logo
Venus Williams, 45, Says Doctors Dismissed This Health Problem for Years

Venus Williams, 45, Says Doctors Dismissed This Health Problem for Years

Yahoo6 hours ago
Venus Williams, 45, Says Doctors Dismissed This Health Problem for Years originally appeared on Parade.
Venus Williams revealed that her doctors dismissed her fibroid symptoms for years before she got proper treatment.
While appearing on the Thursday, July 3, episode of the Today Show, Williams, 45, explained that she experienced extreme symptoms with her periods for years. Her menstrual cramps and nausea got so bad that she often found herself 'hugging the toilet, waiting for this to pass.'
While talking to her doctors about her pain, she said that many of the professionals she spoke to dismissed her discomfort and insisted it was "normal."
'It just got too bad, and I couldn't handle it,' she explained of the pain.
William said she knew that she had fibroids, though doctors never told her how large they were or that they were related to the pain she felt during her periods. She even experienced persistent anemia from heavy periods, which led to repeated iron transfusions.
'I'm sharing now because I was outraged that I didn't know this was possible. I didn't know what was wrong with me,' she said of why she was sharing her experience. 'No one should have to go through this.'
Fibroids are "common growths of the uterus" that "often appear during the years you're usually able to get pregnant and give birth," according to the Mayo Clinic. "Uterine fibroids are not cancer, and they almost never turn into cancer."
Williams explained that she used to experience excessive bleeding and pain during her periods, which would cause her to have low energy. 'I thought maybe it was autoimmune anemia,' she said. 'It was what I was dealing with inside, which was fibroids and something else I had never heard of, which is adenomyosis.'
When she was training for Wimbledon in 2016, the pain got so bad that she couldn't eat.
'We had a doubles final to play next, and I was just lying on the floor in the locker room, like, 'It's gonna pass. It's gonna pass,'' she said. 'Thank God Serena [Williams] got the doctor … and I was able to get up and eat and start playing — bad luck for the opponents.'
As her pain worsened, doctors suggested that she undergo a hysterectomy. However, Williams didn't know if she wanted to have the surgery and that having the choice of naturally carrying a pregnancy "taken away" felt like a "nightmare."
Williams finally found some information about fibroids while scrolling on social media during the summer of 2024. She saw an ad about a center that offered treatment for fibroids, which led her to seek treatment at NYU Langone Health Center for Fibroid Care led by Dr. Taraneh Shirazian.
Parade Daily🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬
Shirazian recommended that Williams undergo a myomectomy, which removes the fibroids from the uterus. While the athlete was initially put off by the idea due to her past of being dismissed by doctors, she ultimately decided to have the surgery. Luckily for Williams, the surgery was a success and she now lives a more comfortable life.
'Hopefully someone will see this interview and say, 'I can get help. I don't have to live this way,'' Williams shared. 'I'm very passionate about this at this point in time because I know that other people can live better than what I lived.'
Venus Williams, 45, Says Doctors Dismissed This Health Problem for Years first appeared on Parade on Jul 3, 2025
This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 3, 2025, where it first appeared.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Teen hospitalized after lightning strikes family sheltering under umbrella on Florida beach
Teen hospitalized after lightning strikes family sheltering under umbrella on Florida beach

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Teen hospitalized after lightning strikes family sheltering under umbrella on Florida beach

A 17-year-old girl is in the hospital after lightning struck her and her family on a Florida beach just outside St. Petersburg. The family of three was struck by lightning while sitting under an umbrella at St. Pete Beach on Independence Day, local outlet Bay News 9 reports. The St. Pete Beach Fire Department responded to a call about the incident just after noon local time. The teen was taken to Tampa General Hospital. She was transported as a 'trauma alert,' which means she may have sustained life-threatening injuries. The girl was with two adults. First responders treated them at the scene, and they refused additional medical treatment, according to Bay News 9. Kyree Mejias told 10 Tampa Bay he witnessed the lightning strike while at St. Pete Beach with his family. 'It was so close to us, we could see the flash,' Mejias said. 'It was more or less just us trying to take care of the tent and all of that, he added. 'As soon as we felt the vibration and the shock, everybody just let go.' The Independent has contacted the St. Pete Beach Fire Department for more information. Florida is known as the country's 'lightning strike capital.' The state sees an average of 1.2 million strikes per year and has more lightning strikes per square mile than any other state. Lightning strikes about 25 million times each year in the U.S., killing around 20 people annually. Just weeks ago, 15-year-old Yassin Khalifa was also struck by lightning while under a tree in New York City's Central Park. He is expected to make a full recovery. "I can see, but I can't talk. I can't move,' the teen recounted to CBS News New York. 'So I'm just kind of locked in my body for a second until I get into the ambulance and I feel everyone trying to shake me.' "Apparently, I'm pretty lucky, because my spine was directly against the tree and no nerve damage happened,' he added.

Ready-made stem cell therapies for pets could be coming
Ready-made stem cell therapies for pets could be coming

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ready-made stem cell therapies for pets could be coming

Earlier this week, San Diego startup Gallant announced $18 million in funding to bring the first FDA-approved ready-to-use stem cell therapy to veterinary medicine. If it passes regulatory muster, it could create a whole new way to treat our fur babies. It's still an experimental field, even though people have been researching stem cells for humans for decades. Seven-year-old Gallant's first target is a painful mouth condition in cats called Feline Chronic Gingivostomatitis (FCGS), which Gallant says could receive FDA approval by early 2026. The field has shown some encouraging early results. Studies on dogs with arthritis showed improvements in pain and mobility, with some benefits lasting up to two years. But when researchers tried similar treatments for kidney disease in cats — that's another condition Gallant wants to tackle — the results were more mixed. What makes Gallant's approach different is convenience. Most stem cell treatments today require harvesting cells from the patient or donors with matching tissue, whereas Gallant's therapy uses ready-to-use cells from donor animals, even if they are a different species. Investors clearly see potential here. The funding round was led by existing backer Digitalis Ventures, with participation from NovaQuest Capital Management, which previously invested in the first FDA-approved human stem cell therapy. The company has an interesting backstory. Gallant's founder, Aaron Hirschhorn, previously sold DogVacay to its biggest rival in the dog-sitting marketplace, Rover. Hirschhorn passed away in 2021; Gallant is now led by Linda Black, who joined as its president and chief scientific officer from nearly the beginning. Gallant has now raised at least $44 million altogether from investors. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Massive Review Finds No 'Safe' Level of Processed Meat Consumption
Massive Review Finds No 'Safe' Level of Processed Meat Consumption

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Massive Review Finds No 'Safe' Level of Processed Meat Consumption

We know that processed meat isn't particularly good for us, having already been linked to dementia, diabetes, and cancer, but how much of it counts as a 'safe' level of consumption? According to new research, there's no such thing. US researchers reviewed over 70 previous studies (involving several million participants in total), analyzing the relationships between ultra-processed food and three health issues: type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease, and colorectal cancer. Associations for processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages, and trans fatty acids were looked into, and it was the processed meat that came out with the worst results – even if the amount eaten is only small. "The monotonic increases in health risk with increased consumption of processed meat suggest that there is not a 'safe' amount of processed meat consumption with respect to diabetes or colorectal cancer risk," the team from the University of Washington in Seattle writes in their published paper. Related: It's important to put the research into context. The associations found are relatively weak, they don't prove direct cause and effect, and the analyzed studies relied on self-reported dietary habits (which may not be completely accurate). However, the study has several strengths too – it uses a Burden of Proof method, which is more conservative when assessing impacts on health. The results tend to be minimum values, which means they likely underestimate the true health risk. What's particularly notable here is that minimal increases in consumption still raised risk levels. "Habitual consumption of even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks, and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer," University of Washington nutrition biologist Demewoz Haile told CNN. For example, the equivalent of one hot dog a day was associated with at least an 11 percent greater risk of type 2 diabetes, and at least a 7 percent greater risk of colorectal cancer, compared to eating no processed meat at all. For beverages, an extra can of sugar-sweetened pop a day was linked to a 8 greater risk of type 2 diabetes, and a 2 percent greater risk of ischemic heart disease, compared to not drinking anything sugary. For trans fatty acids, a small daily amount was associated with a 3 percent increase in risk of ischemic heart disease, compared with zero consumption. "This information provides critical data for public health specialists and policymakers responsible for dietary guidelines and potential initiatives that aim to reduce the consumption of these processed foods," write the researchers. While the study has limitations, its scale and conservative methodology make it worth taking note of. This is backed up by a commentary in the same journal, which does note the role of ultra-processed foods in improving food accessibility and shelf life, particularly in areas with limited access to fresh food. The message from the research team is that cutting out ultra-processed foods as much as possible is the best option for our health. The research has been published in Nature Medicine. Ozempic-Like Drugs Could Treat Chronic Migraines, Trial Finds Gut Bacteria Found to Soak Up Toxic Forever Chemicals Gene Therapy Can Restore Hearing in Adults, First-of-Its-Kind Trial Shows

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store