AI models aren't made equal. Some nonprofits are creating their own tools instead.
And it's using the very technology it believes is causing this problem to fix it.
Education Above All, a nonprofit based in Qatar, believes that because most of the world's popular AI chatbots are created in Silicon Valley, they aren't equipped to understand the linguistic and ethnic nuances of non-English-speaking countries, creating education inequities on a global scale. But its team sees AI as a way to tackle this problem.
In January 2025, the charity teamed up with MIT, Harvard, and the United Nations Development Programme to introduce a free and open-source AI literacy program called Digi-Wise. Delivered in partnership with educators in the developing world, it encourages children to spot AI-fueled misinformation, use AI tools responsibly in the classroom, and even develop their own AI tools from scratch.
As part of this, the charity has developed its own generative AI chatbot called Ferby. It allows users to access and personalize educational resources from the Internet-Free Education Resource Bank, an online library containing hundreds of free and open-source learning materials.
Education Above All said it's already being used by over 5 million Indian children to access "project-based learning" in partnership with Indian nonprofit Mantra4Change. More recently, Education Above All has embedded Ferby into edtech platform SwiftChat, which is used by 124 million students and teachers across India.
"Ferby curates, customizes, and creates learning materials to fit local realities, so a teacher in rural Malawi can run the right science experiment as easily as a teacher in downtown Doha," said Aishwarya Shetty, an education specialist at Education Above All. "By marrying offline ingenuity with AI convenience, we make learning local, low-resource, and always within reach, yet at scale."
Education Above All is among a group of organizations using AI to tackle global inequality and work toward realizing the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Created in 2015, the UN SDGs comprise 17 social, economic, and environmental targets that serve as guidelines for nations, businesses, and individuals to follow to help achieve a more peaceful and prosperous world. Education Above All's projects fall under SDG 4: inclusive and equitable education.
A global effort
A range of other organizations are using AI to augment and enhance their education programming.
Tech To The Rescue, a global nonprofit that connects charities with pro-bono software development teams to meet their goals, is another organization using AI in support of the UN SDGs. Last year, it launched a three-year AI-for-good accelerator program to help NGOs meet the various UN SDGs using AI.
One organization to benefit from the program is Mercy Corps, a humanitarian group that works across over 40 countries to tackle crises like poverty, the climate crisis, natural disasters, and violence. Through the accelerator, it created an AI strategy tool that helps first responders predict disasters and coordinate resources. The World Institute on Disability AI also participated in the accelerator program, creating a resource-matching system that helps organizations allocate support to people with disabilities in hours rather than weeks.
Similarly, the International Telecommunication Union — the United Nations' digital technology agency, and one of its oldest arms — is supporting organizations using technology to achieve the UN SDGs through its AI for Good Innovation Factory startup competition. For example, an Indian applicant — a startup called Bioniks — has enabled a teenager to reclaim the ability to do simple tasks like writing and getting dressed through the use of AI-powered prosthetics.
Challenges to consider
While AI may prove to be a powerful tool for achieving the UN SDGs, it comes with notable risks. Again, as AI models are largely developed by American tech giants in an industry already constrained by gender and racial inequality, unconscious bias is a major flaw of AI systems.
To address this, Shetty said layered prompts for non-English users, human review of underlying AI datasets, and the creation of indigenous chatbots are paramount to achieving Education Above All's goals.
AI models are also power-intensive, making them largely inaccessible to the populations of developing countries. That's why Shetty urges AI companies to provide their solutions via less tech-heavy methods, like SMS, and to offer offline features so users can still access AI resources when their internet connections drop. Open-source, free-of-charge subscriptions can help, too, she added.
AI as a source for good
Challenges aside, Shetty is confident that AI can be a force for good over the next few years, particularly around education. She told BI, "We are truly energized by how the global education community is leveraging AI in education: WhatsApp-based math tutors reaching off-grid learners; algorithms that optimize teacher deployment in shortage areas; personalized content engines that democratize education; chatbots that offer psychosocial support in crisis zones and more."
But Shetty is clear that AI should augment, rather than displace, human educators. And she said the technology should only be used if it can solve challenges faced by humans and add genuine value.
"Simply put," she said, "let machines handle the scale, let humans handle the soul, with or without AI tools."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
‘We're able to explore more behaviors a lot more quickly': How one local robotics company uses AI
Harvard for investigating its 'continued eligibility' for a program that gives visas to international students and faculty. Columbia to restore its federal funding after the administration accused it of allowing antisemitism. President Trump's name appears in documents related to Jeffrey Epstein that his administration is refusing to release, . Separately, a House committee voted to subpoena and files from the administration, while a judge rejected an administration request to unseal other documents in the case. Two fired Market Basket executives accused the grocery chain's board of dismissing them Write to us at . To subscribe, . TODAY'S STARTING POINT In conversations about artificial intelligence, the future tense tends to get a workout. Will AI lead to mass layoffs? Which AI company will end up on top? Will the US's new AI strategy, which the White House Yet for many Americans, AI is already a daily reality. AI-powered chatbots provide customer service, That's also true for local businesses. Earlier this year, the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce was looking for ways to help firms navigate AI adoption. 'People seem to be hungry for, 'Well, how are other people using it?'' said Jim Rooney, who leads the Boston Chamber. Advertisement Rooney's solution was a survey. The anonymized results, I wanted to better understand what local businesses' use of AI looks like in practice. Today's newsletter is the first in a two-part series about what I found. Advertisement Better, faster, smarter When I visited Piaggio Fast Forward on a recent Friday, the Charlestown-based robotics company's brick-walled offices were largely devoid of people. But they were populated by something else: a fleet of squat, rotund machines. This was the gita (pronounced like a Bostonian saying Derek Jeter's surname), which Piaggio unveiled in 2019. Essentially a backpack on wheels, the gita mini and gita plus — and stores groceries, gear, or other cargo beneath a central hatch. The robot's camera and sensors detect color and depth, which, with the push of a button and a warbly chime, lets it 'pair' with a specific person and automatically trundle along behind them during errands. The experience feels like having R2-D2 at your heels. (The resemblance is no longer implicit; Piaggio recently reached a licensing agreement with Lucasfilm and Disney to sell $2,875 gita mini s that So where does AI come in? When Tyson Phillips first joined Piaggio to lead its research and development team, the technology wasn't on the menu. But about two and a half years ago, he came to see it as a necessity. Phillips's engineers built their own AI models to help train the company's robots to interact with people and the environment. 'It's actually very difficult to program a robot to do something,' Phillips said. 'AI is shortening that process a lot.' To train the machines, Phillips invites paid human guinea pigs into a high-ceilinged space in Piaggio's offices. Its floor features lines of colorful tape, mannequins, and other obstacles that simulate what a robot might encounter in the outside world, like doors, walls, and people. Using motion capture cameras, Phillips records the volunteers navigating those obstacles, then distills the data into algorithms to program the robots. Advertisement A Piaggio Fast Forward employee presses a button to "pair" with one of the robotics company's gitamini robots. David L. Ryan/Globe Staff Part of AI's advantage is that it isn't human. Where a flesh-and-blood observer might write off a volunteer's subtle turn or weight shift while opening a door as intuitive, AI can recognize such moves as potentially valuable datapoints. 'With AI tools, we are hoping to identify those much smaller, more nuanced behaviors,' Phillips said. And for a relatively small company like Piaggio, the added analytical firepower helps. 'We're able to explore more behaviors a lot more quickly.' That has come in handy to train Piaggio's other robot, kilo, which looks a bit like if Apple designed a flatbed cart. Built for warehouses and factory floors, kilo 'I think we'll use it to allow us to explore situations that we would've been previously uncomfortable in,' he said. Evolutionary vs. revolutionary Piaggio isn't alone. 'Every robotics company's using AI in some way,' Phillips told me. Yet some prognosticators worry that widespread adoption will cause layoffs, particularly among coders. So far, Piaggio says, AI hasn't replaced anyone on Phillips's team, which includes people with backgrounds in AI as well as in biomechanics and neuroscience. In the Boston Chamber's survey, just 7 percent of companies reported job reductions because of AI. Advertisement Instead, just as Piaggio's robots are designed to work alongside people, Phillips hopes that AI will supplement rather than supplant. His engineers still develop algorithms by hand, using AI to check their work. 'We have an idea, we test it, we check it with AI, we tweak the original idea, we tweak the AI, and it bounces back and forth,' he said. Still, that collaborative spirit helps explain why Piaggio's use of AI is mostly evolutionary, facilitating its business without radically reshaping it. But there are companies in Greater Boston trying to use the technology in more revolutionary ways. Next week, in part two of this series, I'll explore that. Related: As Massachusetts lawmakers try to lure AI data centers, environmental advocates from elsewhere warn that the centers 🧩 9 Across: 90° POINTS OF INTEREST UNITE HERE Local 26 represents Fenway Park concession workers who are threatening to strike. Cassandra Klos/Bloomberg Receipts: Massachusetts lawmakers say court-appointed lawyers should've asked the Legislature for raises sooner, rather than launching a work stoppage that has paralyzed state courts. Emails show the attorneys have been asking Labor dispute: Fenway Park concession workers Piling up: Boston 'Pawtriots': The Patriots' first day of training camp saw the team practicing without pads — Advertisement Feeling better: Eight members of a Parisian youth choir are OK Dwight Evans: The former Red Sox right fielder has another shot at making the Hall of Fame this year. Grant Watch: How a researcher from Medfield created the go-to database Changing the subject: Trump and Tulsi Gabbard, his national intelligence director, baselessly claim that Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and other Democrats plotted a 'coup' against Trump years ago and that they could face criminal charges. ( Wares the beef: Beef prices are climbing across the country as drought Sentenced: A judge gave Bryan Kohberger life in prison without the possibility of parole for killing four University of Idaho students in 2022. The victims' family members excoriated Kohberger. ( BESIDE THE POINT 🌽 Cultivating community: An 18th-century farm is flourishing 🎙️ Big deal: 'The Big Dig,' GBH and PRX's nine-episode series about the infamous Boston megaproject, made Time magazine's list of the 100 best podcasts of all time. ( 🤦🏻♀️ A Miss Conduct classic: Their neighbors' floodlights shine directly into their bedroom. The neighbors 🐻 'Da Pope': A Chicago family on vacation gave Pope Leo XIV a T-shirt inspired by the nickname for the city's NFL team. ( Advertisement 📺 Don't be a Debbie Downer: 'SNL' alumna Rachel Dratch discusses 💃 A step ahead: A Boston soul line dancing group is 🎶 Don't worry: Does live music at Logan baggage claim actually reduce travel stress? Thanks for reading Starting Point. This newsletter was edited by ❓ Have a question for the team? Email us at ✍🏼 If someone sent you this newsletter, you can 📬 Delivered Monday through Friday. Ian Prasad Philbrick can be reached at
The Hill
30 minutes ago
- The Hill
International students look to cleanse social media amid new Trump visa policy
International students are scrubbing their social media or in some case reevaluating their decision to study in the U.S. after the Trump administration announced new visa screenings without offering specific insight into what could get someone on the no-entry list. Companies that specialize in mass deletions of posts have seen an uptick in services since the Department of Homeland Security's announcement. But clearing out everything the administration finds controversial could raise other alarms, leaving foreign students in a bind. 'I think students have pretty much assumed that anything is open for interpretation or misinterpretation, and so as a result, they're extremely cautious when it comes to engaging with social media moving forward,' said Fanta Aw, executive director and CEO of the Association of International Educators, or NAFSA. The new screenings were announced in June after a three-week pause on visa interviews to update the policy, part of a broader Trump crackdown on both legal and illegal immigration. The State Department said it would target those 'who pose a threat to U.S. national security,' without specifying what that would entail, and demanded anyone applying for a student visa make their social media accounts public. The go-to response from students appears to be cleansing their social media of anything even remotely controversial. Dan Saltman, CEO and founder of says his company's trajectory has 'greatly accelerated' with 10 percent growth each month for the past few months. His firm offers a software that allows individuals to mass delete posts across 30 different platforms. 'Basically, our understanding is that people are using this to clean up any political takes that they have, whatsoever, anything that can be seen as inflammatory, really kind of quelling freedom of speech,' Saltman said. 'We've especially seen this growth in international countries, especially India, China, South Korea, have been some of the biggest growth areas that we've seen on that front. And we've also seen it as well from people in the U.S. and the U.K., very heavily. So, it's been an unprecedented level of change of how people think about their privacy,' he added. China and India are the two biggest exporters of students to the U.S. In the 2023-2024 school year, around 1.1 million international students came to America, with those two nations making up more than half. Shaun Carver, executive director of International House at the University of California, Berkeley, said his group has seen a 40 percent decrease in Chinese and Indian students since last year. 'India and China have always been 9 to 10 percent of the I-House population, and this year there both of them are below 6,' Carver said, adding other countries in Africa and the Middle East appear to be securitized heavily. Students and advocates have been spooked for months as they watch the Trump administration target the visas of, and, at times, arrest international students who have expressed pro-Palestinian views. The administration says those under scrutiny have expressed support for Hamas or antisemitism, but students fear getting caught up in a wide net that could potentially flag anything anti-Israel — or anti-Trump — as disqualifying. In response to requests for clarification from The Hill, a State Department spokesperson reiterated students need to change their account settings to 'public' for vetting purposes. 'As with any country, applying for a visa is voluntary, and individuals are free to decide whether to pursue travel to the United States,' the spokesperson added. Plans to purge social media accounts could raise alarms, but the problem could be even worse for someone who never had social media before. 'It's a catch-22 for students: If you didn't have any social media presence to begin with, that could be considered suspect. And so what do you do about that?' Aw asked. 'You go ahead and you create a social media presence, and then, because you've created a social media presence' that would have little activity 'could that also be considered suspect? So there's, there's no winning here on any level,' she added.
Business Insider
31 minutes ago
- Business Insider
I've been an English teacher for 20 years, and my students are now relying on AI to do everything. It's making my job impossible.
The first time I read about AI, I was amazed. I showed ChatGPT to many of my fellow teachers and asked them to enter their favorite essay prompts. While it did not live up to our school's writing standards, within seconds, it spit out an impressive answer. That first year, it was fairly easy to spot AI-generated essays from my students. The arguments spun their wheels, often repeating the same ideas but never getting to the point; the support was sparse, vaguely referencing broad events or characterization; and the thesis statements were trite, giving the most obvious arguments without diving beyond surface-level analysis. It evolved to the point where we teachers thought it might be helpful to have students put in our prompts and have AI write a mock essay. They then would have to write a better one. Sometimes, we would have students explain why the AI essay fell short of our rubrics. In doing so, we thought it would point out that the technology was inadequate and not worth their time. But quickly, AI improved, and my students became too reliant on it. After teaching English for nearly 20 years, I had to rethink my career. My students started using AI regularly Students are now no longer willing to avoid AI. Instead, they grew to depend on it, asking it to give them an outline instead of using their own minds to create the structure of their essays. Instead of using their annotations, they would ask AI for a list of examples from the text. Somewhere in the gray area between plagiarism and cheating, the faculty and I found ourselves in meetings about ethics. While our administrators have been amazing, the technology has been siphoning the joy of teaching English because the red flags have been lowered. It became increasingly difficult to distinguish between what was lifted from AI and what demonstrated the students' skills. How can we assess students' skills with logic and rhetoric if they are using AI's skills with logic and rhetoric instead of their own? I first became really concerned when I watched one student ask AI how to mend a relationship with a friend. Another time, a student took AI's recommendations over mine. It soon became evident that students were constantly asking for the answers rather than help with the skills. Eventually, it seemed students were struggling with the temptation of the low-hanging fruit, and their dependency on AI made my job nearly impossible. My colleagues, both inside and outside my school, are to be applauded. They're buckling down, using various tools to help them. They spent hours trying to nail down proof. Many are deciding to go with all hand-written essays. Still, we teachers are struggling to prevent cheating and navigate its implications. I took a step back from teaching English Hearing the praise of AI technology everywhere drove me to take an opportunity for a discipline that AI has not touched yet. Having a background in American Sign Language, I agreed to take one class of students, but with growing interest, I was allowed to take a full load. This was a breath of fresh air because it meant moving away from the clutches of AI. It was also exciting because the students are excited. They are tuned in, and they seem more engaged than I have seen them in a decade. The fatigue that comes with having to look at a screen for your education is real, and ASL is a break from that routine. It seems they appreciate time away from them. In turn, it now feels like the early days of teaching for me. What I love about the humanities is hollowed by AI; however, ASL retains the human element of teaching. I know AI will eventually be able to impact the ASL classroom, but for now, I'm enjoying this reprieve.
