logo
Critics accuse New Jersey legislators of ‘stealing' opioid settlement funds

Critics accuse New Jersey legislators of ‘stealing' opioid settlement funds

Yahoo3 days ago
Harm reduction advocates staged a die-in at the Trenton Statehouse on Monday, June 30, 2025, after legislators — fearing federal Medicaid cuts would hurt hospitals — decided to divert $45 million in national opioid settlement funds to four of the state's largest hospitals. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor)
New Jersey legislators diverted $45 million from national opioid settlement funds to four hospitals in the $58.8 billion state budget they approved Monday — a last-minute surprise that drove harm-reduction advocates to protest in the Statehouse and the state attorney general to object in unusual public criticism of state lawmakers.
Sen. Paul Sarlo (D-Bergen), who chairs the Senate's budget committee, said the diversion is meant to make up for losses the hospitals are expected to experience from federal Medicaid cuts.
'The thought process here is … to get some of the monies to some of the larger hospital systems for their harm reduction community-based programs, because they're going to take a hit,' Sarlo said. 'These hospitals are going to be on the front line of these Medicaid cuts.'
But Attorney General Matt Platkin said the hospitals will receive the money for uses not yet identified, despite a new five-year strategic plan a state advisory council released two weeks ago that requires beneficiaries to spend settlement funds on evidence-based solutions that help people recover from addiction.
The new appropriation, which he said he learned of Sunday night, 'ignores' that plan, he added.
'These settlement funds are not general revenues for the State. They are the result of some of the most significant lawsuits ever filed by Attorneys General across this country to force companies to pay back the blood money that they stole in fueling the opioid epidemic,' Platkin said in a statement. 'Spending this money in this way is a slap in the face to every family who lost a loved one in this devastating crisis, which continues to claim the lives of thousands of New Jerseyans each year.'
He warned lawmakers about 'repeating the mistakes made with the state's tobacco settlement funds, which should have been used exclusively to address damage caused by cigarettes.'
Harm reduction advocates echoed his concerns, accusing lawmakers of a 'blatant misuse' of settlement funds in weekend deals brokered in secrecy.
Dozens lined a Statehouse hallway to implore passing legislators to vote against the allocation, as they waved tombstone-shaped signs with slogans including 'Stealing sux! Fund harm redux!' and 'Here lie legislators' consciences.' They staged a die-in, partially blocking passers-by until state troopers intervened to move them along, and later, several were kicked out of the building after they unfurled a sign and began shouting during the Senate's session.
Jenna Mellor, who heads the New Jersey Harm Reduction Coalition (pictured on ground), leads a die-in at the Trenton Statehouse on Monday, June 30, 2025. Petra Gaskins, the chief of staff (pictured in blue suit) for Sen. Joe Cryan, stops to hear her concerns. Harm reduction advocates were protesting a plan by legislators to divert $45 million in national opioid settlement funds to four of the state's largest hospitals, in response to anticipate federal Medicaid cuts. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor)
Harm reduction advocates protested at the Trenton Statehouse on Monday, June 30, 2025, after legislators decided to divert $45 million in national opioid settlement funds to four of the state's largest hospitals, in response to anticipated federal Medicaid cuts. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor)
Sen. Anthony Bucco (R-Morris) smiles as he passes harm reduction advocates protesting a controversial budget allocation on Monday, June 30, 2025, in a Statehouse corridor. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor)
Harm reduction advocates staged a die-in at the Trenton Statehouse on Monday, June 30, 2025, after legislators — fearing federal Medicaid cuts would hurt hospitals — decided to divert $45 million in national opioid settlement funds to four of the state's largest hospitals. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor)
Harm reduction advocates protested by unfurling a banner during a Senate session at the Trenton Statehouse on Monday, June 30, 2025, after legislators decided to divert $45 million in national opioid settlement funds to four of the state's largest hospitals, in response to anticipated federal Medicaid cuts. (Dana DiFilippo | New Jersey Monitor)
Jenna Mellor heads the New Jersey Harm Reduction Coalition and was a member of the advisory council, which spent 15 months hearing testimony from hundreds of people to devise its strategic plan.
'This was not in our recommendations,' Mellor said. 'We gave very intentional recommendations for five areas that will save lives — harm reduction expansion, medicine for opioid use disorder, housing, wraparound services, and legal services. We will not be able to fund those things, if the hospitals keep getting this money.'
New Jersey will receive $1.1 billion in settlement funds through 2038, with half going to the state and the other half directly to county and local governments.
The $45 million going to hospitals in the coming budget year represents 10% of the state's total share, as well as the single-biggest settlement fund expenditure in the fiscal year that begins Tuesday, advocates said.
Racquel Romans-Henry, policy director of Salvation and Social Justice, joined advocates' protest at the Statehouse.
'Historically in this state, hospitals have, for better or worse, been the source of a lot of the racial disparities that exist around health care,' Romans-Henry said. 'Giving them this kind of money — when they neither need it and when so many grassroots organizations are reeling from federal cuts and are doing the work on the ground — is really a misalignment of the funds and the intent of the funds.'
Platkin urged legislators to reject the appropriation, but also vowed: 'If they do not, my office will be carefully scrutinizing these hospital systems to make sure every single dollar is spent within the terms of the settlements we fought for years to obtain.'
Spending this money in this way is a slap in the face to every family who lost a loved one in this devastating crisis.
– Attorney General Matt Platkin
Four hospitals will receive the funds, advocates said. RWJBarnabas Health and Cooper University Hospital will get $15 million each, Hackensack University Medical Center will get $10 million, and Atlantic Health System will receive $5 million.
Spokespeople for Gov. Phil Murphy did not respond to a request for comment, but Sarlo said Murphy had signed off on the allocation.
Murphy's former chief of staff, George Helmy, is an executive vice president at RWJ Barnabas and chief of its external affairs and policy office, while Cooper University Health Care is run by South Jersey Democratic power broker George Norcross, another Murphy ally.
Bre Azanedo said grassroots organizations like Black Lives Matter-Paterson, where she serves as a program manager, are more trusted, effective harm reduction providers than hospitals. She also raised concerns about accountability.
'If they're going to add 'no deliverables, no strings attached,' then that should also apply to us, as organizations,' Azanedo said. 'They make us jump through hoops of fire for $20.'
Tonia Ahern, community coordinator for the National Center for Advocacy and Recovery, warned that 'funding enormous health systems' won't solve the overdose crisis.
'We hear horror stories all the time about people being mistreated and discriminated against at the hospital with no accountability,' Ahern said. 'And what happens to people once they leave with no support, or access to medications and individualized care? It's going to fall on harm reduction and recovery organizations to pick up the pieces, and now with less funding.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UnitedHealth Under Fire as Medicaid & Centene Bombshell Rattle Sector
UnitedHealth Under Fire as Medicaid & Centene Bombshell Rattle Sector

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

UnitedHealth Under Fire as Medicaid & Centene Bombshell Rattle Sector

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated UNH continues to face challenges amid a turbulent healthcare insurance landscape. The passage of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act' through Congress, ready for President Donald Trump's signature, threatens to significantly reduce federal Medicaid spending. According to reports, approximately 11.8 million Americans are expected to lose Medicaid coverage by 2034, with 5.2 million affected by new work requirements alone. To curb state-level Medicaid expenditures, the bill gradually limits the use of 'provider taxes' as a revenue source. However, it also allocates $50 billion in funding to support rural hospitals impacted by these cuts. While insurers like UnitedHealth and Humana Inc. HUM may encounter short-term pressure from shrinking Medicaid rolls, they could ultimately benefit as displaced members shift toward private coverage options. UnitedHealth's Medicaid membership declined 4% in 2023, 5.2% in 2024, and 1.4% in the first quarter of 2025. The proposed elimination of ACA marketplace tax credits will likely propel more people into employer-sponsored plans. Meanwhile, Medicare Advantage may gain traction, as seniors grapple with increased out-of-pocket expenses due to rollbacks in Medicare Savings Programs. UnitedHealth's Medicare Advantage enrollment rose by 8.3% in 2023, 1.9% in 2024, and 6.3% in the first quarter of 2025. Another major development shook the market as Centene Corporation CNC, a major Medicaid player, withdrew its 2025 earnings guidance late Tuesday, citing unexpected enrollment shifts and higher medical costs. The move, mirroring UnitedHealth's earlier decision, rattled the managed care sector. Centene shares witnessed massive declines following the news, and peers like UnitedHealth and Humana followed suit. Centene shares plummeted 41.2% following the announcement, dragging down peers: UnitedHealth and Humana dropped 5.4% and 5.1%, respectively, despite broader market gains driven by tech strength and encouraging jobs data. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research From a valuation standpoint, UnitedHealth trades at a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 12.99, up from the industry average of 11.49. UNH currently carries a Value Score of A. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The Zacks Consensus Estimate for UnitedHealth's 2025 earnings is pegged at $22.07 per share, implying a 20.2% drop from the year-ago period. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research The stock currently carries a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell). You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) : Free Stock Analysis Report Humana Inc. (HUM) : Free Stock Analysis Report Centene Corporation (CNC) : Free Stock Analysis Report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research Sign in to access your portfolio

Catholic Bishops Trash Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Passing
Catholic Bishops Trash Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Passing

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Catholic Bishops Trash Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Passing

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The president of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has spoken out against President Donald Trump's massive tax and spending package, saying it contains "unconscionable cuts to... programs that protect God's creation." Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio issued the statement after the budget bill passed Congress and headed to the President's desk. The bill is set to lead to deep cuts in Medicaid and food stamps, and give $170 billion to Trump's immigration policies. Catholics are not the only faith group to speak out against this bill, with leaders from other Christian denominations as well as Jewish leaders voicing their opposition. The White House has been contacted for comment via email. Archbishop Timothy Broglio conducts an Easter Sunday Mass at Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, Sunday, April 12, 2020. Archbishop Timothy Broglio conducts an Easter Sunday Mass at Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, Sunday, April 12, 2020. Jose Luis Magana/AP Photo Why It Matters The budget bill will cause $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid, shutter rural hospitals, and give $45 billion towards the building of detention centers for immigrants. The bill passed through Congress despite opposition from many Americans, with a number of surveys suggesting more than half of those polled were against it. Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope, has also called for compassionate treatment of immigrants and an end to global conflicts, as the Trump administration has pushed ahead with its hardline immigration policy. What To Know While the USCCB had backed elements of the bill "that promote the dignity of human life and support parental choice in education," it had urged lawmakers in a letter ahead of the vote "to make drastic changes to the provisions that will harm the poor and vulnerable." Those changes were not made in either the Senate or House versions of the bill, prompting Archbishop Broglio to conclude: "The bill, as passed, will cause the greatest harm to those who are especially vulnerable in our society." Vice President JD Vance, who speaks openly about his Catholic faith, cast the tie-breaking vote for the bill in the Senate. He posted to X (formerly Twitter) about the bill: "Now we've delivered big tax cuts and the resources necessary to secure the border. Promises made, promises kept!" In a letter sent to the Senate ahead of the vote, a coalition of Christian leaders warned that money put aside for mass deportations would "separate US families, harm US-citizen and immigrant children, and sow chaos in local communities." Jewish leaders have also spoken out against the bill, with Rabbi Jill Jacobs, CEO of T'ruah, a human rights advocacy group, saying: "Today, we see the sins of Sodom being repeated in this bill, which is written from a place of arrogance, cruelty, and selfishness. We fear that, like Sodom, these sins will lead to our destruction." Demonstrators protest prior to a news conference regarding the pending passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act at the Capitol, Tuesday, June 3, 2025, in Washington. Demonstrators protest prior to a news conference regarding the pending passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act at the Capitol, Tuesday, June 3, 2025, in Washington. Rod Lamkey, Jr./AP Photo What People Are Saying Archbishop Timothy P. Broglio said: "The final version of the bill includes unconscionable cuts to healthcare and food assistance, tax cuts that increase inequality, immigration provisions that harm families and children, and cuts to programs that protect God's creation." Rabbi Jill Jacobs, in an open letter, wrote: "This disaster of a bill threatens all Americans. This is no Big Beautiful Bill but rather a Big Bad Betrayal, with devastating costs to human life, freedom, and officials have betrayed their constituents. We condemn the Members of Congress who voted for this disastrous budget." President Donald Trump on Truth Social: "The Republicans in the House of Representatives have just passed the "ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL ACT." Our Party is UNITED like never before and, our Country is "HOT."...Together, we can do things that were not even imagined possible less than one year ago. We will keep working, and winning — CONGRATULATIONS AMERICA!" What Happens Next Trump is set to sign the bill at 4 p.m. ET on Friday.

‘If you want Medicaid, get a f***ing job!' Republicans take hard line in support of Trump bill despite constituent worries
‘If you want Medicaid, get a f***ing job!' Republicans take hard line in support of Trump bill despite constituent worries

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘If you want Medicaid, get a f***ing job!' Republicans take hard line in support of Trump bill despite constituent worries

Nancy Mace grabbed her team, hopped in a van and raced back to Washington in her pajamas Wednesday to vote on President Donald Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — driving through stormy weather after scores of flights into D.C. were canceled. Mace, who is currently weighing a run for governor of South Carolina, knows that she needs the president's endorsement to win in a state that overwhelmingly supported him in 2024. So the mad dash, and the show she put on social media about it all, makes sense politically. But while the audience of one in the White House will appreciate the effort, many constituents back home may be far less pleased. That's because the Trump megabill forces states to carry part of the cost of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food stamps, if they have high rates of overpaying or underpaying recipients. And Mace sounds ready to throw some pain in the direction of her home state in the name of fighting 'waste, fraud and abuse.' 'So under some of the provisions, our state may have to pay fines of upwards of $300 million if we don't get the fraudulent payments for SNAP under control,' she told The Independent. The same goes for Medicaid. 'But if you're talking about able-bodied workers,' she continued, 'my policy is, if you're an able-bodied person and you want Medicaid? Get a f***ing job.' The Trump bill also puts rural hospitals at risk due to changes in how states can raise money for Medicaid. In Fiscal Year 2024, South Carolina had a 9.25 percent error rate for SNAP, according to statistics from the U.S. Department of Agriculture. According to the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation, 64.7 percent of families in South Carolina on Medicaid have a full-time worker in their family. 'We're gonna be fined $300 million a year if our government doesn't get its s*** together,' Mace said. 'If I run for governor, you can be damn sure that's No. 1 on my list.' Many Americans continue to feel ambivalent of the bill. Quinnipiac University released a poll last week showing that 55 percent of Americans oppose the bill based on what they have heard. Americans are about evenly split on the work requirements, with 47 percent supporting work requirements and 46 percent opposing them. That could complicate the prospects for ambitious Republicans. New York Republican Rep. Mike Lawler, who represents a district that Democratic former Vice President Kamala Harris won in last year's presidential election, echoed the sentiment. Like Mace, he is considering a run for governor and has long complained about the cap that the 2017 Trump tax cuts put on the State and Local Tax Deduction, commonly known as SALT But Lawler said that the goal of the Trump legislation is to get states to run their programs properly. 'That's the objective, to get the program fixed so they should be working towards it,' he told The Independent. New York has a 14.09 percent error rate for SNAP. Republicans have long called for work requirements for social safety net programs, with some policy successes. But the current bill's work and cost-sharing provisions became a sticking point during the Senate debate. In the Senate, Republicans cut a deal with Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, whose state has an inordinately high error rate partially because of its rural population, to exempt it state from the cost-sharing part of the bill, which Democrats excoriated. But Rep. Buddy Carter, who is running for the Republican nomination to challenge Sen. Jon Ossoff in Georgia, defended the change in policy. 'We improved the program,' he told The Independent. 'We made sure that people who are on there should be on there, they're going to be off of that. Now we're going to make it better for those who truly need it.' Carter is running to represent a state with a large error rate of 15.65 percent. But Democrats say this will hurt states' ability to provide SNAP benefits. Rep. Mikie Sherrill, the Democratic nominee for governor in New Jersey, specifically said it was unfair, 'especially from a state that sends $70 billion more to the federal government than we get back. 'If they're not going to run their programs, why are we paying taxes?' Sherrill told The Independent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store