Senate court may proceed with VP Sara impeachment trial sans SC TRO
Manila Rep. Joel Chua and Bicol Saro party-list Rep. Terry Ridon, both lawyers, made the remarks in connection with the pending petitions the Vice President and her allies filed to ask the High Tribunal to declare the impeachment complaint against her void.
The petitioners alleged that for violating the one-year bar rule which only allows one complaint filed per impeachable official in a year as provided by the Constitution.
The Supreme Court earlier ordered the House and the Senate to comment on the Vice President and her allies' petitions, although most of the compliance orders were on the House since the High Court asked for the details on the filing of the first three impeachment complaints filed against the Vice President.
'Maliwanag naman po 'yung hinihingi ng Supreme Court. Ito po ay parte ng pag-resolba sa issue po na ibinato sa kanila. And the House can comply with what the Supreme Court is asking from us. And rest assured that this Supreme Court order won't affect the pending impeachment complaint lodged against the Vice President,' Chua said in a press conference.
(What the Supreme Court is asking from us is clear, and this is part of the process of resolving a legal issue brought to them.)
'Wala pong dahilan para antayin ng Senado kung ano po magiging desisyon ng Korte Suprema dahil wala namang po TRO na nilalabas [ang Supreme Court]. Sa ngayon, dapat po mag-proceed pa rin po ang trial hanggang hindi po ito pinapahinto ng Korte Suprema,' Chua added.
(The Senate has no reason for the Supreme Court to wait for a TRO. Since the SC has not issued a TRO at this point, the impeachment trial should proceed until such time that the SC issues a TRO.)
Ridon, for his part, said that the House's position that the impeachment complaint filed against the Vice President is legal is anchored on at least two solid grounds: the Supreme Court decisions on Francisco v. House of Representatives and Gutierrez v. House of Representatives, wherein the High Court ruled that:
the initiation of an impeachment complaint only happens after the House of Representatives Secretary General refers the impeachment complaint to the Office of the Speaker and the same complaint is referred to the House Committee on Justice for deliberations; and
the impeachment complaint can be sent directly to the Senate so it can forthwith proceed to trial as long as at least one-third of the House members signed off on the same impeachment complaint.
'These are the parts of the Francisco and Gutierrez SC rulings that set the requirements to determine if the one-year bar rule was complied with. [Kaya] hindi po ito (pending questions on the impeachment complaint) pwede gamitin ng Senate Impeachment Court na dahilan para hindi po ituloy [at gampanan ang] kanilang constitutional mandate to try and decide the impeachment case of Vice President Sara Duterte,' Ridon said. –NB, GMA Integrated News
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
GMA Network
27 minutes ago
- GMA Network
Senate bill eyes abolition of travel tax
A bill filed in the Senate is seeking to abolish the travel tax which has been described as "outdated" by the author. 'It is high time to give travelers a break and allow for tourism to flourish by removing one of the barriers to travel," said Senator Alan Peter Cayetano, who authored Senate Bill No. 424. The travel tax, imposed under Presidential Decree No. 1183, was signed nearly five decades ago. Cayetano said that this no longer aligns with current economic and regional goals. 'All Filipinos, especially senior citizens and persons with disabilities, must be able to travel freely, without any form of hindrance... By abolishing the travel tax, we inch closer towards realizing the freedom of movement that our fundamental law envisions for every citizen,' said Cayetano. Cayetano cited studies explaining that while the government may lose P4 billion in revenue as a result of the measure, the country's economy would earn around P299 billion through increased tourism and spending. He is also proposing exempting ASEAN nationals from the travel tax, fulfilling the Philippines' commitment under the ASEAN Tourism Agreement of 2002, which calls for the phasing out of travel levies among member states. —Jiselle Anne Casucian/ VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
3 hours ago
- GMA Network
House submits addt'l info on VP Sara impeachment to SC
The House of Representatives has submitted additional information on the impeachment of Vice President Sara Duterte to the Supreme Court, House spokesperson Atty. Princess Abante said in a statement released on Saturday. 'The House of Representatives, through its counsel, the Office of the Solicitor General, filed Friday its compliance to the Supreme Court's directive to provide information on the impeachment proceedings against Vice President Sara Duterte,' Abante said. Abante added that the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG), serving as the House's legal counsel, has electronically filed the required compliance through the Philippine Judiciary Portal and served all parties. Further, a physical copy is set to be formally submitted to the high tribunal on Monday. The SC previously required the Senate of the Philippines and the House of Representatives to comment and submit information regarding the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. That's after the SC En Banc consolidated the petition filed by Duterte against the validity and constitutionality of the fourth impeachment complaint against her and the petition filed by lawyer Israelito Torreon and others seeking to declare the articles of impeachment null and void. The High Court required the House to submit information regarding the status of the first three impeachment complaints filed against Duterte, the exact dates these were endorsed, and whether the secretary general possesses discretion on when to transmit these to the speaker of the House of Representatives. Aside from this, the Court also asked the House to provide the basis and authority of the secretary general to refuse the transmittal of the complaints. The House maintained that all four impeachment complaints were processed in "full accordance with constitutional mandates." Due process The House spokesperson said the three initial impeachment complaints were included in the Order of Business within the 10-session-day period prescribed by the Constitution. 'The fourth complaint, signed and verified by more than one-third of House Members, effectively constituted the Articles of Impeachment and was transmitted directly to the Senate, rendering the earlier complaints moot and subject to archiving,' Abante said. The Articles of Impeachment was endorsed by 215 House members and approved by the plenary last February, accusing Duterte of graft and corruption, bribery, betrayal of public trust, among other crimes. It was the fourth impeachment complaint that was endorsed by over one-third of lawmakers from the House of Representatives, and was later transmitted to the Senate. 'We reiterate that the Vice President's right to due process is fully preserved through the impeachment trial itself—where she will have the opportunity to defend herself and present evidence,' she said. The lower chamber's filing, Abante said, demonstrates its exclusive authority over internal deliberative matters, based on the principle of separation of powers and the legislature's status as a co-equal branch of government. 'There is no constitutional requirement detailing how individual members must review the complaint before signing, nor is there any basis for questioning their certification under oath that they studied and understood the charges and supporting documents,' she said. The Senate, meanwhile, earlier said it has already filed a Manifestation Ad Cautelam to the Supreme Court. —VAL, GMA Integrated News
GMA Network
21 hours ago
- GMA Network
VP Sara's bank records, SALN can be legally disclosed during trial —solon
The bank records and the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) of Vice President Sara Duterte can be legally disclosed during her impeachment trial, Bicol Saro party-list Representative Terry Ridon said. Ridon said the disclosure is relevant to the fourth article of impeachment relating to the culpable violation of the Constitution and betrayal of public trust, particularly the allegations of amassing unexplained wealth and failing to disclose all her properties and interests in properties in her SALN. "The bank records will be examined to determine whether there exists a direct correspondence between her family's typical income and her bank deposits and other investments. It should be noted that former Chief Justice Renato Corona had been convicted on the basis of non-disclosure of several assets in his SALN," he explained. The lawmaker said such disclosure is provided under the 2006 Supreme Court decision in the Ejercito v. Sandiganbayan case wherein the High Court ruled that the bank records of then President Joseph Ejercito can be disclosed during his Sandiganbayan plunder trial because of two exemptions provided under the Bank Secrecy Law. These exemptions are that the examination of bank accounts is upon the order of a competent court in cases of bribery or dereliction of duty of public officials, and that the money deposited or invested is the subject matter of the litigation. 'That [Ejercito v. Sandiganbayan] is the right jurisprudence. Lahat po yan pwedeng buksan kapag nasa impeachment trial na po. The prosecution can request the SALN from the Ombudsman, the Vice President, and even the bank can be asked from the banks,' Ridon said in a news forum. 'In fact, we can also ask the Anti-Money Laundering Council para sa record ng pagpasok at paglabas na pera,' he added. However, the disclosure of these bank deposits and the SALN ultimately rests on the Senate impeachment court, which will vote once a motion for disclosure is put forward by the prosecutors. 'To be very clear, the motions will be subject to a vote by the Senate, so we'd like to manage expectations. The Senate can approve or deny requests for further information on bank accounts,' Ridon said. Asked if the Senate would risk getting the ire of the public in the event it denies such requests for further information, Ridon said it is too early to say. 'We can't preempt how the public would react. But as an impeachment court, it is really the Senate that has the authority on that,' he added. The Vice President's spokesperson, Ruth Castelo, earlier said that her boss is "ready" if the impeachment proceeds. 'The Vice President is ready, she's been saying that. And she's eager to be able to present her case or her evidence in the impeachment court so that once and for all, all doubts cast on her will go away. And that's what she wants,' Castelo said. The impeachment case put forward by the House accuses Duterte of betrayal of public trust, culpable violation of the Constitution, graft and corruption, and other high crimes mainly due to alleged misuse of P612.5 million worth of confidential funds and for threatening to kill President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., his wife Liza, and his cousin, Speaker Martin Romualdez of Leyte. —LDF, GMA Integrated News
