Father of girl who drowned in school sump moves court for compensation
The petitioner T. Amuthan of Uthangudi said he had admitted his daughter to Sri Kindergarten Playschool in K.K. Nagar. On April 29, she drowned in an uncovered sump inside the school premises at around 10.20 a.m.. It was due to the gross negligence on the part of the school authorities and failure of duty on the part of officials, he said.
He said the school owed a duty of care towards his daughter and blatantly breached it, resulting in her untimely death. The school authorities had failed to maintain a safe and secure environment for the students. They failed to take precautions to prevent such foreseeable accidents. There was a clear lack of supervision and security.
The authorities had a statutory duty to inspect the school premises before granting recognition to private schools, as mandated by Tamil Nadu Private Schools (Regulation) Rules, 2023. The authorities failed to conduct a proper site inspection and did not carry out periodic inspections thereafter, he said.
He said the school conducted unauthorised summer classes despite instructions prohibiting the same. As per Rule 38 there were no first aid facilities in the school and the staff lacked training in handling emergencies. Madurai district administration and the school have to pay just and fair compensation for the death of his daughter, he said and sought a compensation of ₹50 lakh.
Justice S. Srimathy ordered notice to Madurai district administration and the school authorities and posted the matter for hearing to August 22.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Preserve CCTV footage or face action: Gujarat Information Commission to police
Ahmedabad: Expressing displeasure over police not providing CCTV footage of police stations sought by citizens under the RTI Act, the Gujarat Information Commission has directed officials concerned to preserve such images or face action under the legislation. In an order issued on July 19, the commission clarified that if an RTI (Right To Information) application is received by a police station within 30 days of an incident, the CCTV footage of that matter must be preserved. "Failure to preserve the recording will lead the commission to initiate proceedings for disciplinary action and penalty under Section 20 of the RTI Act and appropriate action under the Gujarat Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1971," the panel warned in its order. A resident of Ahmedabad's Naroda area had filed an RTI application seeking CCTV footage from Shaher Kotda Police Station to obtain evidence of alleged misconduct against him. When he did not receive the relevant information from the police station, he filed an appeal with the Information Commission. During the hearing of the appeal, a representative of the Public Information Officer (PIO) claimed before the panel that the CCTV footage in question could not be provided to the applicant as it got deleted due to a "technical fault". The officer further claimed that though a technical expert was roped in to retrieve the data as directed by the commission, the footage could not be recovered. Commenting on the response, the commission noted applications seeking CCTV footage of police stations are being received by the panel frequently. "However, the Commission has observed that such CCTV footage is hardly provided to the applicants" the order said. A 2022 circular issued by the General Administration Department (GAD) mandates that CCTV footage must be preserved until the disposal of the second appeal of an RTI applicant, it pointed out. Furthermore, the commission noted the Gujarat Director General of Police (DGP) had also issued similar instructions in the past and directed police officials to preserve the footage till the disposal of the second appeal. The commission stated that the purpose of installing CCTV cameras will only be served only if the GAD circular and departmental instructions are strictly followed. "Despite such instructions, police station officers or staff refuse to provide footage by citing excuses, which is not proper," said the panel. The commission directed the DGP to issue a fresh order asking police officials concerned to strictly adhere to the previous circular on preserving CCTV footage. The commission warned the State Public Information Officer (PIO) and the First Appellate Authority (FAA) will be liable for penalty and disciplinary action under Section 20 of the RTI Act if they fail to provide the footage to applicants.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Preserve CCTV footage or face action: Gujarat Information Commission to police
Ahmedabad, Aug 4 (PTI) Expressing displeasure over police not providing CCTV footage of police stations sought by citizens under the RTI Act, the Gujarat Information Commission has directed officials concerned to preserve such images or face action under the legislation. In an order issued on July 19, the commission clarified that if an RTI (Right To Information) application is received by a police station within 30 days of an incident, the CCTV footage of that matter must be preserved. 'Failure to preserve the recording will lead the commission to initiate proceedings for disciplinary action and penalty under Section 20 of the RTI Act and appropriate action under the Gujarat Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1971," the panel warned in its order. A resident of Ahmedabad's Naroda area had filed an RTI application seeking CCTV footage from Shaher Kotda Police Station to obtain evidence of alleged misconduct against him. When he did not receive the relevant information from the police station, he filed an appeal with the Information Commission. During the hearing of the appeal, a representative of the Public Information Officer (PIO) claimed before the panel that the CCTV footage in question could not be provided to the applicant as it got deleted due to a 'technical fault". The officer further claimed that though a technical expert was roped in to retrieve the data as directed by the commission, the footage could not be recovered. 'However, the Commission has observed that such CCTV footage is hardly provided to the applicants" the order said. A 2022 circular issued by the General Administration Department (GAD) mandates that CCTV footage must be preserved until the disposal of the second appeal of an RTI applicant, it pointed out. Furthermore, the commission noted the Gujarat Director General of Police (DGP) had also issued similar instructions in the past and directed police officials to preserve the footage till the disposal of the second appeal. The commission stated that the purpose of installing CCTV cameras will only be served only if the GAD circular and departmental instructions are strictly followed. 'Despite such instructions, police station officers or staff refuse to provide footage by citing excuses, which is not proper," said the panel. The commission directed the DGP to issue a fresh order asking police officials concerned to strictly adhere to the previous circular on preserving CCTV footage. The commission warned the State Public Information Officer (PIO) and the First Appellate Authority (FAA) will be liable for penalty and disciplinary action under Section 20 of the RTI Act if they fail to provide the footage to applicants. PTI PJT PD RSY view comments First Published: August 04, 2025, 21:00 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
New Indian Express
2 days ago
- New Indian Express
Madras HC: Remand orders against BJP lawyers' wing secy illegal
CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has held illegal the remand orders issued by the respective judicial magistrates in Coimbatore and Thirukazhukundram against advocate D Alexis Sudhakar, the state secretary of BJP's lawyers wing. Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan passed the orders recently on the criminal revision petitions filed by Sudhakar who was arrested on the charges of possession of weapons and cheating. Senior counsel Abudu Kumar Rajaratnam, appearing for Sudhakar, submitted that he was falsely implicated in a series of criminal cases by the police out of political vendetta and was arrested last year. The remand orders issued by the judicial magistrates were arbitrary and in violation of Article 22 (1) of the Constitution which guarantees the right to be informed of the grounds of arrest and the right to consult and be defended by a lawyer of one's choice. He also submitted that mandatory statutory safeguards including service of ground and reasons of arrest and intimation to family members were disregarded by the police officers while arresting Sudhakar. Justice Ilanthiraiyan held that a perusal of the arrest memo reveals the ground arrest and reasons for arrest were not stated. That apart, there is no record to show the petitioner's family was informed of the arrest. The non-compliance of the mandatory provisions is a clear violation, the judge said in the order. He held the remand itself is illegal when the petitioner was not informed of the reasons and the grounds for the arrest.
