Alberta releases its pension survey results, 63% opposed to leaving CPP
Article content
Postmedia first filed a request for responses from the survey a week after it opened in September of 2023, and followed up with multiple further requests in the following months, all of which produced either no records or records that were entirely redacted.
Article content
Article content
Article content
Last December, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner opened reviews into the government's response to three requests: one seeking a summary of the survey results, a second looking for copies of the open-answer questions in the survey, and a third for completed copies of the pension workbook that was distributed in late 2023.
Article content
Article content
According to that summary, 63 per cent of respondents were opposed to an Alberta pension plan (APP), 10 per cent were in favour of an APP, and 12 per cent were undecided or unsure.
Article content
The remaining 15 per cent were other forms of responses, including questions about implementation, suggestions for other alternatives, non-answers, and incomplete responses.
Article content
Article content
More than 94,000 Albertans completed the survey between its opening on Sept. 21, 2023, and its conclusion on Dec. 10, 2023.
Article content
Article content
The government issued a statement to Postmedia following the release of the results.
Article content
'While recent surveys on an APP show public opinion may be shifting, we will continue to engage with Albertans on this topic through the Alberta Next panel. The Alberta Pension Protection Act guarantees we won't replace the CPP with an Alberta Pension Plan unless Albertans approve it in a referendum.'
Article content
Polls from Leger in August and again last February both showed around 23 per cent support for leaving the CPP.
Article content
A government-commissioned survey by respected pollster Janet Brown found that 55 per cent of those who had made up their minds on the issue were in favour of a provincial pension plan if it 'guaranteed all Alberta seniors the same or better benefits' than the existing federal plan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
5 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
'Alberta Forever Canada' petition sees potential hurdles according to Alberta political scientist
The countdown has officially started, and Thomas Lukaszuk has less than 88 days to garner over 290,000 signatures for his 'Alberta Forever Canada' citizen initiative. Article content Alberta's Chief Electoral Officer Gordon McClure issued the petition on Wednesday for a potential referendum that asks whether or not Alberta should remain in Canada. Article content Article content The petition was approved under older guidelines that the province had in place. In total, the petition needs to garner 293,976 signatures by Oct. 28. Article content Article content 'It definitely appears that a referendum on separation in this province was inevitable,' said petition originator and former progressive Conservative deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk. 'Our premier has done everything she could to make it as easy and convenient for the separatists to strike a referendum by lowering the number of required signatures, extending the time of petitioning, and really relaxing fundraising rules.' Article content Article content Lukaszuk ultimately decided to start a new conversation to contrast voices promoting separatism in Alberta. Article content 'That's why I chose to do it,' he said. 'I was fortunate enough to file my petition first, my petition meets all the Federal Supreme Court of Canada and provincial legislative requirements.' Article content They will officially be launching the campaign in Edmonton tomorrow at the Strathcona Farmers Market at 9 a.m., alongside soliciting signatures from Albertans at public events, festivals, and knocking door-to-door. Article content Numerous canvassers from Calgary have also signed up, but are currently in the process of being registered with Elections Alberta. Article content 'They will probably be out in the next four or five days, because Elections Alberta is in the process of accrediting them and that's sort of a bureaucratic process that they have to go through, but there's no other way around that,' Lukaszuk said. Article content Lukaszuk is confident they will hit their mark. Article content 'It looks like there is a lot of appetite for it because there is no shortage of Albertans who want to sign the petition,' he said. ' We're inundated with questions of 'where can we sign,' so now the only challenge we have is getting can sign.' Article content Hurdles and pitfalls
Edmonton Journal
7 hours ago
- Edmonton Journal
Opinion: Premier Smith's wine tax isn't 'Canada First' — it's politics first
Article content When Premier Danielle Smith stood beside B.C. Premier David Eby in May 2024 and announced a new agreement to allow direct-to-consumer (DTC) wine shipping from B.C. into Alberta, many of us in the Canadian wine industry applauded. For the first time in years, it felt like provinces were putting Canadians — and common sense — ahead of bureaucracy and trade barriers. That optimism was short-lived. What Alberta's government did in the months that followed has undermined that agreement and added new costs to Alberta consumers. Worse, it was done quietly — during a time of global tariff uncertainty — under the cover of a foreign trade dispute. Let's walk through what happened: May 2024: Alberta and B.C. agreed to reopen DTC wine shipping. It was heralded as a return to fairness and free interprovincial trade. Article content Article content Article content April 1, 2025: Alberta added a new ad valorem tax — a percentage-based fee tied to the price of the wine. This wasn't part of the original agreement. It mirrors Alberta's wholesale markup, erasing the savings and simplicity that DTC wine was supposed to offer. What was the justification? Premier Smith's government pointed to the Trump administration's reimposition of U.S. tariffs on Canadian wine and other goods. But let's be clear: instead of shielding Canadian businesses from international instability, Alberta used those U.S. tariffs as an excuse to introduce a new tax on B.C. wineries and to raise costs for Alberta residents who want to buy directly. This is not leadership. It's a bait-and-switch. Albertans deserve to know the truth: your government made a public promise of access and fairness, then reversed course behind closed doors. The ad valorem tax introduced in April undermines the very spirit of the DTC agreement. It hurts Alberta consumers and penalizes B.C. producers trying to build direct relationships with wine lovers like you. You can still buy wine directly from B.C. wineries — but now you'll pay more than promised. And we'll get less than we should. This issue is bigger than wine. It speaks to how governments treat their agreements, their business partners, and —most importantly —their citizens. I urge Albertans to demand better from their leaders. Let's stop using international tensions as cover to quietly roll out new taxes on Canadians. Article content
Calgary Herald
9 hours ago
- Calgary Herald
Opinion: Premier Smith's wine tax isn't 'Canada First' - it's politics first
Article content When Premier Danielle Smith stood beside B.C. Premier David Eby in May 2024 and announced a new agreement to allow direct-to-consumer (DTC) wine shipping from B.C. into Alberta, many of us in the Canadian wine industry applauded. For the first time in years, it felt like provinces were putting Canadians — and common sense — ahead of bureaucracy and trade barriers. That optimism was short-lived. What Alberta's government did in the months that followed has undermined that agreement and added new costs to Alberta consumers. Worse, it was done quietly — during a time of global tariff uncertainty — under the cover of a foreign trade dispute. Let's walk through what happened: May 2024: Alberta and B.C. agreed to reopen DTC wine shipping. It was heralded as a return to fairness and free interprovincial trade. Article content Article content Article content Article content April 1, 2025: Alberta added a new ad valorem tax — a percentage-based fee tied to the price of the wine. This wasn't part of the original agreement. It mirrors Alberta's wholesale markup, erasing the savings and simplicity that DTC wine was supposed to offer. What was the justification? Premier Smith's government pointed to the Trump administration's reimposition of U.S. tariffs on Canadian wine and other goods. But let's be clear: instead of shielding Canadian businesses from international instability, Alberta used those U.S. tariffs as an excuse to introduce a new tax on B.C. wineries and to raise costs for Alberta residents who want to buy directly. This is not leadership. It's a bait-and-switch. Albertans deserve to know the truth: your government made a public promise of access and fairness, then reversed course behind closed doors. The ad valorem tax introduced in April undermines the very spirit of the DTC agreement. It hurts Alberta consumers and penalizes B.C. producers trying to build direct relationships with wine lovers like you. You can still buy wine directly from B.C. wineries — but now you'll pay more than promised. And we'll get less than we should. This issue is bigger than wine. It speaks to how governments treat their agreements, their business partners, and —most importantly —their citizens. I urge Albertans to demand better from their leaders. Let's stop using international tensions as cover to quietly roll out new taxes on Canadians.
