US officials open investigation into former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith
The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) confirmed that it was probing whether Smith violated the Hatch Act during his investigation of President Trump. The Hatch Act restricts federal employees from using their position for political activities. The decision by the Office of Special Counsel to open an investigation follows a request by Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton.
The OSC, which is an independent agency that investigates the conduct of the federal employees, cannot bring criminal charges as it doesn't have that authority, Reuters reported. The OSC probe against Smith is the latest salvo in the series of actions taken by the Trump administration and his allies against their perceived political opponents.
Smith was appointed as Special Counsel by the Department of Justice in 2022 under former President Joe Biden to investigate Trump's alleged mishandling of classified documents and his alleged attempt to interfere in the 2020 US presidential election. Smith resigned from his post after Trump defeated former Vice President and Democrats' candidate Kamala Harris.
Republican Senator Tom Cotton, who first raised the request for investigation, accused Smith of aggressively pursuing his cases against Trump with the aim of hurting his presidential campaign and called the former special counsel 'a political actor masquerading as a public official'.
In a post on X, Cotton said 'That's why I've asked this unprecedented interference in the 2024 election be immediately investigated by OSC.' After President Trump won the election, Smith had dropped both the cases and cited a longstanding Justice Department's policy to avoid prosecution of a sitting president.
Trump had denied the charges and said that prosecution cases were politically motivated to damage his presidential campaign.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
21 minutes ago
- Economic Times
California retaliates against Texas - plans to wipe out 5 GOP seats in bold redistricting move
California Democrats are proposing a redistricting map to counter Texas Republicans' efforts, potentially eliminating five GOP-held House seats. Governor Newsom aims to reshape national politics before the 2026 midterms by boosting Democratic margins in key districts. This retaliatory plan faces legal and political hurdles, requiring legislative and voter approval to override the state's independent commission rules. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Which GOP districts would face elimination? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What triggered California's retaliatory redistricting plan? How would California override its independent commission rules? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs In a high-stakes redistricting battle, California Democrats are drafting a retaliatory map that would eliminate five Republican-held districts. Governor Gavin Newsom is opposing Texas 's Republican-led effort to flip seats in the United States House. If approved, California's proposal could reshape national politics ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The plan relies on legislative and voter approval, which presents significant legal and political plan would also generously boost Democratic margins in districts for competitive seats that are anchored in the Central Valley farm belt, Orange County, and San Diego County. This could give Democrats a leg up as Texas Republicans attempt to tip the House's precarious districts currently occupied by Republican Representatives Ken Calvert, Darrell Issa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao, and Doug LaMalfa, the proposal suggests shaving the votes of right-leaning voters and increasing the votes of Democratic voters, as per a report by The Daily would increase the likelihood that a left-leaning candidate would win each race. "The party's advantage would be strengthened to strengthen their hold on the seats in districts held by Democratic Representatives Dave Min, Mike Levin, and Derek Tran," as per the Republicans, on President Donald Trump's urging, have called a special legislative session aiming to redraw congressional lines that would deliver five additional safely Republican seats for the 2026 elections. In opposition, more than 50 Texas House Democrats fled the state, denying quorum and halting the solidarity, Newsom hosted some of those lawmakers in Sacramento and publicly declared that California will not 'sit by idly.' His catchphrase: 'fight fire with fire.' California is now preparing a plan that would shift key districts toward Democrats if Texas congressional delegation's Democratic members were briefed on the proposed map Monday, according to the AP report. Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom has stated his desire to promote partisan redistricting, which coincides with the proposal's halting its efforts will prevent him from proceeding, he says. According to Newsom, a special election would be held during the first week of November. The Democratic-controlled Legislature would create a new congressional map for voters to Monday, Newsom declared, "California will not stand by and watch this democracy deteriorate." To break quorum and stop the Texas Legislature's special session from moving forward with the proposed redistricting, which would probably eliminate an estimated five Democratic seats in the House, many Democratic state representatives in Texas have left the Governor Greg Abbott has ordered state troopers to assist in locating the Democratic lawmakers who are missing and has threatened to remove them from threat and the Texas Democrats' uprising have intensified the already escalating battle over congressional Constitution of California says that redistricting can't happen in the middle of a decade. Voters in 2008 approved a measure that set up a citizens' commission to make fair maps. To undo that, voters would have to agree. Newsom wants to hold a special election on November 4, when voters will decide whether to give the Legislature back power for a short time and adopt the new new map for elections through 2030 would be passed by the Legislature if Californians vote for it. If Texas doesn't want to go first, the measure won't go through, and the commission will stay the same until the next regular a tit-for-tat reaction to Texas redrawing its map to benefit Ken Calvert, Darrell Issa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao, and Doug LaMalfa may see their districts flipped Democratic.
Hindustan Times
21 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Hezbollah chief says missiles will fall on Israel if it resumes war on Lebanon
Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem threatened Israel directly for the first time in months in a televised speech on Tuesday, saying missiles would fall on it if it resumed a broad war on Lebanon. Lebanon's Hezbollah Chief Naim Qassem gives a televised speech from an unknown location, July 30, 2025 in this screen grab from video.(Reuters) His comments came as Lebanon's cabinet met to discuss the fate of Hezbollah's arsenal, after Washington pressured Lebanese officials to commit to disarming the Iran-backed group and amid fears that Israel could intensify strikes if they fail to do so. Qassem said that, should Israel engage in a "large-scale aggression" against Lebanon, Hezbollah, Lebanon's army and Lebanon's people would defend themselves. "This defence will lead to missiles falling inside the Israeli entity, and all the security they have built over eight months will collapse within an hour," he said. A US-brokered ceasefire in November brought an end to months of fighting between Hezbollah and Israel. The war killed much of Hezbollah's leadership - including Qassem's predecessor Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah - and destroyed much of its arsenal. Qassem said the war had killed 5,000 Hezbollah fighters and wounded 13,000, the first official toll the group has given. But he said the organisation remained in good order, with fighters ready to make "the harshest sacrifices" if needed. Minutes after he spoke, dozens of men on motorcycles carrying Hezbollah's yellow flags emerged from its strongholds in Beirut's southern suburbs for the second day in a row. REJECTS 'EXTERNAL DICTATES' Washington and Beirut have been in talks since June on a US roadmap to fully disarm Hezbollah in exchange for a halt to Israeli strikes, the withdrawal of Israeli troops still occupying five points in south Lebanon and funds to rebuild areas destroyed by Israeli bombardment during the war. But with little progress on disarmament, Washington's patience began wearing thin and it pressured Lebanon's ministers to swiftly make a public pledge so that talks could continue. Qassem pushed back against the conditions, saying Israel must implement the ceasefire in full by halting its military activities in Lebanon before any other discussion. "Solve the problem of the (Israeli) aggression, and then we will discuss the issue of the weapons," he said. Addressing Lebanese officials, he said: 'I hope you don't waste time on the storms stirred up by external dictates.'
India Today
21 minutes ago
- India Today
Modi misread Trump: Now India pays the price
A war of words has erupted between New Delhi and Washington, exposing the fragility of what was once hailed as a geopolitical success story. India has hit back hard at US President Donald Trump's threat to hike tariffs on Indian goods over continued imports of Russian oil, calling the targeting "unjustified and unreasonable" whilst slamming what it perceives as Washington's double The so-called Modi-Trump bromance, once paraded as diplomatic triumph, is now cracking under the weight of harsh reality. What began with mutual praise and public spectacle, from the "Howdy Modi" event in Houston to the grand "Namaste Trump" reception in Ahmedabad, has devolved into accusations, tariffs, and transactional Fatal MiscalculationOne of New Delhi's fundamental missteps was assuming that warm handshakes and mega-rallies could override hard economic interests. Modi's outreach to Trump was personal, public, and passionate, but Trump doesn't separate business from bromance. The "great friend" narrative gave India false confidence that proved Modi threw his weight behind Trump, literally sharing the stage with him in Houston and Ahmedabad, it was a bet on personal chemistry over policy complexity. India saw Trump not as a volatile businessman-president, but as a dealmaker who'd favour "friends." The reality? Trump doesn't do friendships, he does leverage. And India misread that playbook temples in Varanasi to villages in Gujarat, people performed pujas praying for Trump's victory. Modi had pulled off spectacular diplomatic theatre, and India felt it had America in its corner. Yet Trump's loyalty lies only with the US balance sheet, viewing India as a trade surplus machine rather than a strategic Russian Oil WedgeIndia's dependence on Russian oil has become the new wedge in this deteriorating relationship. With crude prices volatile and energy security paramount, India turned to Moscow for discounted supply, with Russia now accounting for up to 40% of India's oil imports. Trump, who views foreign policy through a profit-loss lens, sees this as lashed out, accusing India of undermining the West's Ukraine strategy and "helping Putin," with tariffs becoming punishment. Worse still, he's framed it as India profiting from global chaos. Modi's government finds itself caught in a trilemma: oil security, global optics, and Trump's offensive 4th August 2025, India's Ministry of External Affairs dropped a diplomatic bombshell in response. Calling Trump's tariff threats "unjustified and unreasonable," the MEA emphasised that India's oil purchases are driven by survival, not sympathy for Moscow. With Middle Eastern oil redirected to Europe after the Ukraine war, India had little choice but to buy discounted Russian crude to shield its economy. India's anger wasn't merely economic, it was moral. The statement highlighted US and EU hypocrisy, pointing out how the West continues trading heavily with Russia in everything from uranium to fertilisers, yet singles out India for 25% Tariff HammerTrump's imposition of a 25% tariff on all Indian goods wasn't just economic muscle-flexing, it was a warning shot. The US goods trade deficit with India stood at $45.7 billion in 2024, which Trump views as theft, plain and simple. His administration has revived old complaints about high tariffs, restricted market access, regulatory red tape, and "unfair" practices in pharmaceuticals, agriculture, and most jarring for India was Trump's renewed outreach to Pakistan, military meetings, energy cooperation discussions, and vague proposals of "regional balance." For a country that expected Trump to be firmly in its anti-Pakistan corner, this felt like betrayal, exposing another blind spot in India's strategic Path ForwardIndia must now abandon illusions of personal diplomacy. Trump is a negotiator, not a friend, he respects leverage, not loyalty. New Delhi must shift from sentimentality to strategy, from ceremonial displays to pragmatic biggest lesson? Don't tie national strategy to individual leaders. American policy is shifting toward hard realism, and India must do the same. This means engaging not as a junior partner seeking approval, but as a sovereign power navigating a multipolar obsession with optics, handshakes, stagecraft, mega-events, must give way to tough negotiations, quiet diplomacy, and pragmatic positioning. Because Trump isn't here to dance at "Namaste Trump" events, he's here to deal. And if Modi wants to succeed, it's time to stop praying and start playing hardball politics.- Ends
