Russia in Trump's crosshairs—oil markets on alert
On Monday, standing beside UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland, Trump announced that Moscow now has only 10 to 12 days to secure a peace deal over Ukraine.
If it doesn't, he says he will impose 100% tariffs on countries still buying Russian oil, which includes some of the biggest economies in the world, such as India and China.
ADVERTISEMENT
This threat, if acted on, would mark the most aggressive move yet in Washington's effort to tighten the screws on Russian energy exports.
It's also a clear departure from Trump's previous position. Just two weeks ago, he gave Russia 50 days. Now, that window has collapsed, and the consequences of action or inaction are closer than markets had anticipated.
The shift in tone and timing has already started to move prices. Brent crude climbed nearly 3% on Monday. Not because sanctions were in place, but because the market was no longer comfortable assuming they wouldn't be.
When a major energy exporter faces a new access risk, and the message comes from the President of the United States, traders have no choice but to respond.
What happens next is unknowable. Trump has backed down from dramatic threats before, especially when markets push back. He's also shown a willingness to act when it fits his strategy.
For instance, the airstrikes on Iran's nuclear sites in June were not foreshadowed. They were carried out without warning, and they sent ripples through global markets. That's part of what makes this current situation so tense. The unpredictability forces investors to prepare for both outcomes at once.
There's little doubt about the impact if Trump does move forward. Russia continues to export close to 4.7 million barrels of crude per day, and more than 2.5 million barrels of refined products, which represents a significant share of global supply.
If secondary sanctions are imposed, the impact would be swift. Tanker routes would shift, buyers would scramble, and, clearly, pressure on pricing would intensify.
The inflation risk is real. Energy prices remain a critical input in the broader inflation picture. If crude climbs on sanctions, the next inflation print could surprise to the upside.
This would complicate domestic monetary policy just as Trump is publicly calling for interest rate cuts. He's been consistent in arguing that borrowing costs are too high.
However, if inflation rises because of his own actions, the Fed would have no space to ease. This could become politically awkward, particularly in a climate where inflation expectations are stabilising.
Then there's the geopolitical consequence. By threatening secondary sanctions, Trump is essentially asking India, China, and other Russian oil customers to pick sides.
It brings new friction into a set of already fragile global relationships. It could also accelerate the slow fragmentation we've seen in global trade and finance over the last several years.
For investors, this creates a multidimensional challenge. It's not just about oil. It's about policy, inflation, global alignment, and the credibility of US threats.
This is why I don't believe this can be ignored. Even if Trump chooses not to follow through, the possibility has already changed behaviour.
This moment is now priced into the market. The only question is how far it moves from here.
The timeline is tight. The signals are mixed. But the risk is on the table.
Whatever Trump decides to do next, markets are no longer able to look past it.
Nigel Green is deVere CEO and Founder
Also published on Medium.
Notice an issue? Arabian Post strives to deliver the most accurate and reliable information to its readers. If you believe you have identified an error or inconsistency in this article, please don't hesitate to contact our editorial team at editor[at]thearabianpost[dot]com. We are committed to promptly addressing any concerns and ensuring the highest level of journalistic integrity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Ukraine hits Russian oil facilities, military airfield
Ukraine's military said on Saturday that it had struck oil facilities inside Russia, including a major refinery as well as a military airfield for drones and an electronics factory. In a statement on Telegram, Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces said they had hit the oil refinery in Ryazan, about 180 km southeast of Moscow, causing a fire on its premises. Also hit, the USF said, was the Annanefteprodukt oil storage facility in the Voronezh region that borders on northeastern Ukraine. The statement did not specify how the facilities were hit, but the USF specialises in drone warfare, including long-range strikes. There was no immediate comment from Russia on the reported attacks on its infrastructure sites. Separately, Ukraine's SBU intelligence agency said its drones had hit Russia's Primorsko-Akhtarsk military airfield, which has been used to launch waves of long-range drones at targets in Ukraine. The SBU said it also hit a factory in Penza that it said supplies Russia's military-industrial complex with electronics. At the start of Russia's full-scale invasion in 2022, Ukraine had no response to Moscow's vast long-range strike capacity but it has since built up a fleet of long-range kamikaze drones able to carry explosive warheads for many hundreds of kilometres. Russia's defence ministry said in its daily report that its defence units had downed a total of 338 Ukrainian drones overnight. Its reports do not say how many Ukrainian drones were launched at any given time. For its part, Ukraine's air force said it had downed 45 of 53 Russian drones launched towards its territory overnight. On Ukraine's eastern battlefront, Russia's defence ministry said, Russian forces had captured the village of Oleksandro-Kalynove in the Donetsk region on Saturday. Reuters could not immediately verify the battlefield report. Russian forces now control almost 20% of Ukraine in its east and south after three-and-a-half years of grinding war. Meanwhile, Ukrainian authorities said that they had arrested several politicians in connection with a 'large-scale corruption scheme' in the defence sector, shortly after an uproar over the independence of anti-graft bodies. A law passed at the end of July stripped the National Anti-Corruption Agency (NABU) and the Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAP) of their independence and placed them under the supervision of the Prosecutor General, himself appointed by the head of state. President Volodymyr Zelensky on Thursday backtracked and restored the bodies' independence following an outcry from the country's allies and the first anti-government street demonstrations since the Russian invasion in 2022. The NABU said on Saturday that it and the SAP had exposed 'a scheme for the systematic misappropriation of budget funds allocated by local authorities for the needs of the defence forces, as well as the receipt and provision of unlawful benefits on an especially large scale.' It said the scheme involved inflating prices for electronic warfare and drone equipment, and then funnelling off 30 per cent of the contract amounts. The suspects include a member of parliament, heads of district and city administrations, members of the National Guard, and executives at defence companies. The NABU said it has made four arrests so far but did not identify those detained. The interior ministry said it had suspended the suspected members of the National Guard. Zelensky said in a statement: 'I am grateful to the anti-corruption agencies for their work. 'It is important that anti-corruption institutions operate independently, and the law passed on Thursday guarantees them all the tools necessary for a real fight against corruption.' The president initially said he needed to bring the NABU and the SAP under his control because they were inefficient and under 'Russian influence.' But he did an about-face when confronted with the outcry - first serious political crisis since he took office six years ago. Several cases of corruption - an endemic problem in the country - have been exposed within the armed forces and the defence ministry during the war with Russia. Agencies
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
The politics of compromise and conviction
Luke Harris, Tribune News Service Scott Turner was a Texas House Representative, now serving in the Trump Administration as the Secretary of US Housing & Urban Development (HUD). In the Texas House, he talked about 'being the best we can,' and espoused high standards for himself and his colleagues; however, in his current position, he has voiced no complaints or objections against the administration or the Republican Party. Perhaps for less cynical reasons than power itself, but to pursue his policies on housing and healthcare. Turner is a brilliant case study for how ambition causes politicians to accept feeble attempts to reason away their beliefs or ethics, always for something greater, something they can achieve with one more step. That 'one more step' toward completely surrendering their integrity, confounding their ethical clarity, and adopting whatever means meet their ends. During a keynote address in 2014, he spoke of the duty to break the status quo, Democrat or Republican, he said, 'We need servant leaders.... People who live by conviction and principle, not by the waves of the sea of what's popular today.' He shared his experience growing up in a poor home, and his father working two jobs. At his confirmation, he talked empathetically about the homelessness crisis and how his family took in his uncle, providing him with the services he needed. Trump has made comments expressing disdain for the homeless; he said these people were hurting the 'prestige' of major cities, and many homeless people might prefer their situation. An NBC affiliate network reported that 1 in 4 low-income households eligible for HUD rental assistance receive benefits. Turner is championing time limits, which means taking away benefits from more low-income households still unable to afford the cost of living. Trump has further plans to remove people from homeless encampments and place them in large camps or tent-cities, where they will be mandated to receive mental health or addiction treatment. Seemingly in conflict with his views on homelessness and background, these policies are consistent with his previous stances representing Texas, for example, restricting welfare, requiring drug testing for unemployment benefits, voting against free-lunch programs in Texas schools, and opposing the Affordable Care Act. He defined his career as a Texas Representative as an uncompromising advocate for transparency, leading extensive investigations into the conduct of his colleagues, and voting on policies to increase accountability. For example, he voted for HB 1690, which authorized rangers to investigate misconduct of an official or public administration and refer cases to the State Attorney General. He has parted ways with these values, perhaps to advocate for his conservative policies on social programs such as welfare and housing subsidies. However, compromising his fight against improper leadership or self-interested governance — accepting the numerous examples of corruption and secrecy — to achieve an agenda or implement a policy, is not leading on principle or conviction. The Epstein scandal is a recent example of something that clearly runs against Turner's previous views on government transparency and accountability. The footage and DOJ reports are inconsistent, and the Administration, DOJ, and FBI have refused to comment. For example, the files obtained by the AP provide a Suicide Timeline; at 6:33 a.m., staff found Epstein unresponsive, and at 6:45 a.m., EMS arrived. The DOJ released raw footage from the hallway camera. According to the FBI, anyone entering the cell would have been visible on that camera, but the footage shows no one entering his cell around the provided timeline. More concerningly, Pam Bondi, Trump's Attorney General, has directly undermined the investigation into the Epstein files, ordering thousands of FBI agents to redact files. Bondi allegedly pressured the FBI to recruit 1,000 personnel to review 100,000 files relating to Jefferey Epstein and 'flag' any that mentioned Donald Trump. It would not be an exaggeration to compare the redaction of the Epstein files to the shredding of papers or deletion of tapes in the Watergate Scandal. Furthermore, his treatment of the press, on the Epstein Scandal and throughout his two terms, displays a hostility not seen since Nixon's 'Enemy List': revoking CNN reporter Jim Acosta's press pass, restricting AP reporters' access to White House events, ending funding for public broadcast stations, suing 60 Minutes, recently launching a $22 billion suit against The Wall Street Journal, and attacking reporters for 'fake news' or calling journalists 'nasty.'
Sharjah 24
6 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
China and Russia start joint drills in Sea of Japan
Alongside economic and political ties, Moscow and Beijing have strengthened their military cooperation in recent years, and their relations have deepened since Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. The "Joint Sea-2025" exercises kicked off in waters near the Russian port of Vladivostok and would last for three days, China's defence ministry said in a statement on Sunday. The two sides will hold "submarine rescue, joint anti-submarine, air defence and anti-missile operations, and maritime combat". Four Chinese vessels, including guided-missile destroyers Shaoxing and Urumqi, are participating in the exercises alongside Russian ships, the ministry said. After the drills, the two countries will conduct naval patrols in "relevant waters of the Pacific". China and Russia have carried out annual drills for several years, with the "Joint Sea" exercises beginning in 2012.
