logo
Don't give up on oil, Norway warns Britain

Don't give up on oil, Norway warns Britain

Yahoo30-04-2025
Norway will never turn its back on the North Sea as Britain has done, its energy minister has said in a rebuke to Labour's net zero pledges.
Terje Aasland told The Telegraph that Norway had 'a totally different view' to the UK on the oil and gas industry which he said creates jobs and wealth.
Mr Aasland said: 'We want to develop [the North Sea] for the long-term, because the oil and gas industry and the service industry is really important. It saves jobs and creates a lot of value for Norwegian society.
'I think in the UK, the oil and gas industry has contributed in just the same way – until now.'
Ed Miliband, the Energy Secretary, has banned all new drilling for oil and gas in the North Sea as part of his bid to help Britain hit net zero by 2050.
However, Mr Aasland, who is an electrician by trade, said the process of switching entirely to renewable energy sources would be a slow process and Norway expected to be sending fossil fuels to Britain 'for many decades'.
Norway has amassed the biggest sovereign wealth fund in the world largely thanks to its vast investments in oil and gas. The fund is currently worth around £1.3 trillion, equivalent to £235,000 for every Norwegian.
The country is one of the biggest investors in the North Sea, with over 7bn barrels of proven oil reserves. In addition to fossil fuels, Norway also owns swathes of the UK's prime real estate, with significant investments in London's West End including stretches of Covent Garden, Regent Street and Soho.
Mr Aasland's comments come as Mr Miliband and Sir Keir Starmer face increasing pressure over their net zero stance following mass blackouts across Spain, Portugal and parts of France earlier this week.
Red Eléctrica, Spain's national grid operator, has since said the power cuts were caused by a drop in solar power generation. Spain has seen a massive increase in renewable and low carbon electricity generation in recent years, with green energy sources replacing fossil fuels such as coal and gas, as well as nuclear.
Spain's Socialist prime minister, Pedro Sánchez, was accused on Wednesday of putting green ideology ahead of energy security.
Alberto Núñez Feijóo, leader of the opposition People's Party, said Mr Sánchez was covering up information about the cause of the power cut and prioritising green ideology in his energy policy.
In the UK there are now growing signs of a civil war within Labour over its green policies after Sir Tony Blair said on Tuesday that the Government's current net zero policies were 'doomed to fail'.
The former prime minister, who has advised Sir Keir informally, appeared to back down on Wednesday and insisted he supported Labour's plan to reach net zero by 2050. However, Downing Street failed to guarantee Mr Miliband would still be in post by the next election.
In addition to banning North Sea licences, Mr Miliband and Sir Keir have increased the so-called windfall levy on oil and gas producers which charges a 78pc tax on their profits.
Asked what the impact of such policies would have had on Norway, Mr Aasland said: 'We would have seen investments going to other places in the world.'
He added: 'I think if you want to support industry for the long-term, you have to be predictable, you have to have a stable framework, and you have to work together with the industry.
'During the pandemic we saw the supply chains for the oil and gas industry were running out of contracts so we made a tax package to the industry so they could develop more resources in a difficult time – and I got a lot of projects approved.
'That means the Norwegian oil and gas production situation now is quite good. Last year, we produced 124bn cubic metres of gas that we exported to the European market. Norwegian production is now at a peak and will stay there for three to five years.'
Norway became Britain's primary source of gas last year as UK output shrank in the wake of the windfall tax and a ban on new licences.
In the year to September 2024 the UK relied on Norway for 29bn cubic metres of gas, supplied by subsea pipeline and costing consumers £10bn.
Another £10bn was spent buying Norwegian oil. It means the UK paid Norway the equivalent of £714 for every UK household last year alone.
Mr Aasland said he expected Norway's one-sided relationship with the UK to continue as net zero policies accelerate the decline of Britain's North Sea energy industry.
He added: 'Norway has 30pc of the European market. We expect more and more European countries will invest in renewable energy which we will also do in Norway, but gas will deliver the base load capacity that is really important to maintain [stability] in electric systems.
'I think the pipeline gas from Norway will be one of the last sources of gas that the UK stops using.'
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour statistics director removed from job by Trump administration after bad jobs report
Labour statistics director removed from job by Trump administration after bad jobs report

Hamilton Spectator

time8 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Labour statistics director removed from job by Trump administration after bad jobs report

Labour Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics had been removed from her post after Trump called for her firing. 'A recent string of major revisions have come to light and raised concerns about decisions being made by the Biden-appointed Labor Commissioner,' Chavez-DeRemer wrote to justify her removal of Erika McEntarfer as commissioner. While the Trump administration searches for a replacement, deputy commissioner William Wiatrowski will lead the bureau.

Cambodia to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for helping broker peace deal with Thailand
Cambodia to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for helping broker peace deal with Thailand

The Hill

time11 hours ago

  • The Hill

Cambodia to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize for helping broker peace deal with Thailand

Cambodia floated plans Friday to nominate President Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for helping broker a ceasefire agreement that helped the country end its border war with Thailand. 'He should get the Nobel, not only for his work on Cambodia but also elsewhere,' Cambodian deputy prime minister Sun Chanthol said in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, adding that Phnom Penh will present the president's name to the Norwegian Nobel Committee. Trump warned last week that if the cross-border fighting, which lasted for five days, between Cambodia and Thailand did not end soon, neither nation would reach a trade agreement with the U.S. The president spoke with Thailand's acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai and Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet on Monday, sharing that the neighboring countries reached a 'CEASEFIRE and PEACE.' After the pause in fighting was reached, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on social platform X that Trump 'made this happen.' She added in her Monday post, 'Give him the Nobel Peace Prize!' The truce was brokered in Malaysia, negotiations that were attended by U.S. government officials. The war between the two nations killed at least 45 people and displaced over 300,000 residents on both sides. The Trump administration said last week that both Thailand and Cambodia will have their goods subject to a 19 percent tariff. Trump initially threatened to impose a 49 percent tariff on Cambodia's items going into the U.S., later lowering it to 36 percent. On Wednesday, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick revealed that the two nations had reached trade agreements with the U.S., though few details were provided. Since returning to office, Trump has been recommended to receive the prestigious award by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Pakistani officials and a handful of Republican lawmakers and pundits.

Labour Can't Decide What It's Doing With The Internet
Labour Can't Decide What It's Doing With The Internet

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Labour Can't Decide What It's Doing With The Internet

Labour seems to be in two minds over how to handle the internet. While Keir Starmer's comms team is now briefing influencers on government policies, his ministers are cracking down on harmful online content – and facing accusations of mass censorship at the same time. On Thursday afternoon, the prime minister will be hosting a reception for up to 90 influencers in Downing Street, who reportedly have a combined following of a quarter of a billion followers and have already been chatting to No.10 over the last year. Invitees allegedly include cookbook author Chetna Makan and former Love Island contestant now anti-revenge porn campaigner Georgia Harrison, along with other TikTok stars and YouTubers. This move has been criticised and praised in equal measure. While a handful of online users claim no serious influencer would want to be associated with this government, some political pundits claim it is a sign that Downing Street is finally getting with the 21st Century. And that may be true: Ofcom recently found 82% of 16 to 24-year-olds use social media for news, along with 28% of people aged over 55. This online-first attitude also seems to be rewarding their largest electoral threat, Nigel Farage, who has 1.3 million followers on TikTok and is currently leading in the opinion polls by a healthy margin. But, at the same time, the government has just rolled out its Online Safety Act, rather undermining their new approach to the web, as critics have pointed out. Meant to protect children by putting age restrictions on various sites, the legislation has created an uproar in some quarters over fears it would create mass censorship and political debate – while also making it harder to monitor online risks for kids. That's because there's been a huge uptick in the use of virtual private networks (VPNs), which allow people to circumvent the age restrictions by masking a user's identity. Data from the Age Verification Providers Association also found an additional five million online age checks a day are being carried out because of the new legislation. Fears that the Act is too broad and vague in its definitions of 'harmful content' have fuelled further concerns that it will force adults to share personal data with global porn sites – paving the way for mass data breaches in a dangerous overreach. Then there's the ramifications that come with putting up barriers online. Starmer even had to laugh off warnings from Donald Trump earlier this week over fears the new law would limit access to his website, Truth Social. Reform UK have leapt on the opportunity to attack Labour, claiming it would completely tear up the legislation – although the party has confirmed it has no new ideas to protect children from the worst corners of the internet. Still, their debate spiralled out of control when the technology secretary Peter Kyle claimed Farage's criticism indicated he would have been on the same side as the late prolific sexual predator Jimmy Savile. The Reform UK leader has since asked for an apology. Of course, plenty of people are in favour of the legislation, which has been quietly worked on by successive governments. The suicide prevention group, the Molly Rose Foundation, noted: 'The Online Safety Act will help save young lives.' The organisation's CEO Andy Burrows pointed out there has been strong cross-party consensus to protect children online in the past. Scrapping it altogether would actually 'go against what Reform voters think,' he told LBC, noting that more than seven in 10 people who voted Reform at the last election want to keep and even strengthen the Act. Meanwhile, Chris Sherwood from the charity NPSCC wrote in PoliticsHome that 'it's deeply concerning to see the rhetoric around the Online Safety Act shift toward loss of free expression.' The Department of Science, Innovation and Technology told HuffPost UK: 'The Online Safety Act is the biggest step change in children's online safety since the internet began. 'It protects young people from harmful content and holds platforms and tech companies to account. 'This is about creating a safer internet – not censoring it – where children can explore, learn and connect without fear of what's behind the next swipe.' But can Labour really expect a positive reception by using influencers to spread its message while fending off accusations of censorship? Only time will tell if the government can have its cake and eat it too. Related... If You Think Adolescence Is Just About Online Incel Groups, You Missed The Point This 1 Hidden iPhone Feature Could Instantly Make Your Online Data Safer – And It's So Easy To Activate Sorry, The Emoji-Over-Face Parents Might Be Right About Online Privacy

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store