
Actress's parents take fight to the courts after daughter, 30, died when 'physician associate' she wrongly believed was a doctor misdiagnosed her
Emily Chesterton died only three weeks after her 30th birthday in 2022 when a clot in her lungs was mistaken for anxiety and a strain.
She believed she had been seen by her GP at her surgery in London but it was a physician associate who prescribed her propranolol, medication for anxiety.
Emily, from Greater Manchester, but who had moved to London to pursue a career in acting, collapsed later that evening.
Although she was rushed to hospital, her heart had stopped beating, and doctors could not save her life.
A coroner concluded Emily could have been saved if she had been to A&E and given treatment for a pulmonary embolism.
Her parents, Marion and Brendon Chesterton, are now launching a legal fight against the General Medical Council (GMC) demanding more regulation.
Doctors are fully licensed medical professionals who diagnose, prescribe, and perform surgeries independently after years of training.
Her parents, Marion and Brendon Chesterton, are now launching a legal fight against the General Medical Council (GMC), with Anaesthetists United, saying that PAs, and anaesthesia associates (AA) should be properly regulated
Physician associates support doctors by carrying out many clinical tasks but must work under a doctor's supervision and typically cannot prescribe or operate.
Their role helps ease pressure on healthcare systems, though it remains a topic of debate.
Ms Chesterton's symptoms included calf pain, a swollen and hot leg, shortness of breath and she was finding it increasingly difficult to walk.
After reaching out to the practice the first time, the PA recommended she take paracetamol, but her condition became worse and at one point was having difficulty walking and was breathless and lightheaded, her mother told the BBC.
She claims the second appointment her daughter was diagnosed with calf sprain, long Covid and anxiety but her calves were not examined and never made clear she was not a doctor.
Ms Chesterton actually had a blood clot in her left leg, which led to her dying of a pulmonary embolism.
Her father, Brendon, said everyone he had spoken to had told him that a pain in the calf was 'medical 101' that it was a clot.
'We've said the name (physician associate) is rather grand,' he said. 'A physician associate sounds even better than junior doctor. The name itself we objected to. We were told nothing could be done about the naming of them. But it suggests someone who is highly trained and highly competent.
Marion and Brendan Chesterton say their daughter, Emily, would still be alive if a physician associate had sent her to A&E rather than misdiagnose her blood clot symptoms as 'anxiety'
'But people I've talked to, they say a pain in the calf is like medical 101. Everyone should realise that that is indicative of some kind of clot. She didn't notify that.'
The GP practice where Emily was seen, the Vale Practice in Crouch End, has since stopped employing PAs.
Backed by the British Medical Association, the Chesterton family is launching a legal battle with the General Medical Council, accusing it of a failure to uphold its legal duties.
They claim the lines between doctors and non-doctors have become blurred, putting patients at risk.
They're asking the GMC to issue a scope of practice document laying out exactly what each role can do to ensure patient safety and clarify expectations.
Speaking outside the Royal Courts of Justice, Marion Chesterton said: 'To lose a child is so painful, it is not the right order of this world.
'However, to lose a child and then discover it was avoidable is the worst pain ever.
'We do not want anyone else going through the torture we have endured. Physician associates and anaesthesia associates must be regulated thoroughly, they must be properly supervised.'
Mrs Chesterton said: 'We're here to honour our daughter, to make sure that this doesn't happen to any other family. No more Emilys.
'We're here to ask the GMC to do their job and regulate, it's been assigned to them by Parliament, so they've got to do the job.
'If I didn't do this. I'd just lie down in a ditch somewhere and let the world pass me by. I've had to do it because I was so angry.
'When I found out that PAs weren't regulated I was absolutely devastated, I thought "this, this is wrong".'
At the start of the hearing on Wednesday, Mrs Justice Lambert said: 'This case is not just about regulation of assistants, it is about regulation of the medical profession, and that is how I see it.'
Thomas De La Mare KC, representing the Chestertons and Anaesthetists United, told the court: 'At its heart, this case is critically about risk and about the regulation response to risk.'
In written submissions, he said the GMC is 'failing to fulfil its regulatory role on an ongoing basis and this court should find that that is unlawful'.
Mr De La Mare also said the GMC had failed to produce guidance or set standards either for the doctors supervising associates, or for the associates themselves.
It has further failed to 'gather sufficient information to address the question of how it should regulate associates, then lawfully address and answer that question', the court was told.
Mr De La Mare continued: 'The GMC's foundational premise, never consulted upon, that the system for regulating doctors would be appropriate for regulating associates, was and is fundamentally flawed.'
In written submissions, Rory Dunlop KC, for the GMC, said the argument for a defined scope of practice raises the question of whether it would be in the public interest to impose such 'rigid' limits on PAs and AAs.
Saying the court has no 'expertise or experience' in this field, he continued: 'There might be benefits to public safety of imposing limits of the kind that claimants suggest.
'However, there might also be harm to public safety in imposing such limits, e.g. such limits would prevent PAs and AAs from developing their skills, in a suitable supervised setting, and might inhibit some PAs and AAs from doing work they could be competent to do.
'If so, that would have a negative impact on the stretched resources of the NHS and the capacity of doctors to deal with more complex patient issues.
'That, in turn, would have a negative impact on patient safety by making it less likely that patients can get the timely treatment they need.'
He added that no party in the proceedings considers that the GMC is the body best placed to define the scope for PAs or AAs.
The hearing before Mrs Justice Lambert is due to conclude on Thursday with a decision expected in writing at a later date.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
34 minutes ago
- The Sun
NHS strike chaos threatens to spread as paramedics REJECT pay offer on first day of doctors' walkout
NHS strikes threatened to spread yesterday as paramedics in the GMB union voted to reject their annual pay offer. It came as a five-day walkout by hospital resident doctors began over pay, led by the British Medical Association union. NHS chiefs said the health service was still 'open for business'. But ambulance crews and other NHS staff in the GMB union yesterday voted 67 per cent in favour of rejecting their 3.6 per cent offer for this year's pay rise. Paramedics joined nursing strikes in the winter of 2022-23 and could vote to do so again if they cannot get a better offer from Health Secretary Wes Streeting. National Secretary Rachel Harrison said: 'We have written to Wes Streeting, asking him to meet with us to discuss pay and other issues.' The Royal College of Nursing is also angry at getting a lower wage rise than doctors — and hospital consultants with the BMA are also considering striking again. As resident doctors, formerly called junior doctors, kicked off their strike to demand for a 29 per cent pay rise over the 5.4 per cent offer, Mr Streeting warned he could not guarantee patient safety. He said: 'I'm really proud of the way that NHS leaders and frontline staff have mobilised to minimise the disruption and the risk of harm to patients. 'What I can't do is guarantee there will be none. That's why the BMA's action is so irresponsible.' The BMA has made one exception for its strike so far. It allowed resident doctors to be called in to cover neo-natal intensive care at Nottingham City Hospital to protect newborn babies' lives. Strike leader Dr Melissa Ryan, who works there, said: 'We don't have enough senior staff to cover the doctors that aren't there. "It is important to us that those very sick babies get a lot of care.'


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Shed pounds with up to 61% off the walking program that's tailor-made to help you reach your goals - no equipment needed!
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more Whether you have no time for the gym or are looking for an effective low-impact workout, you might want to consider walking your way to a fitter you. It sounds simple — and it is. The difference is that the WalkFit by Welltech program is designed to help you achieve your health and fitness goals without the arbitrary 'rules' that govern the usual walking plans for weight loss. WalkFit by Welltech Walk your way to improved health and fitness with this program that is tailor-made for you! You'll lose weight at a sensible and sustainable pace, enjoying all of the strengthening benefits of walking at the same time. Ready to get started? You can save up to 61 percent on your first subscription period! Click through to begin your walking journey today. That means you aren't bound to walk the standard recommended 10,000 steps if that's not right for you. WalkFit takes a personalized approach, creating a plan tailored to your specific parameters, including your existing weight, fitness level, and age. With such a carefully tailored program at up to 61 percent off your first subscription period, you can feel confident as you get started, knowing that it's made just for you. Everything is accessible, with options like indoor workouts, treadmill exercises, and step aerobics to mix things up and help you stay motivated. Equally motivating are the exciting challenges woven into the program. Some light, fun competition can go a long way in energizing you and keeping you focused — and you'll be rewarded for your efforts with streaks, awards, and badges. Of course, there is really nothing that can spur you to keep going more than seeing your hard work pay off. The program features built-in calorie tracking and step counting, so you'll always have clear insight into all you've achieved. The mindset that fueled the formation of WalkFit is simple: Walking really should be enough to stay fit and healthy. And it can be, but often people feel compelled to do the bigger things — the hardcore workouts and challenges that may burn you out before the scale even has a chance to budge. This program is designed to prevent that. It simplifies working out to its most basic, essentially serving as a powerful reminder that you actually can walk your way to a fitter body, better flexibility, and an overall healthier state. Because it's so easy to get started, you're much more likely to stick with WalkFit than you would a more intense program that leaves you feeling exhausted and frustrated. With this program, you can work your way up in a sensible way, which is the key to achieving results that actually last. As the pounds come off, you'll find yourself becoming stronger and more motivated to continue. It's so easy to get started, too. Just answer a few questions about your goals, body type, target zones, skill level, and sleep quality. The information is used to create a sustainable timeline and even a date by which you can expect to reach your target weight. Don't miss this opportunity to get fit — and stay fit! Get started with up to 61 percent off your first subscription period with WalkFit by Welltech. You are worth the effort!


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Failure to act on 999 call by authorities led to death of malnourished teenager and unwell mother
A teenager with learning difficulties would not have died if an ambulance had been sent to her home following a 999 call made three months before her body was found, a coroner has said. The bodies of Loraine Choulla, aged 18, and her mother Alphonsine Djiako Leuga were both discovered on May 21 last year at their home in Hartley Road, Radford, Nottingham. A week-long inquest heard that Loraine, who had Down's syndrome, was 'entirely dependent' on her mother, who had made a 999 call giving her address and postcode and asking for help on February 2 last year, while feeling unwell. During the 999 call, made shortly after 1pm on February 2, Ms Leuga groaned, requested an ambulance and said 'I need help to my daughter' and 'I'm in the bed, I feel cold and can't move' before cutting off the line. East Midlands Ambulance Service (EMAS) did not send an ambulance to the address after the call was wrongly classed as being abandoned by the caller, the inquest at Nottingham Coroner's Court was told. Summing up the evidence and recording her conclusion on Friday, Nottingham Assistant Coroner Amanda Bewley said 47-year-old Ms Leuga, who born in Cameroon, had frequently refused to answer calls and had gone away for periods of longer than a month. The coroner said she was 'astonished' that Ms Leuga and her daughter were found after a member of the public contacted police after noticing he had not seen them for a lengthy period, rather than by professionals between February and May. After adding that the city council's adult social care department had 'missed opportunities to intervene' and potentially secure a different outcome, the coroner added: 'I am entirely satisfied that had EMAS sent an ambulance to Alphonsine that Loraine would not have died when she died. 'She would most probably still be alive. 'I am clear that Alphonsine died first and Loraine died afterwards.' Ms Leuga died from pneumonia between February 2 and February 8, the coroner recorded, while Loraine had died from dehydration and malnutrition and 'survived her mother by three weeks or more'. The coroner added that she was 'confident to a point of near certainty' that had an ambulance been sent to the address on February 2, Loraine would have been discovered and arrangements made for her needs to be met. The inquest was told that Ms Leuga was admitted to hospital for a blood transfusion in late January last year as she was critically ill with very low iron levels, and was given a 'pragmatic' discharge linked to her daughter's care needs. Pathologist Dr Stuart Hamilton told the hearing by video-link that the mother and daughter were both likely to have been dead for 'weeks to months' before they were found, rather than for days or hours. Dr Hamilton said his initial cause of death following a post-mortem examination on Ms Leuga was pneumonia of uncertain cause, while her daughter's cause of death could not be established. Answering questions from the coroner, the pathologist said he could not rule out that Ms Leuga had died on the day of the 999 call. The body of Loraine, who was born in Italy, showed no evidence of any third party involvement. Dr Hamilton said of the teenager: 'Unfortunately, based on the post-mortem examination and additional tests alone, it is my view that the cause of death is classed as unascertained – that is, I am not able to give a cause of death on the balance of probabilities.' In a statement issued after the inquest, Keeley Sheldon, director of quality at EMAS, said: 'I am truly sorry that we did not respond as we should have to Alphonsine Djiako Leuga and Loraine Choulla. 'Our deepest condolences remain with their family. 'We fully accept the coroner's findings. After our internal investigation, we made changes to our policies, procedures and training to ensure this does not happen in future.'