&w=3840&q=100)
Fire at Iran's largest oil refinery kills 1 in country's southwest region
AP Tehran
A fire at Iran's oldest and largest refinery in the southwest killed one person, state media reported Sunday.
A leaky pump in an under-repair unit at Abadan refinery caused the fire on Saturday, killing a worker, according to the state-owned IRAN newspaper. Firefighters put out the blaze in two hours and operations remained unaffected, the report said.
Iran's deputy parliament speaker, Ali Nikzad, confirmed Sunday that some workers were also injured, media outlets said.
Abadan oil refinery, some 670 kilometres from the capital Tehran, began its operation in 1912. It is the biggest in the Islamic Republic, producing about 25 per cent of the country's fuel with more than 5,200,000 barrels of oil refined daily.
Several fires have broken out across Iran over the past week at residential and commercial buildings, with authorities saying gas leaks and electrical short-circuiting were to blame.
Iran is one of the world's major producers of oil, though sanctions by Western countries have limited its sales.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
25 minutes ago
- Mint
‘Your company truly never cared, never will': MNC employee cries over no leaves or work-from-home on Diwali
A recent post on Reddit has ignited a conversation about the disparities in leave and work-from-home policies for Indian employees compared to their western counterparts within American multinational corporations (MNCs). The anonymous user's candid account of an emotional confrontation with their senior manager over Diwali leave has resonated with many, putting focus on the alleged 'toxic work culture' in these MNCs. The original poster, who is a woman identifying as an employee of an American MNC with a hybrid work model, expressed deep disappointment with the company policies. 'I understand at the end of the day we're just cheap labor for them but god forbid I believe we'd have some policies that treat us like human.' She also bashed the company for favoring their western colleagues by stating, 'American/European colleagues can take long vacations and happily take the weeks of spring break, Thanksgiving and Christmas off.' Original post on Reddit The user further added that similar considerations are not extended to Indian employees, even for major cultural festivals such as Diwali. The core of the user's grievance centers on her company's 'no work from home or leaves' policy during the Diwali week. She revealed that, 'We're all working Diwali week except 1-2 people will be off on different days so there's some support each day.' The user's plight intensified when their request for work remotely from their hometown during the festival week because someone needs to be in the office. 'Believe me, we're still working on a week we deserve to be off. But now they want us in office. We've saved leaves and WFHs all year for this,' she added. The situation turned quickly got heated, which led to a 'crying sobbing angry argument' with the user's senior manager as she asserted 'I HAD TO GO HOME. It's the ONE time I get to.' A resolution only came when another colleague from the same city as the original poster decided to cancel their leaves to come into the office since they'll suffer the least damage. 'So technically this wasn't resolved, someone just sacrificed,' she said. The reddit post ended with a comment on corporate empathy as the user stated, 'Your company truly never cared, never will. Always knew this, but some days are truly frustrating.' Most of the comments on the post emphasised with the user, while some others shared their personal experiences of working with a western MNC. A Reddit user said, 'Well, that's pretty much how things work in Indian MNCs. I do empathize with you, but unfortunately, you wont find any respite here. Everything is 24/7 and #1 priority.' Another user mirrored this thought and said, 'It is not you, it is your managers. I am Indian working in Germany. Our project has a small team in Pune, and the managers always keep proudly proclaiming in the meetings that his team is so dedicated that they can work on weekend and holidays as well.' Among those negative experiences, some users had a completely different story about working with an MNC. A user claimed that not all workplaces are toxic, further reiterating 'I work with a small performance marketing shop, the client is based in Europe, for some reason I can't get into to maintain secrecy, they have the entire first half of August off. They told us no one at their end is going to be working till the 20th atleast. We decided to do the same.'
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Trump Aide Targets India, Alleges It Is Fueling Russia's War On Ukraine: 'Tied With China'
Stephen Miller's comments marked one of the strongest criticisms of India from the Trump camp so far A senior aide to US President Donald Trump has accused India of helping to fund Russia's war in Ukraine by continuing to buy oil from Moscow. The remarks were made as Trump stepped up pressure on New Delhi to halt its energy trade with Russia. Speaking on Fox News ' Sunday Morning Futures, Trump's deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller said, 'What he (Trump) said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia." Miller went on to say that 'people will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That's an astonishing fact." His comments marked one of the strongest criticisms of India from the Trump camp so far. India, a key US partner in the Indo-Pacific region, has maintained strong energy ties with Russia despite the ongoing war in Ukraine and growing Western sanctions against Moscow. According to Indian officials quoted by Reuters on Saturday, New Delhi intends to keep buying Russian oil, arguing it serves the country's energy security needs. As part of its tougher stance, the Trump administration imposed a 25% tariff on Indian products last Friday, citing India's continued purchases of Russian energy and military equipment. Trump has also threatened to raise tariffs up to 100% on imports from any country that continues buying Russian oil unless a major peace deal is reached. Despite the comments, Miller also noted that Trump maintains what he called a 'tremendous" relationship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
A Dutchmans Life Shows Russias Path Not Taken
Derk Sauer, a communist turned journalist, turned capitalist entrepreneur, died this week at 72 after a sailing accident. If you aren't Dutch or haven't been heavily involved with Russia over the last three decades, then you probably haven't heard of him. But he was a hugely important figure for independent Russian media and a man who shaped hundreds of lives if not more, including my own. His is a story that very sadly encapsulates the road that wasn't traveled in post-Soviet Moscow, either by the West in the 1990s, when it mattered most, or by President Vladimir Putin since. When the Soviet Union collapsed, shock therapy — a big bang approach to privatization and ending price controls and other constraints on the market — was prescribed. The idea was for the free market to build a new economy from the rubble of the old. Technology and knowledge transfer from the West would be key. McDonald's Corp. arrived early. Energy majors including ExxonMobil Corp. and BP Plc moved in, hoping to develop neglected and new oil and gas fields. Car manufacturers from General Motors Co. to Mercedes-Benz Group AG were lured by the prospect of selling modern vehicles to those used to having to repair a new Lada before they could drive it. But Moscow also became a kind of Klondike for small-time Western would-be entrepreneurs. Many were carpetbaggers in search of a quick buck. They had the ethics of the Russian oligarchs and criminals with whom they worked to set up anything from casinos to gyms. They came and went with the money. Even blue-chip names like the Harvard Institute for International Development became mired in corruption scandals and left in disgrace. In the end, too little of worth was built. What worked for Poland didn't for Russia, and the result, famously, was a massive transfer of wealth into the hands of a few Russian oligarchs. The economy shrank by almost 15% in 1992 alone. Life expectancy for men fell from to 59 years in 1993 from 64 just three years earlier. Yet this familiar horror show doesn't tell the whole story. Some value was built in the 1990s. When it came to fostering a professional, independent Russian media — a key component in any functioning market democracy — Sauer made a massive contribution. He showed what was possible and what it took to succeed. Sauer arrived before the Soviet collapse to launch a glossy English-language monthly for the Dutch publishing company VNU. As more became possible after 1991, he saw a market for a full-service daily Moscow newspaper, modeled on the Paris-based International Herald Tribune. When VNU didn't buy in, he found investors and started The Moscow Times. He didn't do the usual with such expatriate newspapers, hiring a few low-paid reporters to add some local color to a daily collection of wire stories. Instead, he invested in hiring a sizable team — including myself and older, more experienced hands, including from the IHT and The Washington Post. He used these to train and edit a larger group of young reporters from Russia and abroad. By the time I left after several years as editor in 1997, we had some 60 journalists and editors publishing 32 to 40 pages a day. But this expat-led publishing business soon became a sideshow. Sauer's holding company, Independent Media, expanded to publish Russian editions of a whole range of magazines, from Cosmopolitan and Vogue to Playboy. When an early effort at a Russian-language business newspaper fizzled, he pulled in the Financial Times and Wall Street Journal to create Vedomosti, which quickly became the country's most respected and genuinely independent daily. Nobody, of course, was immune from the wildness of a market that had been liberalized without regulations or institutions in place to create a level playing field. It was a jungle that served mainly the ruthless and the connected. As the money rolled in, Sauer also had to acquire a form of protection, selling a 10% stake in his company to an oligarch. But when either the Kremlin or Russian investors pressured him to shut down coverage that would embarrass them — including access for cash and transfer pricing scandals, respectively — he checked the reporting and let us print. Most important was that he and his family stayed, committing to what they were building. When the first opportunity came to cash out, some co-investors in Independent Media took the money and left. Sauer didn't. He remained even as the market became more difficult and the tolerance of a free press that allowed his stable of newspapers and magazines to thrive began to disappear. After eventually selling the company in 2005, Sauer went on to work with RBC, a Russian news outlet that sought the independence and quality he had come to represent. When The Moscow Times withered in 2017, he bought it back to keep it alive, albeit online and in a much-slimmed form. Increasingly under political pressure, he left RBC and then, in 2022, the country. He helped The Moscow Times and other exiled independent Russian outlets, such as the TV channel Dozhd , to relocate to the Baltic States and Netherlands, as they too had to flee. They continue to write and broadcast for Russians on issues such as the war in Ukraine in ways no domestically based media can. What might have been if more Western businesspeople had come to Russia not to join the pillaging that in many cases passed for investment, but to actually build something? Or had lived by the rules of a regulated free-market democracy, the way Sauer did for journalism? If Western governments had tried harder and risked more? Or if international financial institutions had offered something better suited to Russia than shock therapy? And what if Putin and his vertical power system hadn't made fact-based journalism impossible? If the Kremlin had focused on developing a strong, diversified domestic economy, instead of carving up the nation's resources among friends and looking for expansion and glory at the expense of Russia's neighbors? Those are unanswerable questions, and by now, academic. Perhaps there will be another chance, another Moscow opening, forced by a future, younger generation of Russians at a time when the West has grown wiser and less arrogant. All that's clear to me today, though, is that Russia would be a richer, freer, less aggressive and less paranoid nation had it remained open to people like Derk Sauer, rather than force him out with the ecosystem he did so much to foster. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Marc Champion is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Europe, Russia and the Middle East. He was previously Istanbul bureau chief for the Wall Street Journal.
