, the husband booked the 1,029-sq-ft under-construction apartment in Malad West. However, the woman alleged that after moving into another rented flat in Malad in 2021, the man resumed harassing her, prompting her to file a domestic violence complaint before the Borivali magistrate court.
In the course of those proceedings, she sought an order directing him to pay the balance consideration for the Malad flat, claiming it was necessary to protect her right of residence under section 19 of the DV Act.
The magistrate court rejected her plea on June 3, 2024. The order was upheld by the Dindoshi sessions court on October 19, 2024. She then moved the high court in appeal.
Dismissing her plea, justice Deshpande observed that although the DV Act protects a woman's right to reside in the shared household, the definition requires actual possession or residence. 'The flat is under construction and not in possession of either party. Therefore, it would not qualify as a shared household,' the court ruled.
Directing the husband or his employer to pay pending instalments would be 'stretching it too far', the court added, concluding that such a direction was beyond the scope of the DV Act.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
19 years after Mumbai train attack, there is no closure — only unanswered questions
Nineteen years ago, sophisticated bombs ripped through seven local trains in Mumbai within 11 minutes. They killed 189 people, and injured 816. In less than three months, the Anti-Terrorism Squad of Maharashtra Police arrested 13 individuals, named another 15 in hiding as accused, and claimed to have cracked the case. Stringent anti-terror laws, from the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act to the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, were invoked, and the investigators claimed the accused had confessed to their crimes. They were subsequently tried and awarded sentences of life imprisonment and the death penalty in 2015. On Monday, the Bombay High Court acquitted 12 men, highlighting critical procedural lapses in the investigation. The 617-page verdict raises important questions about how an investigation in a case that shook the nation is riddled with worrying loose ends and gaps. Justice Anil S Kilor begins with a disquieting assessment of the case: 'Punishing the actual perpetrator of a crime is a concrete and essential step toward curbing criminal activities, upholding the rule of law, and ensuring the safety and security of citizens. But creating a false appearance of having solved a case by presenting that the accused have been brought to justice gives a misleading sense of resolution. This deceptive closure undermines public trust and falsely reassures society, while in reality, the true threat remains at large.' The High Court ruling points to a series of serious lapses in the investigation, from picking and choosing eyewitnesses, reliance on maps allegedly recovered from the accused, and how confessional statements were obtained. The court notes the serious allegations and medical evidence of custodial torture of the accused. The ruling shows that even the basic element of the case — the nature of the bombs used — was not established with cogent evidence by the prosecution. The state did not have adequate reasons or material evidence, the court held, to grant sanction to prosecute the accused under MCOCA. This is a crucial step in the process when stringent anti-terror laws are invoked. These are laws enacted with the stated goal of combating terror threats that give the state wide powers. They reverse the burden of proof, allow prolonged detention and powers of invasive surveillance, and relax evidentiary standards. It is worrying that Maharashtra Police could not establish the case even to this standard. 'The prosecution has utterly failed to establish the offence beyond a reasonable doubt against the accused on each count, it is unsafe to reach the satisfaction that the Appellants/Accused have committed the offences for which they have been convicted and sentenced,' the court said. Strict anti-terror laws provide a legal framework for the state. But rigorous and fair investigations are crucial for their effectiveness and legitimacy. It is true that there is immense pressure on the state when a gruesome attack, such as this one, is perpetrated on the people. But that makes it even more important that it holds itself to high standards of investigation. Botched investigations and trials that span decades do an added injustice to the victims. The state has a right to appeal the verdict before the Supreme Court, where the final word lies. For now, 19 years later, there is no closure for families of the victims.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Three held for circulating old Pak video in bid to incite tension during Kanwar Yatra: UP Police
THE MUZAFFARNAGAR police have arrested three men for allegedly circulating a video that originated in Pakistan in the wake of a crime there a year ago with the intent to incite communal disharmony during the ongoing Kanwar Yatra. In a statement issued on Monday, police identified the accused as Nadeem (25), Mansher (45) and Rahees (35) – all from Muzaffarnagar. 'They work as a vegetable vendor, junk dealer and utensil seller,' said a police officer. 'They were circulating a video showing dead women and children soaked in blood, along with an audio message alleging that members of a particular outfit were attacking families belonging to another community in Moradabad district. Investigations revealed that the video actually originated from Muzaffargarh, Pakistan, where a man had murdered his wife and seven children in April 2024,' read the statement. Personnel at the Kakaroli police station received information that some individuals from the village were circulating a video and audio in a Whatsapp group. 'The intention behind this was to incite people of a particular community and instigate communal tension in western Uttar Pradesh during the ongoing Kanwar Yatra,' said the officials. According to the police, taking cognizance of this, a team was immediately constituted by the Kakaroli Police Station. 'We immediately identified the accused and arrested the three. We have also recovered three mobile phones,' said the police. The police have registered at Kakaroli Police Station under Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and sections 55 (instigating certain crime) 61(2) (criminal conspiracy) 103(2) (murder committed by a group), 113(3) (terrorism), 147 (rioting),152 (sedition) 196 (promoting enmity) 197(spreading false information) 299 (outraging religious feeling) 351(3)(criminal intimidation) 353(2)(rumour) of Bharatiya Nyaya Samhita and the IT Act.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Two Walk Free from Nagpur Jail, Four from Amravati After Acquittal in 2006 Mumbai Train Bombings
Nagpur/Amravati: Two of the three prisoners convicted in the 2006 Mumbai suburban train bombings were released from Nagpur Central Jail on Monday evening following their acquittal by the Bombay High Court earlier in the day. Another four convicted in the same case were simultaneously released from Amravati central prison. The men — Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui and Mohammad Ali Alam Sher Sheikh — spent more than 17 years behind bars. A third inmate, Naved Hussain Rashid Hussain Khan, remains in custody in connection with a separate case, jail superintendent Vaibhav Agey confirmed to TOI. The four released from a jail in Amravati, 155km off Nagpur, include Mohammad Majid Mohammad Shafi (51), Jamir Ahmad Latifur Rehman Sheikh (55), Tanveer Ahmad Mohammad Ibrahim Ansari (56) and Sohail Mehmood Sheikh (52). The High Court's acquittal of all 12 accused brought a dramatic end to one of the most closely watched terrorism trials in the country, stemming from the July 11, 2006, bombings on Mumbai's suburban train network. The attacks killed over 180 people and injured more than 800. The case drew criticism over the alleged custodial torture and lack of forensic evidence against the accused. Siddiqui and Khan were sentenced to death, while Sheikh was serving a life term. Another key accused, Kamal Ansari — listed as Accused No. 1 — died in April 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic, while still in Nagpur jail. The released prisoners were arrested in 2006, shortly after the blasts, and remained incarcerated till Monday's judgment. Following the verdict pronounced in Mumbai by Justice Anil Kilor, the new administrative judge of Nagpur bench of the Bombay High Court, Siddiqui and Sheikh were released quietly through a side gate, avoiding the waiting media. They were then flown to Mumbai on an Indigo flight from Nagpur airport. Jail authorities confirmed that under updated Supreme Court guidelines, an accused can now be released on the basis of a digitally signed judgment, eliminating the need to wait for a hard copy. "We only need approval from the High Court's local office. Warrants from the sessions court are required only in bail cases," a jail official clarified. During their incarceration, Siddiqui enrolled in a law degree course through Yashwantrao Chavan Maharashtra Open University and is now in the final semester of his LLB. Khan started a BA course but did not complete it. All three actively used the Right to Information (RTI) Act to file applications challenging prison rules, legal procedures, and lack of academic access. The high court noted in its ruling that all four accused alleged custodial torture at the hands of Mumbai ATS and later retracted their confessions in court. Each of the acquitted individuals was directed to execute a personal bond of ₹25,000 under Section 481 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for future court appearances in the event of an appeal by the state in the Supreme Court.
