Virginia House, Senate move to fast-track CTE teachers
With a growing demand for skilled workers, Virginia lawmakers are tackling a critical issue: the shortage of career and technical education (CTE) teachers. A bipartisan effort to provide an alternative pathway for CTE instructors has cleared both chambers of the General Assembly and now awaits review by the governor.
Businesses across the state have struggled to fill workforce gaps, a challenge that has been a major focus of Gov. Glenn Youngkin's administration. While CTE programs are seen as a vital pipeline for future workers, they face the same staffing shortages as public schools.
'The shortage is expected to worsen over the next five years, and the demand for these programs is increasing,' said Sen. Adam Ebbin, D-Alexandria, who sponsored Senate Bill 879, during a Senate subcommittee hearing last month.
Virginia recorded more than 708,800 students enrolled in at least one CTE course during the 2022-23 school year, Ebbin noted. Yet, filling teaching positions remains a major hurdle — especially for career switchers facing what he called 'unrealistic coursework' requirements before they can teach in their specialized fields.
Ebbin's legislation and House Bill 2018 aim to address this challenge by allowing CTE teacher candidates to receive a provisional license for up to three years. To qualify, candidates must have completed high school or hold an equivalent certificate, along with a special certificate or license in their subject area.
The programs impacted include construction, manufacturing, public safety, and transportation. But unlike traditional teacher licensure, candidates would not have to fulfill all Virginia Board of Education requirements for a full teaching license.
Del. Bonita Anthony, D-Norfolk, who carried the legislation in the House and transitioned from engineering to teaching, emphasized the legislation's broader impact. 'By addressing teacher shortages and supporting CTE programs, this bill strengthens Virginia's workforce and classrooms,' she said.
Her bill was modified to align with the Senate version, which was more 'narrowly focused,' according to House Education Committee Chair Sam Rasoul, D-Roanoke.
A key addition to the House version of the bill was the equivalency assessment framework, designed to ensure licensure keeps pace with evolving industry standards. The legislation has drawn backing from some Northern Virginia school divisions, the Virginia Manufacturers Association, SkillsUSA Virginia Foundation, and the Virginia Association for Career and Technical Education.
While education advocates generally support giving candidates time to earn industry credentials, some worry about cutting essential coursework. Virginia Education Association Policy Analyst Chad Stewart told a Senate subcommittee last month that skipping key teaching courses — such as classroom management — could hurt new instructors.
'We think these teachers are going to be more likely to stay in the classroom if they have these skills,' Stewart said. 'They're also three-hour courses that you can take over the course of three years while you're on your provisional license. We don't see this as overbearing. We see these as essential courses that should be taken by all teachers to be effective and serve all students well.'
Despite the debate, the legislation is moving forward. On Thursday, the Senate Education and Health Committee advanced HB 2018 to the full Senate for consideration.
Meanwhile, Ebbin's version of the bill sailed through the Senate with a unanimous 40-0 vote on Monday and now heads to the House for consideration.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Only 13 percent see transparency on Epstein case: Fox News poll
Just 13 percent of voters in a new survey said that they think the Trump administration has been open and transparent with information in its probe of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein's case. The Fox News poll, released late Wednesday, shows that Republicans were more favorable in assessing the Trump administration's handling of what's been dubbed the 'Epstein files,' but 60 percent of GOP respondents said they do not think the administration has been transparent. Meanwhile, 74 percent of Democrats and 64 percent of independents said they didn't think that the president had been open and transparent, according to the survey. Epstein, who was known in elite circles in New York and Florida, died in a New York City prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He was a former associate of Trump, but the two had a falling out decades ago. The Department of Justice (DOJ) and the FBI concluded its probe earlier this month, finding that Epstein didn't have a 'client list' that would connect his crimes to anyone else. Congress has become bogged down amid pressure to release more information on the case, though. House lawmakers left for their August recess as Democrats sought to force the release of more documents through efforts at the Capitol. 'There's no purpose for the Congress to push an administration to do something they're already doing,' House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told reporters during a news conference Wednesday. Johnson added that the chamber would take 'appropriate action' when it returns this fall if the Trump administration does not release more information. The latest poll also found that 19 percent of respondents surveyed said they had not been following the Epstein case, including a quarter of independents. Fox News surveyed 1,000 registered voters across the country from July 18-21 and the poll has a margin of error of 3 percentage points.


San Francisco Chronicle
12 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
RNC Chairman Michael Whatley plans to run for Senate in North Carolina, with Trump's backing
Michael Whatley, chairman of the national Republican Party, plans to run for an open Senate seat in North Carolina in 2026, with the blessing of President Donald Trump. Democrats see the race as their top chance to flip a seat in the midterm elections as they try to regain control of the Senate. Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, after clashing with Trump, recently announced he would not run for a third term. Whatley's decision was confirmed by two people familiar with his thinking. They were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly before an official announcement and spoke only on condition of anonymity. Trump asked Whatley, who leads the Republican National Committee, to run, according to one of the people. Trump's daughter-in-law, Lara Trump, had been mulling a campaign. She served as co-chair of the RNC last year and currently hosts a show on Fox News Channel. But also lives in Florida and would have had to move back, with a young family, to her home state if she were to run. She had previously declined to run for Senate in North Carolina in 2022 and in 2024 took herself out of the running to fill the term of former Florida Sen. Marco Rubio after he became Donald Trump's secretary of state. Politico first reported news of Whatley's plans. While Lara Trump had been seen as having the right of first refusal in the North Carolina race due to her relationship with the president, Whatley is considered by national Republicans to be a strong contender, thanks partly to the large fundraising network he has cultivated as RNC chair and his perceived loyalty to Donald Trump. He is a well-known name in the state, having served as GOP chair there, and has no voting record that could be used against him by Democrats. The race is expected to be contentious in a state Trump carried by 3.2 percentage points in 2024. Democrats have been encouraging former two-term Gov. Roy Cooper, who is seen as a formidable candidate by both parties, to run. A Cooper adviser, Morgan Jackson, would not confirm on Wednesday that Cooper had made a decision to run, but said 'Cooper would be making his intentions known in the coming days.' First-term Rep. Pat Harrigan, a West Point graduate and former Green Beret who served in Afghanistan and later became a defense-products manufacturer, was also seen as a potential Republican candidate. Harrigan had previously said he would immediately back Lara Trump if she ran. He wrote that 'there's lots of excitement around the 2026 Senate race, but let me be crystal clear about something: if @LaraLeaTrump enters this race, I'll be the first to endorse her and the first to fight for her victory.'


Fast Company
12 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Trump's plan to win AI race includes killing off ‘woke' agenda and removing environmental barriers to innovation
President Donald Trump declared Wednesday that the United States will 'win' the artificial intelligence race. He made the declaration before signing three executive orders aimed at expediting AI -related infrastructure projects, promoting and exporting American-made AI technology, and preventing 'woke AI' in the federal government. Earlier in the day, the White House released a 28-page AI Action Plan, which lays out a detailed policy agenda to accelerate AI innovation, build AI infrastructure, and lead in international AI diplomacy and security. The plan paints a bucolic picture of sorts, in which American workers will benefit from the opportunities created by this technological revolution, including high-paying jobs and scientific discoveries, while the private sector is unencumbered by bureaucratic red tape and onerous regulations. 'Whatever it takes' But Trump also made clear that his AI policy marks a stark departure from the AI guardrails endorsed by President Joe Biden. During a speech Wednesday at an event cohosted by the Hill and Valley Forum and the All-In podcast, Trump took swipes at a number of policies endorsed by his political opponents and told the audience, 'We're getting rid of woke.' The White House's AI agenda outlines risks to innovation from anything perceived as a hindrance—be it ideological policies or environmental regulations—and the executive orders continue a pattern of Trump revoking the policies of his predecessor. The president vowed to do 'whatever it takes' to lead the world in AI innovation. 'With your help, that golden age will be built by American workers, it will be powered by American energy, it will be run on American technology improved by American artificial intelligence, and it will make America richer, stronger, greater, freer, and more powerful than ever before,' he told the tech-heavy audience. Recommended policy actions Among dozens of recommended policy actions, the AI Action Plan calls for eliminating references to misinformation, diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), and climate change. What's more, it notes that AI models must be built on what are referred to as 'American values,' without providing specifics about what those values are. One of the executive orders that Trump signed Wednesday also calls for modifying various environmental regulations to streamline and accelerate the federal permitting of data center infrastructure. Silicon Valley's role Trump's AI policy was heavily shaped by his Silicon Valley donors, including David Sacks, one of four cohosts of the All-In podcast and Trump's special adviser for AI and crypto. While Trump complimented the 'genius and creativity' of Silicon Valley, he also called on change from the technology community. 'Winning the new AI race will demand a new spirit of patriotism and national loyalty in Silicon Valley.' More than 100 groups—including the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), the National Organization for Women (NOW), and Oxfam America— signed a resolution opposing the AI action plan, which they describe as being written by Big Tech and Big Oil. These groups instead advocated for a 'People's AI Action Plan.' 'Just popped out of the air' But even Trump seemed, at times, dubious or just naive about the technological revolution he intends to lead. Though AI technology is hardly new, Trump said it was 'something that nobody expected, it just popped out of the air' and also suggested that AI needs a new moniker because he doesn't like the word 'artificial' and prefers the word 'genius' instead. 'Whether we like it or not, we're suddenly engaged in a fast-paced competition to build and define this groundbreaking technology that will determine so much about the future of civilization itself,' he told the audience.