logo
Idaho legislative session marked by budget conflicts, ‘medical freedom,' tax cuts

Idaho legislative session marked by budget conflicts, ‘medical freedom,' tax cuts

Yahoo05-04-2025
Day after day inside Idaho's Capitol, a group of hardline conservative lawmakers calling themselves the 'Gang of 8' rejected dozens of proposed budgets this legislative session.
They told fellow lawmakers that they wanted no new government employees, no federal money and limited spending. Meanwhile, the Legislature approved $450 million worth of new tax cuts, which will come out of the state's general fund every year.
In interviews with the Idaho Statesman, several said their approach was at least partly inspired by President Donald Trump's cost-cutting actions.
'The DOGE phenomenon is sweeping across the nation,' said Sen. Joshua Kohl, R-Twin Falls, referring to the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. 'We want to be part of that in Idaho. We want to truly be a leader in the conservative movement, really slashing the growth of government.'
But the group's approach clashed with other lawmakers' desire to ensure government agencies had the funding they said they needed to perform their duties.
'I like to give the agencies what they need, within reason, and it doesn't feel to me like we were giving them their asks,' Rep. Marco Erickson, R-Idaho Falls, told the Statesman.
These diverging philosophies were a key source of disagreement this legislative session, sparking fierce debate and contributing to the extension of the legislative session past its target end date.
In a whirlwind of last-minute budget approvals, Idaho lawmakers Friday wrapped up this year's regular legislative session, three months marked by fierce debate over how to fund state agencies and departments. The adjournment date was two weeks past their goal of ending by March 21.
'Our job is to run the government and our state. So we have to pass budgets,' said Rep. Lori McCann, R-Lewiston. 'This session probably killed more budgets than I can ever remember.' She said she wished lawmakers would use 'a pocket knife instead of a chainsaw to balance the budget,' she told the Statesman.
Idaho lawmakers have long sought to keep budgets trim, but many this year invoked the idea of DOGE when rejecting budgets they deemed excessive, Sen. Carrie Semmelroth, D-Boise, told the Statesman. McCann attributed that in part to a growing number of far-right legislators joining the body.
Those who wanted to cut agencies' budgets expressed distrust of the funds those agencies requested through the Legislature's powerful budget-setting group, the Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee. The committee approves budget proposals before they move to the House and Senate floors.
Rep. Wendy Horman, R-Idaho Falls, who co-chairs the Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee, has said that lawmakers on JFAC have done their job of holding agencies accountable for the money. Horman on Thursday touted the work they accomplished on budgets.
'We have work that we can all be proud of,' Horman said on the floor. 'We have been able to fund essential government services while returning as much money to the taxpayer as possible.'
In the last few days of the session, lawmakers also sped through approving a controversial measure that banned businesses and schools from requiring medical interventions, including vaccines and any action taken to prevent the spread of diseases. The first version of the proposal was the only bill Little vetoed so far this year.
The bill would have converted the state's Coronavirus Stop Act into a broader 'Medical Freedom Act,' a law that prohibits businesses from requiring COVID-19 vaccines, and bans requiring medical interventions and action taken to prevent the spread of disease. Little said the bill would have forbid schools and day cares from sending contagious children home.
To override a veto, lawmakers must vote on the bill again and secure two-thirds majority support in both chambers. An attempt to do so for the 'medical freedom' bill failed in the Senate. Lawmakers then passed a new version of the bill that allows some exceptions for schools.
When asked about a potential veto of the latest bill, Assistant Majority Leader Josh Tanner, R-Eagle, told reporters in a news conference that 'I think everyone's in agreement and the issues are resolved.' Little signed the bill into law 15 minutes after it arrived on his desk.
Idaho Republicans ultimately accomplished passing several of their longstanding proposals, including the use of public funds for private school tuition, also known as school vouchers; cuts to the state's voter-approved Medicaid expansion; and the creation of a state crime for illegal entry, directing local police to work with Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The ACLU of Idaho immediately sued the state and temporarily blocked the immigration law from taking place.
They continued on the body's streak of tax cuts, which Little has called 'historic,' with a measure on property tax relief, a reduction on income tax and an increase of the state's grocery tax credit.
'We did a really good job this year,' House Speaker Mike Moyle, R-Star, told reporters Friday. 'It was a good year for Idaho.'
Lawmakers also said they tried to address Idaho's doctor shortage. After years of the state operating under one of the most restrictive abortion bans in the country, prompting an exodus of OB-GYNs, the Legislature passed a bill that would allow judges to dismiss frivolous lawsuits against medical professionals being sued for an illegal procedure. Susie Keller, CEO of the Idaho Medical Association, told the Statesman that the bill doesn't address doctors' concerns about liability.
The law, which threatens doctors with up to five years in prison and loss of their medical license, allows abortions only in cases of reported rape or incest, ectopic pregnancies, or when saving the life of the pregnant patient. The narrow exemptions have created uncertainty and anxiety among doctors about what treatment is legally allowed, and when, Keller said.
'That's a high bar,' Keller previously told the Statesman. 'What I hear our doctors say is, 'How close to death does she have to be? Has she lost 10% of her blood? Has she lost (more)?''
Last year, Idaho lawmakers decided to shake up their budgeting approach. Going forward, budget committee members decided they would separate out 'maintenance' budgets to keep agency operations intact, then consider any funding above last year's in a separate supplemental budget bill.
That approach, some told the Statesman, has created the impression that keeping budgets flat year over year is enough to keep agencies operating. For example, the members of the 'Gang of 8' have promised to reject any budget that exceeds 1% growth over baseline funding in an effort to keep government spending flat and save money.
But the additional 'enhancement' funds that agencies request are often critical, lawmakers said — such as money requested in Senate Bill 1160 to replace 60 aging vehicles in the Department of Health and Welfare.
'Those cars are eventually going to have to be replaced, and they're just going to cost more money' in the future as costs rise, said Rep. Ben Fuhriman, R-Shelley, who expressed disapproval of this and other examples of 'deferred maintenance' to keep budgets flat.
A supplemental budget for the state's Liquor Division, similarly, faced repeated pushback in part over its inclusion of shrink wrap — which the division uses to streamline packaging and prevent theft.
Items like these are 'mandatory to keep things going smoothly,' said Senate Minority Caucus Chair Janie Ward-Engelking, D-Boise.
There was an 'internal battle' in the Legislature when it weighed this approach to budgeting last year, Erickson said, because of concerns that it would slow the process and block funding for important government functions.
'There were several of us who said this is going to happen,' he said. 'And that's what we've seen play out.'
Idaho Democrats in a news conference said their party leaders are the ones who have stood up for Idaho values, in the face of irresponsible governing by the Republican Party. They touted standing up for health care and public schools, and in a news release criticized GOP infighting that 'brought chaos' to the budget-setting process.
'Republicans siphoned money needed for public education to subsidize private school tuition for the wealthy, they eliminated affordable housing funds, and actually managed to make our physician shortage worse, all while leaving us facing future revenue shortfalls,' Minority Leader Ilana Rubel, D-Boise, said in the release. 'They have abandoned the values they once claimed to stand for: fiscal responsibility, local control and limited government. It is Idaho Democrats who champion these values.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Issues New Threat to Obama, Clinton Over Russia Probe: 'Pay a Price'
Trump Issues New Threat to Obama, Clinton Over Russia Probe: 'Pay a Price'

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Trump Issues New Threat to Obama, Clinton Over Russia Probe: 'Pay a Price'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. President Donald Trump has said those involved in promoting what he called the Russia 'hoax,' the belief that the Russian state interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election to help his campaign, "should pay a price" during a television appearance on Friday. During the Newsmax interview, Trump singled out former President Barack Obama, whom he described as "more the mastermind," and Hillary Rodham Clinton, ex-secretary of state and first lady, for what he said was their involvement. Newsweek contacted the office of Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, via the Clinton Foundation, for comment on Saturday by online inquiry form and email respectively outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Following Trump's 2016 presidential election victory, allegations emerged that his campaign had been assisted, either with or without their knowledge, by Russian intelligence services. Subsequently, U.S. intelligence chiefs said they believed Russia intervened to "help" Trump and undermine Clinton. In 2019, Special Counsel Robert Mueller released a major report that concluded Russian interference in the election took place "in sweeping and systematic fashion," but "did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired … with the Russian government" in its efforts. Trump has long described the suggestion that Russia had any influence on the 2016 presidential election as a "hoax." What To Know During Trump's appearance on Newsmax, a conservative-leaning network, the president said he let Clinton "off the hook" over her supposed role in propagating the theory that Russian interference helped him win the 2016 presidential election. However, the president went on to say those involved in promoting the theory "hurt a lot of people," adding: "I think they should pay a price." Asked by the Newsmax host whether Obama was personally "involved," Trump replied: "Totally—he knew about it and then we have it cold; he has it in writing … you could almost say he was more the mastermind. He heard what she [Clinton] was doing and then he approved it, and not only approved it but pushed it. And they knew it was fake. They knew the Russia thing was fake." File photo: Donald Trump raises his hand while boarding Air Force One on August 1, 2025 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. File photo: Donald Trump raises his hand while boarding Air Force One on August 1, 2025 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland. Anna Moneymaker/GETTY Trump added that it would be up to Attorney General Pam Bondi whether to bring indictments over what he termed the Russian interference "hoax." The president said: "I'm not giving her advice one way or the other." Last month, Trump accused Obama of "treason" for what he said was the former president's role in arguing Russia interfered in the U.S. election. It followed a press release from Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard. It said Obama's efforts were part of "what was essentially a yearslong coup with the objective of trying to usurp the president from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people" after the 2016 election. Obama's spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush hit back, saying nothing released by the Trump administration "undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes." Rodenbush added: "These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio." What People Are Saying Referring to Clinton on Newsmax, Trump said: "We had her, and I had her right under the sights, and I told the people, 'Look, you can't do this to a president's wife, an ex-president, and she was secretary of state, but you can't do this to the wife of a president.' "And then they went after me and they meant it. And I said, 'You know, it's amazing I always felt you shouldn't be doing this stuff and I let Hillary off the hook, I totally let her off the hook, then I let her off the hook for what and then I come in and they do the same thing to me," Trump added. "The difference is they actually meant it, and they hurt a lot of people, and it was all a hoax and now they have it in black and white. No, I think they should pay a price. By the way, it could be the biggest scandal in the history of our country, but it continues onward … that scandal has continued from the beginning. Everything they do is a hoax. They're no good at anything other than some forms of nasty politics." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether any criminal charges will be brought against Obama, Clinton or figures involved in investigating alleged Russian election interference in 2016. Any such move would almost certainly spark a furious response from Democrats and civil liberty campaigners.

On the Senate's ‘Kumbaya' committee, John Kennedy is suddenly singing off-key
On the Senate's ‘Kumbaya' committee, John Kennedy is suddenly singing off-key

Politico

time27 minutes ago

  • Politico

On the Senate's ‘Kumbaya' committee, John Kennedy is suddenly singing off-key

'We're just going to do what we can to get the appropriations process moving again, and that's something we haven't had here in quite a while,' Thune said. 'So there's a lot of muscle memory we're trying to engage.'' The Senate is 'trying to find a sweet spot,' Thune added. Kennedy ultimately reached a deal with leadership this week to get a separate vote on funding for Congress. He said he wanted to be able to vote against the Legislative Branch bill without having to oppose a two-bill package focused on the departments of Veterans Affairs and Agriculture. He's angling to make a similar protest vote against the bill funding the Department of Interior and environmental projects, which would complicate Thune putting it in a second spending package that he wants to bring to the floor next month. But Kennedy's position frustrated colleagues who say he didn't articulate any policy concern with the congressional funding bill beyond believing it spent too much money. And his willingness to take a verbal sledgehammer to the Senate's talks is grating on some fellow Republicans who are straining to keep them on track. 'What we're seeing is different, and I don't know why,' Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) said about recent tactics from Kennedy and other senators. 'When I came on the Appropriations Committee, it was kind of like an unspoken rule, if you will — that we would be there to not only support the Republican bills, but as appropriators, we kind of held together … and we made the process work.' 'We don't have that right now, which is unfortunate,' she added. Besides publicly badmouthing the bipartisan process, Kennedy made other moves to rankle his Appropriations colleagues — starting with his vocal support for Trump's pursuit of 'rescissions.' Those spending clawbacks essentially serve to undo the spending panel's work. Not only did Kennedy vote for a first $9 billion package last month, he has also been backchanneling with White House budget director Russ Vought about additional requests. Democrats, and some Republicans, are warning that would blow up the appropriations process, but Kennedy called it 'naive' to think if the White House held off that Democrats would want to 'share a cup of hot cocoa and a hug with us.' Meanwhile, his frequent claim that Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is responsible for breaking the government funding process has particularly rankled Democrats. Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii, who is on the Appropriations Committee and likely to be Schumer's next No. 2, said the idea that 'you're going to blame the Democratic leader, and you control both chambers and the presidency, is plainly goofy.' 'If he wants to vote no on his own bill, I suppose he's entitled to do that. It's a little weird, but he's entitled to do it,' Schatz said. 'But there's no reason he should block the Senate from considering the legislation that he's presumably helped to craft.'

The ‘Epstein files' implosion bleeds into foreign policy
The ‘Epstein files' implosion bleeds into foreign policy

The Verge

time27 minutes ago

  • The Verge

The ‘Epstein files' implosion bleeds into foreign policy

While the summer doldrums have hit Washington, the MAGA influencers can never truly go on vacation, especially if they've spent their careers promising to reveal the truth about Jeffrey Epstein. Although their politicians are now in power, they're getting stonewalled, and in the absence of juicy 'Epstein files' to feed to their audiences, a new maelstrom of discontent is brewing, one that implicates much more than allegations about a pedophile's sex trafficking ring. The complex rift around Donald Trump's loyalists and the diehard Epstein truthers can no longer be separated from the issue of Israel, and as days pass, vocal criticism of the Israeli government is becoming louder and louder inside the American right wing — something that was once unthinkable. It should be emphasized that some of the most anti-Israel voices on the right are simply open antisemites, and that's using the word in the narrowest possible sense. (For example, white nationalist Nick Fuentes has espoused Holocaust denial and praised Hitler.) It is also true, however, that Israel is currently engaged in an internationally unpopular asymmetric war in Gaza, and that there is an outstanding arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the war crime of starvation as a method of warfare. For the hardened antisemite, the mere fact that Epstein was Jewish establishes a connection between the so-called Epstein files and Israel; elsewhere in the MAGAverse, major figures (like Tucker Carlson) advance the theory that the billionaire sex offender was a Mossad asset. (This theory is bolstered in part by long-standing rumors that Ghislaine Maxwell's father was a Mossad agent.) The faction highlighting both Epstein and Israel is either nonideological (such as Theo Von, who pressed JD Vance on the Epstein files and has questioned 'why we [America] support Israel'), deeply populist and/or conspiratorial, and sometimes a combination of these categories. Tucker Carlson's two most recent podcasts, for instance, were deep dives into Epstein's history and heavy criticism of Israeli military strikes on Christian churches in Gaza — just weeks after he referenced the Epstein Mossad theory at the TPUSA conference. Alex Jones has run nonstop coverage of Epstein developments this week and on Wednesday hosted a debate with Fuentes wherein he called the Trump administration an 'absolute failure.' But shockingly, the faction that's attempted to support Trump while placating their audience has pivoted as well: Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a MAGA megastar who somehow balances her support of Trump with her frequent antisemitism, went even further and called Netanyahu's actions a 'genocide.' Both Matt Gaetz and Steve Bannon, whose Epstein messaging waxes and wanes, recently called the situation in Gaza a political liability for Trump. As a news event, it's impossible to ignore Netanyahu's occupation of Gaza and the subsequent humanitarian crisis, and how it's chipped away at Americans' sentiment toward the state of Israel, now at historic lows. Trump himself notably broke with Netanyahu on Monday, telling reporters that he did not believe the prime minister's claims that children were not starving in Gaza. 'Based on television … those children look very hungry,' Trump said, adding later: 'I see it, and you can't fake that.' While unclear if they would have begun criticizing Israel if Trump hadn't done it first, the influencers' pivot was inevitable if one looks at the shifting attitudes of the podcast-listening demographic. A Pew poll published last year found that only half of young Republican men between 18 and 34 were sympathetic to Israel's actions, while the other half were either opposed or unsure — a shocking statistic compared to older Republicans, who overwhelmingly supported Israel. It hasn't gotten better since: a Gallup poll released this Tuesday found that while a majority of self-identified Republicans continued to support Israel's actions in Gaza, 51 percent of men, 54 percent of white people, and a staggering 82 percent of people between the ages of 18 and 34 did not. Maintaining a good relationship with MAGA influencers is a rather different dynamic than maintaining their alliance with Fox News For the Trump team and the Republican Party as a whole, it's becoming clearer that maintaining a good relationship with MAGA influencers is a rather different dynamic than maintaining their alliance with Fox News. A single influencer is held accountable to their audience and the comments section, whereas if a Fox talking head goes rogue, the White House can call Rupert Murdoch — whose media empire, and particularly Fox, needs access to the White House — and wrangle them back into line. (Incidentally, over the past week, according to a Media Matters analysis published Thursday, Fox News spent a cumulative three minutes talking about Epstein, and 85 minutes talking about Sydney Sweeney's denim controversy.) Even if the Trump administration establishes a symbiotic relationship with some influencers, with the expectation that they parrot Trump's line about Epstein (or Israel), they may find that their power to persuade only goes so far. A recent example from the manosphere demonstrates the limit of an influencer to, well, influence: earlier this month, the Nelk Boys, two Canadian right-wing bro podcasters, posted an interview with Netanyahu, whose government (and, by extension, Israel) has become increasingly unpopular with younger Americans due to his actions in Gaza. It backfired completely: their audience immediately began accusing the two of platforming a genocidal Zionist, going ballistic when the hosts admitted that the Israeli government fed them questions, and drew criticism from leftist streamer Hasan Piker and Nick Fuentes during the same livestream. Their YouTube channel has lost over 20,000 subscribers since posting the interview, according to Social Blade. But being on the White House's good side does have its benefits even if one loses followers: Laura Loomer, one of the loudest voices calling for Epstein documents, has recently dialed down her trutherism and instead clung harder to the White House's official continued support on Israel: In a post criticizing Zohran Mamdani, the current Democrat nominee in the New York City mayoral race, she announced that she would never 'feel safe with Muslims holding office in America' and that she didn't care about who she offended. 'This is why I will never care about Gaza,' she added. Unconditional loyalty, however, does have its benefits: Loomer's been credited with convincing Trump to fire over a dozen officials for perceived MAGA disloyalty. Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Tina Nguyen Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Politics

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store