If SEC wants more College Football Playoff respect, it's time to dump cupcake games
The SEC keeps finding new reasons to not add a ninth conference game to its football schedule.
Throughout the four-team College Football Playoff era, the SEC ruled that postseason format, so it found insufficient incentive to add another conference game.
Advertisement
When the scheduling debate resurfaced two years ago, some SEC members expressed reluctance to add another conference game without additional compensation from its media partner. ESPN didn't sweeten the pot. The SEC stayed at eight.
The latest excuse? Many SEC coaches feel loath to welcome a ninth conference game without first knowing the College Football Playoff format for 2026 and beyond.
Georgia quarterback Gunner Stockton (14) runs with the ball against Texas during the second half in the 2024 SEC championship game at Mercedes-Benz Stadium.
What's next, no ninth SEC game until there's peace in the Middle East?
I'm losing my appetite for this eight-or-nine debate.
The number should be 10 – as in, every power-conference team should play a minimum of 10 games against Power Four opponents.
Advertisement
MAN WITH PLAN: Lane Kiffin pushes promising 16-team playoff model
BIG DECISION: SEC's Greg Sankey can be hero or villain in playoff debate
SEC craves more CFP respect while playing cupcake games
The SEC routinely insists it should gain preference from the playoff selection committee because of its run of national championship dominance the past 20 years, plus its strength of schedule. I won't argue that the SEC often boasts the strongest top-to-bottom conference.
The SEC's pandering to the playoff committee, though, plays weak considering how the conference structures its schedule. Teams only play half the other members of their 16-team conference, and most only play one Power Four non-conference opponent, while supplementing the schedule with a few layup games.
Advertisement
In this era of the ever-expanding playoff, it is time for the SEC to curtail its feast of cupcake games. Either stay at eight conference games, or go to nine – so long as it adds up to 10 games against real competition.
Power Four teams playing more games against legitimate opponents – and fewer games against directional schools – would provide clarity to the playoff's at-large selection process.
Alabama, Florida and South Carolina will play 10 regular-season games against Power Four opponents. The SEC's other teams will play eight or nine games against power foes.
By comparison, TCU and Baylor will play a nation-leading 11 games against Power Four competition.
Advertisement
Let's not spare the ACC, either. The ACC joins the SEC in playing eight conference games, while their Big Ten and Big 12 peers play nine. Most ACC schools, at least, will play 10 games against power-conference opponents, if you include Notre Dame as a power foe.
Alternative to a ninth SEC game? Play another Power Four school
Prominent SEC voices continue to trumpet that the committee erred by rejecting three 9-3 teams from the inaugural 12-team playoff, and that the committee does not sufficiently reward the SEC's schedule.
'I have a hard time seeing Ole Miss, Alabama, and South Carolina not being in the best teams last year,' Georgia coach Kirby Smart said, in reference to 9-3 teams that didn't make the playoff.
Advertisement
I maintain the committee flubbed by selecting two-loss SMU, which beat nobody of substance and lost its two games against Top 25 opponents. Mississippi, which smashed Georgia after suffering a résumé-staining loss to Kentucky, would have been a better choice.
And yet, the SEC's three-loss also-rans could have tempted the committee more if they'd played and won another conference game or at least played and won an additional game against a Power Four opponent, instead of creaming a Championship Subdivision school.
We don't know how the committee would view a 9-3 SEC team that played 10 games against Power Four competition.
We do know what the committee thought of the SEC's 9-3 teams that played only nine games against power-conference foes. They thought them undeserving of a playoff bid.
Advertisement
If Florida, which plays Miami and Florida State, goes 9-3 this season, it likely would have a stronger case for an at-large bid than the SEC's three-loss teams last season.
The same is true of South Carolina, which plays Virginia Tech and Clemson for 10 Power Four games. Alabama's games against Wisconsin and Florida State give the Tide 10 games at the big-boy table, too.
Those teams stand in exception to the SEC's majority that choose a path of lesser non-conference resistance.
The SEC keeps floating the myth that the playoff committee does not respect strength of schedule. That's untrue.
Indiana won 11 games last season, but the Hoosiers' soft schedule meant Indiana ranked behind four other at-large playoff qualifiers that won fewer games. Also, the SEC's three-loss teams reached the playoff's doorstep largely because of their strength of schedule. Another marquee victory could help get a three-loss team across the playoff's threshold.
Advertisement
I can understand the SEC's reluctance to add a ninth conference game. Another league game would guarantee another loss to half the conference. Those additional losses would hinder playoff pursuits across half the league.
The alternative to a ninth SEC game, though, should not be a game against Weasel Tech or Seventh-Grade State. Schedule another opponent from the big leagues.
Non-conference scheduling includes the hurdle of needing two to tango. Not every power-conference team wants to play an SEC foe. Nebraska ducked out of its series with Tennessee. Wake Forest canceled on Ole Miss.
Still, the SEC cannot relent. SEC coaches would be wise to keep the pedal down on this blue-sky idea of a Big Ten-SEC challenge.
Advertisement
The SEC insists it wields the nation's strongest conference and that the committee should honor it as such.
That argument holds merit, but the case would become easier to prove if SEC teams scheduled fewer games against Coastal Cupcake and more games against power-conference peers.
Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: SEC wants College Football Playoff respect? Stop playing cupcakes
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
What are Texas A&M's 'most important' games ahead of the 2025 season?
Texas A&M's 2025 college football schedule is nationally regarded as one of the toughest in the SEC, primarily due to road trips against LSU, Missouri, and Texas to conclude the regular season. While this narrative holds up, coach Mike Elko's roster is more than talented and experienced enough to weather the storm. This offseason, Elko has made the necessary adjustments, including adding the former James Madison defensive coordinator to the coaching staff to fix issues in the secondary, paired with signing the talented 2025 recruiting class and adding 14 veterans from the transfer portal, led by wide receiver KC Concepcion and defensive lineman Tyler Odyedim. However, starting quarterback Marcel Reed will need to improve as a pocket passer. Still, the one narrative that needs to be shut down is the notion that the redshirt sophomore's vast importance to the Aggies is crucial to their success, which is not the case given the program's strengths along the offensive line, as well as the depth at running back. Still, quarterback play will remain the "most important" position in the game that dictates success, so prepare for more back takes regarding Reed's play this summer. This weekend, That SEC Podcast continued its offseason preview of all 16 conference teams, focusing this time on Texas A&M's three "must-win" matchups. The first is the road game against Texas, followed by home games against Florida and Auburn. For Texas A&M to make it to the expanded College Football Playoff for the first time in program history, winning two out of three against Texas, Florida, and Auburn is mandatory; a nine or ten-win total will likely be enough to earn a bid. The Texas Longhorns will be led by sophomore QB Arch Manning and defensive standouts, linebacker Anthony Hill and defensive end Collin Simmons, paired with an elite secondary. Meanwhile, Florida QB DJ Lagway and Auburn wide receivers Cam Coleman and Erik Singelton Jr. will pose problems for every defense they face. TexAgs co-owner Billy Liucci provided an interesting take, noting that, while all three games are crucial to making the postseason, A&M's Week 3 road trip against Notre Dame should also be included. "I'll go with 2-1. But my three would be ND, Auburn, Florida. Win those and I think the Ags would be 9-3 or better." Liucci's logic is based on scheduling, as early success and wins against Auburn and Florida, paired with at least seven other wins, would likely secure a playoff berth. Contact/Follow us @AggiesWire on X and like our page on Facebook to follow ongoing coverage of Texas A&M news, notes and opinions. Follow Cameron on X: @CameronOhnysty.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
SEC quarterback rankings: Arch Manning headlines loaded list
The SEC features the nation's best batch of college football quarterbacks, with Arch Manning, Garrett Nussmeier and DJ Lagway included in the top tier. How good is this crop of SEC quarterbacks? Consider, the quarterback ranked last on this list owns a victory as a starter against Nick Saban's Alabama. And the No. 1 quarterback on my list? Well, he requires no introduction. The SEC became the nation's best conference because of its superiority at the line of scrimmage, punishing running backs and speed on the perimeter. Somewhere along the way, though, this conference began attracting the best quarterback talent, too. That's especially reflected this season. Consider this list as a collection of tiers. The top five quarterbacks compromise the top tier, and each would rank highly on a national list of quarterbacks. The middle tier offers stability and parity, and the quarterbacks ranked Nos. 6 through 9 could be scrambled into a different order. Five projected starters transferred to their new schools this past offseason. Some schools, including Alabama, Georgia, Missouri and Tennessee, have not named a starter. The quarterbacks listed reflect our best estimation of the team's starter. Here's how I rank this impressive batch of SEC quarterbacks: 1. Arch Manning (Texas) Manning is far from the most proven quarterback on this list, even if he's got the most famous surname. This ranking is based on Manning's potential for a lofty ceiling after he looked the part of budding star in two spot starts and backup opportunities last season. He should be ready to break out in Year 3 playing for Steve Sarkisian, one of the nation's top quarterback developers. Manning's arm is sharp, and his mobility and size are an X-factor, although he must improve his internal clock of knowing when to scramble when under duress. 2. Garrett Nussmeier (LSU) If you want to know what scouts mean when they say a quarterback has a 'live arm,' watch Nussmeier sling a pass toward the sideline. He's got zip. He needs to reduce his throws into impossible windows and stop telegraphing to the defense where he's going with the ball. His 12 interceptions tied for the most in the SEC, but his 29 touchdown passes ranked just two off the conference lead. He's an established veteran with a big arm, and he's the SEC's returning leader in passing yards. Plus, he's surrounded by a talented receivers. PLAYOFF TALKS: As Big Ten, SEC squabble, the College Football Playoff wins SO, THERE'S A CHANCE?: Five college football sleepers that could contend for national championship 3. LaNorris Sellers (South Carolina) Sellers steadily improved throughout his redshirt freshman season, to the point that he threw for 353 yards and five touchdowns in a November triumph over Missouri. He's an excellent runner, too. Ask Clemson about that. His quarterback efficiency rating in conference games leads all SEC returning quarterbacks. He's accurate, but he needs to improve his processing time. Ball security is his other area for improvement after he fumbled 11 times. If he speeds up his decision-making, he should see those fumble numbers reduce. 4. DJ Lagway (Florida) Lagway is a big play waiting to happen. He throws a good deep ball and averaged 10 yards per pass attempt as a true freshman. He should make more plays with his legs, too, after a hamstring injury slowed him last season. Injuries are a concern. A throwing shoulder injury limited his spring practice participation. By May, though, he was throwing three times per week. Along with his health, he needs to improve his midrange accuracy and reduce interceptions. He threw nine picks in 192 pass attempts last year, but he oozes upside. 5. John Mateer (Oklahoma) Mateer produced awesome stat lines last season at Washington State. He passed for more than 3,100 yards and rushed for more than 800. He's efficient, as well as tough, strong and incredibly athletic. He can throw on the move and from multiple arm angles. He's got plenty of tools in his belt. Why not rank him higher? He's unproven against SEC competition. Two of his worst passing performances last year came in his two games against Power Four competition. 6. Austin Simmons (Mississippi) Rebels coach Lane Kiffin describes Simmons as a 'really talented thrower' with 'a high ceiling." You'd likely hear no argument from Kirby Smart. Simmons looked the part in a relief appearance against Georgia that resulted in a touchdown drive. He threw just 32 passes as a backup last season but looked good doing so. He played college baseball before opting to focus exclusively on football. On the mound, he fired fastballs that topped 90 mph. Is he ready to be the guy in a system that asks a lot of the quarterback? That's the question he must answer. 7. Diego Pavia (Vanderbilt) Vanderbilt's Tasmanian Devil of a quarterback runs on moxie, and he's at his best when facing the state of Alabama. This cocksure sixth-year senior spurred Vanderbilt's upsets of Alabama and Auburn, and he previously beat the Tigers while quarterbacking New Mexico State. Pavia values possession, throwing only four interceptions last year. He's a good runner, but the hits he absorbed took a toll. Pavia passed for fewer than 190 yards in each of his final six games. He lacks top-end arm strength, but he has a nose for playmaking. 8. Marcel Reed (Texas A&M) Would the real Reed please stand up? The Aggie ignited in September after giving the offensive keys to Reed but fizzled in November, as Reed threw six interceptions in his final five games. The quick-footed Reed showed an ability to extend plays and knife through defenses. He'll need to improve his consistency from the pocket and polish his deep ball. Texas A&M returned a lot of production. As Reed goes (or doesn't go), so will the Aggies. 9. Taylen Green (Arkansas) Green is a mobile, hard-nosed runner with a strong arm. He can challenge defenses with downfield strikes. He became more accurate as the season progressed and flourished in an October upset of Tennessee, despite the Vols boasting one of the SEC's top defenses. His next steps are to improve decision-making, navigating through his progressions and sharpening his midrange throws. 10. Gunner Stockton (Georgia) The Bulldogs rallied around Stockton after he took the reins midway through the SEC Championship. It's easy to picture him becoming Georgia's heartbeat. He doesn't match predecessor Carsen Beck's arm talent, but he's more mobile, and there's a certain "Je ne sais quoi" about him that appeals to his teammates. He flashed accuracy when his line protected him, and he's skilled in play-action. Whether he'll stretch defenses downfield remains a question. 11. Ty Simpson (Alabama) Simpson hasn't proven himself yet. A former five-star recruit, he's entering Year 4 at Alabama and he's thrown just 50 career passes, with a 58% completion clip. A natural pocket passer, he possesses some mobility, too, and improvisational skills. Coach Kalen DeBoer desires more consistency from Simpson, the quarterback who's first in line to replace predecessor Jalen Milroe. 12. Blake Shapen (Mississippi State) Shapen looked sharp as Mississippi State's quarterback for four games last September before a shoulder injury shelved him for the rest of the season. He's back for a sixth season, and the former Baylor quarterback grasps coach Jeff Lebby's offense. Shapen's return offers the Bulldogs reason for optimism, considering he completed 68.5% of his passes before the injury. 13. Jackson Arnold (Auburn) Arnold struggled as Oklahoma's starter, losing his job before regaining it and starting in the Sooners' upset of Alabama. That result must give Auburn hope that the junior shouldn't be written off after a rough season playing behind a porous Oklahoma offensive line. Arnold struggled to connect consistently on throws beyond about 10 yards. Arm strength and mobility are assets. Maybe, this former five-star recruit will regain his confidence at Auburn, where he'll have a better offensive line and receivers. 14. Beau Pribula (Missouri) In Pribula's most extensive playing time as a Penn State backup, he showed a steady hand in relief of injured Drew Allar in a win against Wisconsin. He's a quality pickup for Missouri, which needed to replace starter Brady Cook. Pribula hasn't been named for the job, but he seems like he'd be the front-runner in a competition with Sam Horn, Missouri's seldom-used backup. Pribula is an electrifying runner who pairs athleticism with toughness. His running ability provided Penn State with an effective wrinkle to its system. To become a starter, he must prove himself as a consistent pocket passer. 15. Joey Aguilar (Tennessee) Aguilar showed a fearless streak while starting at Appalachian State. A best-case scenario for Tennessee is that he develops into something like what Pavia became for Vanderbilt. Aguilar can extend plays outside the pocket. Fearless can't mean reckless, though. He led the nation in interceptions at App State. Aguilar previously transferred to UCLA, but he left for Tennessee on the backside of the Bruins plundering Nico Iamaleava from the Vols. Aguilar's preseason checklist must include improving pocket poise, ball security and learning a new offense at warp speed. 16. Zach Calzada (Kentucky) Calzada started in Texas A&M's upset of Alabama, way back in 2021, and he now prepares for his seventh season with his fourth program. Calzada never developed enough midrange accuracy at Texas A&M, but he threw a good deep ball, and he's coming off a monster season with Incarnate Word of the Championship Subdivision. He's more intriguing than plenty of past Kentucky quarterbacks. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Why Big Ten will regret bullying SEC on its college football schedule
If the Big Ten strong-arms the SEC into reducing its number of cupcake games and beefing up its schedule, that will be a win for college football. Just not a win for the Big Ten. The SEC speeds too much of its football schedule on easy street. That's the Big Ten's stance, as articulated recently by Illinois coach Bret Bielema. Bielema conveyed the mood of his conference when he called on the SEC to play a ninth conference game. If the Big Ten successfully strong-arms the SEC into reducing its number of cupcake opponents, that will be a win for college football. The stubborn persistence of non-conference pushover games remains one of this sport's lamest elements, and no conference plays more patsies than the SEC. The surest way to reduce the number of cupcakes would be to increase the number of conference games. It's not the only way, but it's the firmest path. Left to their own devices, some schools will pursue the greatest number of non-conference cakewalks. So, I wish the Big Ten luck in its mission to bend the SEC toward nine conference games, a figure that would match the number played by the Big Ten and Big 12. And yet, I wonder whether the Big Ten will come to regret trying to bully the SEC on its schedule. Because, I see this ending one of two ways. Possibility 1: The SEC will dig in its heels, rebuff the Big Ten, and remain at eight conference games. If this occurs, it will show that the Big Ten doesn't possess the power it must think it has to influence other conferences. Wouldn't be the first time this happened, either. Remember when the Big Ten chose to cancel its 2020 season amid the pandemic. How'd that turn out? The SEC decided it would play in 2020, and the Big Ten came crawling back to play a truncated season, revealing itself a follower in 2020, not a leader. More recently, the Big Ten supported a playoff format rigged with a stacked deck of auto bids. When the SEC soured on the plan, the Big Ten's idea withered on the vine. Possibility 2: The SEC will accept the Big Ten's challenge to play a ninth conference game and reap the reward by building strength of schedule metrics that dwarf most of the Big Ten. The SEC repeatedly has proven itself too chicken to add a ninth conference game. The reasons change, but the result remains the same: Eight conference games. The SEC's reluctance to add another conference game amounts to an irrational fear of the boogeyman. If it ever takes the plunge, it would learn that the rewards offset outweigh the risks. The SEC waged an offseason propaganda campaign claiming that the College Football Playoff selection committee does not value its schedule strength. That's hogwash. In truth, the CFP committee has repeatedly valued the SEC's schedule strength. If the playoff had included 16 teams last season, the SEC would have qualified three 9-3 teams and six teams total, while no other conference supplied a three-loss team. The SEC wishes for the selection process to evolve so that strength of schedule metrics are weighted even more in the future, when determining at-large playoff bids. If it achieves that mission and also beefs up its schedule with another conference game, while the playoff expands to 16 teams, look out, Big Ten. The runway would be greased for a cavalcade of 9-3 playoff teams from the SEC. Plus, adding another conference game would help distinguish the SEC's wheat from its chaff, helping ensure that the best SEC teams made the playoff. As it is, the Big Ten owns one upper-hand on the SEC in the rhetoric wars that surround at-large bids: Its membership plays one extra conference game, and most of its members play 10 Power Four opponents, while most SEC teams play nine Power Four foes. If the SEC adds a ninth conference game, the Big Ten would surrender that upper-hand. By trying to persuade the SEC to expand its conference schedule, though, the Big Ten must believe another potential outcome exists. Such as: Possibility 3: A ninth SEC game would cause the conference to buckle under the weight of its collective strength, losses will mount, thereby reducing the number of SEC teams with playoff résumés and allowing more access for the Big Ten. Is this possible? Yes. Probable? No. The committee already values strength of schedule, and the SEC's scheduling would be beyond reproach if it added another conference game. Vanderbilt shocking Alabama and Kentucky upsetting a top-five opponent on the road are exceptions in the SEC, not rules. Despite those results in 2024, Alabama and Mississippi would have qualified for a 16-team playoff as three-loss teams. Now, imagine if Alabama and Ole Miss had inserted another win against an SEC opponent in place of a blowout against Championship Subdivision roadkill. That would have enhanced each team's credentials, and yet, that's what the Big Ten seems to want. It calls on the SEC to enhance its collective strength of schedule, at an inflection point when strength of schedule could be valued more than ever in the playoff selection process. Careful what you wish for, Big Ten. In 2020, when teams played conference-only schedules, the SEC put four teams in the top nine of the final CFP rankings. Playing more SEC games sure didn't hamper the league that year. If the Big Ten gets its way, and the SEC adds another conference game in place of a cupcake, that would buoy college football. Just don't think it helps the Big Ten. Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network's national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@ and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.
