Congress is sitting silently as Trump destroys the U.S. government
On July 14, the U.S. Supreme Court enabled the executive branch to cripple the Department of Education by firing 1,400 employees. Add these actions to the disastrous firings at the U.S. State Department; purges of expertise at Justice; massive layoffs at Interior, including 1,500 at the National Park Service; destruction of USAID; even the planned elimination of NOAA climate laboratories.
Why?
A good question that begs for more than bumper-sticker banality like, 'we are putting an end to Biden-era madness.'
Ask your congresspersons in what universe is the reckless expulsion of expertise a great idea? Ask them if the country is made great by tearing up international agreements, withdrawing from global organizations, treating international trade as buffoonery and empowering dictators like Russian President Putin?
Ask them if America is better if the balance of executive, legislative and judicial branches of government are obliterated under the unqualified leadership of a single man? Does anyone remember Fidel Castro?
We are seeing the destruction of government institutions that have served us not perfectly, but effectively, for decades. This is unforgivably stupid, sad and unnecessary. Yet it seems perfectly acceptable to our elected representatives. We should let them know they're tragically wrong.
Thomas Carsey,
Palmetto Bay
Narrow margins
Re: the July 16 Miami Herald online editorial, 'Brightline's deadly tracks: Why blaming train's victims is a lethal cop-out.' Did the Miami Herald or WLRN bother to notice the 'No Trespassing' signs along the FEC Right of Way (RoW)? Or note that railroad tracks are private property and that unauthorized people who cross onto the RoW are trespassers?
All the crossings where pedestrians and traffic are allowed to cross are protected with crossing gates, numerous flashing red lights and loud bells when a train is approaching. This means pedestrians and traffic must stop and not cross the tracks.
People who live near the train tracks (many have been present in South Florida for more than 100 years) had the audacity to complain about train horns, so now most South Florida rails are quiet zones and the engineers can only sound the horn in an emergency; by then, it is almost too late.
Virtually every person who was hurt or killed by Brightline, Tri-Rail, CSX and FEC is at fault and responsible for their actions. Perhaps it is way easier to blame the trains and that is what the people want to hear.
We live in an overdeveloped, overpriced, overcrowded area where self-centered, self-important people are distracted by their Smartphones as they walk and drive about. They are causing accidents or getting themselves and maybe others killed. That is the root of the problem.
The train always wins. When you see tracks, think trains and do not compromise safety features just to save 30 seconds in your life, because it could be the end of your life.
Cully Waggoner,
West Kendall
Fallen stars
Cuba's government recently said there are no beggars, just fakers in the island nation. In the U.S., our government cuts Medicaid and politicians claim that poor people don't really need it and are engaged in waste and fraud.
In Venezuela, the Maduro regime made political enemies disappear. In the U.S., ICE is making people disappear and has gone after visitors with legitimate visas but the 'wrong' political beliefs. The U.S. also has deported people to Venezuela, and Maduro can make them disappear.
In the past, Nazis built concentration camps, originally for political prisoners. Recently, Florida built one in the Everglades. Perhaps we are choosing the wrong role models.
Chris Cosner,
Pinecrest
Broken treaties
When is a contract not a contract?
When dealing with the federal government, which has clawed back monies already committed to PBS and foreign aid. These entities had promised jobs and commitments to other projects. Now it appears that any contract the United States agrees to is just day-to-day.
Our allies and citizens can no longer rely on the word of our government. What have we become?
Sol Yanowitz,
Miami
Sensible act
The 'Dignity Act,' as proposed by U.S. Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar, is a rational start to sorely needed immigration reform in this country. Introduce the bill and get started on meaningful debate.
If President Trump wants to be remembered for a popular and positive major domestic political shift, like Presidents Reagan and Nixon decades earlier, this is the perfect issue and time.
David Ward,
Reno, NV
Costly lots
Why is the Village of Islamorada considering spending $500,000 in taxpayer funds to create 30 parking spots — more than $16,000 per space — on public property to benefit the private, gated Angler's Reef community?
These $52 million-plus homes already provide private parking. If they need overflow space for guests, trailers, or renters paying $930 nightly, that's a private planning issue — not a public burden. When nearby Hog Heaven Sports Bar & Grill needed parking, it bought adjacent land.
Why can't Angler's Reef lease or buy its own parcel, or pave over a few overpriced and overbuilt condos?
The proposed lot would destroy natural vegetation on Windley Key's median, degrading the landscape for 22,000 passing vehicles and contradicting our Village's environmental goals.
Angler's Reef doesn't even allow public access. Allowing well-connected and well-represented private HOAs to offload costs onto taxpayers sets a dangerous precedent, not to mention legal liability.
The taxpayer funds could go to real community needs, like road safety for all 7,000 residents, not just the wealthy, many of whom are absentee landlords. Public funds should serve the public, not subsidize gated luxury. Islamorada must choose capitalism over cronyism.
Ken Thomas,
Islamorada
Clean up MIA
Though we live in Southwest Florida, we most often fly out of Miami International Airport. Signage to the airport is confusing and frustrating; most troubling however, is the airport's condition: dirty and disorganized, with elevators, people movers, or escalators usually (or always) out of order.
This is especially striking when we return from Asian or European airports, which are beautiful and efficient. I am always ashamed when I land at MIA and think this is the first impression foreign travelers have of our country.
If this is the best that MIA Director and CEO Ralph Cutié can do, then maybe it is time for a new director.
Eva Sands,
Bonita Springs
Detention camp
As a board member of the Interfaith Alliance of Southwest Florida, I condemn the establishment of the Everglades detention center known as 'Alligator Alcatraz.' As a member of the Jewish community of Naples, I am against this abomination that sits an hour from our home.
The Florida Immigration Coalition — and now a Democratic delegation — have seen for themselves the deplorable conditions inside the detention camp that echos our own Jewish history over the centuries.
We, as Floridians, as Jews and as human beings cannot be silent in the face of this pure evil.
Lisa Freund,
Naples
Horrible planning
A recent plane crash near Perry Airport in Pembroke Pines has been horrible for the nearby residents who must deal with this. The city wants a safety study done, but no one has addressed the actual problem.
The airport was built in 1943 by the U.S. Navy for training. Over the years, the city allowed housing developments near and around the airport. How short-sighted by city leaders.
The small planes are sometimes flown by inexperienced pilots in training. There is no place for them to go if they have an emergency. There must be a clear swath for emergencies. This can be accomplished by purchasing, then razing, nearby homes. The cost would be tremendous. And who will pay for relocating the displaced residents?
Robert Lynch,
Davie

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
24 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Gabbard's claims of an anti-Trump conspiracy are not supported by declassified documents
WASHINGTON — Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard this month declassified material that she claimed proved a 'treasonous conspiracy' by the Obama administration in 2016 to politicize U.S. intelligence in service of casting doubt on the legitimacy of Donald Trump's election victory. As evidence, Gabbard cited newly declassified emails from Obama officials and a five-year-old classified House report in hopes of undermining the intelligence community's conclusion that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to boost Trump and denigrate his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Gabbard's claims of an anti-Trump conspiracy are not supported by declassified documents
WASHINGTON (AP) — Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard this month declassified material that she claimed proved a 'treasonous conspiracy' by the Obama administration in 2016 to politicize U.S. intelligence in service of casting doubt on the legitimacy of Donald Trump's election victory. As evidence, Gabbard cited newly declassified emails from Obama officials and a five-year-old classified House report in hopes of undermining the intelligence community's conclusion that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to boost Trump and denigrate his Democratic opponent Hillary Clinton. Russia's activities during the 2016 election remain some of the most examined events in recent history. The Kremlin's campaign and the subsequent U.S. government response were the subject of at least five major investigations by the Republican-led House and Senate intelligence committee ; two Justice Department special counsels; and the department's inspector general . Those investigations either concluded — or accepted the conclusion — that Russia embarked on a campaign to interfere in the election through the use of social media and hacked material. The House-led probe, conducted by Trump allies, also concurred that Russia ran an election interference campaign but said the purpose was to sow chaos in the U.S. rather than boost Trump. Several of the reports criticize the actions of Obama administration officials, particularly at the FBI, but do not dispute the fundamental findings that Moscow sought to interfere in the election. The Associated Press has reviewed those reports to evaluate how Gabbard's claims stack up: Russian election interference CLAIM: 'The intelligence community had one assessment: that Russia did not have the intent and capability to try to impact the outcome of the U.S. election leading up to Election Day. The same assessment was made after the election.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday . The documents Gabbard released do not support her claim. She cites a handful of emails from 2016 in which officials conclude that Russia had no intention of manipulating the U.S. vote count through cyberattacks on voting systems. President Barack Obama's administration never alleged that voting infrastructure was tampered with. Rather, the administration said Russia ran a covert influence campaign using hacked and stolen material from prominent Democrats. Russian operatives then used that information as part of state-funded media and social media operations to inflame U.S. public opinion. More than two dozen Russians were indicted in 2018 in connection with those efforts. Republican-led investigations in Congress have affirmed that conclusion, and the emails that Gabbard released do not contradict that finding. Shift in assessment? CLAIM: 'There was a shift, a 180-degree shift, from the intelligence community's assessment leading up to the election to the one that President Obama directed be produced after Donald Trump won the election that completely contradicted those assessments that had come previously.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. There was no shift. The emails Gabbard released show that a Department of Homeland Security official in August 2016 told then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper there was 'no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count.' The public assessment the Obama administration made public in January 2017 reached the same conclusion: 'DHS assesses that the types of systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in vote tallying.' Putin's intent CLAIM: The Obama administration 'manufactured the January 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment that they knew was false promoting the LIE that Vladimir Putin and the Russian government helped President Trump win the 2016 election.' — Gabbard on Truth Social Wednesday. The material declassified this week reveals some dissent within the intelligence community about whether Putin wanted to help Trump or simply inflame the U.S. public. That same question led to a partisan divide on the House Intelligence panel when it examined the matter several years later. Gabbard's memo released last week cites a 'whistleblower' who she says served in the intelligence community at the time and who is quoted as saying that he could not 'concur in good conscience' with the intelligence community's judgment that Russia had a 'decisive preference' for Trump. Such dissent and debate are not unusual in the drafting of intelligence reports. The Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee examined whether there was any political interference in the Obama administration's conclusions and reported that 'all analysts expressed that they were free to debate, object to content, and assess confidence levels, as is normal and proper.' In 2018, Putin directly addressed the question of whether he preferred Trump at a press conference in Helsinki even as he sidestepped a question about whether he directed any of his subordinates to help Trump. 'Yes, I did,' Putin said. 'Because he talked about bringing the U.S.-Russia relationship back to normal.' Steele dossier CLAIM: 'They used already discredited information like the Steele dossier — they knew it was discredited at the time.' — Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday. The dossier refers to a collection of opposition research files compiled by a former British spy, Christopher Steele, whose work was funded by Democrats during the 2016 election. Those files included uncorroborated tips and salacious gossip about Trump's ties to Russia, but the importance to the Russia investigation has sometimes been overstated. It was not the basis for the FBI's decision to open an investigation in July 2016 into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, the Justice Department's inspector general found. Some of the records released by Gabbard this week also reveal that it was a Central Intelligence Agency human source close to the Kremlin that the agency primarily relied on for its conclusion that Putin wanted to help Trump and hurt Clinton, not the Steele dossier. FBI agents on the case didn't even come to possess the dossier until weeks into their inquiry. Even so, Trump supporters have seized on the unverified innuendo in the document to undercut the broader Russia investigation. Many of Steele's claims have since been discredited or denied. It is true, however, that the FBI and Justice Department relied in part on the Steele dossier to obtain surveillance warrants to eavesdrop on the communications of a former Trump campaign adviser, the inspector general found. FBI agents continued to pursue those warrants even after questions arose about the credibility of Steele's reporting. The dossier was also summarized — over the objections of then-CIA Director John Brennan, he has said — in a two-page annex to the classified version of the intelligence community assessment. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
North Korea's Kim urges troops to prepare 'for real war'
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has urged his military to be ready "for real war" as he observed a firing contest of artillery units, Pyongyang state media said Thursday. Kim's remarks follow the North's deployment of troops and weapons to help Russia during its more than three-year long offensive in Ukraine. Video footage aired by state-run Korea Central Television on Thursday showed soldiers from artillery units firing shells towards the sea. Kim is seen looking through binoculars at an observation post, flanked by two military officials, but the location for Wednesday's contest was not disclosed. He urged the soldiers to be ready "for real war" at "anytime" and be capable of "destroying the enemy in every battle", the Korean Central News Agency reported in an English dispatch. South Korean and Western intelligence agencies have reported Pyongyang sent more than 10,000 soldiers to Russia's Kursk region last year, along with artillery shells, missiles and long-range rocket systems. Around 600 North Korean soldiers have been killed and thousands more wounded fighting for Russia, Seoul has said. Kim offered Moscow his full support for its war in Ukraine during recent talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, state media reported previously. The two heavily sanctioned nations signed a military deal last year, including a mutual defence clause, during a rare visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin to Pyongyang. kjk/amj