Intel CEO considers strategic shift in chip manufacturing
Under the proposed strategy, Intel's foundry business would offer external customers a more advanced generation of chipmaking technology, Reuters reported, citing sources familiar with the matter.
The potential shift marks a departure from the plans set by Tan's predecessor and could involve substantial financial implications. Tan officially took charge in March 2025, succeeding Pat Gelsinger.
Since assuming leadership, Tan has been proactive in reducing costs and seeking new avenues to revitalise the struggling US chipmaker. He also expressed concerns regarding the current 18A manufacturing process.
Industry analysts told the news agency that the next-generation process could enhance Intel's competitiveness against Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC).
To discontinue external sales of the 18A and its variant 18A-P processes, Intel may need to write off these assets. It is estimated that such a write-off could result in a financial loss running into hundreds of millions or potentially billions of dollars.
Tan is considering reallocating resources towards the 14A chipmaking process, where Intel expects to hold an edge over TSMC, as per the two sources. This strategy aims to attract large clients such as Apple and Nvidia, who currently rely on TSMC for chip production.
Tan has instructed the company to prepare options for discussion with Intel's board, potentially including the cessation of marketing 18A to new clients. A decision on the matter may not be reached until a later board meeting due to its complexity and financial stakes.
Intel responded to the report by dismissing it as 'hypothetical scenarios or market speculation'.
The company stated that its primary customer for the 18A process has been Intel itself, with plans to increase production of 'Panther Lake' laptop chips by late 2025. These chips are described as the most advanced designed and manufactured in the US.
'Lip-Bu and the executive team are committed to strengthening our roadmap, building trust with our customers, and improving our financial position for the future. We have identified clear areas of focus and will take actions needed to turn the business around,' Reuters quoted Intel as saying in a statement.
In 2024, Intel reported a net loss of $18.8bn, marking its first unprofitable year since 1986. Recent reports indicate that Intel may reduce its factory workforce by 15% to 20% to address ongoing financial challenges.
"Intel CEO considers strategic shift in chip manufacturing" was originally created and published by Verdict, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
10 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost
WASHINGTON — Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act . Joe Biden had the Inflation Reduction Act . President Donald Trump will have the tax cuts . All were hailed in the moment and became ripe political targets in campaigns that followed. In Trump's case, the tax cuts may almost become lost in the debates over other parts of the multitrillion-dollar bill that Democrats say will force poor Americans off their health care and overturn a decade or more of energy policy.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
OpenAI's Partnership With Microsoft is Good, Says CEO Sam Altman; There's ‘Tension,' But Already Planning ‘Next Decade Together'
Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, has emerged as one of the most influential voices in artificial intelligence (AI), known for his ability to navigate both technological innovation and complex business relationships. In a recent appearance on the Hard Fork Podcast, Altman addressed public speculation about the state of OpenAI's partnership with Microsoft, offering a candid perspective on the realities of high-stakes collaboration in the tech industry. Altman described a recent conversation with Microsoft (MSFT) CEO Satya Nadella, noting it was a 'super nice call' that covered a range of topics, including their shared hopes for a 'very long and productive future working together.' This sentiment underscores the depth of the relationship between the two companies, which began in earnest when Altman secured a $1 billion investment from Microsoft in 2019 — a move that enabled OpenAI to accelerate its research and product development at a critical moment. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Plans 'Fundamentally New Type of Computer' That Will Make AI 'Transcendentally Good' Meta Platforms Stock Looks Cheap - Short OTM Puts for a 2% One-Month Yield Is SoundHound AI Stock a Buy, Sell, or Hold for July 2025? Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Since then, the partnership has expanded dramatically. In 2023, Microsoft announced a new multi-year $10 billion investment in OpenAI, further cementing the relationship and integrating OpenAI's technology into Microsoft's products and cloud infrastructure. Altman acknowledged that, as with any 'deep partnership,' there are 'points of tension,' but emphasized that overall, the collaboration has been 'wonderfully good for both companies.' This pragmatic view is consistent with Altman's reputation for balancing ambition with realism, a skill honed during his years as president of Y Combinator and as a serial entrepreneur in Silicon Valley. Altman's authority on the subject is rooted in his track record of leading OpenAI through both rapid growth and significant challenges. He co-founded OpenAI in 2015 with the mission to advance digital intelligence for the benefit of humanity, and has since overseen the launch of transformative products like GPT-3, DALL-E, and ChatGPT. These innovations have not only shaped the direction of AI research but have also brought the technology to millions of users worldwide. Addressing rumors about friction between OpenAI and Microsoft, Altman remarked that while media coverage sometimes speculates about the partnership 'about to collapse,' his own conversations focus on 'how do we figure out what the next decade together looks like?' He was clear that 'there is' tension, but also 'so much good stuff there,' and he expects the partnership to remain valuable for both sides 'for a very long time to come.' Altman's approach reflects his broader philosophy: ambitious goals require strong, sometimes challenging alliances. His leadership style — marked by transparency, adaptability, and a focus on long-term value — continues to shape OpenAI's role at the forefront of artificial intelligence, and the company's ongoing collaboration with Microsoft remains a central pillar of that strategy. On the date of publication, Caleb Naysmith did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump branded, browbeat and prevailed. But his big bill may come at a political cost
WASHINGTON (AP) — Barack Obama had the Affordable Care Act. Joe Biden had the Inflation Reduction Act. President Donald Trump will have the tax cuts. All were hailed in the moment and became ripe political targets in campaigns that followed. In Trump's case, the tax cuts may almost become lost in the debates over other parts of the multitrillion-dollar bill that Democrats say will force poor Americans off their health care and overturn a decade or more of energy policy. Through persuasion and browbeating, Trump forced nearly all congressional Republicans to line up behind his marquee legislation despite some of its unpalatable pieces. He followed the playbook that had marked his life in business before politics. He focused on branding — labeling the legislation the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' — then relentlessly pushed to strong-arm it through Congress, solely on the votes of Republicans. But Trump's victory will soon be tested during the 2026 midterm elections where Democrats plan to run on a durable theme: that the Republican president favors the rich on tax cuts over poorer people who will lose their health care. Trump and Republicans argue that those who deserve coverage will retain it. Nonpartisan analysts, however, project significant increases to the number of uninsured. Meanwhile, the GOP's promise that the bill will turbocharge the economy will be tested at a time of uncertainty and trade turmoil. Trump has tried to counter the notion of favoring the rich with provisions that would reduce the taxes for people paid in tips and receiving overtime pay, two kinds of earners who represent a small share of the workforce. Extending the tax cuts from Trump's first term that were set to expire if Congress failed to act meant he could also argue that millions of people would avoid a tax increase. To enact that and other expensive priorities, Republicans made steep cuts to Medicaid that ultimately belied Trump's promise that those on government entitlement programs 'won't be affected.' 'The biggest thing is, he's answering the call of the forgotten people. That's why his No. 1 request was the no tax on tips, the no tax on overtime, tax relief for seniors,' said Rep. Jason Smith, R-Mo., chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. 'I think that's going to be the big impact.' Hard to reap the rewards Presidents have seen their signature legislative accomplishments unraveled by their successors or become a significant political liability for their party in subsequent elections. A central case for Biden's reelection was that the public would reward the Democrat for his legislative accomplishments. That never bore fruit as he struggled to improve his poll numbers driven down by concerns about his age and stubborn inflation. Since taking office in January, Trump has acted to gut tax breaks meant to boost clean energy initiatives that were part of Biden's landmark health care-and-climate bill. Obama's health overhaul, which the Democrat signed into law in March 2010, led to a political bloodbath in the midterms that fall. Its popularity only became potent when Republicans tried to repeal it in 2017. Whatever political boost Trump may have gotten from his first-term tax cuts in 2017 did not help him in the 2018 midterms, when Democrats regained control of the House, or in 2020 when he lost to Biden. 'I don't think there's much if any evidence from recent or even not-so-recent history of the president's party passing a big one-party bill and getting rewarded for it,' said Kyle Kondik, an elections analyst with the nonpartisan University of Virginia's Center for Politics. Social net setbacks Democrats hope they can translate their policy losses into political gains. During an Oval Office appearance in January, Trump pledged he would 'love and cherish Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid.' 'We're not going to do anything with that, other than if we can find some abuse or waste, we'll do something,' Trump said. 'But the people won't be affected. It will only be more effective and better.' That promise is far removed from what Trump and the Republican Party ultimately chose to do, paring back not only Medicaid but also food assistance for the poor to make the math work on their sweeping bill. It would force 11.8 million more people to become uninsured by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office, whose estimates the GOP has dismissed. 'In Trump's first term, Democrats in Congress prevented bad outcomes. They didn't repeal the (Affordable Care Act), and we did COVID relief together. This time is different,' said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. 'Hospitals will close, people will die, the cost of electricity will go up, and people will go without food.' Some unhappy Republicans Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., repeatedly argued the legislation would lead to drastic coverage losses in his home state and others, leaving them vulnerable to political attacks similar to what Democrats faced after they enacted 'Obamacare.' With his warnings unheeded, Tillis announced he would not run for reelection, after he opposed advancing the bill and enduring Trump's criticism. 'If there is a political dimension to this, it is the extraordinary impact that you're going to have in states like California, blue states with red districts,' Tillis said. "The narrative is going to be overwhelmingly negative in states like California, New York, Illinois, and New Jersey.' Even Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who eventually became the decisive vote in the Senate that ensured the bill's passage, said the legislation needed more work and she urged the House to revise it. Lawmakers there did not. Early polling suggests that Trump's bill is deeply unpopular, including among independents and a healthy share of Republicans. White House officials said their own research does not reflect that. So far, it's only Republicans celebrating the victory. That seems OK with the president. In a speech in Iowa after the bill passed, he said Democrats only opposed it because they 'hated Trump.' That didn't bother him, he said, 'because I hate them, too.' ___ Associated Press writer Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report. Seung Min Kim, The Associated Press